Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Arthur Glasgow

c. 1750 – 1822-05

Glasgow-649 · 1 mapped association

Moneymore, County Londonderry, IrelandRockbridge, Virginia, United States

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
8Close relations
15Evidence items
11Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1750 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland
Death
1822-05 · Rockbridge, Virginia, United States
Parents
James Glasgow IIunmarkedMary (Harkness) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Rebecca Anderson (McNutt) Glasgow
Children
Ann Nancy (Glasgow) CampbellJohn GlasgowJoseph GlasgowMargaret GlasgowRobert Arthur Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-649
Research clusters
Descendants of James Glasgow (c.1700)
Mapped descendants
69

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJoseph Glasgow (1783)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn Glasgow (1785)
Maternal grandmother positionAnn Nancy (Glasgow) Campbell (1788)
Paternal grandmother positionMargaret Glasgow (1793)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1708–1783Generation42 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · LarneIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Migration · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Robert Glasgow → William Glasgow (+9)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1722–1751) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Robert Glasgow → William Glasgow (+9)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; subject branch: Ellen Anderson Gholson Glasgow; candidate branch: Ellen Glasgow); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Anderson Glasgow, Joseph T Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Mary Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+30 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit25/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1739–1831Generationnominally 11 years; approximate dates permit about 16–21 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · Pine Creek, Allegheny, Pennsylvania, United States · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–21 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–21 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 24.1 km from the subject's birth-period Moneymore (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nancy +11 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Mary Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, Nancy Glasgow; +8 repetition bonus); Joseph +7 (39 public profiles; subject branch: Joseph Anderson Glasgow, Joseph T Glasgow; candidate branch: Joseph B Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander McNutt Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+31 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit24/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1706–?Generation44 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Tyrone, Ireland · County Tyrone — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 77 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Margaret McCullough had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (35) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Margaret Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Margaret in 208 profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nancy +11 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Mary Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, Nancy Glasgow; +8 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander McNutt Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+20 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit21/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1722–?Generationat least 28 years age gapRecorded placesTamlaght, County Londonderry, Ireland · Inishrush · Portglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Collateral Naming · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 28 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Inishrush is 22.5 km from the subject's birth-period Moneymore (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; niece/nephew Ellen Glasgow); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+15 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1737–1787Generationnominally 13 years; approximate dates permit about 16–33 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Londonderry, Ireland · County Londonderry — exact locality unproved · Dunnabraggy townlandIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 13-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–33 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 13-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–33 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Dunnabraggy townland is 2.6 km from the subject's birth-period Moneymore (+3; one or both placements are unproved)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy (Glasgow) Cunningham; +4 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; niece/nephew Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit39/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1715–1765Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesPortglenone — regional family-tradition referenceIndependent clue breadth · 10Age · Broad Migration · Candidate-Family Tradition · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 68 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Portglenone — regional family-tradition reference is 24.1 km from the subject's birth-period Moneymore (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • candidate's name matches the second dated daughter Margaret Glasgow, the expected mother position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Margaret in 208 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Nancy +11 (49 public profiles; subject branch: Nancy Jane (Campbell) Glasgow, Nancy Mary Glasgow; candidate branch: Nancy (Glasgow) Donald, Nancy Glasgow; +8 repetition bonus); Alexander +5 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander McNutt Glasgow, Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+20 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): united states
  • the candidate's own child family has 2 known-position naming matches (+3; branch-level validation)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)

Automated fit12/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1741–?Generationnominally 9 years; approximate dates permit about 15–19 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, Currituck, North CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–19 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 9-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–19 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Susannah +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers

Possible Mother

Abiah GlascoGlasco-39

Automated fit12/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1738–1759Generationnominally 12 years; approximate dates permit about 15–22 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, Currituck, North Carolina · Pasquotank County, North CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Susannah +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1744–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesCurrituck, Currituck, North CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Collateral Naming · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Dorcas +14 (4 public profiles; niece/nephew Dorcas (Glasgow) Pugh) (+14 total)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Susannah +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit5/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1733–?Generation17 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim, Ireland · KilwaughterIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Child Naming · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+1; Ann occurs in 41 public profiles)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 17-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1783), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+1; Ann occurs in 41 public profiles)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ellen +8 (16 public profiles; niece/nephew Ellen Glasgow); Nancy +7 (49 public profiles; niece/nephew Nancy Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+15 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Arthur GlasgowGlasgow-2239

Automated fit1/100
Similar Person
Dates1809–1852PlacesScott Township, Adams, Ohio, United States → Ohio, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Ann, John, Joseph

record-derived birth estimates differ by 59; retained without deduction; death years differ by 30 (−18); unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • child given-name pattern overlaps: Ann, John, Joseph

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 59; retained without deduction; death years differ by 30 (−18); unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-649 · updated 2026-08-19

Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-649), born about 1750, later Rockbridge County, Virginia is now proved to be a brother of Joseph Glasgow (Glasgow-1543) and Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-12). His claimed Moneymore birth and attached parents are still not established.

