Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James Glasgow

c. 1700 – 1759-01-17

Glasgow-1025 · 6 mapped associations

County Tyrone, IrelandDrumearn, Tyrone, Ireland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

6Mapped records
7Close relations
7Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1700 · County Tyrone, Ireland
Death
1759-01-17 · Drumearn, Tyrone, Ireland
Parents
William Walter GlasgowuncertainAnn (McCook) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Margaret Rutherford
Children
James Glasgow IIRobert GlasgowSamuel GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1025
Research clusters
Descendants of James Glasgow (c.1700)
Mapped descendants
329

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJames Glasgow II (1721)
Maternal grandfather positionRobert Glasgow (1724)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit22/100
Weak Lead
Dates1678–1705Generationat least 22 years age gapRecorded placesDuneane, County Antrim, Ireland · County Antrim, Ireland · Duneane congregational associationIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Mapped Proximity · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • mapped Duneane congregational association is 20.5 km from the subject's birth-period Moneymore (+1; one or both placements are unproved)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow II, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit11/100
Weak Lead
Dates1679–?Generation21 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Spouse · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Jean (Dobie) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1699–1703) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • known spouse Jean (Dobie) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow II, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
  • the subject would fill the first son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father James Glasgow shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, James in 224 public profiles; WikiTree: relationship status unmarked; weak alone)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit9/100
Weak Lead
Dates1650–?Generation50 years age gapRecorded placesNorfolk, VirginiaIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Ann +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Ann +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit6/100
Weak Lead
Dates1650–?Generation50 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Killybegs, County Donegal, Ireland · KillybegsIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 50-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 71 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow II, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit4/100
Weak Lead
Dates1680–1753Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesIreland · Worcester County, Maryland · Ireland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-634) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate and subject share the given name James (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 224 public profiles)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow II, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-634) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1680–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 3 years of the subject (+3)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son James Glasgow II, the expected father position (+3; James in 224 profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit7/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1671–1734Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesSaint James, BarbadosIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit7/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1670–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesDuns — BerwickshireIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 51 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit7/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1660–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 61 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1721), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1694–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 15–16 years age gapRecorded placesCavers, Roxburghshire, Scotland · Cavers — RoxburghshireIndependent clue breadth · 1AgeCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 27 years is implausible for two generations (−8); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–16 years) (+4)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate-to-earliest-child interval of 27 years is implausible for two generations (−8); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-1547

Automated fit52/100
Similar Person
Dates1702–?PlacesKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • matching child name: Robert Glasgow

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • matching child name: Robert Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-1140

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1700–?PlacesKilbirnie, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1025 · updated 2026-08-12

The PRONI detail page identifies the 17 January 1759 will as James Glasgow of Drumcarn, County Tyrone, not Drumearn. The earlier assignment to this profile resulted from a place-name error. The index supplies no age or kin, so the testator cannot be distinguished between this profile, Glasgow-1024, or another local James.

It does not prove that he was born in County Tyrone, lived at Moneymore, headed one of the two James Glasgow households in Derryloran in 1740, or fathered any particular later Glasgow. The two Jameses and John at Drumearn in the 1766 religious return must be later namesakes or a younger generation if this identification is correct.

James remains a possible member of the broad R-FT20271 paternal cluster, but the DNA does not identify him. A pedigree audit materially weakens the earlier attempt to map kit 959947 to this profile. Public locality records and the saved WikiTree descendant tree instead place that private tester most plausibly in Robert Glasgow-12's family through son William Glasgow-563, followed by Glasgow-1829, Glasgow-556, Glasgow-1851 and Glasgow-1877. The final parent-child link to the private tester is not publicly exposed, so that mapping remains probable rather than proved.

The reported earliest-ancestor label “James Glasgow” is more naturally read as the James of Moneymore whom later family history calls Robert's father, currently represented—also uncertainly—by Glasgow-1024. It is not evidence for the different James of Drumearn represented here. Kit 333002 is an older Y-37 result associated with the same reported family tradition.

