Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

John Glasgow

c. 1540 – 1576-11

Glasgow-3181 · 1 mapped association

ScotlandHirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
4Close relations
7Evidence items
11Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1540 · Scotland
Death
1576-11 · Hirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland
Parents
John Glasgowuncertain
Spouses
Margaret (Hutcheson) Glasgow
Children
Katherine GlasgowMargaret Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3181
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
2

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionKatherine Glasgow (1575)
Paternal grandmother positionMargaret Glasgow (1576)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers4 leads

Automated fit17/100
Resolve Child Duplicate First
Dates1515–1571Generation25 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Matching Child Profile · Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → James Glasgow (+3)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); candidate parentage depends on resolving a matching existing child profile first

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 25-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 60 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate already has child profile John Glasgow (Glasgow-3193), which the similar-person scorer matches to the subject at 48/100 (+0; resolve that possible duplicate before treating the subject as an additional child)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: Andrew Glasgow → James Glasgow (+3)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); candidate parentage depends on resolving a matching existing child profile first

Automated fit13/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1520–1575Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Repeated Marriage Surnames · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1030) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 55 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the second dated daughter Margaret Glasgow, the expected mother position (+3; Margaret in 208 profiles)
  • uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Hutcheson +8 (+8 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1030) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 2 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1530–1560Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 16–20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Bridgegate, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed as a sibling of another linked father (−5; this makes the candidate an uncle/aunt under that tree hypothesis); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–1564Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+7)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • known spouse Isobel (Brade) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit58/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1516–1575Generationat least 24 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Parental Couple Structure · Sibling Parental CoupleCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 2 exact subject sibling profiles (+20): Stephen Glasgow, William Glasgow
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)

locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 2 exact subject sibling profiles (+20): Stephen Glasgow, William Glasgow
  • the candidate and the subject's linked father John Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 2 exact sibling profiles (+14; strong couple-structure clue)

Deductions and cautions: locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit9/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1530–1552Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–20 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Broad Geography · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same broad administrative area only (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit8/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1530–?Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1530–1563Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 45 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1500–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 75 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1575), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-3193

Automated fit48/100
Similar Person
Dates1540–1559PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland → Kilwinning, Ayrshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • same birth year (+30)

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-1095

Automated fit18/100
Similar Person
Dates1475–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 65; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 65; retained without deduction

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3181

The currently attached father is contradicted. The live profile now makes Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1096), born about 1520, Glasgow the father by combining Ninian's 1596 burgess admission with Ninian's 1613 testament. Those records do prove that Robert had a son John, but that John was alive on 10 January 1613. Glasgow-3181 died in November 1576 and cannot be that man.

The better uncertain father is John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093), born about 1510, Glasgow. Two Glasgow burgh protocols directly prove that he had a son John of the correct generation, but no record found identifies that burgh son as the John who died at Hirdmanscheillis. Replace Robert-1096 with John-1093 only as an uncertain father; do not describe the relationship as confirmed.

The search produced several concrete profile corrections. The testament names John's widow as Margaret Hoghame, a historical shorthand/variant of Margaret Hutchison, and his lawful daughters as Katherine and Marjorie Glasgow, not Katherine and Margaret. Hirdmanscheillis is the historic Hermand in West Calder. The attached sibling relationship to Ninian Glasgow (Glasgow-3188), born about 1550, Glasgow is contradicted by direct records.

Live-profile audit 19 July 2026, refreshed after the latest edit: the new opening Father section is wrong because it assigns a record-defined man alive in 1613 to a profile that died in 1576. The structured father has also been changed from John-1093 to Robert-1096. Both changes must be reversed or qualified as described below.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1540

Profile-stated birthplace: Scotland

Scotland — exact locality unproved

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3181

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Country-level representative point