David Faris prints a family letter dated 6 November 1806 from Joseph and Betty Glasgow to Arthur. Joseph addresses Arthur as his brother and refers to “brother robert.” Joseph's 1831 will independently calls a younger Robert the son of his deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew. The combined evidence makes the three-way sibling relationship strong; it does not identify their parents.

The repeated name Arthur in John Glasgow's descendants is real but heavily confounded by John's wife, Mary Arthur. Their son Arthur can naturally have been named from his mother's surname; later Arthur Glasgow compound names can honour that son or the maternal surname without referring to Arthur-649.

A useful working hypothesis remains: Arthur-649 could have had an older or half-brother Adam who remained in Ireland and became the older Adam implied by John-822's naming pattern. Faris calls emigrant Robert a son of James of Moneymore, while later accounts make Robert, Joseph and Arthur brothers. The resulting Adam-James-John-Arthur sequence could preserve John's father Adam, grandfather James, John himself and his paternal uncle Arthur. No inspected source names Adam in that emigrant family, however.

This hypothesis concerns the record-defined James of Moneymore, whose own dates and spouse are not supplied by the WorldCat summary. It must not be used to validate the internally conflicted live profile Glasgow-1024 or the wholly derivative James-3305.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
c.1750

Possible wider collateral

Moneymore

Moneymore origin is disputed.

Traditional / profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-649

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-649 · updated 2026-08-19

SourceFindingAssessment
Live WikiTree profile, captured 21 July 2026Arthur's biography cites his 1782 Rockbridge marriage, 1820 household and 1822 grave. Its Moneymore birth and attached parents James Glasgow and Mary Harkness are not tied to an original Irish record.Later American identity is reasonably defined; Irish origin and parents remain derivative.
Virginia SAR Revolutionary War burial compilationRecords Arthur's May 1822 burial and approximate 1750 birth but says the DAR application does not specify his service and no pension or bounty-land file is known.Supports the American death-age framework; supplies no Irish origin or parentage.
Town of Glasgow historyIdentifies Robert, Joseph and Arthur as three brothers settled in the valley in 1768; Arthur received McNutt land in 1782 and devised it to son Joseph in 1822.Useful sibling tradition and American chronology; it does not name parents or an Irish location.
Ellen Glasgow, *The Woman Within* (1954), excerpt reproduced by FamilySearch MemoriesSays Arthur was a sixteen-year-old ward who came in 1766 with his mother and elder brothers, and places the family's Irish stage in Counties Down and Antrim.Descendant account written about 188 years after migration. It conflicts with the specific Moneymore/Londonderry placement and does not name Arthur's parents.
David Faris, *The Glasgow Family of Adams County, Ohio* (1990), pp. 14–19; WorldCat catalogue recordPrints the 6 November 1806 Joseph-and-Betty-to-Arthur letter, whose kin terms identify Arthur and Robert as Joseph's brothers.Contemporary relationship evidence in a later transcription; locate the original letter if possible.
Joseph Glasgow's 1831 will transcription, original catalogued in Wythe County Will Book 4, pp. 1–3Calls the younger Robert Glasgow a son of Joseph's deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew.Direct testamentary proof that Joseph and Arthur were brothers.
Arthur's estate agreement, Rockbridge chancery case 1833-005, image 89Identifies Joseph, John, Robert, Rebecca Kerr and Peggy Glasgow as Arthur's children and devisees.Direct evidence separating Arthur's son Robert from Arthur's brother Robert.
John and Mary family page and Arthur, their sonJohn married Mary Arthur. Their fourth son Arthur later named his first two sons Adam and James. John's daughter Rose used Arthur Glasgow McKeown, daughter Margaret used Arthur Glasgow Walkinshaw, and son Adam's descendants also reused Arthur.Confirms a genuine John-line naming pattern, but Mary Arthur and her son provide a complete internal mechanism for the later repetitions. Arthur-649 is not required to explain them.
Public Glasgow Y-DNA projectKit N18544 represents John born 1767. No displayed kit identifies a documented strict male-line descendant of Arthur-649 or his claimed brothers Robert and Joseph.DNA cannot presently test this proposed collateral link.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.13 claims
9Unknown
5Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

Robert Glasgow was brother of Arthur Glasgow

proved1 linked evidence item

Faris prints a 6 November 1806 letter from Joseph and Betty to Arthur that addresses Arthur as brother and refers to brother Robert. Joseph's will independently proves Arthur was Joseph's brother.

