Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Robert Glasgow

c. 1690 (estimated) – after 1754

Glasgow-2867 · 1 mapped association

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandAt Sea

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
6Close relations
7Evidence items
18Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1690 (estimated) · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Death
after 1754 · At Sea
Parents
William Walter GlasgowuncertainAnn (McCook) Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Margaret (Davidson) Glasgow
Children
Christian GlasgowJames GlasgowJohn Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2867
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
9

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Estimate and relationship notes
  • Estimated from a birth or baptism record (b. 1690).

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1645–?Generation45 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow II (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 45-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow II (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1661–1750Generation29 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Stevenson, Lanarkshire, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child WindowSame-spouse child windowAgnes (Spark) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Agnes (Spark) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (16) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 29-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1687–1701) (+6; other parent Agnes (Spark) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Agnes (Spark) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (16) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Davidson +8 (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit16/100
Weak Lead
Dates1648–1690Generation42 years age gapRecorded placesLower Parish, Lancaster, Virginia · Carrituck, North CarolinaIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Same-Sex Generational NamingCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 42-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit6/100
Weak Lead
Dates1655–?Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesMidlothian, Scotland · Midlothian — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child WindowExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationSame-spouse child windowIsobell (Duffe) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Isobell (Duffe) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow II (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1677–1691) (+6; other parent Isobell (Duffe) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Isobell (Duffe) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → James Glasgow II (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit6/100
Weak Lead
Dates1655–?Generation35 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Same-Sex Generational NamingCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name Robert (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 165 public profiles)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit0/100
Weak Lead
Dates1674–1701Generationat least 16 years age gapRecorded placesOld Machar, Aberdeenshire, Scotland · ScotlandIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Spouse-Specific Child WindowSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1687–1701) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)

a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 16 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1687–1701) (+6; other parent John Glasgow)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Davidson +8 (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Hugh Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit14/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1666–?Generationat least 24 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit14/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1646–?Generation44 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 44-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 44-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit14/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1643–?Generation47 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • possible 47-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • possible 47-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Automated fit13/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1660–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 2 years of the subject (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate's household recorded Margaret Glasgow in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland within 2 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality); the subject's current profile explicitly says its displayed family links are not established (score capped at 24; tree descendants are excluded from scoring)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3407

Automated fit70/100
Similar Person
Dates1690–?PlacesCarnwath, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)
  • overlapping locality (+8)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1075

Automated fit56/100
Similar Person
Dates1693–1766PlacesKilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland → Kilbirnie, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • matching child names: James Glasgow, John Glasgow

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 3 (+18)
  • matching child names: James Glasgow, John Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1078

Automated fit52/100
Similar Person
Dates1618–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland → Kilwaughter, County Antrim, IrelandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 72; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 72; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1502

Automated fit34/100
Similar Person
Dates1678–?PlacesCounty Antrim, IrelandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1143

Automated fit34/100
Similar Person
Dates1710–1772PlacesCounty Antrim, IrelandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 20 (+2)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 20 (+2)
  • matching child name: James Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3479

Automated fit32/100
Similar Person
Dates1720–?PlacesIrvine, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 30; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 30; retained without deduction

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-3706

Automated fit32/100
Similar Person
Dates1745–?PlacesLeitholm, Berwickshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 55; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 55; retained without deduction

Same-name candidate

Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1513

Automated fit20/100
Similar Person
Dates1670–?PlacesAyr, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 20 (+2)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 20 (+2)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Conclusion

Glasgow-2867

The 15 February 1754 *Maryland Gazette* report proves only that a Robert Glasgow was master of the snow *John and Archibald*. It names no parents, wife or children, and it does not prove birthplace. The phrase “of Glasgow” in the ship description applies to the vessel, not the person’s origin.

The Glencorse baptisms for Christian/John/James and the online-tree parent/spouse claims are not sufficient to identify him as that shipmaster. No original record yet links this Robert to Margaret Davidson, to children Christian, John and James, to William Glasgow and Ann McCook, or to any shipmaster’s family context.

Keep the currently attached possible family relations as uncertain and do not detach them while the identity remains unresolved. Treat the 1739 Irvine vessel trail as the strongest identity lead.

