Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

William Glasgow

c. 1615 – ?

Glasgow-992 · 1 mapped association

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
10Close relations
1Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1615 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
George GlasgowconfidentMargaret (Stewart) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Bessie (Howie) Glasgow
Children
David GlasgowIssobell GlasgowJonet GlasgowMargaret GlasgowMargaret GlasgowWilliam GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-992
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
7

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionDavid Glasgow (1639)
Maternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1641)
Maternal grandmother positionJonet Glasgow (1636)
Paternal grandmother positionMargaret Glasgow (1638)

Known-position checks: 1 support · 2 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit26/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1583–?Generation32 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Local Same-Spouse Child Window · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-Generation · Undated LocalitySame-spouse child windowJonet (Cunningham) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 32-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1614–1627) (+6; other parent Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow)
  • same-couple children Ninian Glasgow (1614) and Elizabethe Glasgow (1616) bracket the subject in the same specific birth locality (+10; strong household-placement clue, not proof)
  • known spouse Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit24/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1572–?Generationat least 43 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Local Sibling Birth · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name Pattern · Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jonet (Mathie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 43 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 64 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate has another child, John Glasgow, born 4 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
  • known spouse Jonet (Mathie) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (18) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Thomas Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit21/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1582–1647Generation33 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Duddingston, Edinburghshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • known spouse Deborah (Ivey) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Inveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 33-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Deborah (Ivey) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet Glasgow; candidate branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Inveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit14/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1575–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Christina Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1605–1616) (+6)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded John Glasgow in Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-3517) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1605–1616) (+6)
  • known spouse Christina Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Issobell +14 (6 public profiles; subject branch: Issobell Glasgow; candidate branch: Issobell Glasgow); Jonet +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet Glasgow; candidate branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+30 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded John Glasgow in Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-3517) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1609–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 16–16 years age gapRecorded placesMusselburgh, Lothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Collateral NamingCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Issobell +14 (6 public profiles; niece/nephew Issobell Glasgow) (+14 total)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 27 years is implausible for two generations (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Issobell +14 (6 public profiles; niece/nephew Issobell Glasgow) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 27 years is implausible for two generations (−8); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit43/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1597–?Generation18 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanark, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Child Naming · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Local Sibling Birth · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 18-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate has another child, John Glasgow, born 4 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+5; Jonet occurs in 15 public profiles)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit24/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1589–1635Generation26 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Inveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 47 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet Glasgow; candidate branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+12 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); candidate's household recorded Thomas Glasgow in Inveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit12/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1597–?Generationat least 18 years age gapRecorded placesRobertland, Ayrshire, Scotland · Ayrshire — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Child Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Local Same-Spouse Child Window · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowRobert GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1614–1627) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
  • same-couple children Ninian Glasgow (1614) and Elizabethe Glasgow (1616) bracket the subject in the same specific birth locality (+10; strong household-placement clue, not proof)
  • candidate's given name recurs among another recorded child (+5; Jonet occurs in 15 public profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit11/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1585–1627Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Edinburgh · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Jonet +14 (15 public profiles; niece/nephew Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart, sibling Jonet Pady; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1592–?Generationat least 23 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 23 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1636), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-3075

Automated fit47/100
Similar Person
Dates1590–1645PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland → South Leith, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-1556

Automated fit33/100
Similar Person
Dates1612–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland → Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonDifferent marked-confident fathers
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

marked-confident fathers are different (−18); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)

Conflicts: marked-confident fathers are different (−18); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-992

Margaret Stewart (Stewart-65226) is the only proposed missing mother from the graph audit with an exposed transcription capable of direct proof. Her profile cites Glasgow High Kirk register 1/754 for a lawful son of George Glasgow and Margaret Steuart, with William Howie and David Scherrar as witnesses. The date range and William Howie association strongly suggest that this is William-992's entry.

The transcription on Stewart-65226 omits the child's name and event date, however, and William-992 currently cites no baptism at all. Do not attach the mother from graph structure alone.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1615

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-992

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.16 claims
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended update

Glasgow-992

  1. Retrieve the complete Scotland's People entry 1/754 and record the child's

name, exact date, parish and event type.

  1. If it names William, attach Stewart-65226 as confirmed mother and add the

full citation to both profiles.

  1. Do not use sibling status or the single-wife assumption as substitute proof.
  2. Separately source William's marriage and children; the current biography is

largely reconstruction.