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3181

SourceFindingAssessment
National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/5, image 276 and upper part of image 277; local image 276; published testament index, p. 109The testament dative says Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis died in November 1576. His relict Margaret Hoghame gave up the inventory for their lawful bairns and executors dative Kathrine and Marjorie Glasgw. It names no parent or sibling.Direct identity, spouse, child and death evidence; negative for parentage.
Robert Renwick, ed., *Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow*, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563John Glasgow senior resigned a Glasgow tenement to “John Glasgow junior, his son,” reserving annual payments to himself and Jonet Spreull, his spouse.Direct proof that the proposed father had a son John; no Hirdmanscheillis identifier.
Renwick, *Protocols*, vol. 6, protocol 1722, 8 January 1570/71, printed p. 44; saved scanThe witnesses include “John Glasgw, younger son of John Glasgw.” This independently confirms the same-named father-and-son pair in Glasgow eight years after protocol 748.Direct relationship evidence; likely the same burgh son as in 1563, but still no bridge to Hirdmanscheillis.
Renwick, *Protocols*, vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, printed p. 57John Glasgow was served heir to his father William Glasgow in the same Glasgow property block bounded by Robert Young and the late John Rankin. Protocols 809-810 call this owner John Glasgow senior/elder.Strong collateral reconstruction of John senior's burgh family and property; it does not identify the Hirdmanscheillis testator.
Renwick, *Protocols*, vol. 7, protocol 2189, 17 June 1575, printed p. 110Stephen Glasgow, son of the late John Glasgow, acted with consent of his mother and liferentrix Jonet Spreull over the same property block bounded by Robert Young and the late John Rankin.Directly proves Stephen Glasgow (Glasgow-1029), born about 1550, Glasgow was John senior and Jonet's son. It also proves John senior was dead by 17 June 1575, before the Hirdmanscheillis John died in November 1576.
Renwick, *Protocols*, vol. 7, protocol 2002, 19 December 1573, printed p. 36“Robert Glasgw” and “John Glasgw,” both fishers, witnessed the same Bridgegate transaction. Earlier 1571-73 protocols also show a John Glasgow as a burgh landholder.A likely later occurrence of the burgh son, but the record does not say whose son he was. It cannot be assigned to the Hirdmanscheillis testator as fact.
Hardy Bertram McCall, *The History and Antiquities of the Parish of Mid-Calder* (1894), barony-court extractsThe surviving Calder-Comitis court extracts call the place Hirdmanscheillis/Hirdmanschiels and show John Stevenson younger there as bailie in 1583 and at the 1586 wappenschaw. Later passages explicitly gloss Hirdmanschiels as Hermand.Places John's farm in the rural Calder/West Calder network, not in Glasgow burgh. No transfer from Glasgow to Stevenson is preserved in the published extracts.
*The Germanic Toponymicon of Southern Scotland*, University of Glasgow thesis, place-name entryThe Hermand entry gives the historical forms “Hirdmanscheill(i)s” (1583) and “Hirdmans(c)hiel(l)s” (1585-86), in West Calder.Scholarly confirmation of the modern place identification.
James R. Anderson, ed., *Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750*, p. 24, 23 October 1596; NRS Glasgow Commissary Court CC9/7/9, Ninian Glasgow's 1613 testamentThe burgess roll calls Ninian the second son of Robert Glasgow, fisher and burgess. Ninian's testament leaves a new gown to “Johne Glasgw his brother,” who was necessarily alive in 1613.Directly contradicts the present treatment of Ninian as this John's brother: Glasgow-3181 died in 1576, and Ninian's father was Robert, not John senior.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.9 claims
6Unknown
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

John Glasgow was possible son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Two protocols prove the elder John had a son John of the right generation. The Hermand testament names no parent, and no record carries the burgh son into the Calder household.

Andrew Glasgow was possible collateral of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Contemporary rural Calder/West Lothian testaments make sibling or cousin status worth testing, but neither testament names the other. Margaret Glasgow of Croftmalloch is a third possible collateral.

Case-file assessments

Identity analysis

Glasgow-3181

The 1563 and 1571 records almost certainly concern one Glasgow-burgh son John: the name, father, generation and burgh setting coincide. They make John Glasgow (Glasgow-1093) a plausible father candidate for Glasgow-3181.