The fuller private match extract places 959947 in a provisional STR pattern with 200475, 999763 and 478604: all display DYS19=15, DYS456=16 and DYS712=19; 959947 is distinguished by DYS650=20. Relative to Alexander Glasgow-951 kit B580327, it has five differing Big Y STRs among 660 compared markers and twelve non-matching variants. This refines the genetic neighbourhood but does not identify any ancestor as James-1025.

The most efficient placement test is a Big Y-700 upgrade for a documented Kilwaughter male line—preferably kit 254947, representing Robert Glasgow-1143, or B835762, representing James William Glasgow born 1731—and a private-variant comparison with B580327 and 200475. Until then, describe James-1025 as a possible R-FT20271 collateral, not securely inside the Kilwaughter pedigree.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.6 records
2026

Big Y kit 959947 ancestor label

Drumearn townland

The kit reports James Glasgow c.1700 as grandfather of Robert 1749 and is R-FT20271; identity with the Drumearn profile remains unproved.

Genetic placement hypothesisunknown
Source and mapping detail

FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Project Y-DNA results

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Profile-associated representative point

c.1700

Tyrone → Moneymore profile tradition

Moneymore

Group 2 root profile; the location and family structure still require source-level auditing.

Traditional / profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1025

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

1759

Probate residence: Drumearn, County Tyrone

Drumearn townland

The year and exact residence match James-1025's reported 1759 death.

Strong probate-profile matchunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1025

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Exact townland centrepoint

2026

R-FT20271 tested-line connection

Drumearn townland

Big Y kits B580327 and 200475 share R-FT20271, but the public earliest ancestor for 200475 is Robert Glasgow 1749–1836 Scotland and the WikiTree chain from that line to James-1025 is unproved.

Genetic placement hypothesisunknown
Source and mapping detail

FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Project Y-DNA results

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Profile-associated representative point

1759

Armagh Consistory Court probate series

Drumearn townland

Derryloran fell within Armagh's jurisdiction; film 100911 item 4 contains the will index and film 100958 item 2 the administration-bond index.

Archive research leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

FamilySearch catalogue: Armagh will and administration-bond indexes

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Exact townland from separate probate transcription

1767

Stewart of Killymoon estate survey near Cookstown

Cookstown estate area

NLI MS 9627 may identify the post-1759/1766 tenant succession; the UHF public tenant-index search returned no Glasgow result, so the manuscript and spelling variants remain to be inspected.

Archive research leadoriginal
Source and mapping detail

National Library of Ireland MS 9627: Survey of part of James Stewart's estates near Cookstown, 1767

Candidate matched on record type, year, place; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Estate-area representative point

