Skip to page content
Catalogue · 08 Sep 2026

Illustrated manuscript reading

Archibald Glasgow, maltman in Leith: testament testamentar name reread

1662-05-24 (confirmation; death February 1662; will January 1662, exact day unresolved)

National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/70, images 689-693

Second manuscript pass · 10 September 2026

The names, reconsidered

New readings and unchanged uncertainties are both recorded. A confirmed name or role does not by itself confirm a WikiTree identity or a relationship.

Read the name and relationship audit (10 findings, not a count of unique people)
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Agnes Watsone, his relict spous and tutrix testamentar

image 689, opening

Earlier reading / question
Agnes Watson read as widow/tutor
Why this reading
Name, spouse term, and office are explicit.
Effect on the family
Directly proves Agnes was Archibald's surviving wife; tutorship is a separate legal role.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Archibald, George and Williame Glasgowes, minor lawful sons and sole executors

images 689 and 691, child/executor clauses

Earlier reading / question
Archibald, George, William read as lawful sons and executors
Why this reading
The three-name group and plural 'my lawfull sones' recur in the will.
Effect on the family
Directly proves all three sons and their estate office.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Captain George Cocke, burgess in Edinburgh, and Thomas Glasgow, weaver in Edinburgh, as overseers

image 692, oversight clause

Earlier reading / question
Captain George Cocke and Thomas Glasgow read as overseers
Why this reading
Names, designations, and plural role are legible.
Effect on the family
Neither overseer is stated to be kin; Thomas remains an associate/possible relative only.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Thomas Glasgow, weaver in Edinburgh, wrote the will and appears in the caution/confirmation procedure

images 692-693, writing and caution

Earlier reading / question
Thomas Glasgow also writer and named in caution procedure
Why this reading
The name and occupation recur in the closing and court text.
Effect on the family
Repeated legal involvement does not prove brotherhood or another family relationship.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Walter Roddie, indweller in Edinburgh, and Robert Stewart, stabler in Leith, witnesses

image 693, witness clause

Earlier reading / question
Walter Roddie and Robert Stewart read as witnesses
Why this reading
Names, places/occupations, and witness subscriptions are legible.
Effect on the family
Witnesses only; no kinship.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Sir John Nisbet [commission/confirmation title formula]

image 693, confirmation

Earlier reading / question
Sir John Nisbet in official formula
Why this reading
The personal name is legible; the complete title formula was not expanded from expectation.
Effect on the family
Court official only.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Jon Greig in Northleith; Williame Couper in Leith; Jon Watsone [and further names unresolved]

image 690, debts owed to the deceased

Earlier reading / question
John Greig, William Couper, John Watson among debtors
Why this reading
These names and the first two localities are legible in the account.
Effect on the family
Account relationships only; no kinship.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Robert Cunynghame, maltman in Leith; Williame Patersone; Williame Glasgow, weiber in Leith; James Nisbit, apothecar

images 690-691, debts owed by the deceased

Earlier reading / question
Robert Cunningham, William Paterson, William Glasgow, James Nisbet read
Why this reading
Names and stated occupations/localities are legible across the account.
Effect on the family
William Glasgow is a creditor, not a stated brother or son; all remain non-kin account parties unless separately proved.
Unresolved

Agnes [surname illegible]; Jonet Dick[sone?]

image 691, servants' wages

Earlier reading / question
Agnes surname unresolved; Jonet Dickson tentative
Why this reading
Forenames and wage context are visible, but surname letterforms are incomplete/crowded.
Effect on the family
Servants, not family members on present evidence.
Confirmed / reconfirmed

Archibald Glasgow, maltman and indweller in Leith

images 689-693, identity designation

Earlier reading / question
Associated with Glasgow-3078
Why this reading
The designation is explicit in the testament opening and will.
Effect on the family
Defines the 1662 household, but identity with Glasgow-3078 remains qualified because the securely documented 1639/1647 man was a Leith shoemaker.

See how the evidence fits the early families

Follow the handwriting

The people behind the words.

Three crops separate the Leith household, the explicit sons and the January will date. The enlarged words show how the same hand forms names, long s, looped ascenders and abbreviations. The source states family relationships, but those clauses do not by themselves resolve every same-name profile identification.