They do not complete the identity chain. The last likely burgh occurrence is John the fisher in December 1573. The testament's John is documented three years later as a rural livestock tenant roughly 25 miles east in the Calder barony, with a differently documented household and no stated occupation. A move is possible, but no sasine, tack, court minute, testament, spouse record or sibling record connects the two settings. The father should therefore remain uncertain rather than being promoted to confirmed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.6 sources
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3181 was captured 2026-08-19T15:12:35+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathHirmanscheillis, Midlothian, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10931510-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1575-11-08 · Stockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenKatherine GlasgowGlasgow-35901575-00-00 · Hirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenMarjorie GlasgowGlasgow-35891576-00-00 · Hirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-31631540-00-00 · Scotland · 1598-07-10 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
SiblingsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-35221540-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1586-07-15 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsStephen GlasgowGlasgow-10291550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1598-00-00 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SpousesMargaret GlasgowHutcheson-16561550-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00

Record-bearing passages

  • BiographyUncertain father The currently attached John Glasgow is a plausible but uncertain father. A Glasgow burgh protocol dated 13 May 1563 records John Glasgow senior resigning property to “John Glasgow junior, his son,” and a second protocol dated 8 January 1570/71 names “John Glasgw, younger son of John Glasgw.” Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up); vol. 6, protocol 1722, 8 January 1570/71, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc05scogoog/page/n58/mode/2up). These records directly prove that John-1093 had a son John of the correct generation, but no inspected record connects that burgh son to the man at Hirmanscheillis. The relationship must therefore remain uncertain, not confident or DNA-confirmed.
  • This testator cannot be the brother John named in Ninian Glasgow's 1613 testament. Ninian's burgess admission identifies him as a son of Robert Glasgow, and Ninian left a gown to a brother John who was alive on 10 January 1613. James R. Anderson, ed., Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750, p. 24 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, testament of Ninian Glasgow, made 10 January 1613. Glasgow-3181 died in November 1576, so the earlier Robert-1096/Ninian sibling identification is chronologically impossible.
  • This profile cites the registered testament of Johne Glasgw in National Records of Scotland reference CC8/8/5. Johne's entry begins on Image 276 and continues through only the upper portion of Image 277.
  • The lower portion of Image 277 begins a separate testament for Petir Hyme, quarter maister. A detached strip headed The confirmation of the testament of andro hutchesoun is likewise a separate record. Neither should be used as evidence concerning Johne Glasgw or Margaret Hoghame.
  • The manuscript is written in late sixteenth-century Scottish Secretary Hand. Original spelling is retained in the working transcription. Letters supplied when expanding contractions are placed in square brackets; uncertain or unreadable text is marked rather than silently reconstructed. Testator Johne Glasgw, styled in Hirmanscheillis, died in November 1576.
  • The year 1577 in the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the manuscript margin is the year in which the testament was processed by the Edinburgh Commissary Court. The manuscript distinguishes the dates:
  • Death: November j m v c lxxvj — 1576.

    • Executors-dative decree: xxj day of Aprile j m v c lxxvij — 21 April 1577.
    • Marginal date: quarto May 1577 — 4 May 1577. Executors and family
    • Margaret Hoghame is described as Johne's relict. The spelling Hoghame often maps to families later shown as Hutchison.
    • She gave up the inventory in name & behalfe of the bairns. She is not described as executrix.
    • The two lawful bairns were: ** Katherine Glasgw ** Marjorie Glasgw
    • Katherine and Marjorie, rather than Margaret, are described as the executouris dative decernit to their late father. Inventory and valuation
    • The total inventory is read as xlix li xiij s iiij d — £49 13s 4d Scots.
    • The clearest individual entry records tua young nolt of tua zeir auld — two young cattle, two years old.
    • The remaining entries appear to include further livestock, agricultural produce or grain, meal or malt, household vessels and the abuilzement of Johne's body.
    • Several item names and individual marginal valuations remain provisional. They should not be presented as settled diplomatic readings without checking a higher-resolution image. Debts owed to the deceased The heading Followis the dettis awand to the deid is clear.
  • Nothing in the testament states or implies that Johne Mathie was related to Johne Glasgw. No connection should be made to later Mathie or Glasgow profiles from this debt entry alone. Debts owed by the deceased The heading Followis the dettis awand be the deid is clear.
  • kirk duties and burial expenses;