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1025 · updated 2026-08-12

SourceFindingAssessment
PRONI Name Search, Armagh diocesan wills indexJames Glasgow, Drumcarn, County Tyrone, 17 January 1759. The original does not survive.Same-name candidate only; the entry gives no age, family or identifier.
1740 Protestant householders return, DerryloranTwo James Glasgow and two William Glasgow households occur in the parish, without townlands or relationships.Cluster context only; no entry can be assigned to this profile.
1766 Derryloran religious returnTwo James Glasgow householders and John Glasgow occur at Drumearn.Local continuity, but not this man if his estate entered probate in 1759.
FamilyTreeDNA Glasgow Project Y-DNA resultsKits B580327 (Alexander Glasgow-951 line) and 200475 (Robert Glasgow, 1749–1836, Scotland) are both R-FT20271. Kit 254947, closely matching Robert Glasgow-1143, has only Y-111 results.Proves a common direct-paternal ancestor for the two Big Y lines. It does not prove the WikiTree chain from 200475 to James-1025 or locate the common ancestor in Kilwaughter.
Administrator Y-DNA comparison notes supplied 11 August 2026; public projectKit 959947 is R-FT20271 and reports “James Glasgow” as its paternal root. Kit 333002 carries the same family label at Y-37. Relative to B580327, the supplied table gives GD 7 at Y-111 for 959947 and GD 3 at Y-37 for 333002.Confirms paternal kinship within R-FT20271, but the audited descendant trail points to Robert Glasgow-12 through William Glasgow-563; it does not identify James-1025.
Public Peru State College placement notices (1957, 1960 and 1964) and saved WikiTree descendant exportThe private tester's known Humboldt/Nebraska-to-Iowa context matches the family of Joseph Ellsworth Glasgow Jr Glasgow-1877, a direct male-line descendant of Robert Glasgow-12 through William Glasgow-563.Probable tester-to-pedigree mapping. The final private parent-child record is unavailable, so this is not marked proved.
Private B580327 comparison supplied 11 August 2026; FTDNA matching guide959947 has 5/660 Big Y STR mismatches and twelve non-matching variants relative to B580327. Its displayed STR pattern groups it provisionally with 200475, 999763 and 478604, with DYS650=20 distinguishing it from the closest displayed pattern.Refines the tested line's neighbourhood, but supplies no evidence for James-1025.
NLI MS 9627 catalogue recordA 1767 manuscript survey covers part of James Stewart's estates near Cookstown. The UHF tenant database identifies it as the Stewart of Killymoon survey; its public surname search returned no Glasgow result.High-value original source one year after the 1766 Drumearn return. The negative index result is not conclusive: the manuscript may contain spelling variants, subtenants or omitted names.
FamilySearch Armagh probate-index catalogueDerryloran lay within the Consistory Court of Armagh. The will index is film 100911 item 4; the administration-bond index is film 100958 item 2.Gives the correct court and series for seeking executors, administrators, bondsmen or an estate continuation behind the 1759 entry.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.17 claims
4Tree Only
2Derivative
1Original

Documented or strongly supported

James Glasgow was recorded in Drumearn townland (1759).

strongly_supported1 linked evidence item

Probate residence: Drumearn, County Tyrone

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Case-file priorities and cautions

WikiTree recommendations

Glasgow-1025 · updated 2026-08-12

  1. Cite the probate index for Drumearn residence and a **1759 estate/probate

event**.

  1. Retain 17 January 1759 only if the source already cited on WikiTree actually

supplies that day and month. The probate transcription supplied here gives only the year.

  1. Do not convert probate residence into a certain death place.
  2. Describe the Moneymore connection and all parent, spouse and child

relationships as uncertain unless separately sourced.

  1. Do not attach the 1770 Killycoragh William or the 1740/1766 Derryloran

householders as children from name and geography alone.

  1. Do not describe kit 200475 as proving descent from James. It proves

R-FT20271 paternal kinship, while the pedigree back here remains unverified.

Suggested edit summary: Add the 1759 Drumearn probate match and distinguish later Drumearn namesakes.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1025 was captured 2026-08-19T15:04:19+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-07.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthCounty Tyrone, IrelandWikiTree profile field
deathDrumearn, Tyrone, IrelandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-10261664-00-00 · 1784-00-00
ParentsAnn GlasgowMcCook-2171670-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Derryloran, County Tyrone, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
ChildrenJames Glasgow IIGlasgow-10241721-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 1831-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland, United Kingdom
ChildrenRobert GlasgowGlasgow-24251724-00-00 · Moneymore, County Galway, Ireland · 0000-00-00 · USA
ChildrenSamuel GlasgowGlasgow-14921726-00-00 · Moneymore, County Londonderry, Ireland · 1824-00-00 · United States
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-24261735-00-00 · Moneymore, Galway, Connacht, Ireland · 1829-00-00 · USA
SiblingsCapt Robert GlasgowGlasgow-28670000-00-00 · 1754-00-00
SiblingsBessie GlasgowGlasgow-15451682-04-21 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-15441702-11-11 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-13181705-04-22 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesMargaret RutherfordRutherford-48611700-00-00 · Cookstown, Tyrone, , Ireland · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Drumearn Townland, Derryloran Parish, County Tyrone Drumearn_Townland,_Derryloran_Parish,_County_Tyrone

