Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Andrew Glasgow

c. 1645 – ?

Glasgow-1319 · 1 mapped association

Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
3Close relations
6Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1645 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
William Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Bessie GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1319
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
2

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1671)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionBessie Glasgow (1666)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Estimate and relationship notes
  • The export reports 1 children but 2 named child profiles are recoverable from this export.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit29/100
Weak Lead
Dates1614–?Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Walter Glasgow → William Walter Glasgow (+3)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit28/100
Weak Lead
Dates1616–?Generationat least 29 years age gapRecorded placesMid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · Mid CalderIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Local Sibling Birth · Mapped Proximity · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowIssobell (Porteous) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Mid Calder is 3.9 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+3; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1643–1652) (+6; other parent Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Anne Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit20/100
Weak Lead
Dates1620–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Mapped Proximity · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Helen Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 23.6 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Helen +8 (28 public profiles); Marion +8 (23 public profiles) (+20 total including +4 rare-name bundle bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Helen Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Automated fit13/100
Weak Lead
Dates1612–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Walter Glasgow → William Walter Glasgow (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Walter Glasgow → William Walter Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1615–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationSame-spouse child windowBessie (Howie) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Bessie (Howie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Issobell Glasgow in Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1636–1648) (+6; other parent Bessie (Howie) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Bessie (Howie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (25) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Walter Glasgow → William Walter Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Issobell Glasgow in Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit33/100
Weak Lead
Dates1617–?Generation28 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Local Sibling Birth · Mapped Proximity · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1643–1652) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • candidate has another child, Anne Glasgow, born 7 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit19/100
Weak Lead
Dates1620–?Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowWilliam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Issobell Glasgow in Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1636–1648) (+6; other parent William Glasgow)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Issobell Glasgow in Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit17/100
Weak Lead
Dates1600–?Generation45 years age gapRecorded placesSouth LeithIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 45-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 45-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped South Leith is 18.3 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Automated fit15/100
Weak Lead
Dates1597–?Generation48 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • less typical 48-year parent-child age gap (+2)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 48-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit15/100
Weak Lead
Dates1595–?Generationat least 50 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • less typical 50-year parent-child age gap (+2)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 50-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1666), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Edinburgh is 16.2 km from the subject's birth-period Kirknewton — West Lothian (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-1546

Automated fit52/100
Similar Person
Dates1685–?PlacesKirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: Bessie Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 40; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: Bessie Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 40; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-1336

Automated fit52/100
Similar Person
Dates1714–?PlacesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 69; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 69; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1319

Andrew is a legitimate record-defined father: Kirknewton baptism indexes name Andrew/Andro Glasgow as father of Bessie in 1666 and William in 1671. The latter is Glasgow-1026, so that father-child link is direct rather than a naming-pattern reconstruction.

No inspected record identifies Andrew's wife, parents, birth or death. His about 1645 birth is a demographic estimate from the 1666 child, and the structured link to William-3515 rests only on locality and naming. It should not be treated as proved.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1645

Profile-stated birthplace: Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland

Kirknewton — West Lothian

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1319

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement/parish centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1319

SourceFindingAssessment
Bessie Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-ZQXBessie was baptised 29 May 1666 at Kirknewton, daughter of Andrew Glasgow.Direct father-child evidence for Glasgow-1493.
William Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-F2BWilliam, son of Andro Glasgow, was born 9 September and baptised 24 September 1671 at Kirknewton.Direct father-child evidence for Glasgow-1026. The record does not give William the middle name Walter.
William-3515 findingsThe earlier William profile represents baptismal father occurrences from 1643–1655, but no entry names a son Andrew.Chronologically possible father; relationship unsupported.
Live Glasgow-1319 profileThe biography states that no birth record for Andrew has been found and argues from his children's names.The profile itself provides no evidence for Andrew's own parentage.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
4Derivative
2Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Next records to inspect

  1. will — Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on)

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended WikiTree changes

Glasgow-1319

  1. Retain Bessie-1493 and William-1026 as confirmed children and cite both

baptism indexes on Andrew's profile.

