Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

James Glasgow

before 1542 – after 1571-02-09

Glasgow-3921 · 1 mapped association

ScotlandStevenston, Ayrshire

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
5Close relations
4Evidence items
10Candidate leads
Birth
before 1542 · Scotland
Death
after 1571-02-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire
Parents
James Glasgowconfident
Spouses
Margaret (Smith) Glasgow
Children
Catherine (Glasgow) WeirEdward GlasgowGeillis (Glasgow) Wilson
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3921
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
139

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionEdward Glasgow (1570)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionGeillis (Glasgow) Wilson (1565)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers3 leads

Automated fit3/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1520–1575Generationat most 22 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 22 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Logan; candidate branch: Jonet Glasgow); Catherine +3 (32 public profiles; subject branch: Catherine (Glasgow) Weir; candidate branch: Catherine Glasgow) (+19 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Smith +4 (+4 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1516–1575Generationnominally 26 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Stockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJonet (Spreull) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jonet (Spreull) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 26 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 26 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1540–1550) (+3; other parent Jonet (Spreull) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Jonet (Spreull) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (26) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +14 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Logan; candidate branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart, Jonet (Glasgow) Pady; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 1 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–1564Generationat most 42 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (42) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1168) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (42) at the subject's birth (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1168) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit31/100
Weak Lead
Dates1516–1575Generationnominally 26 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJohn GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 26 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 26 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1540–1550) (+3; other parent John Glasgow)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +14 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Logan; candidate branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart, Jonet (Glasgow) Pady; +2 repetition bonus) (+14 total)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit17/100
Weak Lead
Dates1530–?Generationnominally 12 years; approximate dates permit about 15–22 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 35 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 35 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Jonet +12 (15 public profiles; subject branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Logan; candidate branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit5/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1535–?Generationnominally 7 years; approximate dates permit about 15–17 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 30 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 7-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–17 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 30 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1530–1563Generationnominally 12 years; approximate dates permit about 15–22 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 35 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 12-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–22 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 35 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–?Generationat most 42 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1168) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 42 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1565), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named James Glasgow (Glasgow-1168) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-2142

Automated fit18/100
Similar Person
Dates?–?PlacesPlaces not recordedParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

one birth year is unavailable

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: one birth year is unavailable

Same-name candidate

James GlasgowGlasgow-991

Automated fit13/100
Similar Person
Dates1575–?PlacesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland → Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 33; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 33; retained without deduction; unassessed father attachments differ (−5)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3921

Father assessment: James Glasgow elder (Glasgow-1168), born about 1515, Corsankell, Ayrshire is confirmed by record.

The live profile was checked on 19 July 2026. It is already attached to Glasgow-1168 and explicitly represents the younger James at Corsankell. The 1559-60 teind material distinguishes James younger from James elder at the same holding; the 1571 record then expressly calls James and John the elder James's sons. No new profile, split or merge is required.

The 1632 testament-calendar entry for Margaret Smith, spouse of James Glasgow in Brekpleughe, has now been assigned to this existing profile as a later working occurrence. The Stevenston locality is coherent with the wider Corsankell cluster, but the entry gives no age, parent or earlier residence and does not itself prove that Margaret's husband was the younger Corsankell James.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1542

Profile-stated birthplace: Scotland

Scotland — exact locality unproved

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3921

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-level representative point

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3921

SourceFindingAssessment
Margaret H. B. Sanderson, *The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire*, appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” p. 331, citing Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v-167vCorsankell was occupied by Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger and James Glasgow elder in 1559-60.Direct contemporary distinction between two men named James at the same holding; relationship supplied by the later record.
National Records of Scotland, Glencairn papers, GD39/5/59, 9 February 1571The archival description names the Corsinkell occupiers as James Glasgow elder and “James Glasgow and John Glasgow, his sons.”Direct father-son evidence. The place and elder/younger sequence resolve the named son James to Glasgow-3921 and the father to Glasgow-1168.
Francis J. Grant, ed., *Commissariot Record of Glasgow*, p. 460, 21 February 1632Margaret Smith was spouse of James Glasgow in Brekpleughe, Stevenston parish.Direct spouse/locality evidence for the 1632 man; the equation with Glasgow-3921 is a working identity, not directly stated.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.8 claims
3Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Case-file assessments