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography James Glasgow was born about 1700. His birth date is an estimate. No record has yet been found establishing his birthplace, parents, wife or children.
  • An Irish probate index includes an entry for James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone, in 1759. "Cavan, County Armagh, Ireland records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L94F-MWB5?view=index : accessed 26 March 2025), image 76 of 127.
  • The WikiTree source currently associated with the profile appears to give the more precise date 17 January 1759. The meaning of that date has not yet been confirmed. It may represent:
  • the date on which the will was written;

    • the date of probate;
    • the date of administration;
    • the date of an associated bond; or
    • the date on which the record was entered in the index.
  • The separate probate transcription reviewed in July 2026 supplies only the year 1759. The full date should therefore be retained only as an indexed record date, not automatically treated as the date of death.
  • The agreement in name, exact residence and year makes the 1759 probate entry a strong match to this profile. It establishes Drumearn as James’s documented residence at the time of the estate proceeding. It does not prove that Drumearn was his birthplace or place of death.
  • James probably died before the relevant probate or administration action was completed in 1759, although the precise nature and date of that action remain to be confirmed. Drumearn and Derryloran Records The 1740 Protestant householders return for Derryloran parish records two householders named James Glasgow and two named William Glasgow. The return does not give their townlands or state any relationships between them.
  • The 1766 religious census for Derryloran parish records:
  • If the 1759 entry represents probate or administration following this James’s death, the two men named James in 1766 cannot be him. They were probably younger relatives or unrelated namesakes within the same local Glasgow cluster.
  • The 1766 entries demonstrate continued Glasgow residence at Drumearn, but they do not identify the later householders as James’s sons, grandsons, nephews or other relatives.
  • The same will-index page also includes an entry for William Glasgow of Killycooragh, County Tyrone, dated 17 December 1770. No relationship between William and James has been established. Similarity of surname, county and probate context is not sufficient to attach William as a son or other relative. Distinction from Other Men Named James Glasgow This James should not presently be merged with James Glasgow (abt.1720-), who was recorded at Corvanaghan in Kildress parish in 1766.
  • Corvanaghan and Drumearn are separate townlands in different parishes. The difference in residence, together with the apparent 1759 estate proceeding for the Drumearn James, supports treating them as distinct men unless a direct record proves otherwise.
  • This profile should also not automatically be identified with either of the two unnamed-townland James Glasgow householders recorded in Derryloran in 1740. One of those men may have been the Drumearn testator, but the surviving return does not provide enough information to determine which one. Family and Relationship Research No inspected record identifies James’s parents, wife or children.
  • The probate index supplies his name, Drumearn residence and the year 1759, but the available transcription does not name:
  • a widow;

    • children;
    • executors or administrators;
    • beneficiaries;
    • witnesses;
    • sureties; or
    • property inherited by later Glasgow residents.
  • Claims that James lived at Moneymore, was born in County Tyrone or fathered particular later members of the Glasgow family require separate evidence.
  • what the date 17 January 1759 represents;