  1. Retain about 1645 and Kirknewton as explicitly uncertain estimates from

the 1666 child. Kirknewton is Andrew's documented child-baptism location, not his proved birthplace, but remains a useful estimate until better evidence supplies a replacement.

  1. Retain William-3515 as an uncertain father; no record names Andrew as

William's son and the link should not be treated as proved.

  1. Leave Andrew's mother and spouse blank. Do not manufacture a wife from the

children's entries.

  1. Add no death date or place without a separate record.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.6 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1319 was captured 2026-08-19T11:24:03+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-24531625-00-00 · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenBessie GlasgowGlasgow-14931666-05-29 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-39741671-09-24 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-33661643-12-22 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsIsobel GlasgowGlasgow-24541648-02-03 · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohne GlasgowGlasgow-24521648-02-03 · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsWalter GlasgowGlasgow-15541649-09-23 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsHelen GlasgowGlasgow-30241652-11-11 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMarion GlasgowGlasgow-30251655-10-11 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. Bessie Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-ZQX (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-ZQX). source link 1
  2. William Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-F2B (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B). source link 1
  3. www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on). source link 1
  4. www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S). source link 1
  5. familysearch.org (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21). source link 1
  6. Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B) source link 1
  7. Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on) source link 1
  8. Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S) source link 1
  9. "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21 : 11 February 2020), Andro Glasgow in entry for William Glasgow, 1671. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
There is no birth record present for Andrew, we can see in Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland that 'Andro Glasgow' appears as the Father's name on several Christining records in the "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database. 

* Bessie Glasgow (bef.1666-) 
* William Glasgow (bef.1671-) 
Research Notes
Current research
Andrew is a legitimate record-defined father: Kirknewton baptism indexes name Andrew/Andro Glasgow as father of Bessie in 1666 and William in 1671. The latter is Glasgow-1026, so that father-child link is direct rather than a naming-pattern reconstruction.

No inspected record identifies Andrew's wife, parents, birth or death. His about 1645 birth is a demographic estimate from the 1666 child, and the structured link to William-3515 rests only on locality and naming. It should not be treated as proved.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. Bessie Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-ZQX (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-ZQX). William Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-F2B (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S). familysearch.org (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21). 
Sources
* Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B)
* Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on)
* Archived or supplementary source (https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S)
* "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21 : 11 February 2020), Andro Glasgow in entry for William Glasgow, 1671.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
{{One Name Study|name=Glasgow}}

== Biography ==
There is no birth record present for Andrew, we can see in Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland that 'Andro Glasgow' appears as the Father's name on several Christining records in the ''"Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950"'', database. 

* [[Glasgow-1493|Bessie  Glasgow (bef.1666-)]] 
* [[Glasgow-1026|William  Glasgow (bef.1671-)]] 

== Research Notes ==
=== Current research ===

Andrew is a legitimate record-defined father: Kirknewton baptism indexes name Andrew/Andro Glasgow as father of Bessie in 1666 and William in 1671. The latter is [[Glasgow-1026|Glasgow-1026]], so that father-child link is direct rather than a naming-pattern reconstruction.

No inspected record identifies Andrew's wife, parents, birth or death. His <code>about 1645</code> birth is a demographic estimate from the 1666 child, and the structured link to [[Glasgow-2453|William-3515]] rests only on locality and naming. It should not be treated as proved.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material.<ref name="ProjectSource1">[https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-ZQX Bessie Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-ZQX].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource2">[https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B William Glasgow baptism, FamilySearch VQ4K-F2B].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource3">[https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on www.familysearch.org].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource4">[https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S www.familysearch.org].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource5">[https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21 familysearch.org].</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />
* [https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F2B Archived or supplementary source]
* [https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=William&q.surname=Glasgow&q.birthLikePlace=Glasgow%2C%20Scotland&q.spouseGivenName=Ann&q.spouseSurname=McCook&q.birthLikeDate.from=1668&q.birthLikeDate.to=1672&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on Archived or supplementary source]
* [https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GMHJ-37S Archived or supplementary source]
* "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4K-F21 : 11 February 2020), Andro Glasgow in entry for William Glasgow, 1671.