Skip to page content
Home/People/James Glascho
Catalogue · 27 Sep 2026

Researched biography · Glasgow-1081

James Glascho

before 1651 – 1726

Larne, County Antrim, Ireland

Research last reviewed How to read the evidence

About James

This profile represents the Irish James Glascho, a Kilwaughter householder in 1669. His identification with the same-name congregational officer from 1701, apparently deceased by 1726, is a working continuity hypothesis, not an explicit recorded identity. A same-name successor remains possible. The 1727 Connor wills index entry for James Glasgow of Kilwater is a strong match to the later officer.

Birthbefore 1651 · Larne, County Antrim, Ireland
Death1726 · Kilwaughter, Larne, County Antrim, Ireland
LocalityLarne, County Antrim, Ireland
Last reviewed6 October 2026

Connected pages

Other pages on this site that name James Glascho: family studies, places, source pages and other people's research. Open a group to see its pages.

Family and study pages 3 pages

A study page may discuss this person without placing them in that family.

Places 2 places
Sources 13 source pages

The first 10 of 13 source pages are listed here. Every record is listed under Sources below.

Latest findings about this person 3 findings
Research and WikiTree study pages 3 pages
Mentioned in other people's research 7 people

Original evidence and remaining gaps

Identity audit — 21 September 2026

The earlier summary treated 1669–1726 as one continuous biography. The sources remain valid occurrences, but their linkage is now explicitly qualified: if the 1669 householder was at least 21, survival to 1726 would make him at least about 78. That is possible and does not disprove continuity, but a son or other same-name successor must also be tested. Porter's deceased 1726 belongs to the later James, not to Hugh; this correction leaves that reading intact.

The Belfast shipmaster James Glasgow-3172 has an unexamined 1686 will extract, PRONI T/828/15, indexed through NLI MS_UR_012684. A will date alone cannot exclude his survival into the later Kilwaughter period. Confirmed probate or death in 1686 would exclude identity with the later officer; it would not by itself distinguish him from the 1669 householder. No merge or new kinship is supported.

What the research found

These research notes were last revised on 6 October 2026.

Summary of the research

Overall conclusion

The Scottish James recorded in 1645 is now correctly represented separately as Glasgow-3971. Their identity is an open, low-to-moderate hypothesis, not a proved merge. No source names the Irish James's parents or children.

The repeated association with John Glasgow (Glasgow-3913) is stronger than a one-record coincidence. Their entries are consecutive in the 1669 roll (record numbers 5347-5348), place both men at Kilwaughter Demesne and use the same uncommon Glascho spelling. About thirty years later men named John and James represented Kilwaughter and served as its overseer respectively. This supports a persistent local family cluster, but neither man is explicitly identified as the earlier householder. Close kinship is possible, not established (lowered from probable on 6 October 2026; see the assessment below); neither source names a relationship or establishes brothers, father and son, cousins or another degree.

The 1669 transcription distinguishes the Kilwaughter Glascho entries, standardised as Glasgow, from numerous Glass entries including an established Drummaul family. Do not use western County Antrim Glass households as children or descendants of this James without a bridging record.

What the records show

Source findings
Source Finding Assessment
PRONI T/307/A; W. Macafee, 1669 Antrim Hearth Money Roll, records 5347-5348, PDF p. 36 James Glascho was a Kilwaughter Demesne householder immediately after Jo Glascho. Direct Irish occurrence; no age, origin or relationship.
Classon Porter, Congregational Memoirs: Larne and Kilwaughter, continued in volume 3 James was appointed overseer for Kilwochter at the minute printed May 29, 1700.—Thursday (probably Thursday 29 May 1701), stands sixth on the session list that opens the 1721 book, was one of six commissioners when the Presbytery met at Larne on 3 June 1722, and is marked deceased 1726. Locality/name continuity hypothesis; published transcription does not expressly identify the 1669 householder.
PRONI Name Search, Connor wills index James Glasgow of Kilwater, 1727. Strong death/probate match; the original will is lost and no kin are supplied.
Source findingsPorter's extracts re-read on the page images — 6 October 2026

Re-read on the page images of volume 3, pp. 16-19 and pp. 197-198:

  • Overseer: "James Glasgow is appointed for Kilwochter, James Callwell for the south side of the water, James Kerr for the landward of Lairn, James Getty and Charles Adam for the towns" (vol. 3 p. 18), under the minute printed "May 29, 1700.—Thursday".
  • Not an elder in November 1700: "The Session of Enver, alias Lairn, from the tyme of the ordination of Rev. Mr. Ogilvie" (vol. 3 pp. 18-19) names twenty elders and no Glasgow.
  • Session list opening the 1721 book: "James Glasgow (erased), deceased 1726", sixth of thirty elders, directly after five men who were on the 1700 list (vol. 3 p. 197).
  • 3 June 1722: "The Presbytery met at Larne ... The Commissioners were Captain Agnew, James Glasgow, John Torbet, James Boyd, John M'Brown, and John Finlay" (vol. 3 p. 198). James Boyd is not on the session list, so a commissioner was not necessarily an elder.