    • the precise probate court or index series involved;
    • whether the original will, probate record, administration record or bond survives;
    • whether a pre-destruction abstract of the record exists;
    • the names of any beneficiaries, executors, administrators, witnesses or sureties;
    • whether property at Drumearn passed to a later Glasgow;
    • whether either James Glasgo recorded at Drumearn in 1766 can be linked to the estate;
    • whether John Glasgo of Drumearn in 1766 was related to the testator;
    • whether either 1740 Derryloran householder named James Glasgow can be associated with Drumearn; and
    • whether the 1770 William Glasgow of Killycooragh appears in any connected deed, will or administration record.
  • Information from online family trees should be independently verified against contemporary records. Research Conclusion The 1759 probate entry for James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone is a strong match to this profile because the name, exact residence and terminal year agree.
  • It supports Drumearn as his documented residence and 1759 as the year of an estate or probate proceeding. The exact significance of 17 January 1759 remains unresolved, and the date should not yet be used as a certain date of death.
  • If the 1759 entry followed James’s death, the two men named James Glasgo at Drumearn in the 1766 religious census were later namesakes or members of a younger generation.
  • No record presently proves James’s birthplace, death place, parents, wife, children or relationship to the 1740 and 1766 Derryloran householders, William Glasgow of Killycooragh or James Glasgow of Corvanaghan. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. "Cavan, County Armagh, Ireland records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L94F-MWB5?view=index : accessed 26 March 2025), image 76 of 127. source link 1

Other external links in the profile

Full captured biography text
Biography
James Glasgow was born about 1700. His birth date is an estimate. No record has yet been found establishing his birthplace, parents, wife or children.

An Irish probate index includes an entry for James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone, in 1759. "Cavan, County Armagh, Ireland records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L94F-MWB5?view=index : accessed 26 March 2025), image 76 of 127. 

The WikiTree source currently associated with the profile appears to give the more precise date 17 January 1759. The meaning of that date has not yet been confirmed. It may represent:

* the date on which the will was written;
* the date of probate;
* the date of administration;
* the date of an associated bond; or
* the date on which the record was entered in the index.

The separate probate transcription reviewed in July 2026 supplies only the year 1759. The full date should therefore be retained only as an indexed record date, not automatically treated as the date of death.

The agreement in name, exact residence and year makes the 1759 probate entry a strong match to this profile. It establishes Drumearn as James’s documented residence at the time of the estate proceeding. It does not prove that Drumearn was his birthplace or place of death.

James probably died before the relevant probate or administration action was completed in 1759, although the precise nature and date of that action remain to be confirmed.
Drumearn and Derryloran Records
The 1740 Protestant householders return for Derryloran parish records two householders named James Glasgow and two named William Glasgow. The return does not give their townlands or state any relationships between them.

These entries provide evidence for a Glasgow family cluster in Derryloran by 1740, but neither James can presently be identified with this profile.

The 1766 religious census for Derryloran parish records:

* two men named James Glasgo at Drumearn; and
* one John Glasgo at Drumearn.

If the 1759 entry represents probate or administration following this James’s death, the two men named James in 1766 cannot be him. They were probably younger relatives or unrelated namesakes within the same local Glasgow cluster.

The 1766 entries demonstrate continued Glasgow residence at Drumearn, but they do not identify the later householders as James’s sons, grandsons, nephews or other relatives.

The same will-index page also includes an entry for William Glasgow of Killycooragh, County Tyrone, dated 17 December 1770. No relationship between William and James has been established. Similarity of surname, county and probate context is not sufficient to attach William as a son or other relative.
Distinction from Other Men Named James Glasgow
This James should not presently be merged with James Glasgow (abt.1720-), who was recorded at Corvanaghan in Kildress parish in 1766.

Corvanaghan and Drumearn are separate townlands in different parishes. The difference in residence, together with the apparent 1759 estate proceeding for the Drumearn James, supports treating them as distinct men unless a direct record proves otherwise.

This profile should also not automatically be identified with either of the two unnamed-townland James Glasgow householders recorded in Derryloran in 1740. One of those men may have been the Drumearn testator, but the surviving return does not provide enough information to determine which one.
Family and Relationship Research
No inspected record identifies James’s parents, wife or children.

The probate index supplies his name, Drumearn residence and the year 1759, but the available transcription does not name:

* a widow;
* children;
* executors or administrators;
* beneficiaries;
* witnesses;
* sureties; or
* property inherited by later Glasgow residents.

