Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Hew Glasgow

before 1658 – ?

Glasgow-1066 · 1 mapped association

Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
4Close relations
4Evidence items
10Candidate leads
Birth
before 1658 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Margaret (Lachland) Glasgow
Children
Hew GlasgowRobert Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1066
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
31

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionHew Glasgow (1676)
Maternal grandfather positionRobert Glasgow (1678)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit27/100
Weak Lead
Dates1626–?Generationat most 32 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Ayrshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: ayrshire (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; sibling George Glasgow) (+18 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1620–?Generationat most 38 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk and Musselburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowAgnes (Duncan) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Bessie (Whyte) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 38 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Bethia Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 38 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 56 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1655–1661) (+3; other parent Agnes (Duncan) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Bessie (Whyte) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (27) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +7 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes (Glasgow) Snoddy; +4 repetition bonus); Hugh +7 (36 public profiles; subject branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; candidate branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+32 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Bethia Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit22/100
Weak Lead
Dates1616–?Generationnominally 42 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesMid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · Mid CalderIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Anne Glasgow in Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 42 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Issobell (Porteous) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (41) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Anne +12 (10 public profiles; subject branch: Anne Glasgow; candidate branch: Anne Glasgow); Agnes +7 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+32 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate's household recorded Anne Glasgow in Kirknewton and East Calder, Edinburghshire, Scotland within 6 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit21/100
Weak Lead
Dates1645–?Generationnominally 13 years; approximate dates permit about 16–23 years age gapRecorded placesGordon, Berwickshire, Scotland · Gordon — BerwickshireIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Collateral Naming · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 13-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–23 years) (+4)
  • known spouse Agnes (Watt) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (17) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 13-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–23 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 31 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • known spouse Agnes (Watt) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (17) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +7 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +5 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+16 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; sibling Anne Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit18/100
Weak Lead
Dates1626–?Generationat most 32 years age gapRecorded placesKirknewton and East Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · Kirknewton — West LothianIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 50 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +5 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus) (+19 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit37/100
Weak Lead
Dates1632–?Generationat most 26 years age gapRecorded placesMusselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJames GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 26 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Bethia Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 26 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 44 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1655–1661) (+3; other parent James Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +7 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes (Glasgow) Snoddy; +4 repetition bonus); Hugh +7 (36 public profiles; subject branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; candidate branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+32 total including +8 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Bethia Glasgow in Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Automated fit24/100
Weak Lead
Dates1610–?Generationat most 48 years age gapRecorded placesMid CalderIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • less typical 48-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; sibling George Glasgow) (+18 total)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 48-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 66 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; sibling George Glasgow) (+18 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit22/100
Weak Lead
Dates1618–?Generationat most 40 years age gapRecorded placesMusselburgh, Lothian, Scotland · Musselburgh / InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; sibling George Glasgow); Hugh +3 (36 public profiles; sibling Hugh Glasgow) (+18 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit22/100
Weak Lead
Dates1611–?Generationat most 47 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 47 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 47 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; sibling George Glasgow) (+18 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit19/100
Weak Lead
Dates1643–?Generationat most 15 years age gapRecorded placesEdinburgh Parish, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland · EdinburghIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Collateral Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 15 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1676), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; sibling Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; niece/nephew Agnes Glasgow); Jean +3 (42 public profiles; niece/nephew Jean Glasgow) (+18 total)

Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1658

Profile-stated birthplace: Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland

Kilwinning — Ayrshire

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1066

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement/parish centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1066

SourceFindingAssessment
Kilwinning marriage record, 24 May 1676, parish 599, FR34Records Hew Glasgow and Margaret Lachland at Kilwinning.Direct locality evidence for Hew's adult household.
Hew child baptism, FamilySearch XTVY-FQ2 and Robert's 1678 Kilwinning baptismRecords Hew's children at Kilwinning.Does not connect him to Glasgow-1078.
Live relationship data for Glasgow-1073The apparent sibling bridge contains competing same-role parents.Tree conflict; unusable as positive parentage evidence until resolved.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
2Unknown
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended action

Glasgow-1066

Resolve Glasgow-1073's father before using him as a sibling bridge. Treat the Robert candidate as weak unless a record connects the Glasgow/Kilwaughter and Kilwinning households.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown Marriage Record: HEW GLASGOW/MARGARET LACHLAND, 24 May 1676, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M, FR34.
  2. derivative "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTVY-FQ2 (accessed 2025), Hew Glasgow in entry for Hew Glasgow, 1676.
  3. unknown Baptism Record: ROBERT, son of HEW GLASGOW, 1 Dec 1678, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M.
  4. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1066
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1066 was captured 2026-08-10T14:12:13+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2025-04-28.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Kilwinning, Ayrshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
marriage1676-05-24Kilwinning, Ayrshire, ScotlandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-16041626-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland · 1664-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland
ChildrenHugh GlasgowGlasgow-10671676-05-24 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10681678-12-01 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-15121652-00-00 · Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-33751661-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesMargaret GlasgowLachland-21655-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland, United Kingdom · 1676-05-24

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Hugh Glasgow was born about 1650.

  • Hugh married Margaret (Lachland) Glasgow (abt.1655-) on 24 May 1676 in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland. Marriage Record: HEW GLASGOW/MARGARET LACHLAND, 24 May 1676, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M, FR34. Children

    • Hew Glasgow (1676-), baptized 5 May 1676 "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTVY-FQ2 (accessed 2025), Hew Glasgow in entry for Hew Glasgow, 1676.
    • Robert Glasgow (bef.1678-), baptized 1 December 1678 in Kilwinning Baptism Record: ROBERT, son of HEW GLASGOW, 1 Dec 1678, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Marriage Record: HEW GLASGOW/MARGARET LACHLAND, 24 May 1676, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M, FR34.
  2. "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTVY-FQ2 (accessed 2025), Hew Glasgow in entry for Hew Glasgow, 1676. source link 1
  3. Baptism Record: ROBERT, son of HEW GLASGOW, 1 Dec 1678, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M.
Full captured biography text
Biography
Hugh Glasgow was born about 1650. 

Hugh married Margaret (Lachland) Glasgow (abt.1655-) on 24 May 1676 in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland. Marriage Record: HEW GLASGOW/MARGARET LACHLAND, 24 May 1676, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M, FR34. 
Children
* Hew Glasgow (1676-), baptized 5 May 1676 "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTVY-FQ2 (accessed 2025), Hew Glasgow in entry for Hew Glasgow, 1676. 
* Robert Glasgow (bef.1678-), baptized 1 December 1678 in Kilwinning Baptism Record: ROBERT, son of HEW GLASGOW, 1 Dec 1678, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M. 
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

Hugh Glasgow was born about 1650. 

Hugh married [[Lachland-2|Margaret (Lachland) Glasgow (abt.1655-)]] on 24 May 1676 in Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland.<ref>Marriage Record: HEW GLASGOW/MARGARET LACHLAND, 24 May 1676, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M, FR34.</ref>

== Children ==
* [[Glasgow-1067|Hew Glasgow (1676-)]], baptized 5 May 1676<ref>"Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," database, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTVY-FQ2 (accessed 2025), Hew Glasgow in entry for Hew Glasgow, 1676.</ref>
* [[Glasgow-1068|Robert Glasgow (bef.1678-)]], baptized 1 December 1678 in Kilwinning<ref>Baptism Record: ROBERT, son of HEW GLASGOW, 1 Dec 1678, Kilwinning, Parish 599/ M.</ref>


== Sources ==
<references />