The years are corrected from the 1699 and 1700 given in earlier notes. Porter himself adds "(1700)" to the heading of the stipend run ("May 12, 1699 (1700)"), and the weekdays written into the minutes fit 1700 and not 1699: 12 May 1700 was a Sunday ("two Sabbaths together, of which this is the first") and the Presbytery of "the 7th of this inst." fell on Tuesday 7 May 1700. The minute printed "Feb. 27, 1700" is 27 February 1700/01 by ordinary Old Style reckoning. The minute printed "May 29, 1700.—Thursday" belongs to the same continuous run: 29 May fell on a Wednesday in 1700 and a Thursday in 1701, and the run's other weekday clues after 25 March (13 April, a Sunday; 17 April, a Thursday) also fit 1701, so it is probably Thursday 29 May 1701. That is an inference from the weekdays; a wrong weekday in the copy cannot be excluded without the original or the 1826 printing.

These extracts are a printed transcription (The Christian Unitarian 2, 1863, and 3, 1864) of a manuscript copy of the 1699-1701 Larne session record, which Porter believed was "made or procured" by Rev. Samuel Eccles for Rev. D. Davison, who printed extracts from it in the Christian Moderator (1826), pp. 207-245. Porter had not found the original and arranged the extracts "not chronologically, but according to subject", so they stand two removes from the minute book. The entries from 1721 onward are Porter's printed transcription of the session book then in his hands; whether that book is now within PRONI MIC/1B/6 is unverified.

Source findingsNo Glasgow represented Larne at the General Synod — 6 October 2026In the printed General Synod rolls the ruling elder on the Larne minister's row is: 1694 "from Larne, Rob: Neilson" ( p.

In the printed General Synod rolls the ruling elder on the Larne minister's row is: 1694 "from Larne, Rob: Neilson" (p. 12); 1703 James Caldwell (beside Ogilvie, p. 64); 1704 Sam: Smily (p. 75); 1706 John Gordon (p. 106); 1707 Robert Neilson (p. 124); 1708 Robt Ker (p. 141); 1709 none printed (p. 168); 1710 Robt Kerr (p. 188); 1711 William Murray (p. 218); 1712 Ja: Lyle (p. 248); 1715 Ja: Lyle (beside Hud, p. 346); 1716 Rob: Ker (p. 385); 1718 James Lyle (beside Clugston, p. 449); 1719 Rob: Ker (p. 482); 1720 John Tarbett (p. 513). There is no Larne row in 1697 and 1698 (the congregation was vacant; the 1698 row "Wm Leeck - Wm Adair" is probably Ballymena's, Leech being "of Belly-manogh" in 1712), in 1705 (Ogilvie is not on the roll) or in 1713, 1714 and 1717 (vacant). Getty's "Enver" rows, 1715-1720, print Ja: Whyte, Ja: Boyd, James Jackson, John McCullogh, Ja: Jackson and Samuel Smely. The 1691 and 1692 lists name no Larne elder, and the Synods of 1699 to 1702 print no names.

No Glasgow of any forename is printed as Larne's elder in any of these years, or anywhere in the Antrim presbytery lists from 1691 to 1720 (every year checked on the page images) or the Belfast presbytery lists (checked on the images except 1703, part of 1706, 1710, 1719 and 1720, which are OCR only). From 1721 the rolls print ministers and elders in separate columns, so no elder can be tied to Larne; no Glasgow appears in the Antrim lists of 1721-1732 (1721 on the image, later years OCR only). Each congregation sent one elder, so this shows only that no Glasgow represented Larne at Synod in the years printed. It does not show that no Glasgow sat on the Larne session: Porter's session list has James Glasgow an elder by 1721.

The ruling elder James Glasgow printed in the Antrim lists in 1698, 1703 and 1705 sat beside the ministers of Drumaul and Duneane, not Larne, and is represented separately as Glasgow-3967; he is probably not this James.

Identity and family

Relationship assessmentJohn Glasgow-3913 was possibly a close relative (lowered from probable on 6 October 2026).
  • John Glasgow-3913 was possibly a close relative (lowered from probable on 6 October 2026). The evidence is the adjacent 1669 entries with the same uncommon spelling; the men of 1700-01 are tied to the 1669 householders only by unproved continuity and never appear in the same minute, so they are not an independent second record group. The exact relationship is open.
  • Robert Glasgow-3970 at Larne in 1653 is a possible father or older relative only.
  • Robert-1502, Hugh-1503, James-1504, William-1505 and Robert-1143 belong to the later district cluster; none is proved as James's child.
  • Hugh Glasgow (Glasgow-1499) is not supported as a separate son. Porter's session-list transcription assigns deceased 1726 to James himself and gives 8 July 1767 for the documented Hugh Glasgow. Hugh-1499's only defining date is therefore a misattribution, and the profile is a probable duplicate of Hugh-1503 rather than evidence for another child of James.
Identity audit — 21 September 2026The earlier summary treated 1669–1726 as one continuous biography.

