Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow

c. 1624 – ?

Cunningham-22604 · 1 mapped association

ScotlandDeath place unknown

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
2Close relations
3Evidence items
2Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1624 · Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Not recorded
Spouses
Robert Glasgow
Children
James Glasgow
Gender
Female
WikiTree
Cunningham-22604
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
57

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJames Glasgow (1645)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

No candidate met the minimum age, location or family-naming threshold.

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Jonet GlasgowGlasgow-1089

Automated fit43/100
Similar Person
Dates1622–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Automated fit38/100
Similar Person
Dates1597–?PlacesRobertland, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same spouse name (+20)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 27; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same spouse name (+20)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 27; retained without deduction

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Cunningham-22604

This profile should represent the younger Jonet Cunningham reportedly named as mother of James Glasgow in a November 1645 Glasgow parish entry. She is distinct from Jonet Cunningham (Cunningham-20923), who was mother of Robert baptised in 1618.

The 1645 index directly supports Jonet as mother of the Scottish child. Her identification as wife of Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1078) and mother of the later Kilwaughter James is plausible but uncertain, because it depends on two identity links not stated in the register.

Live-profile audit 19 July 2026: the full biography, same-name distinction and relationship cautions have been applied. Only the structured birth certainty remains to change.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Cunningham-22604

SourceFindingAssessment
Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950, FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK, derived from a Glasgow parish registerReports James Glasgow in November 1645 to parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham.Direct indexed motherhood for the Scottish child. The original page has not been inspected, and derivative dates conflict.
Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1078) findingsRobert baptised 1618 is the leading identity for the younger father and the Larne settler.Plausible spouse identity, not proved by occupation, address or marriage record.
James Glasgow (Glasgow-1081) findingsThe Scottish child is a moderate-to-high match to the 1669 Kilwaughter householder.Plausible trans-Channel identity; no Irish record names his mother.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.3 claims
1Derivative
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended correction applied

Cunningham-22604

Verified live 19 August 2026: the 1624 birth is marked about/uncertain and the unsupported Scotland birthplace has been removed. The uncertain Scottish- child/Kilwaughter identity links remain explicitly qualified.

Recommended correction following location audit

Cunningham-22604

Retain or restore Scotland as Jonet's uncertain birthplace. The proposed Scottish-to-Kilwaughter identity remains unresolved, but no reviewed evidence concretely conflicts with Scotland as a broad, uncertain location.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. original "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQHK-VMK); derived from a Glasgow Old Parish Register entry.
  2. derivative "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, record VQHK-VMK.
  3. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Cunningham-22604
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Cunningham-22604 was captured 2026-08-19T14:01:18+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ChildrenJames GlasgowGlasgow-39711645-11-11 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenRev. John Glasgow M.AGlasgow-10731653-00-00 · Scotland · 1721-12-00 · Kilbirnie, Ayrshire, Scotland
SpousesRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10781618-11-17 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Jonet Cunningham—also recorded as Jonet Conynghame—was probably born in Scotland during the early seventeenth century. Her current estimated birth year of about 1624 is uncertain and is not supported by a known baptismal record.
  • A Glasgow parish index records a James Glasgow in November 1645 as a child of Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQHK-VMK); derived from a Glasgow Old Parish Register entry.
  • This record directly establishes that a couple named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham were the parents of the Scottish child.
  • The father was probably Robert Glasgow, baptised at Glasgow in 1618. Their son was probably James Glasgow, who may later have become the James Glascho recorded at Kilwaughter, County Antrim, from 1669.
  • Neither identification is yet proved by a surviving record expressly connecting the 1645 family with the later Irish householders. Jonet’s relationship to Robert and James should therefore remain marked uncertain where the profiles represent that proposed Scottish-to-Irish reconstruction.
  • No reliable record has yet been identified for Jonet’s parents, marriage, later residence or death. Research NotesThe November 1645 record The FamilySearch index reports a James Glasgow recorded at Glasgow in November 1645 to parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham.
  • Derivative references give conflicting dates, including 11 and 25 November. The original Old Parish Register page has not yet been reviewed, so it remains unclear:
  • which date is correct;

