Individual research record
John Glasgow
before 1685 – ?
Glasgow-2475 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- before 1685 · Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland
- Death
- Not recorded · Place not recorded
- Parents
- William Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- Isabell (Kyle) Glasgow
- Children
- Robert GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-2475
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 4
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3145
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- less typical 59-year parent-child age gap (+2)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- less typical 59-year parent-child age gap (+2)
- candidate's birth is 80 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1498
- candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 35 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 35 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 7 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-2436
- candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 23 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 23 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3093
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-1521
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Jean (Service) GlasgowService-456
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: irvine ayrshire (+10)
- the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–19 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 30 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–19 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 30 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: irvine ayrshire (+10)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate has another child, Hugh Glasgow, born 11 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+2; possible sibling-household clue)
Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Ann (McCook) GlasgowMcCook-217
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Bessie Glasgow in Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1544) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1682–1705) (+3; other parent William Walter Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Bessie Glasgow in Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland within 3 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1544) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Mary (Glasgow) MoncriefGlasgow-397
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 34 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 34 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Helen (Clerk) GlasgowClerk-460
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 45 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 45 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Eupham GlasgowLaurimer-1
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 40 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 40 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1706), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John Glasgow MAGlasgow-1077
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
- matching child name: Robert Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1065
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- overlapping locality (+8)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 2 (+25)
- overlapping locality (+8)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3018
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 10 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 10 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1473
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3161
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-551
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 4 (+18)
- same parent name without a shared profile ID: William Glasgow (+2)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 4 (+18)
- same parent name without a shared profile ID: William Glasgow (+2)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1434
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 6 (+10)
- overlapping locality (+8)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 6 (+10)
- overlapping locality (+8)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3990
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 5 (+18)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2475
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTV2-YVQ : 16 September 2021), John Glasgow in entry for Robert Glasgow, 1716.
- unknown JOHN 08-10-1693 JOHN GLASGOW/AGNES MARTINE FR23 (FR23) Irvine 595/ M
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2475
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-2475
John Glasgow
Updated 2025-07-11
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-2475 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-07-11.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | William Glasgow | Glasgow-3080 | 1660-10-15 · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | William Glasgow | Glasgow-3408 | 1706-04-16 · Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Robert Glasgow | Glasgow-2474 | 1716-01-10 · Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Isabell Glasgow | Kyle-2471 | 1685-00-00 · Irvine, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
Biography Born in Irvine before 1690. Potentially related to Michael Glasgow (bef.1680-) and part of the Ayrshire branch. Sources
- "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTV2-YVQ : 16 September 2021), John Glasgow in entry for Robert Glasgow, 1716.
- JOHN 08-10-1693 JOHN GLASGOW/AGNES MARTINE FR23 (FR23) Irvine 595/ M
Profile source citations
- "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTV2-YVQ : 16 September 2021), John Glasgow in entry for Robert Glasgow, 1716. source link 1
- JOHN 08-10-1693 JOHN GLASGOW/AGNES MARTINE FR23 (FR23) Irvine 595/ M
Full captured biography text
Biography Born in Irvine before 1690. Potentially related to Michael Glasgow (bef.1680-) and part of the Ayrshire branch. Sources * "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTV2-YVQ : 16 September 2021), John Glasgow in entry for Robert Glasgow, 1716. * JOHN 08-10-1693 JOHN GLASGOW/AGNES MARTINE FR23 (FR23) Irvine 595/ M
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == Born in Irvine before 1690. Potentially related to [[Glasgow-1406|Michael Glasgow (bef.1680-)]] and part of the Ayrshire branch. == Sources == <references /> * "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTV2-YVQ : 16 September 2021), John Glasgow in entry for Robert Glasgow, 1716. * JOHN 08-10-1693 JOHN GLASGOW/AGNES MARTINE FR23 (FR23) Irvine 595/ M