Skip to page content
Home/People/Samuel Glasgow
Catalogue · 27 Sep 2026

Researched biography · Glasgow-3175

Samuel Glasgow

1740 – 1801

Ulster, Ireland

About Samuel

The exact Old Bailey case already cited on this profile was formerly treated as strongly associated with the May 1761 newspaper respite. That association was withdrawn on 6 October 2026: the defendant was a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman, not this man (see below). The case association does not prove that the defendant was the profile’s Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

Birth1740 · Ulster, Ireland
Death1801 · Hanover Township, Washington, Pennsylvania, United States
LocalityUlster, Ireland

Connected pages

Other pages on this site that name Samuel Glasgow: family studies, places, source pages and other people's research.

What the research found

Summary of the research

Overall conclusion

This summary is given in full at the top of the page.

Later additions

Newest first. Each addition adds to the summary above; it does not replace it.

Newspaper identity review, 6 October 2026
Newspaper identity review, 6 October 2026
Military roster company correction and consolidation, 5 October 2026

Samuel appears in the final unassigned group. Capt. Murray’s company belongs to William Wood, Thomas Kenady and William Langley immediately before the dash. The notice is dated 19 October 1777, sets 10 November as rendezvous, threatens punishment for failure and offers influence toward pardons. No adjudicated desertion, return, punishment, actual pardon or 1761 military commutation is proved. Three archive page URLs preserve one reprinted notice, including two scans labelled 23 October. Glasgow-1134 is the strongest contextual candidate through his estimated Cecil County birth; service identity remains possible, not proved. The other American candidates remain compatible.

A notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, orders absent soldiers of the First Maryland Regiment, including Samuel Glasgow, to return by 10 November. It threatens apprehension and punishment as deserters and offers influence toward pardons. Samuel appears in the final unassigned group. Capt. Murray’s company belongs to William Wood, Thomas Kenady and William Langley immediately before the dash. The notice is dated 19 October 1777, sets 10 November as rendezvous, threatens punishment for failure and offers influence toward pardons. No adjudicated desertion, return, punishment, actual pardon or 1761 military commutation is proved. Three archive page URLs preserve one reprinted notice, including two scans labelled 23 October. Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2, Maryland Gazette, 1777-11-06, p.2, Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2

Earlier 1761 Old Bailey reports, 5 October 2026

Glasgow-3175 cites the identical Old Bailey case. That is a strong case association, not independent proof that the London defendant was the Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

Samuel Glascow is one of two prisoners reported capitally convicted at the Old Bailey; his charge is stealing a bay gelding belonging to Mr Serjeant Haywood. The manslaughter verdict belongs to William Smith, a separate defendant. The relative trial-day statement has no saved dateline; no 13 May trial date is inferred. This is a newspaper report of the case, not a separate trial or proof of ancestral identity. Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 1761-05-14, p.1, The Derby Mercury, 1761-05-08, p.2, Jackson's Oxford Journal, 1761-05-09, p.2

Additional newspaper originals, 5 October 2026

Samuel Glasgow, first Maryland regiment rendezvous notice, 1777: Uncertain 1740/1801 lifespan fits, but neither the family identity nor the London-case link identifies this Maryland soldier. Glasgow-1134 is a possible Maryland/age candidate. Glasgow-3175 is a compatible chronological comparison, but its Ulster/Pennsylvania identity and link to the London defendant remain unresolved. This roster does not prove the 1761 military-commutation claim. No family or life-date change follows.

Additional original newspapers, 5 October 2026

Uncertain 1740 Ulster birth and 1801 Hanover Township, Washington County death are chronologically compatible. Strongest contextual candidate for the 1791 county office; no land or service identity bridge. These are possible identities, not proved matches. The 1770 Whitpain boundary notices, 1777 Maryland recall and 1791 Washington justice commission are separate contexts. The 1794 Old Style London pen-cutter death has no supported match and conditionally conflicts with this profile’s later death estimate. No parent, spouse or migration amendment follows.