Do not merge with Glasgow-3407; no occupational, probate, or familial bridge has been documented.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1690

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2867

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.11 claims
4Unknown
2Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Case-file assessments

Potential-father review — 10 August 2026

Glasgow-2867

James Glasgow (Glasgow-1081) should not receive parentage weight from this profile. James is the documented Kilwaughter man; the shipmaster is unproved against any local family cluster or proven kinship line. Consequently any current kinship bridge is hypothesis-only until a shared original record is found.

[^1]: British Newspaper Archive search for “John and Archibald”, OCR/search extract for the ''Belfast News-Letter'', 12 June 1739. The original newspaper image should be checked before treating the wording as a final transcription.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Next records to inspect

  1. will — Search the Scotland's People wills and testaments index, 1754–1780, for Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow described as a shipmaster, mariner, merchant or sailor.
  2. will — wills and testaments (https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/search-records/legal-records/wills) and High Court of Admiralty catalogue (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=AC).

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended update

Glasgow-2867

  • Do not follow earlier guidance to make confident parent/spouse/child links.

Keep any currently present family links as uncertain only (do not detach anything).

  • Remove confident/assumed vital claims that are not source-backed:

- “born about 1690” - “died 1759/lost at sea” - any “of Glasgow” birthplace inference from the ship phrase.

  • Keep the 1754 shipmaster narrative as the only anchored identity fact.
  • Keep the full, sourced profile on record: shipmaster only, no spouse/parent/child

proof added from this evidence.

See also Glasgow-1026 findings and the graph-claim audit.

Corrected Ireland/US priorities

Glasgow-2867

  • Maintain the Virginia clearance target in CO 5/1444, CO 5/1445 and CO 5/1446

(late-1753 outward movement and vessel-clearance context); CO 5/1447 starts 27 March 1754 and is therefore too late for the original clearance voyage.

  • Use all matching entries to extract master, vessel type, tonnage, owners, bonders,

crew size, origin and destination.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.7 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2867 was captured 2026-08-19T11:32:57+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-10261664-00-00 · 1784-00-00
ParentsAnn GlasgowMcCook-2171670-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Derryloran, County Tyrone, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
ChildrenChristian GlasgowGlasgow-34921708-02-15 · Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-34911710-01-01 · Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenJames GlasgowGlasgow-28681720-02-14 · Glencorse, Midlothian, Scotland · 1784-00-00 · Cecil, Maryland, United States
SiblingsBessie GlasgowGlasgow-15451682-04-21 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJames GlasgowGlasgow-10251700-00-00 · County Tyrone, Ireland · 1759-01-17 · Drumearn, Tyrone, Ireland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-15441702-11-11 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-13181705-04-22 · Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesMargaret GlasgowDavidson-207831690-00-00 · 1759-00-00 · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Robert Glasgow was master of the snow John and Archibald, a vessel described in 1754 as "of Glasgow". He is securely documented only in February 1754. His birth, parentage, family and death have not been established. Voyage of 1754 "Last Tuesday arrived here, in Distress, the Snow John and Archibald, of Glasgow, Robert Glasgow, Master..." The Maryland Gazette, no. 466 (Annapolis, Maryland, 11 April 1754), report dated St John's, Antigua, 15 February 1754, Maryland State Archives, Maryland Gazette Collection MSA SC 2731, M1279, images 472–473; accessed 7 August 2026. issue front page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html) and report page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html).
  • When men climbed the shrouds to set a double-reefed main topsail, lightning split the main-topmast and damaged the rigging. Two men were thrown into the sea and lost. Of two men struck on deck, one died immediately and the other was still unable to perform duty when the report was written. Six people remained aboard when they agreed to bear away for assistance at St John's, Antigua.
  • The same Antigua report was later printed in The Dublin Gazette. The Dublin Gazette, no. 400 (Dublin, 25–29 June 1754), report from St John's, Antigua, dated 15 February 1754, Houses of the Oireachtas Library & Research Service, DGZ/1754/400; accessed 7 August 2026. digital item (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). Research Notes Identity and family The 1754 report gives no age, birthplace, parents, wife, children or later fate. The phrase "of Glasgow" describes the vessel; it is not evidence that Robert himself was born in Glasgow. His position as master does not support a defensible estimated birth year.
  • The Glencorse baptism evidence identifies a Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson as the parents of Christian Glasgow, John Glasgow and James Glasgow. It does not identify that Robert as the 1754 shipmaster. No documentary evidence currently links this shipmaster to William Glasgow, Ann McCook or the Glencorse household.
  • The indexed baptisms cited on the connected child profiles support their parentage. The 1708 and 1710 records name Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson; neither identifies Robert as master of the John and Archibald. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, Christian Glasgow, 1708; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, John Glasgow, 1710; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW).
  • The current profile's only cited support for the dates 1690–1759 and a death at sea is an online memorial. No contemporary record cited there identifies the memorialised man as the master of the John and Archibald. Find a Grave memorial 223820967, Robert Glasgow (1690–1759), described as "Buried or Lost at Sea"; accessed 7 August 2026. memorial (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/223820967/robert_glasgow).
  • The vessel's name does not establish the identities of its owners or any relationship between Robert and men named John or Archibald. Either interpretation remains speculation. Same-name men Robert Glasgow of Kilwaughter has a distinct County Antrim family and documentary context. No record currently connects him with the John and Archibald.
  • None is proved to be this shipmaster. They should not be merged on name and approximate age alone. Priority Research

