Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

John Glasgow

c. 1650 – ?

Glasgow-1498 · 1 mapped association

Cavers, Roxburghshire, ScotlandDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
2Close relations
4Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1650 · Cavers, Roxburghshire, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Janet (Glasgow) Woodside
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1498
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
1

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionJanet (Glasgow) Woodside (1678)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit13/100
Weak Lead
Dates1618–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesDuddingston, Midlothian, Scotland · Duddingston — MidlothianIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Helen (Patoune) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3014) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Helen (Patoune) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (32) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3014) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1626–?Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Ayrshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit10/100
Weak Lead
Dates1617–1670Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesLinlithgow, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · LinlithgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1626–1664Generation24 years age gapRecorded placesAyrshire, Scotland · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow M.A (Glasgow-1073) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 24-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow M.A (Glasgow-1073) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1619–?Generation31 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Margaret (Sluman) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1559) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 31-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Margaret (Sluman) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1559) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit22/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1620–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesLocation not supplied — profile holding pointIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit22/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1610–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesMid CalderIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit18/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1618–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesDuddingston — MidlothianIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3014) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3014) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit16/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1620–1682Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesVirginiaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert Glasgow IICurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1637–1653) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow II)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Norfolk, Virginia within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1637–1653) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow II)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Norfolk, Virginia within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit16/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1617–?Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Anne Glasgow in Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1678), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1643–1652) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Anne Glasgow in Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3012

Automated fit45/100
Similar Person
Dates1649–?PlacesKirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonSame parent name; profile identity unproved
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 1 (+25)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: John Glasgow (+2)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3093

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1648–?PlacesMid Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1498

John Glasgow is directly named under Cavers parish and marked as a survivor of the 1679 wreck. The source does not name his parents, relate him to William, or give his later destination.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1650

Profile-stated birthplace: Cavers, Roxburghshire, Scotland

Cavers — Roxburghshire

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1498

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Parish centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1498

SourceFindingAssessment
Thomson, *A Cloud of Witnesses*, appendix, local complete copy ../../surname-research/pre-1700/sources/thomson_cloud_of_witnesses.pdfLists John Glasgow and William Glasgow under Cavers; survivor notation explained in the appendix.Direct for presence/survival; silent on age, parentage, kinship and destination.
Live capture captures/20260717T083224Z_Glasgow-1498.jsonAttached Glasgow-3331 as father and links the other prisoner to Glasgow-1605.Neither identification is supported by the prisoner list.
Glasgow-3331 capture ../Glasgow-591/captures/20260716T214155Z_Glasgow-3331.jsonIts biography says no children are confirmed.Conflicts with the father attachment.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.5 claims
3Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

John Glasgow of Cavers survived the 1679 wreck, but the prisoner list gives no parents, kinship to William, or later destination.

strongly_supported1 linked evidence item

The list directly names and marks John but supplies none of the relationships currently inferred on WikiTree.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended correction applied

Glasgow-1498

Verified live 19 August 2026: birth fields, father Glasgow-3331 and daughter Glasgow-2249 are explicitly uncertain. The biography now states that the 1679 list names no parents, kinship or destination and does not prove the listed William is Glasgow-1605.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1498 was captured 2026-08-18T15:04:41+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-04-06.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthCavers, Roxburghshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-33311632-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · Biggar, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenJanet WoodsideGlasgow-22491678-00-00 · Ireland · 1755-00-00
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-27311670-00-00 · Roxburghshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography John Glasgow (about 1650 – ?) was one of the Covenanter prisoners aboard the ship Croune of London when it wrecked near the Mull of Deerness in Orkney on 10 December 1679. The vessel was transporting 257 Scottish Presbyterian Covenanters, captured at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge, to forced labor in the American Plantations. Locked below deck, many perished, but John Glasgow and William Glasgow (bef.1658–)—both said to be from Cavers Parish, Roxburghshire—were among the survivors. William Glasgow, The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc. (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. Dr. Mark Jardine’s article on the wreck of the Croune (https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/)
  • The Covenanters were a 17th-century Scottish Presbyterian sect who opposed attempts by Charles II to impose an episcopal structure on the Scottish Church. Many were fined, imprisoned, or exiled for their religious convictions. A contemporary source depicted the Covenanters as swearing to defend “their bodies, property and consciences against all attacks; to defend Christ’s gospel and the purity of the Church; to submit to no ruler who would not submit to Christ, and to defend their liberty from fears without and within.” Genealogical Note