    • whether the event was a birth, baptism or registration;
    • whether an occupation or residence was recorded for the father;
    • who appeared as witnesses or sponsors.
  • The profile should therefore refer only to November 1645 unless the original entry is obtained. Estimated birth Jonet’s birth year of about 1624 is an estimate rather than a documented event.
  • It appears to have been calculated from the 1645 record of her child. No source currently gives Jonet’s age or birthplace. Her birth should remain uncertain, and Scotland should not be entered as a more precise place without additional evidence. Proposed husband Robert Glasgow, baptised at Glasgow on 17 November 1618, is the best current candidate for the Robert named with Jonet in the 1645 entry.
  • The 1645 index does not give Robert’s age, occupation or parentage. It therefore cannot by itself prove that Jonet’s husband was the man baptised in 1618. Their relationship should remain uncertain. Proposed son The Scottish James recorded in November 1645 was directly a son of a Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham.
  • He is probably James Glasgow, later recorded as a householder and Presbyterian congregation member at Kilwaughter. A 1645 birth would make him about twenty-four at the time of the 1669 Hearth Money Roll.
  • No surviving record explicitly states that the Scottish child became the Kilwaughter householder. If Glasgow-1081 represents both identities, Jonet’s structured relationship to him should therefore remain uncertain. Not the older Jonet Cunningham This Jonet must not be confused with Jonet Conynghame, wife of Robert Glasgow and mother of the Robert baptised in 1618.
  • Robert Glasgow and Jonet Conynghame | +-- Robert Glasgow, baptised 1618 probable husband of the younger Jonet Cunningham | +-- James Glasgow, recorded November 1645
  • The repeated names created an earlier interpretation in which the older Robert and Jonet were treated as parents of children recorded from 1614 through 1645. That thirty-one-year span is possible but doubtful.
  • The better current reconstruction places the 1645 James one generation lower, as the son of the Robert baptised in 1618 and this younger Jonet Cunningham. Name forms The surname appears in several equivalent historical forms, including:
  • The spelling used in a derivative index should not be treated as evidence that separate spellings identify different families. Suggested structured data

    • Preferred name: Jonet
    • Last name at birth: Cunningham
    • Other surname spelling: Conynghame
    • Birth: about 1624, Scotland, uncertain and estimated
    • Death: unknown
    • Parents: unknown
    • Spouse: Robert Glasgow, uncertain
    • Child: James Glasgow, uncertain where the profile combines the Scottish and Irish identities Further research The most useful next records are:
  • The complete Glasgow Old Parish Register page containing the November 1645 entry

    • Other Glasgow baptisms to parents named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham
    • A marriage record or marriage contract for Robert and Jonet
    • Glasgow burgess, craft and property records identifying the younger Robert’s wife
    • Testamentary records naming Jonet, her husband or her children
    • Witness and sponsor comparisons between the 1618 and 1645 baptismal entries
    • Records distinguishing this Jonet from the older Jonet Conynghame Sources
    • "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, record VQHK-VMK.

Profile source citations

  1. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQHK-VMK); derived from a Glasgow Old Parish Register entry. source link 1
  2. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, record VQHK-VMK.
Full captured biography text
Biography
Jonet Cunningham—also recorded as Jonet Conynghame—was probably born in Scotland during the early seventeenth century. Her current estimated birth year of about 1624 is uncertain and is not supported by a known baptismal record.

A Glasgow parish index records a James Glasgow in November 1645 as a child of Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQHK-VMK); derived from a Glasgow Old Parish Register entry. 

This record directly establishes that a couple named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham were the parents of the Scottish child.

The father was probably Robert Glasgow, baptised at Glasgow in 1618. Their son was probably James Glasgow, who may later have become the James Glascho recorded at Kilwaughter, County Antrim, from 1669.

Neither identification is yet proved by a surviving record expressly connecting the 1645 family with the later Irish householders. Jonet’s relationship to Robert and James should therefore remain marked uncertain where the profiles represent that proposed Scottish-to-Irish reconstruction.

No reliable record has yet been identified for Jonet’s parents, marriage, later residence or death.
Research NotesThe November 1645 record
The FamilySearch index reports a James Glasgow recorded at Glasgow in November 1645 to parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham. 