Newspaper review, 5 October 2026

The exact Old Bailey case already cited on this profile is strongly associated with the newly inspected May 1761 newspaper respite. The case association does not prove that the defendant was the profile’s Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

What the records show

Source findings — newspaper review

The Derby Mercury, 22 May 1761, p.3, original image, reports Samuel Glascow’s respite after gelding theft. The adjoining unnatural-crime description belongs to Thomas Andrews. The Old Bailey trial t17610506-1 records the 6 May Guilty verdict and death sentence, with owner William Hayward rather than the paper’s Heywood. Associated catalogue metadata lists a conditional pardon, TNA SP 44/87 f.68; its text and conditions were not inspected.

Source findings — additional original newspapers
Source findingsA notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, orders absent soldiers of the First Maryland Regiment, including Samuel Glasgow, to return by 10 November.

A notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, orders absent soldiers of the First Maryland Regiment, including Samuel Glasgow, to return by 10 November. It threatens apprehension and punishment as deserters and offers influence toward pardons. Notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, captain in the first Maryland regiment, orders listed soldiers to rendezvous on the 10th of next month. It threatens deserter punishment for failing to attend and offers to seek pardons for those returning after absence without leave. It does not establish an existing desertion conviction; William Davis is a separate following person. Glasgow-1134 is a possible Maryland/age candidate. Glasgow-3175 is a compatible chronological comparison, but its Ulster/Pennsylvania identity and link to the London defendant remain unresolved. This roster does not prove the 1761 military-commutation claim. Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2

Identity and family

Identity and relationship assessments — newspaper review

Samuel’s defence describes Holbourn work, time abroad and High Wickham residence; those are attributed statements. Henry Ward attributes a statement about an unnamed mother in South-street. No birth date, origin or family identity is established. The 1740 Ulster birth and 1801 Pennsylvania death remain uncertain; Military commutation requires its own source. The complete 22 May Public Advertiser paragraph and separate issue masthead now support 21 May as the reported royal-review day. A complete proposed qualification and original-record citations are queued locally; no live profile was edited.

Identity assessment — newspaper candidates withdrawn, 6 October 2026The Derby Mercury, 1761-05-08, p.2 : no longer a candidate for this profile.
  • The Derby Mercury, 1761-05-08, p.2: no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 reports that Samuel Glascow was capitally convicted at the Old Bailey for stealing Serjeant Hayward's bay gelding. His own trial testimony describes a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman. That conflicts with Glasgow-3175 (an Ulster-born Pennsylvania settler), so the London man has no compatible profile.
  • The Public Advertiser, 1761-05-22, p.3: no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 report that Samuel Glascow, horse-stealer, was respited during His Majesty's pleasure on 21 May 1761. This is the same London defendant; no compatible WikiTree profile (draft flagged on group 394296692).
  • The Public Advertiser, 1761-05-26, p.4: no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 advertisement for the printed Old Bailey Proceedings listing Samuel Glascow's horse-stealing trial. This is the same London defendant; it adds no new fact.

Other research notes

Date qualification resolved — additional original, 5 October 2026

The [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424820/ Public Advertiser, 22 May 1761, p.3] says the report of seven Newgate malefactors was made to the King at St James’s “Yesterday”, and reports Samuel’s respite. A separate page-1 masthead is Friday, 22 May 1761, supporting 21 May as the reported royal-review day. This does not verify military commutation or pardon conditions. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/1212389396/ Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 14 May 1761, p.1] reports Samuel among two capital convictions; its manslaughter defendant is William Smith, not Samuel. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424864/ Public Advertiser, 26 May 1761, p.4] advertises printed trial proceedings listing Samuel’s horse-stealing case; it is not a new trial. All three original passages were inspected 5 October 2026. The exact cited-case association remains strong; ancestral identity stays unresolved.

Still open

Questions the records have not yet answered, suggested next searches and suggested corrections.

Next questions

Find local original land, service, office or household records to bridge the named person to this family. Current family assessments retain their existing uncertainty.

Next questions

Inspect original company rolls, enlistments, discharge or pardon papers for identifying details before attaching him to a profile or joining him to the London case.