    • a kist or coffin and mortcloth;
    • funeral provisions including ale, wine, candles or spice;
    • arrears of maill extending over six years.
  • The exact wording and sums remain working readings. The account concludes by calculating the free gear remaining after deduction of the debts. Confirmation on Image 277 The upper portion of Image 277 continues Johne Glasgw's entry. It contains the formal court procedure by which the testament and executors were confirmed and the required caution or surety was accepted.
  • No new testamentary family group begins at the top of Image 277. Johne's entry ends immediately before the large new heading in the middle of the page.
  • The large heading beginning The testament dative Inventar in the lower portion of Image 277 belongs to Petir Hyme, quarter maister, not Johne Glasgw. Archival and legal context

    • Margin note: Johne glasgw quarto May 1577.
    • The body cites an executors-dative decree dated the xxj day of Aprile 1577.
    • Johne's death clause gives November 1576.
    • Court: Edinburgh Commissary Court.
    • National Records of Scotland reference: CC8/8/5.
    • Relevant manuscript extent: Image 276 and the upper portion of Image 277 only. Diplomatic Transcription and Modern Rendering Semi-diplomatic working transcription
  • :1 The testament dative Inventar of the guidis geir soumes :2 of money & dettis pertening to vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis :3 the tyme of his deceis quha deceissit in the moneth of November :4 the zeir of god j m v c lxxvj zeiris Faithfullie maid & gevin vp be :5 Margaret Hoghame his relict in name & behalfe of Kathrine :6 & Marjorie Glasgwis thair lauchfull bairnis & executouris dative decernit :7 to thair said vmq[uhi]le father be decreit of the commissaris of Ed[inbu]r[gh] :8 as the samin decreit of the dait xxj day of Aprile the zeir of :9 god j m v c lxxvij zeiris at lenth proportis :10 In the first the said vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw had guidis geir soumes :11 of money & dettis of the availl & pryces following pertening to him :12 in the tyme of his deceis foirsaid viz tua ky [valuation indistinct] :13 Item tua young nolt of tua zeir auld pryce [indistinct] :14 [Further livestock entry and valuation indistinct] :15 [Further goods or produce and valuation indistinct] :16 [Grain, meal or malt entry partly indistinct] :17 [Further inventory entry partly indistinct] :18 Item the abuilzement of his body [remainder partly indistinct] :19 Summa of the Inventar, xlix li xiij s iiij d :20 Followis the dettis awand to the deid :21–32 [Several named debtors, places and sums follow. See the working readings above. A complete diplomatic reading of each name and marginal sum is not yet secure.] :33 Followis the dettis awand be the deid :34–40 [Kirk, burial and funeral expenses and arrears of maill follow. Individual wording and sums remain partly indistinct.] :41–Image 277 upper [The court confirmation and caution clause continues.] :End [Johne Glasgw's entry ends before the new testament for Petir Hyme.]
  • :1–2 This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the goods, property, money and debts belonging to the late John Glasgow in Hirmansheils. :3–4 He died in November 1576. :4–6 His widow, Margaret Hoghame, submitted the inventory in the name and on behalf of Katherine and Marjorie Glasgow. :6–9 Katherine and Marjorie were their lawful children and had been appointed executors dative to their late father by a decree of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh dated 21 April 1577. :10–18 The inventory then lists John Glasgow's property and the value assigned to each item. The clearest entry is two young cattle, each two years old. Other entries concern livestock, agricultural produce, household goods and his clothing. :19 The total inventory was £49 13s 4d Scots. :20–32 The next section lists debts and other sums owed to John by named individuals. :33–40 The following section lists John's own unpaid debts, including burial or kirk expenses and arrears of rent. :Image 277 upper The Commissary Court then completed the formal confirmation of the testament and executors after the required caution or surety was provided. Research notes

    • 1576 and 1577 are not competing readings of the same date. The manuscript gives death in November 1576, followed by court proceedings in April and May 1577.
    • Hirmanscheillis is retained as the testament's confirmed place form. Published Calder barony-court extracts and a University of Glasgow place-name study identify the historical Hirdmanschiels forms with Hermand in West Calder. Hardy Bertram McCall, The History and Antiquities of the Parish of Mid-Calder (1894), barony-court extracts (https://www.electricscotland.com/history/westcalder/mid_calder.pdf); The Germanic Toponymicon of Southern Scotland, University of Glasgow thesis, Hermand entry (https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1343/1/2003scott1phd.pdf).
    • Quarter maister belongs to Petir Hyme's separate testament in the lower portion of Image 277. It is not Johne Glasgw's occupation.
    • The debt owed by Johne Mathie does not establish a family relationship.
    • All monetary amounts are Scots money unless the source expressly says otherwise.
    • The inventory total is read as xlix li xiij s iiij d — £49 13s 4d Scots.
    • The item-level inventory and debtor readings remain provisional where the clerk's minims, abbreviations or marginal figures are indistinct. Sources
    • National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/5, Image 276 and upper portion of Image 277, testament dative and inventory of Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis; court record dated 1577.