The earlier summary treated 1669–1726 as one continuous biography. The sources remain valid occurrences, but their linkage is now explicitly qualified: if the 1669 householder was at least 21, survival to 1726 would make him at least about 78. That is possible and does not disprove continuity, but a son or other same-name successor must also be tested. Porter's deceased 1726 belongs to the later James, not to Hugh; this correction leaves that reading intact.

The Belfast shipmaster James Glasgow-3172 has an unexamined 1686 will extract, PRONI T/828/15, indexed through NLI MS_UR_012684. A will date alone cannot exclude his survival into the later Kilwaughter period. Confirmed probate or death in 1686 would exclude identity with the later officer; it would not by itself distinguish him from the 1669 householder. No merge or new kinship is supported. See the bounded audit for search scope and access limits.

Identity assessment — one James or two, 6 October 2026Keep one profile; do not split.

Keep one profile; do not split. The records cannot decide whether the 1669 householder and the later officer were one man (unresolved).

  • The elder "James Glasgow (erased), deceased 1726", the James Glasgow who was a commissioner at Larne on 3 June 1722 and the 1727 Connor wills index entry "James Glasgow, Kilwater" are probably one man (inference): one James in the congregational record, a Kilwaughter place in the index, and a death year that fits the index year.
  • The overseer for Kilwochter of (probably) 29 May 1701 is probably the same man, but this is the weakest step: the session minutes for 1701-1721 are lost, and the identification rests on the same name and district and the absence of any recorded rival.
  • He is never marked senior or junior. That proves little: the clerks used such markers inconsistently, and this congregation shows same-name succession (a James Ramsay on the 1700 list and a James Ramsay constituted elder on 30 April 1721; two unmarked Robert Whites on the 1721 list).
  • If he was the 1669 householder he was about 53 or more in 1701, 74 or more in 1722 and about 78 at death. That is possible: the 1722 Presbytery met at Larne, so a commissioner did not have to travel. An unrecorded successor is also possible.

Death: 1726, from the annotation "deceased 1726" against James Glasgow in the Larne session list (Porter's printed transcription); a will of James Glasgow of Kilwater is indexed in 1727 (Connor; original lost). This applies to the session elder. "Before 1651" for the birth is only a boundary from the 1669 roll.

Relationship assessment — John Glasgow-3913, 6 October 2026John Glasgow-3913 and James Glasgow-1081 were possibly close kin.

John Glasgow-3913 and James Glasgow-1081 were possibly close kin. The 1669 hearth-money roll (Macafee transcription, records 5347-5348) lists "Jo Glascho" and "James Glascho" consecutively at Kilwaughter Demesne with the same uncommon spelling. That is strong association evidence that the two households were connected, but it states no relationship and supports no particular degree: brother, father and son, uncle and nephew, and cousin are all open. Men named John (called "sen." in 1700) and James act for the Kilwochter district in 1700-01, never in the same minute; their identity with the 1669 householders is itself unproved, so they are not an independent second line of evidence. The assessment was "probable" until 6 October 2026 and was lowered because every element of it is association evidence (adjacency, spelling, place, recurring forenames). The sibling arrangement on WikiTree exists only through the uncertain shared father Glasgow-3970; it stays uncertain and nothing is detached.

Still open

Questions the records have not yet answered, suggested next searches and suggested corrections.

Decisive next records
  • NRS GD154/505-534 and PRONI D282 tenant succession.
  • PRONI T/808/14889, 1666 subsidy roll.
  • Probate substitutes for the destroyed 1727 will.
  • Complete County Antrim townland indexes rather than surname-only deed searches; the volunteer townland transcription is complete for 1708–1820, while the ordinary person index is incomplete.
Next records
  • PRONI MIC/1B/6: the first page of the session book begun in February 1721, for the exact wording and order of the list and any note of when James became an elder.
  • The Christian Moderator (1826), pp. 207-245, the earlier printing of the 1699-1701 extracts, to test the year of the overseer minute.
  • NRS GD154/525, /530 and /532 (Kilwaughter rentals c.1690-1708): a James and a John Glasgow as tenants, with any "elder", "younger" or successor wording, would test one James against two.

Family and relationships

Unless a link is marked otherwise, the family links below come from the WikiTree family tree and have not yet been checked against original records.