Derivative references give conflicting dates, including 11 and 25 November. The original Old Parish Register page has not yet been reviewed, so it remains unclear:

* which date is correct;
* whether the event was a birth, baptism or registration;
* whether an occupation or residence was recorded for the father;
* who appeared as witnesses or sponsors.

The profile should therefore refer only to November 1645 unless the original entry is obtained.
Estimated birth
Jonet’s birth year of about 1624 is an estimate rather than a documented event.

It appears to have been calculated from the 1645 record of her child. No source currently gives Jonet’s age or birthplace. Her birth should remain uncertain, and Scotland should not be entered as a more precise place without additional evidence.
Proposed husband
Robert Glasgow, baptised at Glasgow on 17 November 1618, is the best current candidate for the Robert named with Jonet in the 1645 entry.

That placement is chronologically plausible and fits the proposed reconstruction connecting the Glasgow family with Larne and Kilwaughter in County Antrim.

The 1645 index does not give Robert’s age, occupation or parentage. It therefore cannot by itself prove that Jonet’s husband was the man baptised in 1618. Their relationship should remain uncertain.
Proposed son
The Scottish James recorded in November 1645 was directly a son of a Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham. 

He is probably James Glasgow, later recorded as a householder and Presbyterian congregation member at Kilwaughter. A 1645 birth would make him about twenty-four at the time of the 1669 Hearth Money Roll.

No surviving record explicitly states that the Scottish child became the Kilwaughter householder. If Glasgow-1081 represents both identities, Jonet’s structured relationship to him should therefore remain uncertain.
Not the older Jonet Cunningham
This Jonet must not be confused with Jonet Conynghame, wife of Robert Glasgow and mother of the Robert baptised in 1618.

The two women belong to different generations:

Robert Glasgow and Jonet Conynghame
|
+-- Robert Glasgow, baptised 1618
probable husband of the younger Jonet Cunningham
|
+-- James Glasgow, recorded November 1645

The repeated names created an earlier interpretation in which the older Robert and Jonet were treated as parents of children recorded from 1614 through 1645. That thirty-one-year span is possible but doubtful.

The better current reconstruction places the 1645 James one generation lower, as the son of the Robert baptised in 1618 and this younger Jonet Cunningham.
Name forms
The surname appears in several equivalent historical forms, including:

* Cunningham
* Cunynghame
* Conynghame

The spelling used in a derivative index should not be treated as evidence that separate spellings identify different families.
Suggested structured data
* Preferred name: Jonet
* Last name at birth: Cunningham
* Other surname spelling: Conynghame
* Birth: about 1624, Scotland, uncertain and estimated
* Death: unknown
* Parents: unknown
* Spouse: Robert Glasgow, uncertain
* Child: James Glasgow, uncertain where the profile combines the Scottish and Irish identities
Further research
The most useful next records are:

* The complete Glasgow Old Parish Register page containing the November 1645 entry
* Other Glasgow baptisms to parents named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham
* A marriage record or marriage contract for Robert and Jonet
* Glasgow burgess, craft and property records identifying the younger Robert’s wife
* Testamentary records naming Jonet, her husband or her children
* Witness and sponsor comparisons between the 1618 and 1645 baptismal entries
* Records distinguishing this Jonet from the older Jonet Conynghame
Sources
* "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, record VQHK-VMK.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

'''Jonet Cunningham'''—also recorded as '''Jonet Conynghame'''—was probably born in Scotland during the early seventeenth century. Her current estimated birth year of about 1624 is uncertain and is not supported by a known baptismal record.

A Glasgow parish index records a James Glasgow in November 1645 as a child of '''Robert Glasgow''' and '''Jonet Cunningham'''.<ref name="James1645">"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, [https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:VQHK-VMK FamilySearch record VQHK-VMK]; derived from a Glasgow Old Parish Register entry.</ref>

This record directly establishes that a couple named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham were the parents of the Scottish child.

The father was probably [[Glasgow-1078|Robert Glasgow]], baptised at Glasgow in 1618. Their son was probably [[Glasgow-1081|James Glasgow]], who may later have become the James ''Glascho'' recorded at Kilwaughter, County Antrim, from 1669.