Recommended correction — the 1761 Old Bailey Samuel Glascow is not this man, 6 October 2026

The earlier statements in this file that the Old Bailey case cited on this profile is 'strongly associated' with him are superseded. The defendant's own trial testimony (Old Bailey Proceedings Online) and the May 1761 reports (The Derby Mercury, 8 May 1761, p. 2) show that Samuel Glascow, capitally convicted of horse-stealing in 1761 and later respited, was a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman: a London man, not the Ulster-born Pennsylvania Samuel. The association with this profile is withdrawn; see the identity assessment of 6 October 2026 above.

Recorded in research/latest-findings.json (6 October 2026); carried into this file on 7 October 2026.

Family and relationships

Unless a link is marked otherwise, the family links below come from the WikiTree family tree and have not yet been checked against original records.

Spouse or partner 1Mary StephensonDates not established
Person and datesRelationshipCurrent assessmentWhy this relationship is shown
Mary Stephenson
Dates not established
spouseUnassessed partner linkFrom the family tree; not yet checked against records.

Life and records

Explore the dated recordsChronology, roles and locations

Historical chronology

Birth

Subject

Life events

Ulster, Ireland

Profile-stated Ulster birth

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Ulster — exact county unproved

Record detail

The profile supplies the historic province of Ulster only before his later Pennsylvania residence.

Death

Subject

Life events

Hanover Township, Washington, Pennsylvania, United States

Sources

The only source so far is the WikiTree profile itselfReferences and source limitations
  1. Profile-stated Ulster birth

    1740–1801 · Ulster — exact county unproved · Source association

    The profile supplies the historic province of Ulster only before his later Pennsylvania residence.

Each entry is a separately identified record. Shared URLs may represent one transcription or search page containing more than one record; they are not independent confirmations.

Suggested profile text

For WikiTree editors

Suggested update to the WikiTree profile

This study has prepared revised text for the public WikiTree profile. WikiTree editors can compare it with the current profile and copy it; the research account above is the study's own.

Cite the original 1761 theft trial and respite; Qualify the unproved Ulster/Pennsylvania identity bridge and military commutation. Record the 1791 Washington County justice as a possible candidate, preserving identity limits.

Compared with Glasgow-3175, captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00 · 2026-07-21.

Current captured WikiTree biography

Read-only capture used for the comparison above.