Relationship correction — validation-warning resolution

Glasgow-3921

WikiTree may flag [[Glasgow-1495|Katherine Glasgow]]'s estimated birth about 1580 as occurring after James's death. This is not a chronological conflict: 9 February 1571 is the last date on which James is documented alive, and his death field is marked after, not as an exact death date. Katherine's birth estimate and her identification as James's daughter are not established by the reviewed records; the father link remains uncertain.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Case-file priorities and cautions

Recommended correction applied

Glasgow-3921

Applied live on 19 August 2026 after an independent warning audit. Birth is before 1542/uncertain; death is after 9 February 1571 with place blank; the complete biography explains the validation warning and qualifies the 1632 Brekpleughe identity. Katherine-1495 is explicitly uncertain.

Recommended correction following location audit

Glasgow-3921

Retain or restore Stevenston, Ayrshire as the uncertain death location. James was last documented at Corsinkell in Stevenston parish, and no reviewed evidence conflicts with that plausible location.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3921 was captured 2026-08-19T14:01:18+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathStevenston, AyrshireWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJames GlasgowGlasgow-11681515-00-00 · Scotland · 1571-02-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland
ChildrenGeillis WilsonGlasgow-31791565-00-00 · Scotland · 1603-11-05 · Ardrossan, Ayrshire, Scotland
ChildrenEdward GlasgowGlasgow-15571570-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Inveresk and Musselburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland
ChildrenCatherine WeirGlasgow-14951580-00-00 · Scotland · 1605-05-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland
SiblingsAgnes LoganGlasgow-31780000-00-00 · 1628-00-00 · Stevenson, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-31931540-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland. · 1559-00-00 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland
SpousesMargaret GlasgowSmith-3741101540-00-00 · 1632-02-21 · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date Glasgow Name Study Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography James Glasgow was born before 1542, probably in Scotland. The year is an estimate based on his being at least 18 years old when he appeared as a tenant in a record dated 1559–60.
  • In the Cunninghame teind lists of 1559–60, Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger, and James Glasgow elder were listed under Corsankell in the parish of Stevenston, Ayrshire. Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix "The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60," p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36), Corsankell entry. Sanderson identifies the underlying record as Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v. The qualifiers younger and elder distinguish two contemporary men named James Glasgow but do not, by themselves, establish their relationship.
  • A later record resolves the father-and-son relationship. On 9 February 1571 Corsankell was occupied by James Glasgow elder and by James and John Glasgow, his sons. National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. This proves that James was alive on that date; it does not give his death date or place. Research Notes This profile represents James Glasgow younger. The 1571 record directly identifies James Glasgow elder as his father and John Glasgow as his brother. No reviewed source identifies James's mother, precise birthplace, or death.
  • A 1632 testament-calendar entry names Margaret Smith as the spouse of a James Glasgow at Brekpleughe in Stevenston parish. Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 460 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/1up), Smith, Margaret, 21 February 1632; cross-reference under Glasgow, James, p. 195 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/195/mode/1up). The locality makes this a possible later identity, but the entry gives no age, parent or earlier residence. The equation with the Corsankell man and the attached marriage remain uncertain.
  • WikiTree may flag Katherine Glasgow's estimated birth about 1580 as occurring after James's death. This is not a chronological conflict: 9 February 1571 is the last date on which James is documented alive, and his death field is marked “after,” not as an exact death date. Katherine's birth estimate and her identification as James's daughter are not established by the reviewed records; the father link remains uncertain.
  • The former profile Glasgow-2429 now redirects to James Glasgow, a Midlothian man estimated to have been born about 1585. He could not have been the adult tenant designated younger in 1559–60. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix "The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60," p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36), Corsankell entry. Sanderson identifies the underlying record as Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v. source link 1
  2. National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. source link 1
  3. Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 460 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/1up), Smith, Margaret, 21 February 1632; cross-reference under Glasgow, James, p. 195 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/195/mode/1up). source link 1 source link 2
Full captured biography text
Biography
James Glasgow was born before 1542, probably in Scotland. The year is an estimate based on his being at least 18 years old when he appeared as a tenant in a record dated 1559–60.