    • Priority 1 — Virginia clearance and ownership. ** Search The National Archives series CO 5/1444–1447, Virginia Naval Office shipping returns, concentrating on late 1753 through March 1754, for the John and Archibald / John & Archibald and Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow / Glasco / Glassgow. Record the district, entry or clearance date, owner, tonnage, cargo, crew, registration, bonders, stated home port and destination. collection description (https://britishonlinearchives.com/collections/68/volumes/462/south-eastern-american-states-1689-1769).
  • Priority 1 — Clyde customs records. ** Ask Glasgow City Archives to identify Glasgow Outport records in CE59 and Port Glasgow and Greenock records in CE60 covering 1753–1755. Search inward and outward accounts and letter books for the vessel and master. A matching entry could identify the owners, tonnage, route, repairs and Robert's later activity. NRS customs guide (https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/learning-and-events/research-guides/customs-and-excise-records/).
  • Priority 2 — Testament and maritime litigation. ** Search the Scotland's People wills and testaments index, 1754–1780, for Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow described as a shipmaster, mariner, merchant or sailor. Search National Records of Scotland High Court of Admiralty processes, class AC, particularly 1754–1756, for the vessel, freight, salvage, repairs or insurance disputes. A matching record may name relatives, owners or business associates. wills and testaments (https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/search-records/legal-records/wills) and High Court of Admiralty catalogue (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=AC). Current research The 1754 report proves only a shipmaster Robert Glasgow aboard the John and Archibald. It names no parents, wife or children. The Glencorse baptisms prove the three children belonged to parents named Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson, but do not prove that father was the captain. The attached William Glasgow/Ann McCook ancestry is unsupported and is not used to distinguish him from other Roberts.
  • This profile remains separate from Glasgow-3407, but not because the current families overlap. The child-parent links represent the documented Glencorse household; the identification of that household's Robert as the captain remains uncertain until a port, ownership, probate or maritime record supplies identifying kin.
  • This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html). www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html). www.virtualtreasury.ie (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW). Sources

Profile source citations

  1. The Maryland Gazette, no. 466 (Annapolis, Maryland, 11 April 1754), report dated St John's, Antigua, 15 February 1754, Maryland State Archives, Maryland Gazette Collection MSA SC 2731, M1279, images 472–473; accessed 7 August 2026. issue front page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html) and report page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html). source link 1 source link 2
  2. When men climbed the shrouds to set a double-reefed main topsail, lightning split the main-topmast and damaged the rigging. Two men were thrown into the sea and lost. Of two men struck on deck, one died immediately and the other was still unable to perform duty when the report was written. Six people remained aboard when they agreed to bear away for assistance at St John's, Antigua. The same Antigua report was later printed in The Dublin Gazette. The Dublin Gazette, no. 400 (Dublin, 25–29 June 1754), report from St John's, Antigua, dated 15 February 1754, Houses of the Oireachtas Library & Research Service, DGZ/1754/400; accessed 7 August 2026. digital item (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). source link 1
  3. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, Christian Glasgow, 1708; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). source link 1
  4. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, John Glasgow, 1710; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW). source link 1
  5. Find a Grave memorial 223820967, Robert Glasgow (1690–1759), described as "Buried or Lost at Sea"; accessed 7 August 2026. memorial (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/223820967/robert_glasgow). source link 1
  6. www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html). source link 1
  7. www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html). source link 1
  8. www.virtualtreasury.ie (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). source link 1
  9. www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). source link 1
  10. www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW). source link 1