Claims that James lived at Moneymore, was born in County Tyrone or fathered particular later members of the Glasgow family require separate evidence.

The presence of Glasgow householders at Drumearn in 1766 makes a family connection plausible, but no specific relationship should be created from surname and locality alone.
Y-DNA Research
James is the earliest currently identified ancestor in the paternal line of a Y-DNA relative of M Glasgow.

The reported comparison is five differences over 660 markers. This result may support a relationship within a wider Glasgow paternal line, but it does not identify:

* the generation at which the lines connect;
* the common ancestor;
* this James as the ancestor of another documented Glasgow line; or
* either 1766 Drumearn householder as his son.

Y-DNA evidence should be used alongside documentary evidence rather than as a substitute for it.
Research Priorities
Further research should establish:

* what the date 17 January 1759 represents;
* the precise probate court or index series involved;
* whether the original will, probate record, administration record or bond survives;
* whether a pre-destruction abstract of the record exists;
* the names of any beneficiaries, executors, administrators, witnesses or sureties;
* whether property at Drumearn passed to a later Glasgow;
* whether either James Glasgo recorded at Drumearn in 1766 can be linked to the estate;
* whether John Glasgo of Drumearn in 1766 was related to the testator;
* whether either 1740 Derryloran householder named James Glasgow can be associated with Drumearn; and
* whether the 1770 William Glasgow of Killycooragh appears in any connected deed, will or administration record.

An online family tree for a James Glasgow is available at:

* https://gw.geneanet.org/moodyfh?n=glasgow&oc=1&p=james

Information from online family trees should be independently verified against contemporary records.
Research Conclusion
The 1759 probate entry for James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone is a strong match to this profile because the name, exact residence and terminal year agree.

It supports Drumearn as his documented residence and 1759 as the year of an estate or probate proceeding. The exact significance of 17 January 1759 remains unresolved, and the date should not yet be used as a certain date of death.

If the 1759 entry followed James’s death, the two men named James Glasgo at Drumearn in the 1766 religious census were later namesakes or members of a younger generation.

No record presently proves James’s birthplace, death place, parents, wife, children or relationship to the 1740 and 1766 Derryloran householders, William Glasgow of Killycooragh or James Glasgow of Corvanaghan.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Drumearn Townland, Derryloran Parish, County Tyrone]]

== Biography ==

'''James Glasgow''' was born about '''1700'''. His birth date is an estimate. No record has yet been found establishing his birthplace, parents, wife or children.

An Irish probate index includes an entry for '''James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone''', in '''1759'''.<ref>"Cavan, County Armagh, Ireland records," images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L94F-MWB5?view=index : accessed 26 March 2025), image 76 of 127.</ref>

The WikiTree source currently associated with the profile appears to give the more precise date '''17 January 1759'''. The meaning of that date has not yet been confirmed. It may represent:

* the date on which the will was written;
* the date of probate;
* the date of administration;
* the date of an associated bond; or
* the date on which the record was entered in the index.

The separate probate transcription reviewed in July 2026 supplies only the year 1759. The full date should therefore be retained only as an indexed record date, not automatically treated as the date of death.

The agreement in name, exact residence and year makes the 1759 probate entry a strong match to this profile. It establishes Drumearn as James’s documented residence at the time of the estate proceeding. It does not prove that Drumearn was his birthplace or place of death.

James probably died before the relevant probate or administration action was completed in 1759, although the precise nature and date of that action remain to be confirmed.

== Drumearn and Derryloran Records ==

The 1740 Protestant householders return for Derryloran parish records two householders named '''James Glasgow''' and two named '''William Glasgow'''. The return does not give their townlands or state any relationships between them.

These entries provide evidence for a Glasgow family cluster in Derryloran by 1740, but neither James can presently be identified with this profile.

The 1766 religious census for Derryloran parish records:

* two men named '''James Glasgo''' at Drumearn; and
* one '''John Glasgo''' at Drumearn.