Joseph Glasgow was brother of Arthur Glasgow

proved1 linked evidence item

Joseph's 1831 will calls a younger Robert the son of his deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

Arthur Glasgow was possible collateral of Adam Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Faris calls emigrant Robert a son of James of Moneymore, while later accounts group Robert, Joseph and Arthur as brothers. John-822's son name Arthur is independently explained by his wife Mary Arthur (Arthur-2480); no source names Adam or John in the emigrant family. Neither conflicted Glasgow-1024 nor derivative Glasgow-3305 is a proved identity for Faris's James.

Case-file assessments

Relationship assessment

Glasgow-649 · updated 2026-08-19

The most coherent version of the new hypothesis is:

James Glasgow of Moneymore, identity and dates not established
├── ? Adam Glasgow, born by about 1740, remained in Ireland
│   = Maria
│   ├── Adam Glasgow, born about 1758
│   └── John Glasgow, born 1767
├── Robert Glasgow, born 1749, emigrated
└── ? Arthur Glasgow, born about 1750, emigrated to Virginia

This is chronologically possible and would let John's first son Adam honour his paternal grandfather, James preserve the preceding paternal generation, and Arthur honour a paternal uncle. The sequence is not a strict application of the usual naming convention because a second son ordinarily represented the maternal grandfather. The model is not yet preferable to the second-1740-Hugh model because no source names Adam as Arthur's brother, Faris's evidence remains uninspected, Ellen Glasgow's account instead places the family's Irish stage in Down and Antrim, and Mary Arthur independently explains the name Arthur.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Next records to inspect

  1. research assessment — WorldCat catalogue record (https://search.worldcat.org/title/22731567).
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.13 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-649 was captured 2026-08-19T09:47:48+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthMoneymore, County Londonderry, IrelandWikiTree profile field
deathRockbridge, Virginia, United StatesWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJames Glasgow IIGlasgow-10241721-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 1831-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland, United Kingdom
ParentsMary GlasgowHarkness-11491725-00-00 · County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJoseph GlasgowGlasgow-6481783-10-14 · Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia, United States · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-20701785-12-27 · 1830-07-23 · Lexington, Virginia, United States
ChildrenAnn Nancy CampbellGlasgow-8761788-00-00 · Rockbridge, Virginia, United States · 1877-00-00 · Adams, Ohio, United States
ChildrenRobert Arthur GlasgowGlasgow-9021792-00-00 · Rockbridge County, Virginia · 1862-06-26 · Rockbridge County, Virginia Lexington Magisterial District
ChildrenMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-20711793-00-00 · Virginia, United States · 1873-06-24 · Lexington, Virginia, United States
SiblingsJoseph GlasgowGlasgow-15431735-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJames GlasgowGlasgow-33051740-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-121749-02-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 1839-08-05 · Georges Creek, Adams County, Ohio
SpousesRebecca Anderson GlasgowMcNutt-6001755-00-00 · Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia · 1818-01-00 · Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia, United States · 1782-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Falling Spring Presbyterian Church Cemetery, Glasgow, Virginia Falling_Spring_Presbyterian_Church_Cemetery,_Glasgow,_Virginia Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study NSDAR_Patriot_Ancestors Rockbridge_County_Militia,_Virginia_Militia,_American_Revolution