Parents 1Robert Glasgowbefore 1625–date not established
Person and datesRelationshipCurrent assessmentWhy this relationship is shown
Robert Glasgow
before 1625–date not established
fatherUnassessed father linkFrom the family tree; not yet checked against records.
Children 2Robert Glasgowc. 1675–date not establishedJames Glasgow R.Ebefore 1678–after 1705
Person and datesRelationshipCurrent assessmentWhy this relationship is shown
Robert Glasgow
c. 1675–date not established
sonUnassessed son linkFrom the family tree; not yet checked against records.
James Glasgow R.E
before 1678–after 1705
sonUnassessed son linkFrom the family tree; not yet checked against records.
Brothers and sisters 1John Glasgowc. 1650–after 1700
Person and datesRelationshipCurrent assessmentWhy this relationship is shown
John Glasgow
c. 1650–after 1700
siblingUnassessed sibling linkFrom the family tree; not yet checked against records.

Life and records

Explore the dated recordsChronology, roles and locations

Historical chronology

Birth

Subject

Life events

Demesne townland, Kilwaughter (estimated)

Hearth-money return, Kilwaughter Demesne

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Demesne townland, Kilwaughter

Record detail

The later Kilwaughter James is a probable repeated identity; no relationship to the separate Drummaul Glass households is stated.

Kilwaughter district overseer

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

Directly named in the published congregational transcript; identity with the 1669 householder remains probable.

Meeting-house overseer, session member and will-index occurrence

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

The 1700 actor, the man recorded dead in 1726 and the 1727 testator are probably one man.

Named in Kilwaughter session list

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

Probably the same James as the 1700 overseer and 1727 testator.

Presbytery commissioner

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

Probably the same James as the 1721 session member.

Death

Subject

Life events

Kilwaughter, Larne, County Antrim, Ireland

Marked deceased in congregational list

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

Strongly matches the 1727 Kilwater will-index entry.

Connor diocesan will index

Record association

Records mentioning this person

Kilwaughter

Record detail

Indexed as James Glasgow of Kilwater; the original will does not survive.

Sources

Browse 7 source recordsReferences and source limitations
  1. Hearth-money return, Kilwaughter Demesne

    1669 · Demesne townland, Kilwaughter · Source association

    The later Kilwaughter James is a probable repeated identity; no relationship to the separate Drummaul Glass households is stated.

  2. Meeting-house overseer, session member and will-index occurrence

    1700–1727 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    The 1700 actor, the man recorded dead in 1726 and the 1727 testator are probably one man.

  3. Kilwaughter district overseer

    1700 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    Directly named in the published congregational transcript; identity with the 1669 householder remains probable.

  4. Named in Kilwaughter session list

    1721 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    Probably the same James as the 1700 overseer and 1727 testator.

  5. Presbytery commissioner

    1722 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    Probably the same James as the 1721 session member.

  6. Marked deceased in congregational list

    1726 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    Strongly matches the 1727 Kilwater will-index entry.

  7. Connor diocesan will index

    1727 · Kilwaughter · Source association

    Indexed as James Glasgow of Kilwater; the original will does not survive.

Each entry is a separately identified record. Shared URLs may represent one transcription or search page containing more than one record; they are not independent confirmations.

WikiTree comparison and complete revised profileOpen complete content
Original notes and downloadsNotes as written, replaced interpretations, comparisons and data exports

The material the page is built from: research notes as originally written, earlier interpretations that have been replaced, automated comparisons and data downloads. The account above is the current one; nothing here overrides it.

Research notes as originally written

Current conclusion

This profile represents the Irish James `Glascho`, a Kilwaughter householder in
1669. His identification with the same-name congregational officer from 1701,
apparently deceased by 1726, is a working continuity hypothesis, not an explicit
recorded identity. A same-name successor remains possible. The 1727 Connor wills
index entry for James Glasgow of Kilwater is a strong match to the later officer.

The Scottish James recorded in 1645 is now correctly represented separately as
[Glasgow-3971](https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3971). Their identity is an
open, low-to-moderate hypothesis, not a proved merge. No source names the Irish
James's parents or children.

The repeated association with [John Glasgow (Glasgow-3913)](https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3913)
is stronger than a one-record coincidence. Their entries are consecutive in the
1669 roll (record numbers 5347-5348), place both men at Kilwaughter Demesne and
use the same uncommon `Glascho` spelling. About thirty years later men named John and James
represented Kilwaughter and served as its overseer respectively. This supports
a persistent local family cluster, but neither man is explicitly identified as
the earlier householder. **Close kinship is possible, not established** (lowered
from probable on 6 October 2026; see the assessment below); neither source names a
relationship or establishes brothers, father and son, cousins or another degree.

The 1669 transcription distinguishes the Kilwaughter `Glascho` entries,
standardised as Glasgow, from numerous `Glass` entries including an established
Drummaul family. Do not use western County Antrim Glass households as children
or descendants of this James without a bridging record.