NameRelationship / roleUncertain
New to secretary hand? Start with the shapes.

Follow the writing line. Ascenders rise above small letters; descenders fall below them. A neighbouring line can cross the word you are reading.

Count the short strokes. These are called minims. Joined i, m, n and u shapes can be ambiguous; compare a clear repeated word by the same clerk rather than guessing from a modern alphabet.

Separate reading from expansion. A contraction is not a fully written modern word. Square brackets retain doubtful letters or editorial additions. A familiar legal formula is a clue, not permission to fill a gap.

Then assess the relationship. Reading a name securely is not the same as proving kinship. Look for the actual role words and who they refer to.

Who appears in these passages?

Select a name to jump to its manuscript evidence.

The reading desk

One name. Three ways to look.

Choose a name or relationship below. Compare the original ink, a paper-free view and the same spelling in a secretary-hand teaching font. Open the reasoning only when you need it.

01Lawfull sones: the long forms are not modern printed lettersLawfull sones: the long forms are not modern printed lettersInspect reading

Proposed readinglawfull sones

The three sons are named across the line break. This panel compares a tall loop in lawfull with the long opening form in sones. The crop preserves neighbouring strokes so their overlap is visible rather than erased.

01 Original word Untouched manuscript
02 Ink on white Derived from the original pixels

Open the original above if this browser cannot process the image.

03 Same spelling, another hand Joscelyn teaching font
lawfull sonesLoading the secretary-hand teaching font...

lawfull sones

The white-background view suppresses paper colour; reviewed focus boundaries exclude separable neighbouring fragments where available. It does not restore missing strokes. Colour follows retained source pixels inside proposed letter groups, not a reconstructed pen path. Ambiguous crossings remain neutral where reviewed; other crossing ink may still belong to another line.

The font repeats the proposed spelling, not this clerk's handwriting. Similarity is a teaching aid, not confirmation; uncertainties remain in the reading above.

Locate the word in its passage Original context
The three sons are named across the line break. This panel compares a tall loop in lawfull with the long opening form in sones. The crop preserves neighbouring strokes so their overlap is visible rather than erased.
Reading, meaning and uncertainty

Expansion: lawful sons

Confidence: High for the relationship wording; identity with the earlier shoemaker remains a separate question.

Evidence boundary: The testament identifies lawful sons, but these letterforms do not establish whether their father was the Archibald documented as a shoemaker in 1647.

Teaching typeface: Joscelyn by Peter S. Baker, based on a different Renaissance secretary hand. SIL Open Font License. Source images remain separate and unchanged.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 689; Crown copyright

1. Leith residence and Agnes Watson, relict spouse

1. Leith residence and Agnes Watson, relict spouse: cropped original manuscript, CC8/8/70, image 689
Click the manuscript to enlarge

Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 689; Crown copyright. Cropped from the supplied original; © Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Coloured boxes are reading aids, not part of the manuscript.

On the page

Archibald Glasgow maltman Indweller In leith ... / be Agnes Watsone his relict spous ...

In modern English

Archibald Glasgow, maltman living in Leith; Agnes Watson, his surviving spouse.

How to read it

The designation in leith follows Indweller near the top. Further down, Agnes Watsone is immediately followed by his relict spous. In seventeenth-century Scots legal usage, relict identifies the surviving spouse. That explicit relationship wording must be kept separate from the later tutorship and administration language, which describes legal functions rather than additional kinship.

What this establishes

The record locates this maltman in Leith and expressly identifies Agnes as his widow.

What it does not establish

It does not establish a marriage date, Agnes's parents, or the maltman's identity with every earlier Archibald record.

High for the residence and spouse wording.

Slow reading

Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.

Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.

Phrase 01

Archibald Glasgow

Archibald Glasgow

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The capital A opens with a broad loop before the narrow joined rch strokes.
  2. Tall ascenders in b and d rise above the middle letters of Archibald.
  3. Glasgow begins with a conspicuous looped G and contains a lower g loop beneath the baseline.
  4. The final ow runs into a fine exit stroke before maltman.

Compare in this hand: The same forename recurs in abbreviated form in the sons step; the full form here supports that expansion.

