Individual research record
John Glasgow
before 1540 – after 1559
Glasgow-3193 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- before 1540 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
- Death
- after 1559 · Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland
- Parents
- James Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- Agnes WIlson
- Children
- Not recorded
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3193
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 0
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
No named children are recoverable, so child-naming analysis cannot be run.
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3181
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- same birth year (+30)
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1095
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
record-derived birth estimates differ by 65; retained without deduction
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- shared recorded place (+20)
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 65; retained without deduction
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
Father assessment: Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1096), born about 1520, Glasgow is unsupported. No record or property sequence connects Robert the Glasgow fisher to this Kilwinning man. The geographically closer John, directly called son of James Glasgow elder at Corsankell in 1571, is the stronger competing hypothesis.
Preferred working placement: James Glasgow elder (Glasgow-1168), Corsankell, Ayrshire is a plausible father candidate. Corsankell in Stevenston parish is substantially closer to Kilwinning than Robert's Glasgow-burgh household, and the 1571 record expressly gives James a son John. The remaining issue is proving that this son was the same John recorded with Agnes Wilson at Burrowland and Dalgarven in 1559-60.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3193
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: Settlement centrepoint
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)
Source findings
| Source | Finding | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| 1570 Glasgow protocol and cluster analysis in the captured WikiTree profile | Ayrshire locality, chronology and network evidence favour Robert, but the cited "younger John" record likely concerns another burgh line and does not prove this edge. | Indirect cluster evidence. |
| National Records of Scotland, GD39/5/59, 9 February 1571 | A John Glasgow is explicitly a son of James Glasgow elder in the Corsankell occupancy. | Direct relationship for the named Corsankell John, but identity with this Kilwinning profile is unresolved. |
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.6 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
Hugh Glasgow was uncertain son or grandson of John Glasgow
Replaces an unsupported Midlothian attachment with the geographically coherent Corsankell branch, but Hugh is presently only a tree-derived placeholder and the spacing may require an omitted generation.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open
Which records prove the subject's identity across events?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Which original or indexed records identify the parents?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.
Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- unknown 331
- unknown National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571.
- unknown Protocol Books of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, entry dated 8 January 1570, naming “Johne Glasgw yonger,” son of “Johne Glasgw”; volume and folio remain to be confirmed.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3193
- unknown Controlled relationship assessment
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3193
John Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3193 was captured 2026-08-19T15:12:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Kilwinning, Ayrshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | James Glasgow | Glasgow-1168 | 1515-00-00 · Scotland · 1571-02-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland |
| Siblings | Agnes Logan | Glasgow-3178 | 0000-00-00 · 1628-00-00 · Stevenson, Lanarkshire, Scotland |
| Siblings | James Glasgow | Glasgow-3921 | 1542-00-00 · Scotland · 1571-02-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire |
| Spouses | Agnes WIlson | WIlson-130143 | 1540-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1559-00-00 |
Profile categories
Glasgow_Name_Study
Record-bearing passages
- Biography John Glasgow is represented here with an uncertain birth boundary before 1540 and an uncertain association with Glasgow, Lanarkshire. His documented or proposed Ayrshire locations—Burrowland, Dalgarven, Kilwinning and Corsankell—are retained as evidence leads, but the records do not yet prove that every occurrence belonged to one man. Burrowland and Dalgarven The Cunninghame teind material for 1559-60 lists a John Glasgow at Burrowland and a joint holding of John Glasgow and Agnes Wilson at Dalgarven. Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36). Sanderson cites Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v-167v. See also A Short History of Kilwinning Parish (https://www.kilwinningheritage.org.uk/office/resources/documents/a-short-history-of-kilwinning-parish-2nd-ed.pdf). The transcription does not call Agnes John's wife and does not prove that the Burrowland and Dalgarven occurrences were the same John.
- Agnes Wilson is therefore retained as an uncertain spouse candidate. Burrowland and Dalgarven remain plausible locations for the Kilwinning reconstruction, not proved birth or death places. Corsankell working identification On 9 February 1571, letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell identified James Glasgow and John Glasgow as sons of James Glasgow elder, an occupier there. National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. This directly proves the relationship for the John named at Corsankell. It does not prove that the Corsankell son was the same man as the John or Johns recorded at Burrowland and Dalgarven in 1559-60.