Profile source citations

  1. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up); vol. 6, protocol 1722, 8 January 1570/71, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc05scogoog/page/n58/mode/2up). source link 1 source link 2
  2. James R. Anderson, ed., Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750, p. 24 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, testament of Ninian Glasgow, made 10 January 1613. source link 1
  3. Hardy Bertram McCall, The History and Antiquities of the Parish of Mid-Calder (1894), barony-court extracts (https://www.electricscotland.com/history/westcalder/mid_calder.pdf); The Germanic Toponymicon of Southern Scotland, University of Glasgow thesis, Hermand entry (https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1343/1/2003scott1phd.pdf). source link 1 source link 2
  4. National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/5, Image 276 and upper portion of Image 277, testament dative and inventory of Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis; court record dated 1577.
Full captured biography text
BiographyUncertain father
The currently attached John Glasgow is a plausible but uncertain father. A Glasgow burgh protocol dated 13 May 1563 records John Glasgow senior resigning property to “John Glasgow junior, his son,” and a second protocol dated 8 January 1570/71 names “John Glasgw, younger son of John Glasgw.” Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up); vol. 6, protocol 1722, 8 January 1570/71, scan (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc05scogoog/page/n58/mode/2up). These records directly prove that John-1093 had a son John of the correct generation, but no inspected record connects that burgh son to the man at Hirmanscheillis. The relationship must therefore remain uncertain, not confident or DNA-confirmed.

This testator cannot be the brother John named in Ninian Glasgow's 1613 testament. Ninian's burgess admission identifies him as a son of Robert Glasgow, and Ninian left a gown to a brother John who was alive on 10 January 1613. James R. Anderson, ed., Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750, p. 24 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, testament of Ninian Glasgow, made 10 January 1613. Glasgow-3181 died in November 1576, so the earlier Robert-1096/Ninian sibling identification is chronologically impossible.

⚠️ Palaeographic Warning

This profile cites the registered testament of Johne Glasgw in National Records of Scotland reference CC8/8/5. Johne's entry begins on Image 276 and continues through only the upper portion of Image 277.

The lower portion of Image 277 begins a separate testament for Petir Hyme, quarter maister. A detached strip headed The confirmation of the testament of andro hutchesoun is likewise a separate record. Neither should be used as evidence concerning Johne Glasgw or Margaret Hoghame.

The manuscript is written in late sixteenth-century Scottish Secretary Hand. Original spelling is retained in the working transcription. Letters supplied when expanding contractions are placed in square brackets; uncertain or unreadable text is marked rather than silently reconstructed.
Testator
Johne Glasgw, styled in Hirmanscheillis, died in November 1576.

The year 1577 in the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the manuscript margin is the year in which the testament was processed by the Edinburgh Commissary Court. The manuscript distinguishes the dates:

* Death: November j m v c lxxvj — 1576.
* Executors-dative decree: xxj day of Aprile j m v c lxxvij — 21 April 1577.
* Marginal date: quarto May 1577 — 4 May 1577.
Executors and family
* Margaret Hoghame is described as Johne's relict. The spelling Hoghame often maps to families later shown as Hutchison.
* She gave up the inventory in name & behalfe of the bairns. She is not described as executrix.
* The two lawful bairns were:
** Katherine Glasgw
** Marjorie Glasgw
* Katherine and Marjorie, rather than Margaret, are described as the executouris dative decernit to their late father.
Inventory and valuation
* The total inventory is read as xlix li xiij s iiij d — £49 13s 4d Scots.
* The clearest individual entry records tua young nolt of tua zeir auld — two young cattle, two years old.
* The remaining entries appear to include further livestock, agricultural produce or grain, meal or malt, household vessels and the abuilzement of Johne's body.
* Several item names and individual marginal valuations remain provisional. They should not be presented as settled diplomatic readings without checking a higher-resolution image.
Debts owed to the deceased
The heading Followis the dettis awand to the deid is clear.