Side-by-side comparison of the live and replacement profiles
Current profileReplacement profile
Current profile
Replacement profile1[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]
Current profile
Replacement profile2
Current profile1== Biography ==
Replacement profile3== Biography ==
Current profile2
Replacement profile4This profile records an uncertain 1740 birth in Ulster and an uncertain 1801 death in Pennsylvania. The identity bridge between that ancestor and the London defendant described below has not been established.
Current profile3Samuel was born in 1740.
Replacement profile
Current profile4
Replacement profile5
Current profile5'''Samuel Glascow'''
Replacement profile6'''Samuel Glascow'''
Current profile6* Life archive ID: obpt17610506-1-defend30
Replacement profile7* Life archive ID: obpt17610506-1-defend30
Current profile7* Gender: Male
Replacement profile8* Gender: Male
Current profile8* Tattoo: No
Replacement profile9* Tattoo: No
Current profile9* First recorded: 6th May 1761
Replacement profile10* First recorded: 6th May 1761
Current profile10
Replacement profile11
Current profile11== Criminal Records ==
Replacement profile12== Criminal Records ==
Current profile12* Tried: 6th May 1761 at Old Bailey, London
Replacement profile13* Tried: 6th May 1761 at Old Bailey, London
Current profile13 * Crime: Theft (stealing one bay-colored gelding, value £10)
Replacement profile14 * Crime: Theft (stealing one bay-colored gelding, value £10)
Current profile14 * Verdict: Guilty
Replacement profile15 * Verdict: Guilty
Current profile15 * Sentence: Death (later commuted to military service)
Replacement profile16 * Sentence: Death. A later newspaper reports respite; military commutation remains unverified in the inspected sources.
Current profile16* Conditional pardon: 6th May 1761
Replacement profile17* Conditional pardon: associated Old Bailey catalogue metadata lists an entry dated 6th May 1761, TNA SP 44/87 f.68; the original document and conditions have not been inspected.
Current profile17* Sentence respited: 21st May 1761
Replacement profile18* Sentence respite reported after the royal review of 21st May 1761: the Public Advertiser of Friday 22nd May says the Newgate report was made to the King “Yesterday”. The official respite instrument and pardon conditions remain uninspected.
Current profile18
Replacement profile19
Current profile19
Replacement profile20
Current profile
Replacement profile21
Current profile
Replacement profile22== Research Notes ==
Current profile
Replacement profile23== Original records and identity limits ==
Current profile
Replacement profile24The [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t17610506-1 Old Bailey Proceedings, t17610506-1, 6 May 1761] record Samuel Glascow’s gelding-theft indictment, Guilty verdict and death sentence. The owner is William Hayward in the trial. The [https://www.newspapers.com/image/394296948/ Derby Mercury, 22 May 1761, p.3] reports respite, calling the owner Mr Serjeant Heywood. Its adjacent unnatural-crime description applies to Thomas Andrews, not Samuel.
Current profile
Replacement profile25
Current profile
Replacement profile26Samuel’s statements about Holbourn work, time abroad and High Wickham residence are attributed defence testimony; the trial supplies no birth date or origin. [https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/ar_9141_29053 Associated catalogue metadata] describes a conditional pardon, but does not establish the conditions without its underlying document.
Current profile
Replacement profile27
Current profile
Replacement profile28The same case ID, obpt17610506-1-defend30, already appears in the profile’s Digital Panopticon citation. This establishes the case association, not the defendant’s identity with the Ulster/Pennsylvania family. No parent, spouse or descendant relationship is proved by the inspected case or newspaper.
Current profile
Replacement profile29
Current profile
Replacement profile30=== Possible Pennsylvania office record ===
Current profile
Replacement profile31[https://www.newspapers.com/image/584905489/ Aurora General Advertiser, 21 September 1791, p.2] lists Samuel Glasgow under Washington among Pennsylvania justices of the peace in commission on 1 September 1791. The original heading and name list were inspected. The same county as this profile’s uncertain later death makes this a possible identity candidate; the record does not prove that this ancestor held the office. Original commission, court, township and signature evidence is still required. This candidate does not bridge the separate 1761 London defendant to the Pennsylvania family.
Current profile
Replacement profile32
Current profile
Replacement profile33=== Reported royal-review date ===
Current profile
Replacement profile34The [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424820/ Public Advertiser, 22 May 1761, p.3] says the report of seven Newgate malefactors was made to the King at St James’s “Yesterday”, and reports Samuel’s respite. A [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424813/ separate page-1 masthead] is Friday, 22 May 1761, supporting 21 May as the reported royal-review day. This does not verify military commutation or pardon conditions. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/1212389396/ Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 14 May 1761, p.1] reports Samuel among two capital convictions; its manslaughter defendant is William Smith, not Samuel. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424864/ Public Advertiser, 26 May 1761, p.4] advertises printed trial proceedings listing Samuel’s horse-stealing case; it is not a new trial. All three original passages were inspected 5 October 2026.
Current profile20
Replacement profile35
Current profile21== Sources ==
Replacement profile36== Sources ==
Current profile22<references />
Replacement profile37<references />
Current profile23
Replacement profile38
Current profile24
Replacement profile39
Current profile25* "Family Tree," database, <i>FamilySearch</i> (http://familysearch.org : modified 03 October 2023, 03:34), entry for Samuel Glasgow, Sr (PID https://beta.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:G3PH-ZHN ); contributed by various users.
Replacement profile40* "Family Tree," database, <i>FamilySearch</i> (http://familysearch.org : modified 03 October 2023, 03:34), entry for Samuel Glasgow, Sr (PID https://beta.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/4:1:G3PH-ZHN ); contributed by various users.
Current profile26* [https://www.digitalpanopticon.org/life?id=obpt17610506-1-defend30 Digital Panopticon - Samuel Glascow]
Replacement profile41* [https://www.digitalpanopticon.org/life?id=obpt17610506-1-defend30 Digital Panopticon - Samuel Glascow]
Full replacement WikiTree biography

Copy this complete text into the WikiTree biography editor. Removed lines appear red on the left; added lines appear green on the right. Apply any structured vital or relationship correction described in the update separately in WikiTree's data fields.

