Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Andrew Glasgow

before 1540 – 1598-07-10

Glasgow-3163 · 1 mapped association

ScotlandKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
7Close relations
5Evidence items
7Candidate leads
Birth
before 1540 · Scotland
Death
1598-07-10 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Jonet Glasgow Anderson
Children
Andrew GlasgowDavid GlasgowJames GlasgowJohn GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3163
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
134

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionJames Glasgow (1575)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn Glasgow (1579)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Estimate and relationship notes
  • The export reports 3 children but 5 named child profiles are recoverable from this export.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers3 leads

Automated fit10/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1515–1571Generationat most 25 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Broad Geography · Household · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Tradition Validation · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 25 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate's name matches the first dated son James Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, James in 224 profiles)
  • family naming controls: 0 supporting and 1 conflicting known positions (already reflected in naming weight)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1520–1575Generationat most 20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show 1 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–1564Generationat most 40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers4 leads

Automated fit58/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1516–1575Generationnominally 24 years; true gap uncertain age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Parental Couple Structure · Sibling Parental CoupleCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 2 exact subject sibling profiles (+20): Stephen Glasgow, William Glasgow
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of nominally 24 years; true gap uncertain (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 2 exact subject sibling profiles (+20): Stephen Glasgow, William Glasgow
  • the candidate and the subject's linked father John Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 2 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit16/100
Weak Lead
Dates1530–?Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Clerk +8 (+8 total)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show 2 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit0/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1530–1563Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–?Generationat most 40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 40 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3163

Father assessment: John Glasgow (1516), Glasgow-1093, burgess of Glasgow is possible but unsupported, not contradicted. John is of the correct generation, but no record found calls Andrew his son, brother or other kinsman. The positive evidence for John's documented family is concentrated in Glasgow burgh property records, while Andrew is documented as a rural tenant at Corstoun in the barony/parish of Caldercleir.

The best new working hypothesis is that Andrew belonged to a Calder/West Lothian rural cluster, potentially including John Glasgow (about 1540), Glasgow-3181, in Hirmenschelis and Margaret Glasgow, Glasgow-3164, of Croftmalloch. This is a research cluster, not a proved sibling group. John and Margaret's testaments do not state a relationship to Andrew.

Live update 19 August 2026: the biography correctly transcribes spouse Jonet Anderson and the four testament-named children. The missing sons now have profiles [[Glasgow-4006|Andrew]] and [[Glasgow-4007|William]] and are attached as Confident (not DNA); their mother fields remain blank.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1540

Profile-stated birthplace: Scotland

Scotland — exact locality unproved

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3163

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-level representative point

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3163

SourceFindingAssessment
NRS Edinburgh Commissary Court CC8/8/32, Andrew Glasgow's 1598 testament; printed index p. 108The family clause names "Marioune James Andro and Williame his said four bairnis." It proves Andrew's spouse and four children but does not name either parent.Direct evidence for the four children; negative for the attached father.
Scottish Record Society, *Commissariot of Edinburgh: Register of Testaments, 1514-1600*, p. 108The surname entries place three contemporary rural Glasgows together in the Edinburgh jurisdiction: Andrew in Corstoun, Caldercleir (1598); John in Hirmenschelis (1577); and Margaret, spouse of John Edstoun in Croftmalloch (1580).A useful same-region cluster, but an index supplies no relationship. Each testament must be read independently before proposing sibling links.
Norman Dixon, *The Placenames of Midlothian*, entry for CorstounCorstoun is identified as a farm on the Calder, with the early form "Corstoun" recorded in the seventeenth-century Great Seal register. The surviving farm site is also independently located near Kirknewton in West Lothian.Supports identifying Andrew's residence with Corston farm in the Calder district, rather than with Glasgow burgh. It does not identify his family.
National Records of Scotland, GD150, Papers of the Earls of MortonThe catalogue identifies the exact undigitised estate series for Andrew's residence: GD150/696-757, Barony of Caldercleir, 1506-1824, and GD150/2027-2060, Midlothian rentals, 1554-1823. General deeds for Andrew's adult period are GD150/320-493 (1551-1597).Highest-value unresolved source set. A Corstoun rental, tack or occupier succession could name Andrew's predecessor, heir, son or surety. The records are open but held off site and are not digitised in the public catalogue.
National Records of Scotland, Croftmalloch place recordCroftmalloch is in Whitburn parish, West Lothian. This establishes the location attached to Margaret Glasgow's 1580 testament.Confirms Margaret was another rural West Lothian Glasgow. It does not prove she was Andrew's sister.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.12 claims
3Unknown
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

Andrew Glasgow was possible son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

The generation works, but exhaustive published-register searches found no burgh-to-Calder bridge. Andrew's positive evidence is a rural Caldercleir testament and estate context.