See the graph-claim audit.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.1 source

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-992
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-992 was captured 2026-08-10T13:17:56+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-09.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
marriage1640-00-00High Church, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-10991569-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1640-00-00
ParentsMargaret GlasgowStewart-652261590-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJonet GlasgowGlasgow-15221636-07-30 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-15231638-02-15 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1642-00-00
ChildrenDavid GlasgowGlasgow-15181639-09-22 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-14971641-10-24 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1647-00-00
ChildrenMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-15241643-11-16 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenIssobell GlasgowGlasgow-15201646-07-07 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-15211648-09-28 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJonet StewartGlasgow-30611607-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMargarat StewartGlasgow-11001610-05-06 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsThomas GlasgowGlasgow-11031612-03-15 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1675-00-00 · Linlithgow, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
SiblingsArchibald Glasgow M.AGlasgow-11011614-06-19 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1677-00-00 · Rathmelton, Aughnish, County Donegal, Ireland
SiblingsBarbara GlasgowGlasgow-11021617-10-21 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesBessie GlasgowHowie-11191620-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1640-00-00 · High Church, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography William Glasgow married Bessie Howie (abt.1620-), and they had seven children between 1636 and 1648 in Glasgow. A "William Howie" appears as the guardian of Archibald Glasgow (1614-). It is likely that George Glasgow (abt.1575-aft.1640) named a son William after his confirmed father, William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585). Similar Profiles Several other Williams born around the same time are first cousins twice removed from this William. All descend from William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585):
  • William Glasgow (1612-) — son of William Glasgow (1590-1645) and Christian Scot (1590-), born in Glasgow.

    • William Glasgow (1614-) — son of James Glasgow (abt.1575-) and Christina Bie (1589-), born in Inveresk.
    • William Glasgow (1609-) — son of John Glasgow (abt.1579-), born in Mid Calder. Research Notes
    • Glasgow, William — 9 April 1673, Quodquen — Testament Dative — Lanark Commissary Court — CC14/5/9
    • Glasgow, William — 22 July 1646, mealmaker in Leith — Testament Dative and Inventory — Edinburgh Commissary Court Sources

Profile source citations

No structured source citation was recoverable from the profile biography.

Full captured biography text
Biography
William Glasgow married Bessie Howie (abt.1620-), and they had seven children between 1636 and 1648 in Glasgow. A "William Howie" appears as the guardian of Archibald Glasgow (1614-). It is likely that George Glasgow (abt.1575-aft.1640) named a son William after his confirmed father, William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585).
Similar Profiles
Several other Williams born around the same time are first cousins twice removed from this William. All descend from William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585):

* William Glasgow (1612-) — son of William Glasgow (1590-1645) and Christian Scot (1590-), born in Glasgow.
* William Glasgow (1614-) — son of James Glasgow (abt.1575-) and Christina Bie (1589-), born in Inveresk.
* William Glasgow (1609-) — son of John Glasgow (abt.1579-), born in Mid Calder.
Research Notes
* Glasgow, William — 9 April 1673, Quodquen — Testament Dative — Lanark Commissary Court — CC14/5/9
* Glasgow, William — 22 July 1646, mealmaker in Leith — Testament Dative and Inventory — Edinburgh Commissary Court
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
William Glasgow married [[Howie-1119|Bessie Howie (abt.1620-)]], and they had seven children between 1636 and 1648 in Glasgow. A "William Howie" appears as the guardian of [[Glasgow-1101|Archibald Glasgow (1614-)]]. It is likely that [[Glasgow-1099|George Glasgow (abt.1575-aft.1640)]] named a son William after his confirmed father, [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585)]].

=== Similar Profiles ===
Several other Williams born around the same time are first cousins twice removed from this William. All descend from [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow (abt.1504-bef.1585)]]:

* [[Glasgow-1556|William Glasgow (1612-)]] — son of [[Glasgow-3075|William Glasgow (1590-1645)]] and [[Scot-373|Christian Scot (1590-)]], born in Glasgow.
* [[Glasgow-3517|William Glasgow (1614-)]] — son of [[Glasgow-991|James Glasgow (abt.1575-)]] and [[Bie-55|Christina Bie (1589-)]], born in Inveresk.
* [[Glasgow-1087|William Glasgow (1609-)]] — son of [[Glasgow-1561|John Glasgow (abt.1579-)]], born in Mid Calder.

== Research Notes ==

* Glasgow, William — 9 April 1673, Quodquen — Testament Dative — Lanark Commissary Court — CC14/5/9
* Glasgow, William — 22 July 1646, mealmaker in Leith — Testament Dative and Inventory — Edinburgh Commissary Court


== Sources ==
<references />