Open WikiTree profile

Original notes and downloadsNotes as written, replaced interpretations, comparisons and data exports

The material the page is built from: research notes as originally written, earlier interpretations that have been replaced, automated comparisons and data downloads. The account above is the current one; nothing here overrides it.

Research notes as originally written

Current conclusion

The exact Old Bailey case already cited on this profile was formerly treated as strongly associated with the May 1761 newspaper respite. That association was withdrawn on 6 October 2026: the defendant was a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman, not this man (see below). The case association does not prove that the defendant was the profile’s Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

Current conclusion — newspaper review, 5 October 2026

The exact Old Bailey case already cited on this profile is strongly associated with the newly inspected May 1761 newspaper respite. The case association does not prove that the defendant was the profile’s Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

Source findings — newspaper review

The Derby Mercury, 22 May 1761, p.3, [original image](https://www.newspapers.com/image/394296948/), reports Samuel Glascow’s respite after gelding theft. The adjoining unnatural-crime description belongs to Thomas Andrews. The [Old Bailey trial t17610506-1](https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t17610506-1) records the 6 May Guilty verdict and death sentence, with owner William Hayward rather than the paper’s Heywood. [Associated catalogue metadata](https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/ar_9141_29053) lists a conditional pardon, TNA SP 44/87 f.68; its text and conditions were not inspected.

Identity and relationship assessments — newspaper review

Samuel’s defence describes Holbourn work, time abroad and High Wickham residence; those are attributed statements. Henry Ward attributes a statement about an unnamed mother in South-street. No birth date, origin or family identity is established. The 1740 Ulster birth and 1801 Pennsylvania death remain uncertain; Military commutation requires its own source. The complete 22 May Public Advertiser paragraph and separate issue masthead now support 21 May as the reported royal-review day. A complete proposed qualification and original-record citations are queued locally; no live profile was edited.

Current conclusion — additional original newspapers, 5 October 2026

Uncertain 1740 Ulster birth and 1801 Hanover Township, Washington County death are chronologically compatible. Strongest contextual candidate for the 1791 county office; no land or service identity bridge. These are possible identities, not proved matches. The 1770 Whitpain boundary notices, 1777 Maryland recall and 1791 Washington justice commission are separate contexts. The 1794 Old Style London pen-cutter death has no supported match and conditionally conflicts with this profile’s later death estimate. No parent, spouse or migration amendment follows.

Source findings — additional original newspapers

[Whitpain notice](https://www.newspapers.com/image/39398014/); [Maryland recall](https://www.newspapers.com/image/590968568/); [Washington commission list and saved heading](https://www.newspapers.com/image/584905489/); [London death claim and saved heading](https://www.newspapers.com/image/32751669/). Originals inspected 5 October 2026.

Next questions

Find local original land, service, office or household records to bridge the named person to this family. Current family assessments retain their existing uncertainty.

Date qualification resolved — additional original, 5 October 2026

The [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424820/ Public Advertiser, 22 May 1761, p.3] says the report of seven Newgate malefactors was made to the King at St James’s “Yesterday”, and reports Samuel’s respite. A [separate page-1 masthead](https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424813/) is Friday, 22 May 1761, supporting 21 May as the reported royal-review day. This does not verify military commutation or pardon conditions. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/1212389396/ Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 14 May 1761, p.1] reports Samuel among two capital convictions; its manslaughter defendant is William Smith, not Samuel. [https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424864/ Public Advertiser, 26 May 1761, p.4] advertises printed trial proceedings listing Samuel’s horse-stealing case; it is not a new trial. All three original passages were inspected 5 October 2026. The exact cited-case association remains strong; ancestral identity stays unresolved.