Reading limits: The full name is clear; this clause identifies the testator but does not distinguish every namesake outside the document.

Phrase 02

leith

Leith

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The opening l rises in a tall narrow loop above the other letters.
  2. The short e and dotted i sit low between the two tall outer letters.
  3. The t is crossed, and the final h closes with a loop and returning foot.

Reading limits: The place-name is secure; the modern expansion supplies capitalization only.

Phrase 03

Agnes Watsone

Agnes Watson

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The capital A is larger and more open than the following gnes sequence.
  2. The g in Agnes drops below the baseline in a narrow loop.
  3. Watsone begins with a broad angular W and ends with a small open e.
  4. The tall t and long s-like stroke break up the otherwise compact surname.

Reading limits: Watsone is the literal spelling; Watson is the normalized surname.

Phrase 04

his relict spous

his surviving spouse

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The initial h of his has a tall loop, followed by a short i and compact final s.
  2. Relict is separated as its own word, with a tall l at the start and crossed t at the end.
  3. Spous begins with a long secretary s and finishes in a small terminal s stroke.
  4. The three words occupy one continuous phrase immediately after Agnes's name.

Reading limits: Spous is the visible Scots spelling of spouse; relict means surviving spouse here, not merely an estate representative.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 691; Crown copyright

2. Three names followed by my lawful sons

2. Three names followed by my lawful sons: cropped original manuscript, CC8/8/70, image 691
Click the manuscript to enlarge

Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 691; Crown copyright. Cropped from the supplied original; © Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Coloured boxes are reading aids, not part of the manuscript.

On the page

... Arch[ibal]d George / & Williame Glasgowes my lawfull sones my onlie ex[ecuto]ris ...

In modern English

Archibald, George and William Glasgow, my lawful sons and my sole executors.

How to read it

The first two forenames stand at the right end of the nomination line; William and the shared surname continue at the left of the next. The abbreviated Archibald is expanded from its surviving letters and the full form elsewhere in this hand. The plural phrase my lawfull sones grammatically qualifies the three-name group. The following executor wording states their legal role and is not being used to infer the relationship.

What this establishes

Archibald, George and William are explicitly the testator's sons and are appointed executors.

What it does not establish

This clause alone does not assign birth dates, distinguish every namesake or prove that no other child had ever existed.

High for the three-name group and sonship; the first forename is abbreviated.

Slow reading

Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.

Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.

Phrase 01

Archd

Archibald

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The enlarged capital A has the same broad opening movement as the full Archibald in the household step.
  2. The surviving rch strokes are tightly compressed before the shortened ending.
  3. A raised terminal d and abbreviation stroke signal omitted internal letters rather than a different forename.

Compare in this hand: The full Archibald Glasgow near the start of the testament supplies a same-hand comparison for the expansion.

Reading limits: Archibald is the conventional and context-supported expansion; the omitted letters are not individually written.

Phrase 02

George

George

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The capital G is an open loop larger than the following letters.
  2. The middle or is compact, while the second g drops below the baseline.
  3. The final e is a small rightward turn immediately before the line edge.

Reading limits: The forename is clear despite crowding at the right margin.

Phrase 03

Williame Glasgowes

William Glasgow; the surname applies to the named sons

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. Williame starts with a broad angular W followed by two close l strokes and a dotted i.
  2. The final e of Williame is lighter and joins visually toward the following surname.
  3. Glasgowes has a large opening G, a descending lower g and a clearly continued terminal es.
  4. The phrase begins at the left margin because it continues the list from the preceding line.

Reading limits: The literal terminal -es belongs to the manuscript grammar; the expansion normalizes the individual surname without treating it as a different family name.

Phrase 04

my lawfull sones

my lawful sons

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The y in my drops below the line and leads into a visible word space before lawfull.
  2. Lawfull has tall l strokes and a long descending f amid a dense group of minims.
  3. Sones begins with a long secretary s and ends with a light open e-s sequence.
  4. The plural ending agrees with the three preceding forenames.

