Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Jonet (Glasgow) Pady

before 1565 – after 1598-06-20

Glasgow-3917 · 1 mapped association

Scotland→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
1Close relations
3Evidence items
10Candidate leads
Birth
before 1565 · Scotland
Death
after 1598-06-20 · Place not recorded
Parents
William Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Not recorded
Children
Not recorded
Gender
Female
WikiTree
Glasgow-3917
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
0

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

No named children are recoverable, so child-naming analysis cannot be run.

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1565

Profile-stated birthplace: Scotland

Scotland — exact locality unproved

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3917

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-level representative point

Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.4 claims
2Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open

No formal open question is recorded for this person.

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.3 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 8, 1581-1585 (Glasgow, 1899), protocol 2478, p. 78 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsofproto08glas/page/78/mode/1up), 19 March 1582-3.
  2. unknown Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 11, 1597-1600 (Glasgow, 1900), protocol 3459, pp. 74-75 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc04renwgoog/page/74/mode/1up), 20 June 1598.
  3. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3917
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3917 was captured 2026-08-10T13:17:56+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-10.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-35221540-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1586-07-15 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsGeorge GlasgowGlasgow-10991569-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1640-00-00
SiblingsBarbara LittleGlasgow-5671585-00-00 · Scotland · 1627-00-00 · Edinburgh

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography Jonet Glasgow was married to William Pady. On 19 March 1582/3 the spouses acquired eight ells of land in Bridgegait, Glasgow. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 8, 1581-1585 (Glasgow, 1899), protocol 2478, p. 78 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsofproto08glas/page/78/mode/1up), 19 March 1582-3.

  • The same couple remained together on 20 June 1598, when William Pady and Jonet Glasgow received an equal pro indiviso feu portion in St Teneu Street. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 11, 1597-1600 (Glasgow, 1900), protocol 3459, pp. 74-75 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc04renwgoog/page/74/mode/1up), 20 June 1598. Research Notes

    • Birth: before 1565, Scotland, uncertain.
    • Death: after 20 June 1598, place unknown, uncertain.
    • Spouse: William Pady.
  • The birth estimate assumes that Jonet was at least 18 at the 1583 purchase. The records do not identify her parents or children. She is not Jonet Glasgow, estimated born about 1600 at Mid Calder, who was not alive for the 1583 transaction.
  • the subject's given name Jonet recurs below 2 independent child branches of candidate's child George Glasgow (Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart; William Glasgow branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+26; catalogue rarity 12, Jonet in 14 profiles; grandchild-level echo, supports investigating the subject as that child's missing sibling) Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 8, 1581-1585 (Glasgow, 1899), protocol 2478, p. 78 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsofproto08glas/page/78/mode/1up), 19 March 1582-3. source link 1
  2. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 11, 1597-1600 (Glasgow, 1900), protocol 3459, pp. 74-75 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc04renwgoog/page/74/mode/1up), 20 June 1598. source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Jonet Glasgow was married to William Pady. On 19 March 1582/3 the spouses acquired eight ells of land in Bridgegait, Glasgow. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 8, 1581-1585 (Glasgow, 1899), protocol 2478, p. 78 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsofproto08glas/page/78/mode/1up), 19 March 1582-3. 

The same couple remained together on 20 June 1598, when William Pady and Jonet Glasgow received an equal pro indiviso feu portion in St Teneu Street. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 11, 1597-1600 (Glasgow, 1900), protocol 3459, pp. 74-75 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc04renwgoog/page/74/mode/1up), 20 June 1598. 
Research Notes
* Birth: before 1565, Scotland, uncertain.
* Death: after 20 June 1598, place unknown, uncertain.
* Spouse: William Pady.

The birth estimate assumes that Jonet was at least 18 at the 1583 purchase. The records do not identify her parents or children. She is not Jonet Glasgow, estimated born about 1600 at Mid Calder, who was not alive for the 1583 transaction. 

* the subject's given name Jonet recurs below 2 independent child branches of candidate's child George Glasgow (Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart; William Glasgow branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+26; catalogue rarity 12, Jonet in 14 profiles; grandchild-level echo, supports investigating the subject as that child's missing sibling)
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

Jonet Glasgow was married to William Pady. On 19 March 1582/3 the spouses acquired eight ells of land in Bridgegait, Glasgow.<ref>Robert Renwick, ed., ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', vol. 8, 1581-1585 (Glasgow, 1899), protocol 2478, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsofproto08glas/page/78/mode/1up p. 78], 19 March 1582-3.</ref>

The same couple remained together on 20 June 1598, when William Pady and Jonet Glasgow received an equal pro indiviso feu portion in St Teneu Street.<ref>Robert Renwick, ed., ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', vol. 11, 1597-1600 (Glasgow, 1900), protocol 3459, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc04renwgoog/page/74/mode/1up pp. 74-75], 20 June 1598.</ref>

=== Research Notes ===

* Birth: before 1565, Scotland, uncertain.
* Death: after 20 June 1598, place unknown, uncertain.
* Spouse: William Pady.

The birth estimate assumes that Jonet was at least 18 at the 1583 purchase. The records do not identify her parents or children. She is not [[Glasgow-3183|Jonet Glasgow]], estimated born about 1600 at Mid Calder, who was not alive for the 1583 transaction. 

* the subject's given name Jonet recurs below 2 independent child branches of candidate's child George Glasgow (Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart branch: Jonet (Glasgow) Stewart; William Glasgow branch: Jonet Glasgow) (+26; catalogue rarity 12, Jonet in 14 profiles; grandchild-level echo, supports investigating the subject as that child's missing sibling)

== Sources ==
<references />