Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Thomas Glasgow

before 1627 – ?

Glasgow-3187 · 1 mapped association

Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
8Close relations
5Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
before 1627 · Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John GlasgowunmarkedJonet (Mathie) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Catherine (Weir) Glasgow
Children
Catharine GlasgowElizabeth GlasgowJeane GlasgowMargaret GlasgowThomas Glasgow M.A
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3187
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
5

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionThomas Glasgow M.A (1650)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionMargaret Glasgow (1644)
Paternal grandmother positionElizabeth Glasgow (1647)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1590–1650Generationat most 37 years age gapRecorded placesLanarkshire, Scotland · Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · Lanarkshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Bessie (Robertson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Bessie (Robertson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Elizabeth Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Elizabeth in 146 profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit8/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1600–?Generationat most 27 years age gapRecorded placesAyrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jeane +16 (2 public profiles; subject branch: Jeane Glasgow; candidate branch: Jeane Glasgow) (+16 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1590–1645Generationat most 37 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Catherine (Fraser) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Catherine (Fraser) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1620–?Generationnominally 7 years; approximate dates permit about 16–17 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Mapped Proximity · Sex-Aware Ordered NamingExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–17 years) (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 8.5 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 24 years is implausible for two generations (−8); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–17 years) (+4)
  • mapped Musselburgh / Inveresk is 8.5 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Elizabeth Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Elizabeth in 146 profiles)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 24 years is implausible for two generations (−8); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1618–?Generationnominally 9 years; approximate dates permit about 16–19 years age gapRecorded placesDuddingston, Midlothian, Scotland · Duddingston — MidlothianIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Mapped ProximityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–19 years) (+4)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
  • mapped Duddingston — Midlothian is 3.0 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+3; one or both placements are unproved)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 26 years is implausible for two generations (−8); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–19 years) (+4)
  • mapped Duddingston — Midlothian is 3.0 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+3; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 26 years is implausible for two generations (−8); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1587–?Generationat most 40 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • mapped Inveresk is 8.8 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+2; one or both placements are unproved)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 57 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Inveresk is 8.8 km from the subject's birth-period Edinburgh (+2; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1600–?Generationnominally 27 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 27 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 27 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1597–?Generationat most 30 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 30 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 30 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1595–?Generationnominally 32 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 32 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 32 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1585–1627Generationat most 42 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Edinburgh · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1644), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: edinburgh (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Thomas GlasgowGlasgow-2459

Automated fit44/100
Similar Person
Dates1615–?PlacesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)
  • matching child name: Margaret Glasgow
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Thomas

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison

Same-name candidate

Thomas GlasgowGlasgow-1243

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1715–?PlacesEdinburgh, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 88; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 88; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1627

Profile-stated birthplace: Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland

Edinburgh

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3187

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.12 claims
4Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown MARGARET 27-12-1644 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1323 (FR1323) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  2. unknown ELIZABETH 01-07-1647 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1362 (FR1362) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  3. unknown CATHARINE 16-01-1649 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1400 (FR1400) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  4. unknown JEANE 08-03-1650 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1426 (FR1426) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  5. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3187
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3187 was captured 2026-08-07T09:54:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-07-12.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Edinburgh, Midlothian, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10301575-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ParentsJonet GlasgowMathie-1591597-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-11601644-12-27 · Edinburgh, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenElizabeth GlasgowGlasgow-11611647-07-01 · Edinburgh, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenCatharine GlasgowGlasgow-11621649-01-16 · Edinburgh, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenThomas Glasgow M.AGlasgow-34131650-00-00 · Edinburgh, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJeane GlasgowGlasgow-11631650-03-08 · Edinburgh, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10881619-05-13 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJonet GlasgowGlasgow-10891622-09-26 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-10901627-02-02 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesCatherine GlasgowWeir-39791625-00-00 · Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 · 1644-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Thomas was born about 1627. Research Notes

    • Thomas Research (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Thomas-1)
    • His wife, Catherine (Weir) Glasgow (abt.1625-) is not to be confused with Catherine (Glasgow) Weir (bef.1584-) Sources
    • MARGARET 27-12-1644 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1323 (FR1323) Edinburgh 685/1 F
    • ELIZABETH 01-07-1647 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1362 (FR1362) Edinburgh 685/1 F
    • CATHARINE 16-01-1649 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1400 (FR1400) Edinburgh 685/1 F
    • JEANE 08-03-1650 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1426 (FR1426) Edinburgh 685/1 F

Profile source citations

  1. MARGARET 27-12-1644 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1323 (FR1323) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  2. ELIZABETH 01-07-1647 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1362 (FR1362) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  3. CATHARINE 16-01-1649 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1400 (FR1400) Edinburgh 685/1 F
  4. JEANE 08-03-1650 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1426 (FR1426) Edinburgh 685/1 F

Other external links in the profile

Full captured biography text
Biography
Thomas was born about 1627. 
Research Notes
* Thomas Research (https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Thomas-1)
* His wife, Catherine (Weir) Glasgow (abt.1625-) is not to be confused with Catherine (Glasgow) Weir (bef.1584-)
Sources
* MARGARET 27-12-1644 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1323 (FR1323) Edinburgh 685/1 F
* ELIZABETH 01-07-1647 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1362 (FR1362) Edinburgh 685/1 F
* CATHARINE 16-01-1649 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1400 (FR1400) Edinburgh 685/1 F
* JEANE 08-03-1650 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1426 (FR1426) Edinburgh 685/1 F
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == 
Thomas was born about 1627. 
== Research Notes ==
* [https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Space:Thomas-1 Thomas Research]
* His wife, [[Weir-3979|Catherine (Weir) Glasgow (abt.1625-)]] is not to be confused with [[Glasgow-1495|Catherine (Glasgow) Weir (bef.1584-)]]
== Sources ==

* MARGARET 27-12-1644 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1323 (FR1323) Edinburgh 685/1 F
* ELIZABETH 01-07-1647 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1362 (FR1362) Edinburgh 685/1 F
*    CATHARINE 16-01-1649 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1400 (FR1400) Edinburgh 685/1 F
*  JEANE 08-03-1650 THOMAS GLASGOW/CATHARINE WEIR FR1426 (FR1426) Edinburgh 685/1 F
<references />