Reading limits: The relationship and plural are explicit; this clause does not establish birth order or whether other children existed.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 692; Crown copyright

3. The January date belongs to making the will

3. The January date belongs to making the will: cropped original manuscript, CC8/8/70, image 692
Click the manuscript to enlarge

Choose a phrase to locate it in the manuscript. Only its outline is shown, so overlapping strokes stay readable.

National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/70, image 692; Crown copyright. Cropped from the supplied original; © Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Coloured boxes are reading aids, not part of the manuscript.

On the page

... writtin be Thomas Glasgow weaver In ed[inbu]r[gh] ... / at leith the [xxiij?] day of Jan[uar] 1662 yeiris ...

In modern English

Written by Thomas Glasgow, weaver in Edinburgh; at Leith on an uncertain day in January 1662.

How to read it

Read the writer's name in the upper line separately from the place-and-date formula below. The enlarged month begins with a long descending J and a contracted January form; the preceding day numeral remains too uncertain to promote. This closing date belongs to making the will, not to the marginal May confirmation or the separate February death statement.

What this establishes

The will was made in January 1662 and names Thomas Glasgow as its writer.

What it does not establish

It does not establish the precise January day or make Thomas a relative. It is not a birth, marriage or death date.

High for January 1662; uncertain for the day numeral.

Slow reading

Inspect the words, not just the conclusion.

Compare the original strokes with the proposed reading. Tall or trailing strokes from neighbouring lines may enter a sample; the notes distinguish what is visible from what remains uncertain.

Phrase 01

Thomas Glasgow

Thomas Glasgow

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. Thomas begins with a larger crossed capital T followed by a tall looped h.
  2. The final s of Thomas is a long secretary form rather than a modern rounded s.
  3. Glasgow opens with a broad looped G and contains a lower g loop beneath the baseline.
  4. The final ow runs toward, but remains separable from, the following occupational wording.

Reading limits: The name is clear; nothing in this boxed name itself states that Thomas is related to the testator.

Phrase 02

Jan[uar] 1662

January 1662

Magnified from the same manuscript image. No letters have been redrawn.
Look at the strokes
  1. The month begins with a large J whose stem descends far below the other letters.
  2. The letters after Jan are compressed and partly raised in the conventional contracted month form.
  3. The four digits are separately visible, with a tall 1 and rounded final 2.
  4. The date sits in the lower closing line, beneath Thomas Glasgow's name.

Reading limits: January and 1662 are secure; the exact letters represented by the contraction and the preceding day numeral remain qualified.

Manuscript detail

Full case analysisInterpretation, supporting evidence, changed readings and remaining questions.

Modern interpretation

What the record says

Archibald Glasgow was a maltman living in Leith and died in February 1662.

Agnes Watson is expressly his surviving spouse. She acts as testamentary tutor and estate administrator for their minor children.

Archibald, George, and William Glasgow are expressly called his lawful sons and are his sole executors and equal beneficiaries after debts.

Captain George Cock and Thomas Glasgow, weaver in Edinburgh, are overseers. Thomas also wrote the will and appears in the caution procedure, but no surviving clause calls him Archibald's brother or other relative.

William Glasgow, weaver in Leith, is a creditor. His shared surname does not establish kinship.

Evidence and limits

What it establishes

  • Confirmed explicit family: wife/widow Agnes Watson; lawful sons Archibald, George, and William Glasgow.
  • Confirmed legal roles: the sons are sole executors; Agnes is tutor/intromissatrix during minority; George Cock and Thomas Glasgow are overseers.
  • Confirmed associates: Walter Roddie and Robert Stewart are witnesses; Sir John Nisbet acts in confirmation; Thomas Glasgow is writer and appears in caution procedure.
  • Confirmed account participants include John Greig, William Couper, John Watson, Robert Cunningham, William Paterson, William Glasgow the Leith weaver, and James Nisbet the apothecary; the account does not state that any is kin.
  • Probable servant name Jonet Dickson remains qualified; Agnes's servant surname remains unreadable.
  • The testament defines a Leith maltman. Association with Glasgow-3078 is useful but not proved by this document alone because the securely documented 1647 heir was a Leith shoemaker.

