Individual research record
James Glasgow
1735-11-11 – 1788-05-19
Glasgow-804 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- 1735-11-11 · Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland
- Death
- 1788-05-19 · Newberry, Newberry, South Carolina, United States
- Parents
- Not recorded
- Spouses
- Mary Norris
- Children
- James Thomas Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-804
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 2
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1932
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 81 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 28-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 81 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Kilwinning — Ayrshire is 22.2 km from the subject's birth-period Ayr (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1140
- plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 88 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 88 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-3104
- possible 46-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
- candidate's birth is 99 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- possible 46-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 99 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- mapped Kilwinning — Ayrshire is 22.2 km from the subject's birth-period Ayr (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1131
- possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-1547
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 86 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 86 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
- candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Barbara GlasgowGlasgow-3301
- possible 45-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 98 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- possible 45-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 98 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Mother
Sarah (Murray) GlasgowMurray-20395
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1728–1740) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 78 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1728–1740) (+6; other parent James Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Mary (Harkness) GlasgowHarkness-1149
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3305) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-3305) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Janet Glasgow WoodsideGlasgow-2249
- candidate's birth is 110 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
chronologically conflicting 57-year parent-child age gap (−8); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Show complete scoring
- candidate's birth is 110 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Thomas Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: chronologically conflicting 57-year parent-child age gap (−8); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)
Possible Mother
Margaret (McEachin) GlasgowMcEachin-120
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1788), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
- descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-1144
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 4 (+18)
- death years within 5 (+5)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 4 (+18)
- death years within 5 (+5)
- overlapping locality (+8)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
James GlasgowGlasgow-1509
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- child given-name pattern overlaps: James
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-804
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.2 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s; South Carolina; Year: 1769; Page Number: 136; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-804
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-804
James Glasgow
Updated 2024-09-20
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-804 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2024-09-20.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Newberry, Newberry, South Carolina, USA | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children | James Thomas Glasgow | Glasgow-803 | 1788-05-16 · Newberry County, South Carolina, USA · 1849-10-28 · Abbeville County, South Carolina, USA |
| Spouses | Mary | Norris-6604 | 1748-04-05 · Coatbridge, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1842-07-23 · Abbeville County, South Carolina, USA · 1788-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
- Biography James was born in 1735. He passed away in 1788.
Possibly descended from Hugh Glasgow (abt.1600-). Sources
- U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s; South Carolina; Year: 1769; Page Number: 136; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.
Profile source citations
- U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s; South Carolina; Year: 1769; Page Number: 136; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.
Full captured biography text
Biography James was born in 1735. He passed away in 1788. Possibly descended from Hugh Glasgow (abt.1600-). Sources * U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s; South Carolina; Year: 1769; Page Number: 136; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == James was born in 1735. He passed away in 1788. Possibly descended from [[Glasgow-1603|Hugh Glasgow (abt.1600-)]]. == Sources == <references /> * U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s; South Carolina; Year: 1769; Page Number: 136; Ancestry.com. U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc, 2010.