In the Cunninghame teind lists of 1559–60, Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger, and James Glasgow elder were listed under Corsankell in the parish of Stevenston, Ayrshire. Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix "The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60," p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36), Corsankell entry. Sanderson identifies the underlying record as Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v. The qualifiers younger and elder distinguish two contemporary men named James Glasgow but do not, by themselves, establish their relationship.

A later record resolves the father-and-son relationship. On 9 February 1571 Corsankell was occupied by James Glasgow elder and by James and John Glasgow, his sons. National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. This proves that James was alive on that date; it does not give his death date or place.
Research Notes
This profile represents James Glasgow younger. The 1571 record directly identifies James Glasgow elder as his father and John Glasgow as his brother. No reviewed source identifies James's mother, precise birthplace, or death.

A 1632 testament-calendar entry names Margaret Smith as the spouse of a James Glasgow at Brekpleughe in Stevenston parish. Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 460 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/1up), Smith, Margaret, 21 February 1632; cross-reference under Glasgow, James, p. 195 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/195/mode/1up). The locality makes this a possible later identity, but the entry gives no age, parent or earlier residence. The equation with the Corsankell man and the attached marriage remain uncertain.

WikiTree may flag Katherine Glasgow's estimated birth about 1580 as occurring after James's death. This is not a chronological conflict: 9 February 1571 is the last date on which James is documented alive, and his death field is marked “after,” not as an exact death date. Katherine's birth estimate and her identification as James's daughter are not established by the reviewed records; the father link remains uncertain.

The former profile Glasgow-2429 now redirects to James Glasgow, a Midlothian man estimated to have been born about 1585. He could not have been the adult tenant designated younger in 1559–60.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
[[Category:Glasgow Name Study]]

== Biography ==

'''James Glasgow''' was born before 1542, probably in Scotland. The year is an estimate based on his being at least 18 years old when he appeared as a tenant in a record dated 1559–60.

In the Cunninghame teind lists of 1559–60, Katherine Campbell, James Glasgow younger, and James Glasgow elder were listed under Corsankell in the parish of Stevenston, Ayrshire.<ref name="Teinds">Margaret H. B. Sanderson, ''The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire'', ''Ayrshire Collections'', vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix "The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559–60," [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 p. 331], Corsankell entry. Sanderson identifies the underlying record as Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v–167v.</ref> The qualifiers younger and elder distinguish two contemporary men named James Glasgow but do not, by themselves, establish their relationship.

A later record resolves the father-and-son relationship. On 9 February 1571 Corsankell was occupied by [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]] and by James and [[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]], his sons.<ref name="Reversion">National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571.</ref> This proves that James was alive on that date; it does not give his death date or place.

== Research Notes ==

This profile represents James Glasgow younger. The 1571 record directly identifies [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]] as his father and [[Glasgow-3193|John Glasgow]] as his brother. No reviewed source identifies James's mother, precise birthplace, or death.

A 1632 testament-calendar entry names Margaret Smith as the spouse of a James Glasgow at Brekpleughe in Stevenston parish.<ref>Francis J. Grant, ed., ''Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800'' (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/460/mode/1up p. 460], Smith, Margaret, 21 February 1632; cross-reference under Glasgow, James, [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/195/mode/1up p. 195].</ref> The locality makes this a possible later identity, but the entry gives no age, parent or earlier residence. The equation with the Corsankell man and the attached marriage remain uncertain.

WikiTree may flag [[Glasgow-1495|Katherine Glasgow]]'s estimated birth about 1580 as occurring after James's death. This is not a chronological conflict: 9 February 1571 is the last date on which James is documented alive, and his death field is marked “after,” not as an exact death date. Katherine's birth estimate and her identification as James's daughter are not established by the reviewed records; the father link remains uncertain.

The former profile Glasgow-2429 now redirects to [[Glasgow-991|James Glasgow]], a Midlothian man estimated to have been born about 1585. He could not have been the adult tenant designated younger in 1559–60.

== Sources ==
<references />