What changed in this reading

  • No wife-or-sons conclusion changed; the explicit household is reconfirmed after a complete page-by-page name audit.
  • The reread inventories overseers, witnesses, officials, account parties, and servants separately and excludes unsupported kinship for both Thomas Glasgow and creditor William Glasgow.
  • The profile association is now expressly qualified at the occupation seam: maltman in 1662 versus shoemaker in the independent 1639/1647 chain.

Still open

Do not fill these gaps with assumptions

  • Exact January day on which the will was made
  • Agnes the servant's surname and whether Jonet's surname is Dickson
  • Several debtor/creditor names, all sums, and portions of the financial account
  • Any kinship between Archibald and overseer/writer Thomas Glasgow or creditor William Glasgow
  • Whether the 1662 Leith maltman is identical to Glasgow-3078, the separately documented Leith shoemaker
Full working transcriptionLine-oriented readings, unresolved text and a downloadable plain-text version.

LLM-assisted working transcription

Read the manuscript passages

Download text

Square brackets mark uncertainty, editorial expansions or missing text. Ellipses mark omitted or unresolved wording. Numbering identifies lines in this working reading, not official manuscript line numbers. This is not a complete diplomatic edition.

Image / passage 1 / image 689

  1. The testament testamentar and Inventar [of] umquhile Archibald Glasgow
  2. maltman Indweller In leith [who] deceissit in the moneth of ffebry [1662]
  3. givine up be Agnes Watsone his relict spous tutrix testamentar
  4. in name and behalf of Archibald George and Williame Glasgowes minoris bairnes
  5. lawfull to the said umquhile defunct

Image / passage 2 / image 690

  1. [the three sons] he nominat his onlie executoris in his latterwill
  2. [inventory of malt, bear, household plenishing, and clothing]
  3. Debtis awand to the deid: Jon Greig in Northleith; Williame Couper in Leith; Jon Watsone [and names/sums partly unresolved]
  4. Debtis awand be the deid: Robert Cunynghame maltman in Leith; Williame Patersone; Williame Glasgow weiber in Leith; James Nisbit apothecar [and sums partly unresolved]

Image / passage 3 / image 691

  1. [servants' wages:] Agnes [surname illegible] and Jonet Dick[sone?]
  2. I Archibald Glasgow maltman and Indweller in Leith [latterwill]
  3. Archibald George and Williame Glasgowes my lawfull sones my onlie executoris
  4. [goods to the three sons equally]
  5. my weilbelovit spous Agnes Watsone [as] intromissatrix and tutrix

Image / passage 4 / image 692

  1. for the weill and behoove of my said childrene by the advice and consent of
  2. captane George Cocke burges in Edinburgh and Thomas Glasgow weaver in Edinburgh as oversiars
  3. [Agnes to administer during the children's minority with the overseers' consent]
  4. this testament [was] writtin be Thomas Glasgow weaver in Edinburgh
  5. at Leith the [day numeral unresolved] day of Jan[uar] 1662

Image / passage 5 / image 693

  1. witnesses Walter Roddie Indweller in Edinburgh and Robert Stewart stabler in Leith
  2. [subscriptions of Archibald Glasgow, Walter Roddie, and Robert Stewart]
  3. Sir John Nisbet [commissary/confirmation formula]
  4. Thomas Glasgow weaver in Edinburgh [caution procedure]
  5. [following James Davidsone testament excluded]
Source files and reading provenanceOriginal references, pages examined and the limits of this review.

Source coverage and reading provenance

High for Archibald's name, maltman occupation, Leith residence, Agnes Watson as wife/widow, the three lawful sons, their executorship, and the stated roles of George Cock and Thomas Glasgow. Moderate for some account names and low for servant surnames and complete financial detail. The profile identity remains qualified.

Reviewed: 2026-09-10. Method: Codex fresh original-image name, role, and locality audit.

Pages examined

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Supplied local source files

  • 1662_Archibald.pdf

The full originals remain in the local research archive. Selected unaltered crops are shown above for reading and commentary, with separate switchable highlights. Image credit: Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland / ScotlandsPeople. Duplicate downloads are not independent evidence. Consult the original using the reference above through ScotlandsPeople.

All associated profiles and identity comparisonsIncludes possible and rejected associations, not just proved relatives.

Back to all transcriptions

Your research notebook.

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.