Andrew Glasgow was possible collateral of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Contemporary rural Calder/West Lothian testaments make sibling or cousin status worth testing, but neither testament names the other. Margaret Glasgow of Croftmalloch is a third possible collateral.

James Glasgow was possible son of Andrew Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Andrew's 1598 testament directly names a son James. Glasgow-991 fits the generation and has Mid Calder family records, but no record equates him with Andrew's son. The Mid Calder and Inveresk baptism groups may represent one mobile family or two namesakes.

Case-file assessments

Relationship assessment

Glasgow-3163

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.4 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/32, Commissary Court of Edinburgh, Testament of Andro Glasgw, 1598.
  2. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3163
  3. unknown Controlled relationship assessment
  4. derivative "Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XTRN-WMS), James Glasgow in entry for William Glasgow, 1614.
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3163 was captured 2026-08-19T15:39:04+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathKirknewton, Linlithgowshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10931516-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1575-11-08 · Stockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenJames GlasgowGlasgow-9911575-00-00 · Inveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-15611579-00-00 · Linlithgowshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenDavid GlasgowGlasgow-10281586-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland
ChildrenAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-40061597-02-06
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-40071597-02-06
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-31811540-00-00 · Scotland · 1576-11-00 · Hirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-35221540-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1586-07-15 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsStephen GlasgowGlasgow-10291550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1598-00-00 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SpousesJonet GlasgowAnderson-1034631540-00-00 · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • The identity and territorial description below are verified from the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the heading of the testament register. The spouse and four children are included because the relevant names and relationship terms can be read securely from the supplied register images.
  • Original spellings are retained where quoted. Modern forms of the forenames are supplied for clarity. The children's surname is inferred from their father because the manuscript gives only their forenames in the family clause. Cancelled text is treated as cancelled and is not counted as part of the operative wording. Biography Andro Glasgw was described in his testament as:
  • His testament testamentar and inventar survives in the records of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh under National Records of Scotland reference CC8/8/32. National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/32, Commissary Court of Edinburgh, Testament of Andro Glasgw, 1598.
  • The register copy states that the testament was:
  • The year is written in the manuscript as Jaj vC lxxxxvij — 1597 as written. The opening also records that Andro died in February of the stated year, although the precise day of his death has not yet been read securely. The National Records of Scotland catalogue dates the testament to 1598. Family Andro Glasgw's spouse was Jonet Andersone, modernised as Janet Anderson.
  • She is named in the introductory portion of the testament in the phrase:
  • The testament explicitly names four children, described collectively as Andro's:
  • Marioune Glasgw — modernised as Marion; the surname is inferred from her father and is not repeated beside her forename in the testament

    • James Glasgw — surname inferred from his father
    • Andro Glasgw — modernised as Andrew; surname inferred from his father
    • Williame Glasgw — modernised as William; surname inferred from his father
  • The cancelled name appears to have been a scribal false start, probably repeating the spouse's name before the clerk began listing the children. It should not be interpreted as an additional child.
  • The testament does not state the children's ages, birth order, dates of birth, marital status or later residences. The existing John and David links are retained as uncertain topology, but neither name appears among the four children in the testament. Research Notes

    • The manuscript heading identifies the record as a testament testamentar and inventar, not a testament dative.
    • The manuscript year, 1597 as written, and the NRS catalogue year, 1598, are both retained without attempting an Old Style/New Style calendar conversion.
    • The marginal annotation clearly includes Julij 1598, but the expression identifying the precise day is not presently secure enough to publish.
    • Corstoun has not been equated with a more precise modern locality. The only location asserted here is the manuscript's description: Corstoun in the parish of Caldercleir, within the sheriffdom of Edinburgh.
    • Jonet Andersone is securely identified as Andro's spouse through the combination of her full name in the introductory section and the later reference to his "said spous".
    • Four children are explicitly identified by forename and described collectively as Andro's "said four bairnis": Marioune, James, Andro and Williame.
    • The surname Glasgw is not written after each child's forename in the family clause. It is inferred from their stated relationship to Andro Glasgw.
    • The cancelled occurrence of "Jonet" is not evidence of a fifth child.
    • The testament does not establish any relationship between this family and other Glasgw, Glasgow, Andersone or Anderson families.
    • The lower part of the second supplied register image begins a separate testament. Names and information from that later entry must not be attributed to Andro Glasgw.
    • Highest-value unresolved estate searches are NRS GD150/696-757 (Barony of Caldercleir) and GD150/2027-2060 (Midlothian rentals), especially records covering about 1550-1605 for Corstoun/Corston and Glasgow surname variants. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/32, Commissary Court of Edinburgh, Testament of Andro Glasgw, 1598.
Full captured biography text
Palaeographic note:

The identity and territorial description below are verified from the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the heading of the testament register. The spouse and four children are included because the relevant names and relationship terms can be read securely from the supplied register images.