    • There is an unresolved genealogical issue: no reliable record has been found for John Glasgow’s father. A possible father is sometimes listed in online trees, but he appears too young or was not yet born.
    • The only other Glasgow recorded in Roxburghshire at an earlier date is Alan Glasgow (1550–1594), but no documentary link to John Glasgow has been established. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. William Glasgow, The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc. (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. Dr. Mark Jardine’s article on the wreck of the Croune (https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/) source link 1
  2. William Glasgow, The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc. (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. jardine's book of martyrs (https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/) source link 1
  3. -->
Full captured biography text
Biography
John Glasgow (about 1650 – ?) was one of the Covenanter prisoners aboard the ship Croune of London when it wrecked near the Mull of Deerness in Orkney on 10 December 1679. The vessel was transporting 257 Scottish Presbyterian Covenanters, captured at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge, to forced labor in the American Plantations. Locked below deck, many perished, but John Glasgow and William Glasgow (bef.1658–)—both said to be from Cavers Parish, Roxburghshire—were among the survivors. William Glasgow, The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc. (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. Dr. Mark Jardine’s article on the wreck of the Croune (https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/) 

The Covenanters were a 17th-century Scottish Presbyterian sect who opposed attempts by Charles II to impose an episcopal structure on the Scottish Church. Many were fined, imprisoned, or exiled for their religious convictions. A contemporary source depicted the Covenanters as swearing to defend “their bodies, property and consciences against all attacks; to defend Christ’s gospel and the purity of the Church; to submit to no ruler who would not submit to Christ, and to defend their liberty from fears without and within.”
Genealogical Note
* There is an unresolved genealogical issue: no reliable record has been found for John Glasgow’s father. A possible father is sometimes listed in online trees, but he appears too young or was not yet born. 
* The only other Glasgow recorded in Roxburghshire at an earlier date is Alan Glasgow (1550–1594), but no documentary link to John Glasgow has been established.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Notables Sticker}}

== Biography ==
John Glasgow (about 1650 – ?) was one of the Covenanter prisoners aboard the ship '''Croune of London''' when it wrecked near the Mull of Deerness in Orkney on 10 December 1679. The vessel was transporting 257 Scottish Presbyterian Covenanters, captured at the Battle of Bothwell Bridge, to forced labor in the American Plantations. Locked below deck, many perished, but John Glasgow and [[Glasgow-1605|William Glasgow (bef.1658–)]]—both said to be from Cavers Parish, Roxburghshire—were among the survivors.<ref>William Glasgow, ''The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc.'' (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. [https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/ Dr. Mark Jardine’s article on the wreck of the Croune]</ref>

The Covenanters were a 17th-century Scottish Presbyterian sect who opposed attempts by Charles II to impose an episcopal structure on the Scottish Church. Many were fined, imprisoned, or exiled for their religious convictions. A contemporary source depicted the Covenanters as swearing to defend “their bodies, property and consciences against all attacks; to defend Christ’s gospel and the purity of the Church; to submit to no ruler who would not submit to Christ, and to defend their liberty from fears without and within.”

== Genealogical Note ==
* There is an unresolved genealogical issue: no reliable record has been found for John Glasgow’s father. A possible father is sometimes listed in online trees, but he appears too young or was not yet born.  
* The only other Glasgow recorded in Roxburghshire at an earlier date is [[Glasgow-3023|Alan Glasgow (1550–1594)]], but no documentary link to John Glasgow has been established.

== Sources ==
<references />

<!--{{Notables Sticker}}

*  Error: Father is too young or not born  
* Only other Glasgow who appears in Roxburghshire previously is [[Glasgow-3023|Alan Glasgow (1550-1594)]]

== Biography ==
In 1679, The Croune of London was shipwrecked carrying 257 prisoners of war that were being banished to the American Plantations. They were Covenanters a 17th Century Scottish Presbyterian Christian sect. During a shipwreck, they were abandoned to their fate, locked below the deck. Among the survivors were John Glasgow (abt.1650-) and [[Glasgow-1605|William Glasgow (bef.1658-)]] of Cavers, Roxburghsire parish.

''Brandishing ‘uplifted swords’, the Covenanters swore to ‘keep their bodies, property and consciences against all attacks; to defend Christ’s gospel and the purity of the Church; to submit to no ruler who would not submit to Christ, and to defend their liberty from fears without and within’.''<ref>William Glasgow, The History of the Reformed Presbyterian Church in America, with Sketches of all her Ministry, Congregations, Missions, Institutions, Publications, etc. (Baltimore: Hill & Harvey, Publishers, 1888), 245. [https://drmarkjardine.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/beyond-orkneys-fatal-shore-the-wreck-of-the-croune-10-december-1679-history-scotland/ jardine's book of martyrs]</ref> 
== Sources ==
<references />-->