Other external links in the profile

Full captured biography text
Biography
Robert Glasgow was master of the snow John and Archibald, a vessel described in 1754 as "of Glasgow". He is securely documented only in February 1754. His birth, parentage, family and death have not been established.
Voyage of 1754
 "Last Tuesday arrived here, in Distress, the Snow John and Archibald, of Glasgow, Robert Glasgow, Master..." The Maryland Gazette, no. 466 (Annapolis, Maryland, 11 April 1754), report dated St John's, Antigua, 15 February 1754, Maryland State Archives, Maryland Gazette Collection MSA SC 2731, M1279, images 472–473; accessed 7 August 2026. issue front page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html) and report page (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html). 

The vessel had been sailing from Virginia to Glasgow. On 24 January 1754, at latitude 32°15′, it encountered a gale from W.S.W., sprang a leak and required both pumps to be worked continuously. 

When men climbed the shrouds to set a double-reefed main topsail, lightning split the main-topmast and damaged the rigging. Two men were thrown into the sea and lost. Of two men struck on deck, one died immediately and the other was still unable to perform duty when the report was written. Six people remained aboard when they agreed to bear away for assistance at St John's, Antigua. 

The same Antigua report was later printed in The Dublin Gazette. The Dublin Gazette, no. 400 (Dublin, 25–29 June 1754), report from St John's, Antigua, dated 15 February 1754, Houses of the Oireachtas Library & Research Service, DGZ/1754/400; accessed 7 August 2026. digital item (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). 
Research Notes
Identity and family
The 1754 report gives no age, birthplace, parents, wife, children or later fate. The phrase "of Glasgow" describes the vessel; it is not evidence that Robert himself was born in Glasgow. His position as master does not support a defensible estimated birth year.

The Glencorse baptism evidence identifies a Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson as the parents of Christian Glasgow, John Glasgow and James Glasgow. It does not identify that Robert as the 1754 shipmaster. No documentary evidence currently links this shipmaster to William Glasgow, Ann McCook or the Glencorse household.

The indexed baptisms cited on the connected child profiles support their parentage. The 1708 and 1710 records name Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson; neither identifies Robert as master of the John and Archibald. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, Christian Glasgow, 1708; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, John Glasgow, 1710; accessed 7 August 2026. record (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW). 

The current profile's only cited support for the dates 1690–1759 and a death at sea is an online memorial. No contemporary record cited there identifies the memorialised man as the master of the John and Archibald. Find a Grave memorial 223820967, Robert Glasgow (1690–1759), described as "Buried or Lost at Sea"; accessed 7 August 2026. memorial (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/223820967/robert_glasgow). 

The vessel's name does not establish the identities of its owners or any relationship between Robert and men named John or Archibald. Either interpretation remains speculation.
Same-name men
Robert Glasgow of Kilwaughter has a distinct County Antrim family and documentary context. No record currently connects him with the John and Archibald.

Other same-name profiles include:

* Robert Glasgow of Irvine, Ayrshire
* Robert Glasgow of Kilbirnie, Ayrshire
* Robert Glasgow of Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian

None is proved to be this shipmaster. They should not be merged on name and approximate age alone.
Priority Research
* Priority 1 — Virginia clearance and ownership.
** Search The National Archives series CO 5/1444–1447, Virginia Naval Office shipping returns, concentrating on late 1753 through March 1754, for the John and Archibald / John & Archibald and Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow / Glasco / Glassgow. Record the district, entry or clearance date, owner, tonnage, cargo, crew, registration, bonders, stated home port and destination. collection description (https://britishonlinearchives.com/collections/68/volumes/462/south-eastern-american-states-1689-1769).

