William Glasgow
The descendant’s FT20271 result is confirmed; the attachment to William c.1655/56 is a reported pedigree.
Documentary route: Scotland → Ulster
Reported historical root
Read the family evidence →Several supplied tested or inferred Glasgow lines meet here. A shared genetic branch does not resolve the missing documentary link between their named ancestors.
Several supplied tested or inferred Glasgow lines meet here. A shared genetic branch does not resolve the missing documentary link between their named ancestors.
Reported estimate: 1583 CE · reported 95%: 1387–1728
TMRCA from the supplied research snapshot, not a date of migration or surname adoption.
FT20271 gathers the tested lines behind several Scottish, Ulster and American family histories. Its early-modern age gives those later movements a common paternal context.
FT20271, FGC5690 and FT16542 form the supplied block. The common-ancestor estimate is 1583, with a reported range of 1387–1728. Five tests remain at this level and two share the younger FTE32242 branch.
The reported roots include County Antrim, Derry and Scotland. Different families can remain, move between Scotland and Ulster, or cross the Atlantic in later generations.
Think of a family expanding through several households rather than one traveller following every later route. The genetic node brings their histories into the same frame; individual papers can explain how religion, land, work and relatives shaped each movement.
Next research step: Place the older Kilwaughter lines with SNP tests and compare them with the known Antrim and Derry branches.
Inspect the supplied model and its sources →The descendant’s FT20271 result is confirmed; the attachment to William c.1655/56 is a reported pedigree.
Documentary route: Scotland → Ulster
Reported historical root
Read the family evidence →FT20271 is checked in the reference kit’s VCF/BED. Alexander’s line and James J’s line share DYS714=27 and GD 3 at Y-111; no shared downstream SNP is exposed.
Documentary route: Antrim · later descendants in Scotland
Linked tested descendant line
Read the family evidence →The tester’s documented paternal line reaches James J. His father is still the working-tree question; the genetic pairing with Alexander does not choose between the two routes.
Documentary route: South Carolina → Tennessee
Documented line to James J
Read the family evidence →Descendant tests through William, John M. and James M. place FT20271 at or above Robert. The James M. branch alone carries the child SNP FTE32242.
Documentary route: Moneymore → Virginia → Ohio
Carrier inferred across three sons
Read the family evidence →The public 1950 census supplies the final public father–son bridge in this William branch; the living tester’s name is not included.
Documentary route: Virginia → Ohio
Documented tester continuation
Read the family evidence →The descendant remains basal FT20271, without FTE32242. The public early chain is supported; the final private continuation is labelled probable by the project.
Documentary route: Virginia → Ohio
Probable private continuation
Read the family evidence →This page describes the supplied research snapshot. It is not a fresh database lookup, a revised SNP age estimate or an independent confirmation of a pedigree. Supplied line references →