Original spellings are retained where quoted. Modern forms of the forenames are supplied for clarity. The children's surname is inferred from their father because the manuscript gives only their forenames in the family clause. Cancelled text is treated as cancelled and is not counted as part of the operative wording.
Biography
Andro Glasgw was described in his testament as:

"Andro Glasgw in Corstoun in the parochin of Caldercleir within the schirefdom of Edinburgh"

His testament testamentar and inventar survives in the records of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh under National Records of Scotland reference CC8/8/32. National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/32, Commissary Court of Edinburgh, Testament of Andro Glasgw, 1598. 

The register copy states that the testament was:

"maid and gevin vp be him self vpoun the sext day of Februar"

The year is written in the manuscript as Jaj vC lxxxxvij — 1597 as written. The opening also records that Andro died in February of the stated year, although the precise day of his death has not yet been read securely. The National Records of Scotland catalogue dates the testament to 1598.
Family
Andro Glasgw's spouse was Jonet Andersone, modernised as Janet Anderson.

She is named in the introductory portion of the testament in the phrase:

"pairtlie maid and gevin vp be Jonet Andersone"

A later distribution clause refers to Andro's "said spous", linking that description to the previously named Jonet Andersone.

The testament explicitly names four children, described collectively as Andro's:

"said four bairnis"

They were:

* Marioune Glasgw — modernised as Marion; the surname is inferred from her father and is not repeated beside her forename in the testament
* James Glasgw — surname inferred from his father
* Andro Glasgw — modernised as Andrew; surname inferred from his father
* Williame Glasgw — modernised as William; surname inferred from his father

The relevant family line contains a cancelled occurrence of Jonet immediately before the four children's names. The operative wording may be represented as:

 Jonet Marioune James Andro and Williame his said four bairnis

The cancelled name appears to have been a scribal false start, probably repeating the spouse's name before the clerk began listing the children. It should not be interpreted as an additional child.

No child named Jon is identified in this family clause. The earlier proposed reading of "Jon ... his son" resulted from incorrectly separating the name Jonet Andersone.
Children
* Marioune Glasgw — named as one of Andro's four bairns. Marion Glasgow is a cautious identity candidate only; her existing uncertain parent topology is preserved and she is not attached here.
* James Glasgw — named as one of Andro's four bairns. James Glasgow remains an uncertain identity candidate; the forename alone does not prove that profile's identity.
* Andro Glasgw — named as one of Andro's four bairns and represented by Andrew Glasgow.
* Williame Glasgw — named as one of Andro's four bairns and represented by William Glasgow.

The testament does not state the children's ages, birth order, dates of birth, marital status or later residences. The existing John and David links are retained as uncertain topology, but neither name appears among the four children in the testament.
Research Notes
* The manuscript heading identifies the record as a testament testamentar and inventar, not a testament dative.
* The manuscript year, 1597 as written, and the NRS catalogue year, 1598, are both retained without attempting an Old Style/New Style calendar conversion.
* The marginal annotation clearly includes Julij 1598, but the expression identifying the precise day is not presently secure enough to publish.
* Corstoun has not been equated with a more precise modern locality. The only location asserted here is the manuscript's description: Corstoun in the parish of Caldercleir, within the sheriffdom of Edinburgh.
* Jonet Andersone is securely identified as Andro's spouse through the combination of her full name in the introductory section and the later reference to his "said spous".
* Four children are explicitly identified by forename and described collectively as Andro's "said four bairnis": Marioune, James, Andro and Williame.
* The surname Glasgw is not written after each child's forename in the family clause. It is inferred from their stated relationship to Andro Glasgw.
* The cancelled occurrence of "Jonet" is not evidence of a fifth child.
* The testament does not establish any relationship between this family and other Glasgw, Glasgow, Andersone or Anderson families.
* The lower part of the second supplied register image begins a separate testament. Names and information from that later entry must not be attributed to Andro Glasgw.
* Highest-value unresolved estate searches are NRS GD150/696-757 (Barony of Caldercleir) and GD150/2027-2060 (Midlothian rentals), especially records covering about 1550-1605 for Corstoun/Corston and Glasgow surname variants.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
'''Palaeographic note:'''

The identity and territorial description below are verified from the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the heading of the testament register. The spouse and four children are included because the relevant names and relationship terms can be read securely from the supplied register images.

Original spellings are retained where quoted. Modern forms of the forenames are supplied for clarity. The children's surname is inferred from their father because the manuscript gives only their forenames in the family clause. Cancelled text is treated as cancelled and is not counted as part of the operative wording.