Current conclusion — additional newspaper originals, 5 October 2026

Samuel Glasgow, first Maryland regiment rendezvous notice, 1777: Uncertain 1740/1801 lifespan fits, but neither the family identity nor the London-case link identifies this Maryland soldier. Glasgow-1134 is a possible Maryland/age candidate. Glasgow-3175 is a compatible chronological comparison, but its Ulster/Pennsylvania identity and link to the London defendant remain unresolved. This roster does not prove the 1761 military-commutation claim. No family or life-date change follows.

Source findings

A notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, orders absent soldiers of the First Maryland Regiment, including Samuel Glasgow, to return by 10 November. It threatens apprehension and punishment as deserters and offers influence toward pardons. Notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, captain in the first Maryland regiment, orders listed soldiers to rendezvous on the 10th of next month. It threatens deserter punishment for failing to attend and offers to seek pardons for those returning after absence without leave. It does not establish an existing desertion conviction; William Davis is a separate following person. Glasgow-1134 is a possible Maryland/age candidate. Glasgow-3175 is a compatible chronological comparison, but its Ulster/Pennsylvania identity and link to the London defendant remain unresolved. This roster does not prove the 1761 military-commutation claim. [Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/41048937/)

Next questions

Inspect original company rolls, enlistments, discharge or pardon papers for identifying details before attaching him to a profile or joining him to the London case.

Current conclusion — earlier 1761 Old Bailey reports, 5 October 2026

Glasgow-3175 cites the identical Old Bailey case. That is a strong case association, not independent proof that the London defendant was the Ulster-born Pennsylvania ancestor.

Samuel Glascow is one of two prisoners reported capitally convicted at the Old Bailey; his charge is stealing a bay gelding belonging to Mr Serjeant Haywood. The manslaughter verdict belongs to William Smith, a separate defendant. The relative trial-day statement has no saved dateline; no 13 May trial date is inferred. This is a newspaper report of the case, not a separate trial or proof of ancestral identity. [Berrow’s Worcester Journal, 1761-05-14, p.1](https://www.newspapers.com/image/1212389396/), [The Derby Mercury, 1761-05-08, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/394296692/), [Jackson's Oxford Journal, 1761-05-09, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/396510014/)

Current conclusion — military roster company correction and consolidation, 5 October 2026

Samuel appears in the final unassigned group. Capt. Murray’s company belongs to William Wood, Thomas Kenady and William Langley immediately before the dash. The notice is dated 19 October 1777, sets 10 November as rendezvous, threatens punishment for failure and offers influence toward pardons. No adjudicated desertion, return, punishment, actual pardon or 1761 military commutation is proved. Three archive page URLs preserve one reprinted notice, including two scans labelled 23 October. Glasgow-1134 is the strongest contextual candidate through his estimated Cecil County birth; service identity remains possible, not proved. The other American candidates remain compatible.

A notice dated Baltimore, 19 October 1777, signed Joseph Ford, orders absent soldiers of the First Maryland Regiment, including Samuel Glasgow, to return by 10 November. It threatens apprehension and punishment as deserters and offers influence toward pardons. Samuel appears in the final unassigned group. Capt. Murray’s company belongs to William Wood, Thomas Kenady and William Langley immediately before the dash. The notice is dated 19 October 1777, sets 10 November as rendezvous, threatens punishment for failure and offers influence toward pardons. No adjudicated desertion, return, punishment, actual pardon or 1761 military commutation is proved. Three archive page URLs preserve one reprinted notice, including two scans labelled 23 October. [Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/590968568/), [Maryland Gazette, 1777-11-06, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/41048973/), [Maryland Gazette, 1777-10-23, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/41048937/)