* Priority 1 — Clyde customs records.
** Ask Glasgow City Archives to identify Glasgow Outport records in CE59 and Port Glasgow and Greenock records in CE60 covering 1753–1755. Search inward and outward accounts and letter books for the vessel and master. A matching entry could identify the owners, tonnage, route, repairs and Robert's later activity. NRS customs guide (https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/learning-and-events/research-guides/customs-and-excise-records/).

* Priority 2 — Testament and maritime litigation.
** Search the Scotland's People wills and testaments index, 1754–1780, for Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow described as a shipmaster, mariner, merchant or sailor. Search National Records of Scotland High Court of Admiralty processes, class AC, particularly 1754–1756, for the vessel, freight, salvage, repairs or insurance disputes. A matching record may name relatives, owners or business associates. wills and testaments (https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/search-records/legal-records/wills) and High Court of Admiralty catalogue (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=AC).
Current research
The 1754 report proves only a shipmaster Robert Glasgow aboard the John and Archibald. It names no parents, wife or children. The Glencorse baptisms prove the three children belonged to parents named Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson, but do not prove that father was the captain. The attached William Glasgow/Ann McCook ancestry is unsupported and is not used to distinguish him from other Roberts.

This profile remains separate from Glasgow-3407, but not because the current families overlap. The child-parent links represent the documented Glencorse household; the identification of that household's Robert as the captain remains uncertain until a port, ownership, probate or maritime record supplies identifying kin.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material. www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html). www.msa.maryland.gov (https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html). www.virtualtreasury.ie (https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3). www.familysearch.org (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW). 
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

== Biography ==
'''Robert Glasgow''' was master of the snow ''John and Archibald'', a vessel described in 1754 as "of Glasgow". He is securely documented only in February 1754. His birth, parentage, family and death have not been established.

=== Voyage of 1754 ===

<blockquote>"Last Tuesday arrived here, in Distress, the Snow John and Archibald, of Glasgow, Robert Glasgow, Master..."</blockquote><ref name="MarylandGazette1754">''The Maryland Gazette'', no. 466 (Annapolis, Maryland, 11 April 1754), report dated St John's, Antigua, 15 February 1754, Maryland State Archives, Maryland Gazette Collection MSA SC 2731, M1279, images 472–473; accessed 7 August 2026. [https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html issue front page] and [https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html report page].</ref>

The vessel had been sailing from Virginia to Glasgow. On 24 January 1754, at latitude 32°15′, it encountered a gale from W.S.W., sprang a leak and required both pumps to be worked continuously.<ref name="MarylandGazette1754" />

When men climbed the shrouds to set a double-reefed main topsail, lightning split the main-topmast and damaged the rigging. Two men were thrown into the sea and lost. Of two men struck on deck, one died immediately and the other was still unable to perform duty when the report was written. Six people remained aboard when they agreed to bear away for assistance at St John's, Antigua.<ref name="MarylandGazette1754" />

The same Antigua report was later printed in ''The Dublin Gazette''.<ref name="DublinGazette1754">''The Dublin Gazette'', no. 400 (Dublin, 25–29 June 1754), report from St John's, Antigua, dated 15 February 1754, Houses of the Oireachtas Library & Research Service, DGZ/1754/400; accessed 7 August 2026. [https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400 digital item].</ref>

== Research Notes ==
=== Identity and family ===

The 1754 report gives no age, birthplace, parents, wife, children or later fate. The phrase "of Glasgow" describes the vessel; it is not evidence that Robert himself was born in Glasgow. His position as master does not support a defensible estimated birth year.

The Glencorse baptism evidence identifies a Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson as the parents of [[Glasgow-3492|Christian Glasgow]], [[Glasgow-3491|John Glasgow]] and [[Glasgow-2868|James Glasgow]]. It does not identify that Robert as the 1754 shipmaster. No documentary evidence currently links this shipmaster to [[Glasgow-1026|William Glasgow]], [[McCook-217|Ann McCook]] or the Glencorse household.