== Biography ==

'''Andro Glasgw''' was described in his testament as:

<blockquote>
"Andro Glasgw in Corstoun in the parochin of Caldercleir within the schirefdom of Edinburgh"
</blockquote>

His '''testament testamentar and inventar''' survives in the records of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh under National Records of Scotland reference '''CC8/8/32'''.<ref>National Records of Scotland, CC8/8/32, Commissary Court of Edinburgh, ''Testament of Andro Glasgw'', 1598.</ref>

The register copy states that the testament was:

<blockquote>
"maid and gevin vp be him self vpoun the sext day of Februar"
</blockquote>

The year is written in the manuscript as '''Jaj vC lxxxxvij''' — 1597 as written. The opening also records that Andro died in February of the stated year, although the precise day of his death has not yet been read securely. The National Records of Scotland catalogue dates the testament to '''1598'''.

== Family ==

Andro Glasgw's spouse was '''Jonet Andersone''', modernised as Janet Anderson.

She is named in the introductory portion of the testament in the phrase:

<blockquote>
"pairtlie maid and gevin vp be Jonet Andersone"
</blockquote>

A later distribution clause refers to Andro's '''"said spous"''', linking that description to the previously named Jonet Andersone.

The testament explicitly names four children, described collectively as Andro's:

<blockquote>
"said four bairnis"
</blockquote>

They were:

* '''Marioune''' Glasgw — modernised as Marion; the surname is inferred from her father and is not repeated beside her forename in the testament
* '''James''' Glasgw — surname inferred from his father
* '''Andro''' Glasgw — modernised as Andrew; surname inferred from his father
* '''Williame''' Glasgw — modernised as William; surname inferred from his father

The relevant family line contains a cancelled occurrence of '''Jonet''' immediately before the four children's names. The operative wording may be represented as:

<blockquote>
<del>Jonet</del> Marioune James Andro and Williame his said four bairnis
</blockquote>

The cancelled name appears to have been a scribal false start, probably repeating the spouse's name before the clerk began listing the children. It should not be interpreted as an additional child.

No child named '''Jon''' is identified in this family clause. The earlier proposed reading of "Jon ... his son" resulted from incorrectly separating the name '''Jonet Andersone'''.

== Children ==

* '''Marioune Glasgw''' — named as one of Andro's four bairns. [[Glasgow-3062|Marion Glasgow]] is a cautious identity candidate only; her existing uncertain parent topology is preserved and she is not attached here.
* '''James Glasgw''' — named as one of Andro's four bairns. [[Glasgow-991|James Glasgow]] remains an uncertain identity candidate; the forename alone does not prove that profile's identity.
* '''Andro Glasgw''' — named as one of Andro's four bairns and represented by [[Glasgow-4006|Andrew Glasgow]].
* '''Williame Glasgw''' — named as one of Andro's four bairns and represented by [[Glasgow-4007|William Glasgow]].

The testament does not state the children's ages, birth order, dates of birth, marital status or later residences. The existing [[Glasgow-1561|John]] and [[Glasgow-1028|David]] links are retained as uncertain topology, but neither name appears among the four children in the testament.

== Research Notes ==

* The manuscript heading identifies the record as a '''testament testamentar and inventar''', not a testament dative.
* The manuscript year, 1597 as written, and the NRS catalogue year, 1598, are both retained without attempting an Old Style/New Style calendar conversion.
* The marginal annotation clearly includes '''Julij 1598''', but the expression identifying the precise day is not presently secure enough to publish.
* Corstoun has not been equated with a more precise modern locality. The only location asserted here is the manuscript's description: Corstoun in the parish of Caldercleir, within the sheriffdom of Edinburgh.
* Jonet Andersone is securely identified as Andro's spouse through the combination of her full name in the introductory section and the later reference to his "said spous".
* Four children are explicitly identified by forename and described collectively as Andro's "said four bairnis": Marioune, James, Andro and Williame.
* The surname '''Glasgw''' is not written after each child's forename in the family clause. It is inferred from their stated relationship to Andro Glasgw.
* The cancelled occurrence of "Jonet" is not evidence of a fifth child.
* The testament does not establish any relationship between this family and other Glasgw, Glasgow, Andersone or Anderson families.
* The lower part of the second supplied register image begins a separate testament. Names and information from that later entry must not be attributed to Andro Glasgw.
* Highest-value unresolved estate searches are NRS GD150/696-757 (Barony of Caldercleir) and GD150/2027-2060 (Midlothian rentals), especially records covering about 1550-1605 for Corstoun/Corston and Glasgow surname variants.

== Sources ==

<references />