Source findings

| Source | Finding | Assessment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PRONI `T/307/A`; W. Macafee, [1669 Antrim Hearth Money Roll](https://www.billmacafee.com/1660shearthmoneyrolls/1669hearthmoneyrollsantrim.pdf), records 5347-5348, PDF p. 36 | James `Glascho` was a Kilwaughter Demesne householder immediately after Jo `Glascho`. | Direct Irish occurrence; no age, origin or relationship. |
| Classon Porter, [*Congregational Memoirs: Larne and Kilwaughter*](https://archive.org/details/christianunitari0002unse), continued in [volume 3](https://archive.org/details/christianunitari0003unse) | James was appointed overseer for Kilwochter at the minute printed `May 29, 1700.—Thursday` (probably Thursday 29 May 1701), stands sixth on the session list that opens the 1721 book, was one of six commissioners when the Presbytery met at Larne on 3 June 1722, and is marked `deceased 1726`. | Locality/name continuity hypothesis; published transcription does not expressly identify the 1669 householder. |
| [PRONI Name Search](https://apps.proni.gov.uk/ProniNames_IE/SearchPage.aspx), Connor wills index | James Glasgow of Kilwater, 1727. | Strong death/probate match; the original will is lost and no kin are supplied. |

Relationship assessment

- John Glasgow-3913 was possibly a close relative (lowered from probable on
  6 October 2026). The evidence is the adjacent 1669 entries with the same uncommon
  spelling; the men of 1700-01 are tied to the 1669 householders only by unproved
  continuity and never appear in the same minute, so they are not an independent
  second record group. The exact relationship is open.
- Robert Glasgow-3970 at Larne in 1653 is a possible father or older relative only.
- Robert-1502, Hugh-1503, James-1504, William-1505 and Robert-1143 belong to the
  later district cluster; none is proved as James's child.
- [Hugh Glasgow (Glasgow-1499)](https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1499)
  is not supported as a separate son. Porter's session-list transcription assigns
  `deceased 1726` to James himself and gives 8 July 1767 for the documented Hugh
  Glasgow. Hugh-1499's only defining date is therefore a misattribution, and the
  profile is a probable duplicate of Hugh-1503 rather than evidence for another
  child of James.

Decisive next records

- NRS GD154/505-534 and PRONI D282 tenant succession.
- PRONI T/808/14889, 1666 subsidy roll.
- Probate substitutes for the destroyed 1727 will.
- Complete County Antrim townland indexes rather than surname-only deed
  searches; the volunteer townland transcription is complete for 1708–1820,
  while the ordinary person index is incomplete.

Identity audit — 21 September 2026

The earlier summary treated 1669–1726 as one continuous biography. The sources
remain valid occurrences, but their linkage is now explicitly qualified: if the
1669 householder was at least 21, survival to 1726 would make him at least about
78. That is possible and does not disprove continuity, but a son or other
same-name successor must also be tested. Porter's `deceased 1726` belongs to the
later James, not to Hugh; this correction leaves that reading intact.

The Belfast shipmaster [James Glasgow-3172](https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3172)
has an unexamined 1686 will extract, PRONI T/828/15, indexed through
[NLI MS_UR_012684](https://sources.nli.ie/Record/MS_UR_012684). A will date alone
cannot exclude his survival into the later Kilwaughter period. Confirmed probate
or death in 1686 would exclude identity with the later officer; it would not by
itself distinguish him from the 1669 householder. No merge or new kinship is
supported. See the [bounded audit](../larne-proof-2026-09-21/early-james.md) for
search scope and access limits.

Source findings

### Porter's extracts re-read on the page images — 6 October 2026

Re-read on the page images of [volume 3, pp. 16-19](https://archive.org/details/christianunitari0003unse/page/18/mode/1up) and [pp. 197-198](https://archive.org/details/christianunitari0003unse/page/197/mode/1up):

- **Overseer:** "James Glasgow is appointed for Kilwochter, James Callwell for the south side of the water, James Kerr for the landward of Lairn, James Getty and Charles Adam for the towns" (vol. 3 p. 18), under the minute printed "May 29, 1700.—Thursday".
- **Not an elder in November 1700:** "The Session of Enver, alias Lairn, from the tyme of the ordination of Rev. Mr. Ogilvie" (vol. 3 pp. 18-19) names twenty elders and no Glasgow.
- **Session list opening the 1721 book:** "James Glasgow (erased), deceased 1726", sixth of thirty elders, directly after five men who were on the 1700 list (vol. 3 p. 197).
- **3 June 1722:** "The Presbytery met at Larne ... The Commissioners were Captain Agnew, James Glasgow, John Torbet, James Boyd, John M'Brown, and John Finlay" (vol. 3 p. 198). James Boyd is not on the session list, so a commissioner was not necessarily an elder.