Neither identification is yet proved by a surviving record expressly connecting the 1645 family with the later Irish householders. Jonet’s relationship to Robert and James should therefore remain marked uncertain where the profiles represent that proposed Scottish-to-Irish reconstruction.

No reliable record has yet been identified for Jonet’s parents, marriage, later residence or death.

== Research Notes ==

=== The November 1645 record ===

The FamilySearch index reports a James Glasgow recorded at Glasgow in November 1645 to parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham.<ref name="James1645" />

Derivative references give conflicting dates, including 11 and 25 November. The original Old Parish Register page has not yet been reviewed, so it remains unclear:

* which date is correct;
* whether the event was a birth, baptism or registration;
* whether an occupation or residence was recorded for the father;
* who appeared as witnesses or sponsors.

The profile should therefore refer only to '''November 1645''' unless the original entry is obtained.

=== Estimated birth ===

Jonet’s birth year of about 1624 is an estimate rather than a documented event.

It appears to have been calculated from the 1645 record of her child. No source currently gives Jonet’s age or birthplace. Her birth should remain uncertain, and Scotland should not be entered as a more precise place without additional evidence.

=== Proposed husband ===

[[Glasgow-1078|Robert Glasgow]], baptised at Glasgow on 17 November 1618, is the best current candidate for the Robert named with Jonet in the 1645 entry.

That placement is chronologically plausible and fits the proposed reconstruction connecting the Glasgow family with Larne and Kilwaughter in County Antrim.

The 1645 index does not give Robert’s age, occupation or parentage. It therefore cannot by itself prove that Jonet’s husband was the man baptised in 1618. Their relationship should remain uncertain.

=== Proposed son ===

The Scottish James recorded in November 1645 was directly a son of a Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham.<ref name="James1645" />

He is probably [[Glasgow-1081|James Glasgow]], later recorded as a householder and Presbyterian congregation member at Kilwaughter. A 1645 birth would make him about twenty-four at the time of the 1669 Hearth Money Roll.

No surviving record explicitly states that the Scottish child became the Kilwaughter householder. If Glasgow-1081 represents both identities, Jonet’s structured relationship to him should therefore remain uncertain.

=== Not the older Jonet Cunningham ===

This Jonet must not be confused with [[Cunningham-20923|Jonet Conynghame]], wife of [[Glasgow-1027|Robert Glasgow]] and mother of the Robert baptised in 1618.

The two women belong to different generations:

Robert Glasgow and Jonet Conynghame
|
+-- Robert Glasgow, baptised 1618
probable husband of the younger Jonet Cunningham
|
+-- James Glasgow, recorded November 1645

The repeated names created an earlier interpretation in which the older Robert and Jonet were treated as parents of children recorded from 1614 through 1645. That thirty-one-year span is possible but doubtful.

The better current reconstruction places the 1645 James one generation lower, as the son of the Robert baptised in 1618 and this younger Jonet Cunningham.

=== Name forms ===

The surname appears in several equivalent historical forms, including:

* Cunningham
* Cunynghame
* Conynghame

The spelling used in a derivative index should not be treated as evidence that separate spellings identify different families.

=== Suggested structured data ===

* '''Preferred name:''' Jonet
* '''Last name at birth:''' Cunningham
* '''Other surname spelling:''' Conynghame
* '''Birth:''' about 1624, Scotland, uncertain and estimated
* '''Death:''' unknown
* '''Parents:''' unknown
* '''Spouse:''' [[Glasgow-1078|Robert Glasgow]], uncertain
* '''Child:''' [[Glasgow-1081|James Glasgow]], uncertain where the profile combines the Scottish and Irish identities

=== Further research ===

The most useful next records are:

* The complete Glasgow Old Parish Register page containing the November 1645 entry
* Other Glasgow baptisms to parents named Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham
* A marriage record or marriage contract for Robert and Jonet
* Glasgow burgess, craft and property records identifying the younger Robert’s wife
* Testamentary records naming Jonet, her husband or her children
* Witness and sponsor comparisons between the 1618 and 1645 baptismal entries
* Records distinguishing this Jonet from [[Cunningham-20923|the older Jonet Conynghame]]

== Sources ==

<references />

* "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," FamilySearch database, James Glasgow, November 1645, parents Robert Glasgow and Jonet Cunningham, record VQHK-VMK.