The current working readings of the debtor and place names include:

* Henry Coultar his wyf in Aderstoun
* Johne Donaldsone in the Borders
* Johne Williamsone in the Bent
* Sawll Wallace in Clocherd
* Robert Manys in Taleraw
* Johne Mathie in Boxhame

These personal names and place names remain palaeographic working readings. Modern locations should not yet be assigned solely from this image.

The current draft reads the Johne Mathie entry as xliij s iiij d and an old account for half a boll of oats as xvj s. The marginal figures should be checked again before being treated as final.

Nothing in the testament states or implies that Johne Mathie was related to Johne Glasgw. No connection should be made to later Mathie or Glasgow profiles from this debt entry alone.
Debts owed by the deceased
The heading Followis the dettis awand be the deid is clear.

The following portion appears to include:

* kirk duties and burial expenses;
* a kist or coffin and mortcloth;
* funeral provisions including ale, wine, candles or spice;
* arrears of maill extending over six years.

The exact wording and sums remain working readings. The account concludes by calculating the free gear remaining after deduction of the debts.
Confirmation on Image 277
The upper portion of Image 277 continues Johne Glasgw's entry. It contains the formal court procedure by which the testament and executors were confirmed and the required caution or surety was accepted.

No new testamentary family group begins at the top of Image 277. Johne's entry ends immediately before the large new heading in the middle of the page.

The large heading beginning The testament dative Inventar in the lower portion of Image 277 belongs to Petir Hyme, quarter maister, not Johne Glasgw.
Archival and legal context
* Margin note: Johne glasgw quarto May 1577.
* The body cites an executors-dative decree dated the xxj day of Aprile 1577.
* Johne's death clause gives November 1576.
* Court: Edinburgh Commissary Court.
* National Records of Scotland reference: CC8/8/5.
* Relevant manuscript extent: Image 276 and the upper portion of Image 277 only.
Diplomatic Transcription and Modern Rendering
Semi-diplomatic working transcription

:Margin Johne glasgw
:Margin quarto May 1577

:1 The testament dative Inventar of the guidis geir soumes
:2 of money & dettis pertening to vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis
:3 the tyme of his deceis quha deceissit in the moneth of November
:4 the zeir of god j m v c lxxvj zeiris Faithfullie maid & gevin vp be
:5 Margaret Hoghame his relict in name & behalfe of Kathrine
:6 & Marjorie Glasgwis thair lauchfull bairnis & executouris dative decernit
:7 to thair said vmq[uhi]le father be decreit of the commissaris of Ed[inbu]r[gh]
:8 as the samin decreit of the dait xxj day of Aprile the zeir of
:9 god j m v c lxxvij zeiris at lenth proportis
:10 In the first the said vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw had guidis geir soumes
:11 of money & dettis of the availl & pryces following pertening to him
:12 in the tyme of his deceis foirsaid viz tua ky [valuation indistinct]
:13 Item tua young nolt of tua zeir auld pryce [indistinct]
:14 [Further livestock entry and valuation indistinct]
:15 [Further goods or produce and valuation indistinct]
:16 [Grain, meal or malt entry partly indistinct]
:17 [Further inventory entry partly indistinct]
:18 Item the abuilzement of his body [remainder partly indistinct]
:19 Summa of the Inventar, xlix li xiij s iiij d
:20 Followis the dettis awand to the deid
:21–32 [Several named debtors, places and sums follow. See the working readings above. A complete diplomatic reading of each name and marginal sum is not yet secure.]
:33 Followis the dettis awand be the deid
:34–40 [Kirk, burial and funeral expenses and arrears of maill follow. Individual wording and sums remain partly indistinct.]
:41–Image 277 upper [The court confirmation and caution clause continues.]
:End [Johne Glasgw's entry ends before the new testament for Petir Hyme.]