The years are corrected from the 1699 and 1700 given in earlier notes. Porter himself adds "(1700)" to the heading of the stipend run ("May 12, 1699 (1700)"), and the weekdays written into the minutes fit 1700 and not 1699: 12 May 1700 was a Sunday ("two Sabbaths together, of which this is the first") and the Presbytery of "the 7th of this inst." fell on Tuesday 7 May 1700. The minute printed "Feb. 27, 1700" is 27 February 1700/01 by ordinary Old Style reckoning. The minute printed "May 29, 1700.—Thursday" belongs to the same continuous run: 29 May fell on a Wednesday in 1700 and a Thursday in 1701, and the run's other weekday clues after 25 March (13 April, a Sunday; 17 April, a Thursday) also fit 1701, so it is **probably Thursday 29 May 1701**. That is an inference from the weekdays; a wrong weekday in the copy cannot be excluded without the original or the 1826 printing.

These extracts are a printed transcription (*The Christian Unitarian* 2, 1863, and 3, 1864) of a manuscript copy of the 1699-1701 Larne session record, which Porter believed was "made or procured" by Rev. Samuel Eccles for Rev. D. Davison, who printed extracts from it in the *Christian Moderator* (1826), pp. 207-245. Porter had not found the original and arranged the extracts "not chronologically, but according to subject", so they stand two removes from the minute book. The entries from 1721 onward are Porter's printed transcription of the session book then in his hands; whether that book is now within PRONI MIC/1B/6 is unverified.

Identity assessment — one James or two, 6 October 2026

Keep one profile; do not split. The records cannot decide whether the 1669 householder and the later officer were one man (unresolved).

- The elder "James Glasgow (erased), deceased 1726", the James Glasgow who was a commissioner at Larne on 3 June 1722 and the 1727 Connor wills index entry "James Glasgow, Kilwater" are **probably one man** (inference): one James in the congregational record, a Kilwaughter place in the index, and a death year that fits the index year.
- The overseer for Kilwochter of (probably) 29 May 1701 is probably the same man, but this is the weakest step: the session minutes for 1701-1721 are lost, and the identification rests on the same name and district and the absence of any recorded rival.
- He is never marked senior or junior. That proves little: the clerks used such markers inconsistently, and this congregation shows same-name succession (a James Ramsay on the 1700 list and a James Ramsay constituted elder on 30 April 1721; two unmarked Robert Whites on the 1721 list).
- If he was the 1669 householder he was about 53 or more in 1701, 74 or more in 1722 and about 78 at death. That is possible: the 1722 Presbytery met at Larne, so a commissioner did not have to travel. An unrecorded successor is also possible.

Death: 1726, from the annotation "deceased 1726" against James Glasgow in the Larne session list (Porter's printed transcription); a will of James Glasgow of Kilwater is indexed in 1727 (Connor; original lost). This applies to the session elder. "Before 1651" for the birth is only a boundary from the 1669 roll.

Relationship assessment — John Glasgow-3913, 6 October 2026

John Glasgow-3913 and James Glasgow-1081 were possibly close kin. The 1669 hearth-money roll (Macafee transcription, records 5347-5348) lists "Jo Glascho" and "James Glascho" consecutively at Kilwaughter Demesne with the same uncommon spelling. That is strong association evidence that the two households were connected, but it states no relationship and supports no particular degree: brother, father and son, uncle and nephew, and cousin are all open. Men named John (called "sen." in 1700) and James act for the Kilwochter district in 1700-01, never in the same minute; their identity with the 1669 householders is itself unproved, so they are not an independent second line of evidence. The assessment was "probable" until 6 October 2026 and was lowered because every element of it is association evidence (adjacency, spelling, place, recurring forenames). The sibling arrangement on WikiTree exists only through the uncertain shared father Glasgow-3970; it stays uncertain and nothing is detached.

Next records

- PRONI MIC/1B/6: the first page of the session book begun in February 1721, for the exact wording and order of the list and any note of when James became an elder.
- The *Christian Moderator* (1826), pp. 207-245, the earlier printing of the 1699-1701 extracts, to test the year of the overseer minute.
- NRS GD154/525, /530 and /532 (Kilwaughter rentals c.1690-1708): a James and a John Glasgow as tenants, with any "elder", "younger" or successor wording, would test one James against two.

