Individual research record
John Glasgow
c. 1626 – c. 1664
Glasgow-1604 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1626 · Ayrshire, Scotland
- Death
- c. 1664 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland
- Parents
- Hugh Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- Not recorded
- Children
- Hew GlasgowJohn GlasgowRobert GlasgowJohn Glasgow M.A
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-1604
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 49
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
Robert Glasgow IGlasgow-1156
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Deborah (Ivey) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 44-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 70 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Deborah (Ivey) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (37) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Robert in 165 profiles)
- family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Hugh +7 (36 public profiles; subject branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; candidate branch: Hugh Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +7 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+32 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Possible Father
Robert GlasgowGlasgow-1027
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
- candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 43-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 69 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1614–1627) (+6; other parent Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow)
- known spouse Jonet (Cunningham) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (29) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, Robert in 165 profiles)
- family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Marion +8 (23 public profiles; sibling Marion Glasgow) (+8 total)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Cunningham +4 (+4 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-3075
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Catherine (Fraser) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Catherine (Fraser) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+7)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+10 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Marion +8 (23 public profiles; sibling Marion Glasgow) (+8 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3296
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Bessie (Robertson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1086) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 36-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Bessie (Robertson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (36) at the subject's birth (+3)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Isobel +14 (5 public profiles; subject branch: Isobel Glasgow; candidate branch: Isobel Glasgow); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; subject branch: Alexander Glasgow; candidate branch: Alexander Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1086) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1561
- possible 47-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3056) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- possible 47-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 73 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 4 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jean +7 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+14 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; niece/nephew Agnes Glasgow); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; niece/nephew Alexander Glasgow); Hugh +3 (36 public profiles; niece/nephew Hugh Glasgow) (+9 total)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3056) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Deborah (Ivey) GlasgowIvey-2264
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 37-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 63 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 6 years of the subject (+1)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; Robert in 165 profiles)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +10 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow, Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Hugh +7 (36 public profiles; subject branch: Hugh Glasgow, Hugh Glasgow; candidate branch: Hugh Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus); Jean +7 (42 public profiles; subject branch: Jean Glasgow, Jean Glasgow; candidate branch: Jean Glasgow; +4 repetition bonus) (+32 total including +8 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); descendant-name recurrence has no independent household, record, migration or specific-locality anchor (score capped at 39)
Possible Mother
Catherine (Fraser) GlasgowFraser-15286
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 26-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
- uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+10 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Jonet (Cunningham) GlasgowCunningham-20923
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 29 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1614–1627) (+6; other parent Robert Glasgow)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; Robert in 165 profiles)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Cunningham +4 (+4 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required
Possible Mother
Beatrix GlasgowGlasgow-1083
- possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; sibling Alexander Glasgow) (+18 total)
locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- possible 16-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; sibling Alexander Glasgow) (+18 total)
Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Cathrin GlasgowGlasgow-3321
- possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
- candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1652), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Anne +12 (10 public profiles; niece/nephew Anne Glasgow); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; sibling Agnes Glasgow); Alexander +3 (59 public profiles; sibling Alexander Glasgow) (+18 total)
Deductions and cautions: same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3145
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- shared recorded place (+20)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3610
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3015
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
No indexed conflict
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 8 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: No indexed conflict
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1088
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 7 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Show 4 lower-scoring duplicate lead(s)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3331
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 6 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 6 (+10)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1105
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1030
- same first and last name (+18)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 54; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 54; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1561
- same first and last name (+18)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 47; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 47; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
John is the best existing-profile candidate for the father of Rev. John Glasgow M.A. (Glasgow-1073), about 1653, Kilbirnie, but the profile is only a scaffold. Birth about 1626, death about 1664 at Kilwinning, father Glasgow-1603 and the three attached sons all ultimately rest on an Ancestry tree or on records that name only the later fathers.
John Glasgow (Glasgow-3145), about 1626, Scotland/Ayrshire is empty and unsourced, has the exact same estimated birth year, and is attached directly to Midlothian James-991. It is probably a duplicate of Glasgow-1604 or a second artifact of the same imported tree, not independent evidence for another John generation.
The strongest working placement is:
Glasgow-1098 ? Glasgow-1168 -> Glasgow-3193
? Glasgow-1603 / omitted Ayrshire generation
? Glasgow-1604
? Glasgow-1073 (possibly the same man as Glasgow-3375)Do not add Rev. John as a second contemporary son named John until Glasgow-3375 has been tested as his duplicate. The 1679 and 1689 Kilwinning OPR entries could refer to the minister before his 1690 marriage to Jean Cunningham.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Ayrshire, Scotland
Ayrshire — exact locality unproved
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1604
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: County-level representative point
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
John Glasgow M.A was uncertain son of John Glasgow
Generation and the Kilwinning-Kilbirnie corridor fit the wider Corsankell branch. John-1604's dates, death and family are tree-derived, so the edge is a topology scaffold, not record proof.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open
Which records prove the subject's identity across events?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Which original or indexed records identify the parents?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.
Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- tree_only Ancestry user-submitted tree (https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/26875475/person/152122295783/facts)
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1604
- unknown Controlled relationship assessment
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-1604
John Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-1604 was captured 2026-08-19T15:34:20+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Ayrshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Hugh Glasgow | Glasgow-1603 | 1600-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · Ayrshire, Scotland |
| Children | Robert Glasgow | Glasgow-1512 | 1652-00-00 · Ayr, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Hew Glasgow | Glasgow-1066 | 1658-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | John Glasgow | Glasgow-3375 | 1661-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
Profile categories
Unsourced_Profiles
Record-bearing passages
- Biography John Glasgow is retained as a useful but uncertain Ayrshire-generation profile. His approximate 1626 birth in Ayrshire, approximate 1664 death at Kilwinning, attached father Hugh Glasgow, and attached sons ultimately derive from an online family tree or from records that name only the later fathers. No independent record currently proves these details as a single identity. Research NotesAttached relationships The father and all three son links are retained as uncertain working relationships:
John Glasgow and Barbara Alason were parents at Kilwinning in 1679 and 1689, but no record names Glasgow-1604 as John's father. Glasgow-3375 is a serious duplicate candidate for Rev. John Glasgow M.A.. Rev. John has not been added as a second contemporary son.
- Robert Glasgow and Margaret Donald had sons at Ayr in 1670–71, but those records do not name Robert's father.
- Hew Glasgow married Margaret Lachland in 1676 and had children at Kilwinning, but those records do not name his father. Possible duplicate profile John Glasgow, also estimated born about 1626, is probably a duplicate or another artifact of the same imported tree. It supplies no independent evidence for another generation. No merge has been performed; the profiles should remain separate until an original record distinguishes or unites them.
The source of the supposed 1664 Kilwinning death has not been identified. The date and place are retained as uncertain research leads, not sourced facts. SourcesResearch lead
- Ancestry user-submitted tree (https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/26875475/person/152122295783/facts)
Profile source citations
- Ancestry user-submitted tree (https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/26875475/person/152122295783/facts) source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography John Glasgow is retained as a useful but uncertain Ayrshire-generation profile. His approximate 1626 birth in Ayrshire, approximate 1664 death at Kilwinning, attached father Hugh Glasgow, and attached sons ultimately derive from an online family tree or from records that name only the later fathers. No independent record currently proves these details as a single identity. Research NotesAttached relationships The father and all three son links are retained as uncertain working relationships: * John Glasgow and Barbara Alason were parents at Kilwinning in 1679 and 1689, but no record names Glasgow-1604 as John's father. Glasgow-3375 is a serious duplicate candidate for Rev. John Glasgow M.A.. Rev. John has not been added as a second contemporary son. * Robert Glasgow and Margaret Donald had sons at Ayr in 1670–71, but those records do not name Robert's father. * Hew Glasgow married Margaret Lachland in 1676 and had children at Kilwinning, but those records do not name his father. Possible duplicate profile John Glasgow, also estimated born about 1626, is probably a duplicate or another artifact of the same imported tree. It supplies no independent evidence for another generation. No merge has been performed; the profiles should remain separate until an original record distinguishes or unites them. The source of the supposed 1664 Kilwinning death has not been identified. The date and place are retained as uncertain research leads, not sourced facts. SourcesResearch lead * Ancestry user-submitted tree (https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/26875475/person/152122295783/facts)
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Unsourced}}
== Biography ==
John Glasgow is retained as a useful but uncertain Ayrshire-generation profile. His approximate 1626 birth in Ayrshire, approximate 1664 death at Kilwinning, attached father [[Glasgow-1603|Hugh Glasgow]], and attached sons ultimately derive from an online family tree or from records that name only the later fathers. No independent record currently proves these details as a single identity.
== Research Notes ==
=== Attached relationships ===
The father and all three son links are retained as uncertain working relationships:
* [[Glasgow-3375|John Glasgow]] and Barbara Alason were parents at Kilwinning in 1679 and 1689, but no record names Glasgow-1604 as John's father. Glasgow-3375 is a serious duplicate candidate for [[Glasgow-1073|Rev. John Glasgow M.A.]]. Rev. John has not been added as a second contemporary son.
* [[Glasgow-1512|Robert Glasgow]] and Margaret Donald had sons at Ayr in 1670–71, but those records do not name Robert's father.
* [[Glasgow-1066|Hew Glasgow]] married Margaret Lachland in 1676 and had children at Kilwinning, but those records do not name his father.
=== Possible duplicate profile ===
[[Glasgow-3145|John Glasgow]], also estimated born about 1626, is probably a duplicate or another artifact of the same imported tree. It supplies no independent evidence for another generation. No merge has been performed; the profiles should remain separate until an original record distinguishes or unites them.
The source of the supposed 1664 Kilwinning death has not been identified. The date and place are retained as uncertain research leads, not sourced facts.
== Sources ==
<references />
=== Research lead ===
* [https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/26875475/person/152122295783/facts Ancestry user-submitted tree]