Modern English rendering

:1–2 This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the goods, property, money and debts belonging to the late John Glasgow in Hirmansheils.
:3–4 He died in November 1576.
:4–6 His widow, Margaret Hoghame, submitted the inventory in the name and on behalf of Katherine and Marjorie Glasgow.
:6–9 Katherine and Marjorie were their lawful children and had been appointed executors dative to their late father by a decree of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh dated 21 April 1577.
:10–18 The inventory then lists John Glasgow's property and the value assigned to each item. The clearest entry is two young cattle, each two years old. Other entries concern livestock, agricultural produce, household goods and his clothing.
:19 The total inventory was £49 13s 4d Scots.
:20–32 The next section lists debts and other sums owed to John by named individuals.
:33–40 The following section lists John's own unpaid debts, including burial or kirk expenses and arrears of rent.
:Image 277 upper The Commissary Court then completed the formal confirmation of the testament and executors after the required caution or surety was provided.
Research notes
* 1576 and 1577 are not competing readings of the same date. The manuscript gives death in November 1576, followed by court proceedings in April and May 1577.
* Hirmanscheillis is retained as the testament's confirmed place form. Published Calder barony-court extracts and a University of Glasgow place-name study identify the historical Hirdmanschiels forms with Hermand in West Calder. Hardy Bertram McCall, The History and Antiquities of the Parish of Mid-Calder (1894), barony-court extracts (https://www.electricscotland.com/history/westcalder/mid_calder.pdf); The Germanic Toponymicon of Southern Scotland, University of Glasgow thesis, Hermand entry (https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1343/1/2003scott1phd.pdf). 
* Quarter maister belongs to Petir Hyme's separate testament in the lower portion of Image 277. It is not Johne Glasgw's occupation.
* The debt owed by Johne Mathie does not establish a family relationship.
* All monetary amounts are Scots money unless the source expressly says otherwise.
* The inventory total is read as xlix li xiij s iiij d — £49 13s 4d Scots.
* The item-level inventory and debtor readings remain provisional where the clerk's minims, abbreviations or marginal figures are indistinct.
Sources
* National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/5, Image 276 and upper portion of Image 277, testament dative and inventory of Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis; court record dated 1577.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
==  Biography  ==

=== Uncertain father ===

The currently attached [[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]] is a plausible but '''uncertain''' father. A Glasgow burgh protocol dated 13 May 1563 records John Glasgow senior resigning property to “John Glasgow junior, his son,” and a second protocol dated 8 January 1570/71 names “John Glasgw, younger son of John Glasgw.”<ref name="FatherProtocols">Robert Renwick, ed., ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up scan]; vol. 6, protocol 1722, 8 January 1570/71, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc05scogoog/page/n58/mode/2up scan].</ref> These records directly prove that John-1093 had a son John of the correct generation, but no inspected record connects that burgh son to the man at Hirmanscheillis. The relationship must therefore remain uncertain, not confident or DNA-confirmed.

This testator cannot be the brother John named in [[Glasgow-3188|Ninian Glasgow]]'s 1613 testament. Ninian's burgess admission identifies him as a son of [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]], and Ninian left a gown to a brother John who was alive on 10 January 1613.<ref>James R. Anderson, ed., ''Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750'', [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up p. 24], 23 October 1596; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, testament of Ninian Glasgow, made 10 January 1613.</ref> Glasgow-3181 died in November 1576, so the earlier Robert-1096/Ninian sibling identification is chronologically impossible.

⚠️ '''Palaeographic Warning'''

This profile cites the registered testament of Johne Glasgw in National Records of Scotland reference CC8/8/5. Johne's entry begins on Image 276 and continues through only the upper portion of Image 277.

The lower portion of Image 277 begins a separate testament for '''Petir Hyme, quarter maister'''. A detached strip headed '''The confirmation of the testament of andro hutchesoun''' is likewise a separate record. Neither should be used as evidence concerning Johne Glasgw or Margaret Hoghame.

The manuscript is written in late sixteenth-century Scottish Secretary Hand. Original spelling is retained in the working transcription. Letters supplied when expanding contractions are placed in square brackets; uncertain or unreadable text is marked rather than silently reconstructed.

===  Testator  ===

'''Johne Glasgw''', styled '''in Hirmanscheillis''', died in November '''1576'''.