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Arthur was born about 1750. He served as a soldier in Virginia during the Revolution.
  • "Arthur Glasgow died in May 1822, aged 72 years, so he was born in about 1750. He married widow Rebeckah Anderson McNutt McCorkle, on 7 Jan 1782 in Rockbridge County, Virginia. Arthur Glasgow in the Virginia, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1660-1800 She was the widow of John McCorkle (died Jan 1781) and the daughter of John McNutt and Katherine Anderson.
  • According to the source below, "Arthur Glasgow was a descendant of Earl Glasgow, of Scotland," where Arthur emigrated from to our colonies. Oren Frederic Morton's, A History of Rockbridge County, Virginia, Supplement, Staunton, VA, 1920, page 304-306 has some data on Arthur and his family through Alexander McNutt Glasgow. Page 253-254, says the 3 Glasgow brothers, Arthur, Robert and Joseph came to our colonies in the late 1700's. Glasgow Township was named for the family.
  • In 1820 he was living in Rockbridge County, Virginia and had 9 slaves. 1820 United States Federal Census for Arthur Glasgow
  • He died in May, 1822 and is buried in Falling spring Presbyterian Church Cemetery in Glasgow, Rockbridge County, Virginia. The date is visible on his headstone. Arthur Glasgow in the U.S., Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current Research Notes Current research Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-649), born about 1750, later Rockbridge County, Virginia is now proved to be a brother of Joseph Glasgow and Robert Glasgow. His claimed Moneymore birth and attached parents are still not established.
  • David Faris prints a family letter dated 6 November 1806 from Joseph and Betty Glasgow to Arthur. Joseph addresses Arthur as his brother and refers to “brother robert.” Joseph's 1831 will independently calls a younger Robert the son of his deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew. The combined evidence makes the three-way sibling relationship strong; it does not identify their parents.
  • A useful working hypothesis remains: Arthur-649 could have had an older or half-brother Adam who remained in Ireland and became the older Adam implied by John-822's naming pattern. Faris calls emigrant Robert a son of James of Moneymore, while later accounts make Robert, Joseph and Arthur brothers. The resulting Adam-James-John-Arthur sequence could preserve John's father Adam, grandfather James, John himself and his paternal uncle Arthur. No inspected source names Adam in that emigrant family, however.
  • This hypothesis concerns the record-defined James of Moneymore, whose own dates and spouse are not supplied by the WorldCat summary. It must not be used to validate the internally conflicted live profile Glasgow-1024 or the wholly derivative James-3305.
  • This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. Virginia SAR Revolutionary War burial compilation (https://www.virginiasar.org/assets/PROGRAMS/AMERICANHERITIAGE/RWGPreservation/2nd%20Edition%20VASSAR%20Rev%20War%20Burial%20Book%20Sep%2016%202022%20without%20illlustrations%20%282%29.pdf). Town of Glasgow history (https://glasgowvirginia.org/history). FamilySearch Memories (https://www.familysearch.org/en/memories/memory/16905684). WorldCat catalogue record (https://search.worldcat.org/title/22731567). Joseph Glasgow's 1831 will transcription (https://swvirginians.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/joseph-glasgow-pulaski-co-va-will-of-1831/). Sources

    • The Cabells and Their Kin: A Memorial Volume of History, Biography, and Genealogy Alexander Brown January 1, 1895 Houghton, Mifflin & Company: Wife, Child page 293
  • https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/36061468/rebeckah-anderson-glasgow
  • [https://www.geni.com/people/Arthur-Glasgow/6000000014243731235 Archived or supplementary source (https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=BAo7AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA293])

Profile source citations

  1. Arthur Glasgow in the Virginia, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1660-1800
  2. 1820 United States Federal Census for Arthur Glasgow
  3. Arthur Glasgow in the U.S., Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current
  4. Virginia SAR Revolutionary War burial compilation (https://www.virginiasar.org/assets/PROGRAMS/AMERICANHERITIAGE/RWGPreservation/2nd%20Edition%20VASSAR%20Rev%20War%20Burial%20Book%20Sep%2016%202022%20without%20illlustrations%20%282%29.pdf). source link 1
  5. Town of Glasgow history (https://glasgowvirginia.org/history). source link 1
  6. FamilySearch Memories (https://www.familysearch.org/en/memories/memory/16905684). source link 1
  7. WorldCat catalogue record (https://search.worldcat.org/title/22731567). source link 1
  8. Joseph Glasgow's 1831 will transcription (https://swvirginians.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/joseph-glasgow-pulaski-co-va-will-of-1831/). source link 1
  9. [https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=BAo7AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA293] The Cabells and Their Kin: A Memorial Volume of History, Biography, and Genealogy Alexander Brown January 1, 1895 Houghton, Mifflin & Company: Wife, Child page 293 source link 1
  10. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/36061468/rebeckah-anderson-glasgow source link 1
  11. Archived or supplementary source (https://www.geni.com/people/Arthur-Glasgow/6000000014243731235) source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Arthur was born about 1750. He served as a soldier in Virginia during the Revolution. 