Earlier research proposed Robert Glasgow, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, as John's father, and still earlier associated the profile with John Glasgow and Jonet Spreull through a Glasgow-burgh protocol naming “Johne Glasgw yonger.” Protocol Books of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, entry dated 8 January 1570, naming “Johne Glasgw yonger,” son of “Johne Glasgw”; volume and folio remain to be confirmed. No property sequence or other record connects either burgh hypothesis to the Ayrshire man, so both are retained only as rejected former hypotheses and are not structured parents. Research Notes
- Working father: James Glasgow elder, uncertain.
- Probable brother: James Glasgow younger, only if the Kilwinning man was the Corsankell son.
- Working spouse: Agnes Wilson, uncertain; the teind list records joint occupancy, not a stated marriage.
- Birth and death places remain uncertain. Corsankell is a documented residence of the record-proved son John in 1571, not a proved birth or death place for this profile.
- The structured death boundary after 1559 is retained. If the Corsankell match is correct, John was alive on 9 February 1571.
- Further evidence should connect Burrowland or Dalgarven with Corsankell before any relationship is treated as certain. Sources
Profile source citations
- Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36). Sanderson cites Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v-167v. See also A Short History of Kilwinning Parish (https://www.kilwinningheritage.org.uk/office/resources/documents/a-short-history-of-kilwinning-parish-2nd-ed.pdf). source link 1 source link 2
- National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. source link 1
- Protocol Books of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, entry dated 8 January 1570, naming “Johne Glasgw yonger,” son of “Johne Glasgw”; volume and folio remain to be confirmed.
Full captured biography text
Biography John Glasgow is represented here with an uncertain birth boundary before 1540 and an uncertain association with Glasgow, Lanarkshire. His documented or proposed Ayrshire locations—Burrowland, Dalgarven, Kilwinning and Corsankell—are retained as evidence leads, but the records do not yet prove that every occurrence belonged to one man. Burrowland and Dalgarven The Cunninghame teind material for 1559-60 lists a John Glasgow at Burrowland and a joint holding of John Glasgow and Agnes Wilson at Dalgarven. Margaret H. B. Sanderson, The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire, Ayrshire Collections, vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” p. 331 (https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36). Sanderson cites Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v-167v. See also A Short History of Kilwinning Parish (https://www.kilwinningheritage.org.uk/office/resources/documents/a-short-history-of-kilwinning-parish-2nd-ed.pdf). The transcription does not call Agnes John's wife and does not prove that the Burrowland and Dalgarven occurrences were the same John. Agnes Wilson is therefore retained as an uncertain spouse candidate. Burrowland and Dalgarven remain plausible locations for the Kilwinning reconstruction, not proved birth or death places. Corsankell working identification On 9 February 1571, letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell identified James Glasgow and John Glasgow as sons of James Glasgow elder, an occupier there. National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, GD39/5/59 (https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59), letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571. This directly proves the relationship for the John named at Corsankell. It does not prove that the Corsankell son was the same man as the John or Johns recorded at Burrowland and Dalgarven in 1559-60. Glasgow-3193 is retained as a plausible working match to the Corsankell son. James elder remains attached as an uncertain father, not a proved parent of this Kilwinning reconstruction. If the identification is correct, James Glasgow younger was probably John's brother; that sibling conclusion remains dependent on the same unresolved identity bridge. Earlier research proposed Robert Glasgow, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, as John's father, and still earlier associated the profile with John Glasgow and Jonet Spreull through a Glasgow-burgh protocol naming “Johne Glasgw yonger.” Protocol Books of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, entry dated 8 January 1570, naming “Johne Glasgw yonger,” son of “Johne Glasgw”; volume and folio remain to be confirmed. No property sequence or other record connects either burgh hypothesis to the Ayrshire man, so both are retained only as rejected former hypotheses and are not structured parents. Research Notes * Working father: James Glasgow elder, uncertain. * Probable brother: James Glasgow younger, only if the Kilwinning man was the Corsankell son. * Working spouse: Agnes Wilson, uncertain; the teind list records joint occupancy, not a stated marriage. * Birth and death places remain uncertain. Corsankell is a documented residence of the record-proved son John in 1571, not a proved birth or death place for this profile. * The structured death boundary after 1559 is retained. If the Corsankell match is correct, John was alive on 9 February 1571. * Further evidence should connect Burrowland or Dalgarven with Corsankell before any relationship is treated as certain. Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
{{One Name Study|name=Glasgow}}
{{Scotland Sticker}}
'''John Glasgow''' is represented here with an uncertain birth boundary before 1540 and an uncertain association with Glasgow, Lanarkshire. His documented or proposed Ayrshire locations—Burrowland, Dalgarven, Kilwinning and Corsankell—are retained as evidence leads, but the records do not yet prove that every occurrence belonged to one man.