If the 1759 entry represents probate or administration following this James’s death, the two men named James in 1766 cannot be him. They were probably younger relatives or unrelated namesakes within the same local Glasgow cluster.

The 1766 entries demonstrate continued Glasgow residence at Drumearn, but they do not identify the later householders as James’s sons, grandsons, nephews or other relatives.

The same will-index page also includes an entry for '''William Glasgow of Killycooragh, County Tyrone''', dated '''17 December 1770'''. No relationship between William and James has been established. Similarity of surname, county and probate context is not sufficient to attach William as a son or other relative.

== Distinction from Other Men Named James Glasgow ==

This James should not presently be merged with [[Glasgow-2988|James Glasgow (abt.1720-)]], who was recorded at '''Corvanaghan''' in Kildress parish in 1766.

Corvanaghan and Drumearn are separate townlands in different parishes. The difference in residence, together with the apparent 1759 estate proceeding for the Drumearn James, supports treating them as distinct men unless a direct record proves otherwise.

This profile should also not automatically be identified with either of the two unnamed-townland James Glasgow householders recorded in Derryloran in 1740. One of those men may have been the Drumearn testator, but the surviving return does not provide enough information to determine which one.

== Family and Relationship Research ==

No inspected record identifies James’s parents, wife or children.

The probate index supplies his name, Drumearn residence and the year 1759, but the available transcription does not name:

* a widow;
* children;
* executors or administrators;
* beneficiaries;
* witnesses;
* sureties; or
* property inherited by later Glasgow residents.

Claims that James lived at Moneymore, was born in County Tyrone or fathered particular later members of the Glasgow family require separate evidence.

The presence of Glasgow householders at Drumearn in 1766 makes a family connection plausible, but no specific relationship should be created from surname and locality alone.

== Y-DNA Research ==

James is the earliest currently identified ancestor in the paternal line of a Y-DNA relative of [[Glasgow-933|M Glasgow]].

The reported comparison is five differences over 660 markers. This result may support a relationship within a wider Glasgow paternal line, but it does not identify:

* the generation at which the lines connect;
* the common ancestor;
* this James as the ancestor of another documented Glasgow line; or
* either 1766 Drumearn householder as his son.

Y-DNA evidence should be used alongside documentary evidence rather than as a substitute for it.

== Research Priorities ==

Further research should establish:

* what the date 17 January 1759 represents;
* the precise probate court or index series involved;
* whether the original will, probate record, administration record or bond survives;
* whether a pre-destruction abstract of the record exists;
* the names of any beneficiaries, executors, administrators, witnesses or sureties;
* whether property at Drumearn passed to a later Glasgow;
* whether either James Glasgo recorded at Drumearn in 1766 can be linked to the estate;
* whether John Glasgo of Drumearn in 1766 was related to the testator;
* whether either 1740 Derryloran householder named James Glasgow can be associated with Drumearn; and
* whether the 1770 William Glasgow of Killycooragh appears in any connected deed, will or administration record.

An online family tree for a James Glasgow is available at:

* https://gw.geneanet.org/moodyfh?n=glasgow&oc=1&p=james

Information from online family trees should be independently verified against contemporary records.

== Research Conclusion ==

The 1759 probate entry for '''James Glasgow of Drumearn, County Tyrone''' is a strong match to this profile because the name, exact residence and terminal year agree.

It supports Drumearn as his documented residence and 1759 as the year of an estate or probate proceeding. The exact significance of 17 January 1759 remains unresolved, and the date should not yet be used as a certain date of death.

If the 1759 entry followed James’s death, the two men named James Glasgo at Drumearn in the 1766 religious census were later namesakes or members of a younger generation.

No record presently proves James’s birthplace, death place, parents, wife, children or relationship to the 1740 and 1766 Derryloran householders, William Glasgow of Killycooragh or James Glasgow of Corvanaghan.

== Sources ==

<references />