Source findings

### No Glasgow represented Larne at the General Synod — 6 October 2026

In the printed General Synod rolls the ruling elder on the Larne minister's row is: 1694 "from Larne, Rob: Neilson" ([p. 12](https://archive.org/details/recordsofgeneral01pres/page/12/mode/1up)); 1703 James Caldwell (beside Ogilvie, [p. 64](https://archive.org/details/recordsofgeneral01pres/page/64/mode/1up)); 1704 Sam: Smily (p. 75); 1706 John Gordon (p. 106); 1707 Robert Neilson (p. 124); 1708 Robt Ker (p. 141); 1709 none printed (p. 168); 1710 Robt Kerr (p. 188); 1711 William Murray (p. 218); 1712 Ja: Lyle (p. 248); 1715 Ja: Lyle (beside Hud, p. 346); 1716 Rob: Ker (p. 385); 1718 James Lyle (beside Clugston, p. 449); 1719 Rob: Ker (p. 482); 1720 John Tarbett (p. 513). There is no Larne row in 1697 and 1698 (the congregation was vacant; the 1698 row "Wm Leeck - Wm Adair" is probably Ballymena's, Leech being "of Belly-manogh" in 1712), in 1705 (Ogilvie is not on the roll) or in 1713, 1714 and 1717 (vacant). Getty's "Enver" rows, 1715-1720, print Ja: Whyte, Ja: Boyd, James Jackson, John McCullogh, Ja: Jackson and Samuel Smely. The 1691 and 1692 lists name no Larne elder, and the Synods of 1699 to 1702 print no names.

**No Glasgow of any forename is printed as Larne's elder in any of these years**, or anywhere in the Antrim presbytery lists from 1691 to 1720 (every year checked on the page images) or the Belfast presbytery lists (checked on the images except 1703, part of 1706, 1710, 1719 and 1720, which are OCR only). From 1721 the rolls print ministers and elders in separate columns, so no elder can be tied to Larne; no Glasgow appears in the Antrim lists of 1721-1732 (1721 on the image, later years OCR only). Each congregation sent one elder, so this shows only that no Glasgow represented Larne at Synod in the years printed. It does not show that no Glasgow sat on the Larne session: Porter's session list has James Glasgow an elder by 1721.

The ruling elder James Glasgow printed in the Antrim lists in 1698, 1703 and 1705 sat beside the ministers of Drumaul and Duneane, not Larne, and is represented separately as Glasgow-3967; he is probably not this James.
Automated parent comparison (research aid, not a recommendation)

Stored scores are preserved for audit only. They are not probabilities or genealogical evidence, and a reviewed exclusion remains excluded.

  • James Glasgow: 11/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Ann (Johnson) Glasgow: 8/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • James Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Agnes (Watt) Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • James Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Robert Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Agnes (Duncan) Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • John Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Eupham Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
  • Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow: 0/100 · Stored classification: weak lead
Research data and downloads