Identity assessment — newspaper candidates withdrawn, 6 October 2026

- [The Derby Mercury, 1761-05-08, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/394296692/): no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 reports that Samuel Glascow was capitally convicted at the Old Bailey for stealing Serjeant Hayward's bay gelding. His own trial testimony describes a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman. That conflicts with Glasgow-3175 (an Ulster-born Pennsylvania settler), so the London man has no compatible profile.
- [The Public Advertiser, 1761-05-22, p.3](https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424820/): no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 report that Samuel Glascow, horse-stealer, was respited during His Majesty's pleasure on 21 May 1761. This is the same London defendant; no compatible WikiTree profile (draft flagged on group 394296692).
- [The Public Advertiser, 1761-05-26, p.4](https://www.newspapers.com/image/34424864/): no longer a candidate for this profile. May 1761 advertisement for the printed Old Bailey Proceedings listing Samuel Glascow's horse-stealing trial. This is the same London defendant; it adds no new fact.

Current conclusion — newspaper identity review, 6 October 2026

- [The Pennsylvania Gazette, 1770-02-01, p.3](https://www.newspapers.com/image/39398014/): Samuel Glasgow (adjoining landowner, Whitpain Township) — **possible** match. Independent corroboration of residence: 1769 Philadelphia County proprietary tax list, Whitpain Township, 'Samuel Glascow' (Friends Journal Gwynedd-area transcription; John Sanders of the same notice also listed in Whitpain). WikiTree candidates: Glasgow-3175 (b. c.1740 Ulster, d. 1801 Hanover Twp, Washington Co., PA; wife Mary Stephenson) is a Pennsylvania settler of the right age, with no record placing him in Whitpain - possible only (his biography's Old Bailey 1761 'Samuel Glascow' identification is itself unproved). Glasgow-1134 (Cecil County-born c.1749-1754; probably the First Maryland sergeant of 1776-77, see group 41048937) is weak. Glasgow-1492 (Moneymore, b. c.1726; possibly the 1766 Gorteen householder in Derryloran) is weak. The other Pennsylvania Samuel of the period - Samuel Glasgow, West Nottingham, Chester County, taxed householder 1751-1775 - is a different man (simulta Sources: [1769 Philadelphia County Proprietary tax lists for townships around Gwynedd (Whitpain: Samuel Glascow) - transcription, Friends Journal legacy site](https://www.friendsjournal.org/legacy/abington/gwynedd/gwyn1769tax.html)
- [The Pennsylvania Gazette, 1770-07-12, p.3](https://www.newspapers.com/image/39400791/): Samuel Glasgow (boundary landowner, Whitpain Township) — **possible** match. Same man as the February 1770 notice (same estate, same neighbours John Saunders and John Eldridge). 1769 Philadelphia County tax list has Samuel Glascow in Whitpain. No WikiTree profile documents him; Glasgow-3175 is a compatible Pennsylvania namesake only; 1134 and 1492 weaker (see group 39398014). Sources: [1769 Philadelphia County Proprietary tax list transcription (Whitpain: Samuel Glascow)](https://www.friendsjournal.org/legacy/abington/gwynedd/gwyn1769tax.html)

Current conclusion — newspaper identity review, 6 October 2026

- [Aurora General Advertiser, 1791-09-21, p.2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/584905489/): Samuel Glasgow (justice of the peace in commission, Washington County, Pennsylvania, 1791) — **possible** match. Independent county records fix the office-holder's identity and locality. Crumrine's History of Washington County (1882) lists 'Hon. Samuel Glasgow, commissioned May 7, 1788' among county justices, and puts him first in the Hanover Township justices' list ('Samuel Glasgow, May 7, 1788'). The 1800 Hanover Township assessment, quoted by Crumrine, lists 'Samuel Glasgow, justice of the peace'. The county slave register, as transcribed by Afrolumens, records Samuel Glasgow of Peters Township, wheelwright, in 1782, 'Samule Glasgow Esquire of Hanover township' on 2 June 1792, and Hanover through the 1800 septennial census. Glasgow-3175 (Samuel, c.1740 Ulster – 1801 Hanover Township, Washington County; wife Mary Stephenson) agrees on name, county, township and period, and his recorded death place is the JP's township. However, his profile rests only on a FamilySearch user tree, and its biography Sources: [Boyd Crumrine, History of Washington County, Pennsylvania (1882), full text: justices list ('Samuel Glasgow, commissioned May 7, 1788'), Hanover Township justices list and 1800 Hanover assessment](https://archive.org/details/historyofwashing00crum); [ldsgenealogy.com transcription of Crumrine (1882), part 65 (county justices list)](https://ldsgenealogy.com/PA/books/History-of-Washington-County-Pennsylvania-with-biographical-sketches-of-many-of-its-pioneers-and-prominent-men-part-65.htm); [Afrolumens Project, Washington County, Pennsylvania slave register transcriptions (Samuel Glasgow, Peters Township wheelwright; 'Samule Glasgow Esquire of Hanover township', 2 June 1792)](https://afrolumens.com/slavery/washfi.html)