"Arthur Glasgow died in May 1822, aged 72 years, so he was born in about 1750. He married widow Rebeckah Anderson McNutt McCorkle, on 7 Jan 1782 in Rockbridge County, Virginia. Arthur Glasgow in the Virginia, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1660-1800 She was the widow of John McCorkle (died Jan 1781) and the daughter of John McNutt and Katherine Anderson.

According to the source below, "Arthur Glasgow was a descendant of Earl Glasgow, of Scotland," where Arthur emigrated from to our colonies. Oren Frederic Morton's, A History of Rockbridge County, Virginia, Supplement, Staunton, VA, 1920, page 304-306 has some data on Arthur and his family through Alexander McNutt Glasgow. Page 253-254, says the 3 Glasgow brothers, Arthur, Robert and Joseph came to our colonies in the late 1700's. Glasgow Township was named for the family. 

Children with Rebeckah: 
Joseph Glasgow, 14 Oct 1783 
John Glasow, 17 Dec 1785
Ann Nancy Glasgow, 1788, (Thos McCleland, 1804)
Robert Arthur Glasgow, 1792
Margaret Glasgow, 1793, (Mrs. Edmondson), 
Rebecca (John Carr, 1804)

In 1820 he was living in Rockbridge County, Virginia and had 9 slaves. 1820 United States Federal Census for Arthur Glasgow 

He died in May, 1822 and is buried in Falling spring Presbyterian Church Cemetery in Glasgow, Rockbridge County, Virginia. The date is visible on his headstone. Arthur Glasgow in the U.S., Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current 
Research Notes
Current research
Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-649), born about 1750, later Rockbridge County, Virginia is now proved to be a brother of Joseph Glasgow and Robert Glasgow. His claimed Moneymore birth and attached parents are still not established.

David Faris prints a family letter dated 6 November 1806 from Joseph and Betty Glasgow to Arthur. Joseph addresses Arthur as his brother and refers to “brother robert.” Joseph's 1831 will independently calls a younger Robert the son of his deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew. The combined evidence makes the three-way sibling relationship strong; it does not identify their parents.

The repeated name Arthur in John Glasgow's descendants is real but heavily confounded by John's wife, Mary Arthur. Their son Arthur can naturally have been named from his mother's surname; later Arthur Glasgow compound names can honour that son or the maternal surname without referring to Arthur-649.

A useful working hypothesis remains: Arthur-649 could have had an older or half-brother Adam who remained in Ireland and became the older Adam implied by John-822's naming pattern. Faris calls emigrant Robert a son of James of Moneymore, while later accounts make Robert, Joseph and Arthur brothers. The resulting Adam-James-John-Arthur sequence could preserve John's father Adam, grandfather James, John himself and his paternal uncle Arthur. No inspected source names Adam in that emigrant family, however.

This hypothesis concerns the record-defined James of Moneymore, whose own dates and spouse are not supplied by the WorldCat summary. It must not be used to validate the internally conflicted live profile Glasgow-1024 or the wholly derivative James-3305.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. Virginia SAR Revolutionary War burial compilation (https://www.virginiasar.org/assets/PROGRAMS/AMERICANHERITIAGE/RWGPreservation/2nd%20Edition%20VASSAR%20Rev%20War%20Burial%20Book%20Sep%2016%202022%20without%20illlustrations%20%282%29.pdf). Town of Glasgow history (https://glasgowvirginia.org/history). FamilySearch Memories (https://www.familysearch.org/en/memories/memory/16905684). WorldCat catalogue record (https://search.worldcat.org/title/22731567). Joseph Glasgow's 1831 will transcription (https://swvirginians.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/joseph-glasgow-pulaski-co-va-will-of-1831/). 
Sources
* The Cabells and Their Kin: A Memorial Volume of History, Biography, and Genealogy Alexander Brown January 1, 1895 Houghton, Mifflin & Company: Wife, Child page 293

* https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/36061468/rebeckah-anderson-glasgow

* [https://www.geni.com/people/Arthur-Glasgow/6000000014243731235 Archived or supplementary source (https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=BAo7AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA293])
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

[[Category:Falling Spring Presbyterian Church Cemetery, Glasgow, Virginia]]
== Biography ==
{{1776 Sticker |image=|unit=Rockbridge County Militia, Virginia Militia, American Revolution}} 
{{Society Ancestor|Society=DAR|Ancestor=A045298 }}

Arthur was born about 1750. He served as a soldier in Virginia during the Revolution. <ref>{{DAR-grs| A045298 | Arthur Glasgow | 05 Apr 2024}}
</ref>

"Arthur Glasgow died in May 1822, aged 72 years, so he was born in about 1750. He married widow Rebeckah Anderson McNutt McCorkle, on 7 Jan 1782 in Rockbridge County, Virginia.<ref>Arthur Glasgow in the Virginia, U.S., Compiled Marriages, 1660-1800</ref>She was the widow of John McCorkle (died Jan 1781) and the daughter of John McNutt and Katherine Anderson.