=== Burrowland and Dalgarven ===
The Cunninghame teind material for 1559-60 lists a John Glasgow at Burrowland and a joint holding of John Glasgow and Agnes Wilson at Dalgarven.<ref name="Teinds1559">Margaret H. B. Sanderson, ''The People of Sixteenth Century Ayrshire'', ''Ayrshire Collections'', vol. 14, no. 8 (Ayrshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, 1987), appendix “The Cunninghame Teind Lists of 1559-60,” [https://aanhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/people-of-ayrshire.pdf#page=36 p. 331]. Sanderson cites Scottish Record Office, Register of Acts and Decreets, vol. 22, fols. 102v-167v. See also [https://www.kilwinningheritage.org.uk/office/resources/documents/a-short-history-of-kilwinning-parish-2nd-ed.pdf ''A Short History of Kilwinning Parish''].</ref> The transcription does not call Agnes John's wife and does not prove that the Burrowland and Dalgarven occurrences were the same John.
[[WIlson-130143|Agnes Wilson]] is therefore retained as an uncertain spouse candidate. Burrowland and Dalgarven remain plausible locations for the Kilwinning reconstruction, not proved birth or death places.
=== Corsankell working identification ===
On 9 February 1571, letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell identified James Glasgow and John Glasgow as sons of [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]], an occupier there.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Charter Chest of the Earls of Glencairn, [https://catalogue.nrscotland.gov.uk/nrsonlinecatalogue/details.aspx?reference=GD39%2F5%2F59 GD39/5/59], letters of reversion concerning the 40-shilling land of Corsankell, 9 February 1571.</ref> This directly proves the relationship for the John named at Corsankell. It does not prove that the Corsankell son was the same man as the John or Johns recorded at Burrowland and Dalgarven in 1559-60.
Glasgow-3193 is retained as a plausible working match to the Corsankell son. James elder remains attached as an '''uncertain''' father, not a proved parent of this Kilwinning reconstruction. If the identification is correct, [[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow younger]] was probably John's brother; that sibling conclusion remains dependent on the same unresolved identity bridge.
Earlier research proposed [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]], fisher and burgess of Glasgow, as John's father, and still earlier associated the profile with [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] and [[Spreull-4|Jonet Spreull]] through a Glasgow-burgh protocol naming “Johne Glasgw yonger.”<ref name="Protocol1570">''Protocol Books of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', entry dated 8 January 1570, naming “Johne Glasgw yonger,” son of “Johne Glasgw”; volume and folio remain to be confirmed.</ref> No property sequence or other record connects either burgh hypothesis to the Ayrshire man, so both are retained only as rejected former hypotheses and are not structured parents.
=== Research Notes ===
* Working father: [[Glasgow-1168|James Glasgow elder]], uncertain.
* Probable brother: [[Glasgow-3921|James Glasgow younger]], only if the Kilwinning man was the Corsankell son.
* Working spouse: [[WIlson-130143|Agnes Wilson]], uncertain; the teind list records joint occupancy, not a stated marriage.
* Birth and death places remain uncertain. Corsankell is a documented residence of the record-proved son John in 1571, not a proved birth or death place for this profile.
* The structured death boundary after 1559 is retained. If the Corsankell match is correct, John was alive on 9 February 1571.
* Further evidence should connect Burrowland or Dalgarven with Corsankell before any relationship is treated as certain.
== Sources ==
<references />