The indexed baptisms cited on the connected child profiles support their parentage. The 1708 and 1710 records name Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson; neither identifies Robert as master of the ''John and Archibald''.<ref name="Christian1708">"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, Christian Glasgow, 1708; accessed 7 August 2026. [https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3 record].</ref><ref name="John1710">"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950", database, FamilySearch, John Glasgow, 1710; accessed 7 August 2026. [https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW record].</ref>

The current profile's only cited support for the dates 1690–1759 and a death at sea is an online memorial. No contemporary record cited there identifies the memorialised man as the master of the ''John and Archibald''.<ref name="FindAGrave">Find a Grave memorial 223820967, Robert Glasgow (1690–1759), described as "Buried or Lost at Sea"; accessed 7 August 2026. [https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/223820967/robert_glasgow memorial].</ref>

The vessel's name does not establish the identities of its owners or any relationship between Robert and men named John or Archibald. Either interpretation remains speculation.

=== Same-name men ===

[[Glasgow-1143|Robert Glasgow of Kilwaughter]] has a distinct County Antrim family and documentary context. No record currently connects him with the ''John and Archibald''.

Other same-name profiles include:

* [[Glasgow-2474|Robert Glasgow of Irvine, Ayrshire]]
* [[Glasgow-1132|Robert Glasgow of Kilbirnie, Ayrshire]]
* [[Glasgow-1445|Robert Glasgow of Kirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian]]

None is proved to be this shipmaster. They should not be merged on name and approximate age alone.

=== Priority Research ===

* '''Priority 1 — Virginia clearance and ownership.'''
** Search The National Archives series CO 5/1444–1447, Virginia Naval Office shipping returns, concentrating on late 1753 through March 1754, for the ''John and Archibald'' / ''John & Archibald'' and Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow / Glasco / Glassgow. Record the district, entry or clearance date, owner, tonnage, cargo, crew, registration, bonders, stated home port and destination. [https://britishonlinearchives.com/collections/68/volumes/462/south-eastern-american-states-1689-1769 collection description].

* '''Priority 1 — Clyde customs records.'''
** Ask Glasgow City Archives to identify Glasgow Outport records in CE59 and Port Glasgow and Greenock records in CE60 covering 1753–1755. Search inward and outward accounts and letter books for the vessel and master. A matching entry could identify the owners, tonnage, route, repairs and Robert's later activity. [https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/learning-and-events/research-guides/customs-and-excise-records/ NRS customs guide].

* '''Priority 2 — Testament and maritime litigation.'''
** Search the Scotland's People wills and testaments index, 1754–1780, for Robert Glasgow / Glasgo / Glascow described as a shipmaster, mariner, merchant or sailor. Search National Records of Scotland High Court of Admiralty processes, class AC, particularly 1754–1756, for the vessel, freight, salvage, repairs or insurance disputes. A matching record may name relatives, owners or business associates. [https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/search-records/legal-records/wills wills and testaments] and [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=AC High Court of Admiralty catalogue].

=== Current research ===

The 1754 report proves only a shipmaster Robert Glasgow aboard the ''John and Archibald''. It names no parents, wife or children. The Glencorse baptisms prove the three children belonged to parents named Robert Glasgow and Margaret Davidson, but do not prove that father was the captain. The attached William Glasgow/Ann McCook ancestry is unsupported and is not used to distinguish him from other Roberts.

This profile remains separate from [[Glasgow-3407|Glasgow-3407]], but not because the current families overlap. The child-parent links represent the documented Glencorse household; the identification of that household's Robert as the captain remains uncertain until a port, ownership, probate or maritime record supplies identifying kin.

This assessment draws on the cited records and public source material.<ref name="ProjectSource1">[https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0472.html www.msa.maryland.gov].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource2">[https://www.msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc4800/sc4872/001279/html/m1279-0473.html www.msa.maryland.gov].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource3">[https://www.virtualtreasury.ie/item/DGZ-1754-400 www.virtualtreasury.ie].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource4">[https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-CB3 www.familysearch.org].</ref><ref name="ProjectSource5">[https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQ4J-PHW www.familysearch.org].</ref>

== Sources ==
<references />