Person data (JSON) · Family network

{
  "id": "Glasgow-1081",
  "vitals": {
    "birth": {
      "date": "before 1651",
      "place": "Larne, County Antrim, Ireland",
      "status": "uncertain"
    },
    "death": {
      "date": "1726",
      "place": "Kilwaughter, Larne, County Antrim, Ireland",
      "status": "uncertain"
    }
  },
  "relationships": {
    "parents": [
      {
        "id": "Glasgow-3970",
        "name": "Robert Glasgow",
        "relationship": "father",
        "status": "unknown",
        "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
        "basis": "tree",
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "tree_relationship": true,
        "relationship_source": "wikitree_parent_field",
        "tree_status": "uncertain",
        "tree_status_label": "WikiTree: uncertain parent",
        "url": "/people/glasgow-3970.html",
        "json_url": "/people/glasgow-3970.json",
        "network_url": "/people/glasgow-3970.network.json",
        "wikitree_url": "https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3970",
        "claim_id": "C-7b7a4b4a126a"
      }
    ],
    "spouses": [],
    "children": [
      {
        "id": "Glasgow-3967",
        "name": "James Glasgow R.E",
        "relationship": "son",
        "status": "unknown",
        "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
        "basis": "tree",
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "tree_relationship": true,
        "relationship_source": "reconstructed_parent_reference",
        "tree_status": "unmarked",
        "tree_status_label": "WikiTree: relationship status unmarked",
        "url": "/people/glasgow-3967.html",
        "json_url": "/people/glasgow-3967.json",
        "network_url": "/people/glasgow-3967.network.json",
        "wikitree_url": "https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3967",
        "claim_id": "C-c86e05db913b"
      },
      {
        "id": "Glasgow-1502",
        "name": "Robert Glasgow",
        "relationship": "son",
        "status": "unknown",
        "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
        "basis": "tree",
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "tree_relationship": true,
        "relationship_source": "reconstructed_parent_reference",
        "tree_status": "unmarked",
        "tree_status_label": "WikiTree: relationship status unmarked",
        "url": "/people/glasgow-1502.html",
        "json_url": "/people/glasgow-1502.json",
        "network_url": "/people/glasgow-1502.network.json",
        "wikitree_url": "https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-1502",
        "claim_id": "C-2a4d55d9c517"
      }
    ],
    "siblings": [
      {
        "id": "Glasgow-3913",
        "name": "John Glasgow",
        "relationship": "sibling",
        "status": "unknown",
        "status_label": "WikiTree relationship snapshot",
        "basis": "tree",
        "evidence_ids": [],
        "tree_relationship": true,
        "relationship_source": "wikitree_relation_snapshot",
        "url": "/people/glasgow-3913.html",
        "json_url": "/people/glasgow-3913.json",
        "network_url": "/people/glasgow-3913.network.json",
        "wikitree_url": "https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Glasgow-3913",
        "claim_id": "C-0b7f5f02f857"
      }
    ]
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "id": "C-0b10fc9ace12",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Demesne townland, Kilwaughter (1669).",
      "status": "proved",
      "status_label": "Documented occurrence",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-0b10fc9ace12"
      ],
      "notes": "Hearth-money return, Kilwaughter Demesne",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-4a23941a5541",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1700–1727).",
      "status": "probable",
      "status_label": "Probable repeated identity",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-4a23941a5541"
      ],
      "notes": "Meeting-house overseer, session member and will-index occurrence",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-b532713107b2",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1700).",
      "status": "probable",
      "status_label": "Probable repeated identity",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-b532713107b2"
      ],
      "notes": "Kilwaughter district overseer",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-0a4f950f4e0f",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1721).",
      "status": "probable",
      "status_label": "Probable repeated identity",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-0a4f950f4e0f"
      ],
      "notes": "Named in Kilwaughter session list",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-24ca92f0ae84",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1722).",
      "status": "probable",
      "status_label": "Probable repeated identity",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-24ca92f0ae84"
      ],
      "notes": "Presbytery commissioner",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-92050f89c5eb",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1726).",
      "status": "probable",
      "status_label": "Probable repeated identity",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-92050f89c5eb"
      ],
      "notes": "Marked deceased in congregational list",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-62af3ff32277",
      "type": "recorded_occurrence",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was recorded in Kilwaughter (1727).",
      "status": "proved",
      "status_label": "Documented occurrence",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-62af3ff32277"
      ],
      "notes": "Connor diocesan will index",
      "provenance": "mapped_record"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-4d0991b36ae3",
      "type": "relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-3971",
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glasgow was possible same man as James Glascho",
      "status": "possible",
      "status_label": "Open; low-to-moderate",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-d90df0857620"
      ],
      "notes": "The chronology permits the identity, but no record carries the Scottish child to Ireland or names the Irish man's birthplace or parents. The profiles must remain separate.",
      "provenance": "surname-research/indexes/relationship-hypotheses.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-0e20e3de17c4",
      "type": "relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081",
        "Glasgow-3970"
      ],
      "claim": "James Glascho was possible son or younger relative of Robert Glaskow",
      "status": "possible",
      "status_label": "Open; low",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-477ae3862c0f"
      ],
      "notes": "The location and generation fit, but neither record states a relationship and the men could be unrelated namesakes.",
      "provenance": "surname-research/indexes/relationship-hypotheses.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-0ee3fed572bd",
      "type": "relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-3913",
        "Glasgow-1081"
      ],
      "claim": "John / Jo Glascho was probable brother or close collateral of James Glascho",
      "status": "possible",
      "status_label": "Working; moderate",
      "evidence_ids": [
        "E-380ba03058c5"
      ],
      "notes": "They were separate adjacent same-surname householders at the same demesne. Brother is plausible, but father-son, uncle-nephew and cousins remain possible because the roll gives no ages or kin terms.",
      "provenance": "surname-research/indexes/relationship-hypotheses.md"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-7b7a4b4a126a",
      "type": "tree_relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081",
        "Glasgow-3970"
      ],
      "claim": "WikiTree currently connects James Glascho and Robert Glasgow as father.",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "notes": "Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.",
      "provenance": "wikitree_parent_field"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-c86e05db913b",
      "type": "tree_relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081",
        "Glasgow-3967"
      ],
      "claim": "WikiTree currently connects James Glascho and James Glasgow R.E as son.",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "notes": "Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.",
      "provenance": "reconstructed_parent_reference"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-2a4d55d9c517",
      "type": "tree_relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081",
        "Glasgow-1502"
      ],
      "claim": "WikiTree currently connects James Glascho and Robert Glasgow as son.",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "WikiTree tree relationship",
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "notes": "Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.",
      "provenance": "reconstructed_parent_reference"
    },
    {
      "id": "C-0b7f5f02f857",
      "type": "tree_relationship",
      "subject_ids": [
        "Glasgow-1081",
        "Glasgow-3913"
      ],
      "claim": "WikiTree currently connects James Glascho and John Glasgow as sibling.",
      "status": "unknown",
      "status_label": "WikiTree relationship snapshot",
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "notes": "Tree structure only; no documentary conclusion is implied.",
      "provenance": "wikitree_relation_snapshot"
    }
  ],
  "research_assessments": null,
  "shared_relationship_assertions": null,
  "relationship_history": null
}

Saved people and pages

Select 2 people to compare their evidence.