According to the source below, "Arthur Glasgow was a descendant of Earl Glasgow, of Scotland," where Arthur emigrated from to our colonies. Oren Frederic Morton's, A History of Rockbridge County, Virginia, Supplement, Staunton, VA, 1920, page 304-306 has some data on Arthur and his family through Alexander McNutt Glasgow. Page 253-254, says the 3 Glasgow brothers, Arthur, Robert and Joseph came to our colonies in the late 1700's. Glasgow Township was named for the family. 

Children with Rebeckah: 
Joseph Glasgow, 14 Oct 1783 
John Glasow, 17 Dec 1785
Ann Nancy Glasgow, 1788,  (Thos McCleland, 1804)
Robert Arthur Glasgow, 1792
Margaret Glasgow, 1793, (Mrs. Edmondson), 
Rebecca (John Carr, 1804)

In 1820 he was living in Rockbridge County, Virginia and had 9 slaves.<ref>1820 United States Federal Census for Arthur Glasgow</ref>

He died in May, 1822 and is buried in Falling spring Presbyterian Church Cemetery in Glasgow, Rockbridge County, Virginia.  The date is visible on his headstone.<ref>Arthur Glasgow in the U.S., Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current</ref>

== Research Notes ==
=== Current research ===

[[Glasgow-649|Arthur Glasgow (Glasgow-649), born about 1750, later Rockbridge County, Virginia]] is now proved to be a brother of [[Glasgow-1543|Joseph Glasgow]] and [[Glasgow-12|Robert Glasgow]]. His claimed Moneymore birth and attached parents are still not established.

David Faris prints a family letter dated 6 November 1806 from Joseph and Betty Glasgow to Arthur. Joseph addresses Arthur as his brother and refers to “brother robert.” Joseph's 1831 will independently calls a younger Robert the son of his deceased brother Arthur and Joseph's nephew. The combined evidence makes the three-way sibling relationship strong; it does not identify their parents.

The repeated name <code>Arthur</code> in John Glasgow's descendants is real but heavily confounded by John's wife, '''Mary Arthur'''. Their son Arthur can naturally have been named from his mother's surname; later <code>Arthur Glasgow</code> compound names can honour that son or the maternal surname without referring to Arthur-649.

A useful working hypothesis remains: Arthur-649 could have had an older or half-brother Adam who remained in Ireland and became the older Adam implied by John-822's naming pattern. Faris calls emigrant Robert a son of '''James of Moneymore''', while later accounts make Robert, Joseph and Arthur brothers. The resulting <code>Adam-James-John-Arthur</code> sequence could preserve John's father Adam, grandfather James, John himself and his paternal uncle Arthur. No inspected source names Adam in that emigrant family, however.

This hypothesis concerns the record-defined '''James of Moneymore''', whose own dates and spouse are not supplied by the WorldCat summary. It must not be used to validate the internally conflicted live profile Glasgow-1024 or the wholly derivative James-3305.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material.<ref name="ProjectSource1">[https://www.virginiasar.org/assets/PROGRAMS/AMERICANHERITIAGE/RWGPreservation/2nd%20Edition%20VASSAR%20Rev%20War%20Burial%20Book%20Sep%2016%202022%20without%20illlustrations%20%282%29.pdf Virginia SAR Revolutionary War burial compilation].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource2">[https://glasgowvirginia.org/history Town of Glasgow history].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource3">[https://www.familysearch.org/en/memories/memory/16905684 FamilySearch Memories].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource4">[https://search.worldcat.org/title/22731567 WorldCat catalogue record].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource5">[https://swvirginians.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/joseph-glasgow-pulaski-co-va-will-of-1831/ Joseph Glasgow's 1831 will transcription].</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />

* [https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=BAo7AAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=en&pg=GBS.PA293]  The Cabells and Their Kin: A Memorial Volume of History, Biography, and Genealogy Alexander Brown January 1, 1895 Houghton, Mifflin & Company: Wife, Child page 293

* {{FindAGrave|36061430}} https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/36061468/rebeckah-anderson-glasgow

* [https://www.geni.com/people/Arthur-Glasgow/6000000014243731235 Archived or supplementary source]