Recommended correction — the 1761 Old Bailey Samuel Glascow is not this man, 6 October 2026

The earlier statements in this file that the Old Bailey case cited on this profile is 'strongly associated' with him are superseded. The defendant's own trial testimony ([Old Bailey Proceedings Online](https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/)) and the May 1761 reports ([The Derby Mercury, 8 May 1761, p. 2](https://www.newspapers.com/image/394296692/)) show that Samuel Glascow, capitally convicted of horse-stealing in 1761 and later respited, was a Holborn/High Wycombe tradesman: a London man, not the Ulster-born Pennsylvania Samuel. The association with this profile is **withdrawn**; see the identity assessment of 6 October 2026 above.

Recorded in `research/latest-findings.json` (6 October 2026); carried into this file on 7 October 2026.
Automated parent comparison (research aid, not a recommendation)

Stored scores are preserved for audit only. They are not probabilities or genealogical evidence, and a reviewed exclusion remains excluded.

  • James Glasgow II: 22/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • James Glasgow: 15/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Samuel Glasgow: 9/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Mary (Harkness) Glasgow: 3/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Samuel Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Samuel Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Katherine (Wilson) Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Mary Jones: 24/100 · Stored classification: chronology-only fallback
  • Margaret McCullough: 22/100 · Stored classification: chronology-only fallback
  • Ann Glasgow: 14/100 · Stored classification: chronology-only fallback
Research data and downloads

Person data (JSON) · Family network

{
  "id": "Glasgow-3175",
  "vitals": {
    "birth": {
      "date": "1740",
      "place": "Ulster, Ireland",
      "status": "uncertain"
    },
    "death": {
      "date": "1801",
      "place": "Hanover Township, Washington, Pennsylvania, United States",
      "status": "uncertain"
    }
  },
  "relationships": {
    "parents": [],
    "spouses": [
      {
        "id": "Stephenson-14548",
        "name": "Mary Stephenson",
        "relationship": "spouse",
        "status": "unknown",
        "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
        "basis": "tree",
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "tree_relationship": true,
        "relationship_source": "wikitree_spouse_field",
        "tree_status": "unmarked",
        "tree_status_label": "WikiTree: relationship status unmarked",
        "url": null,
        "json_url": null,
        "network_url": null,
        "wikitree_url": "https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Stephenson-14548",
        "claim_id": "C-ef0cdba96f1c"
      }
    ],
    "children": [],
    "siblings": []
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C-6997fe9a42aa",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-3175"
      ],
      "claim": "Samuel Glasgow was recorded in Ulster — exact county unproved (1740–1801).",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "Profile location lead",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-6997fe9a42aa"
      ],
      "notes": "Profile-stated Ulster birth",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-ef0cdba96f1c",
      "type": "tree_relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-3175",
        "Stephenson-14548"
      ],
      "claim": "WikiTree currently connects Samuel Glasgow and Mary Stephenson as spouse.",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "notes": "Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.",
      "provenance": "wikitree_spouse_field"
    }
  ],
  "research_assessments": null,
  "shared_relationship_assertions": null,
  "relationship_history": null
}

Saved people and pages

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.