The year '''1577''' in the National Records of Scotland catalogue and the manuscript margin is the year in which the testament was processed by the Edinburgh Commissary Court. The manuscript distinguishes the dates:

* Death: November '''j m v c lxxvj''' — 1576.
* Executors-dative decree: '''xxj day of Aprile j m v c lxxvij''' — 21 April 1577.
* Marginal date: '''quarto May 1577''' — 4 May 1577.

===  Executors and family  ===

* '''Margaret Hoghame''' is described as Johne's '''relict'''. The spelling Hoghame often maps to families later shown as Hutchison.
* She gave up the inventory '''in name & behalfe''' of the bairns. She is not described as executrix.
* The two lawful bairns were:
** '''Katherine Glasgw'''
** '''Marjorie Glasgw'''
* Katherine and Marjorie, rather than Margaret, are described as the '''executouris dative decernit''' to their late father.

===  Inventory and valuation  ===

* The total inventory is read as '''xlix li xiij s iiij d''' — '''£49 13s 4d Scots'''.
* The clearest individual entry records '''tua young nolt of tua zeir auld''' — two young cattle, two years old.
* The remaining entries appear to include further livestock, agricultural produce or grain, meal or malt, household vessels and the '''abuilzement''' of Johne's body.
* Several item names and individual marginal valuations remain provisional. They should not be presented as settled diplomatic readings without checking a higher-resolution image.

===  Debts owed to the deceased  ===

The heading '''Followis the dettis awand to the deid''' is clear.

The current working readings of the debtor and place names include:

* '''Henry Coultar his wyf in Aderstoun'''
* '''Johne Donaldsone in the Borders'''
* '''Johne Williamsone in the Bent'''
* '''Sawll Wallace in Clocherd'''
* '''Robert Manys in Taleraw'''
* '''Johne Mathie in Boxhame'''

These personal names and place names remain palaeographic working readings. Modern locations should not yet be assigned solely from this image.

The current draft reads the Johne Mathie entry as '''xliij s iiij d''' and an old account for half a boll of oats as '''xvj s'''. The marginal figures should be checked again before being treated as final.

Nothing in the testament states or implies that Johne Mathie was related to Johne Glasgw. No connection should be made to later Mathie or Glasgow profiles from this debt entry alone.

===  Debts owed by the deceased  ===

The heading '''Followis the dettis awand be the deid''' is clear.

The following portion appears to include:

* kirk duties and burial expenses;
* a kist or coffin and mortcloth;
* funeral provisions including ale, wine, candles or spice;
* arrears of maill extending over six years.

The exact wording and sums remain working readings. The account concludes by calculating the free gear remaining after deduction of the debts.

===  Confirmation on Image 277  ===

The upper portion of Image 277 continues Johne Glasgw's entry. It contains the formal court procedure by which the testament and executors were confirmed and the required caution or surety was accepted.

No new testamentary family group begins at the top of Image 277. Johne's entry ends immediately before the large new heading in the middle of the page.

The large heading beginning '''The testament dative Inventar''' in the lower portion of Image 277 belongs to '''Petir Hyme, quarter maister''', not Johne Glasgw.

===  Archival and legal context  ===

* Margin note: '''Johne glasgw quarto May 1577'''.
* The body cites an executors-dative decree dated '''the xxj day of Aprile''' 1577.
* Johne's death clause gives November 1576.
* Court: Edinburgh Commissary Court.
* National Records of Scotland reference: CC8/8/5.
* Relevant manuscript extent: Image 276 and the upper portion of Image 277 only.

===  Diplomatic Transcription and Modern Rendering  ===
{{Image|file=Glasgow-3181.png|align=c|size=xl|caption=Image 276, NRS CC8/8/5}}

'''Semi-diplomatic working transcription'''

:Margin  Johne glasgw
:Margin  quarto May 1577

:1  The testament dative Inventar of the guidis geir soumes
:2  of money & dettis pertening to vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis
:3  the tyme of his deceis quha deceissit in the moneth of November
:4  the zeir of god j m v c lxxvj zeiris Faithfullie maid & gevin vp be
:5  Margaret Hoghame his relict in name & behalfe of Kathrine
:6  & Marjorie Glasgwis thair lauchfull bairnis & executouris dative decernit
:7  to thair said vmq[uhi]le father be decreit of the commissaris of Ed[inbu]r[gh]
:8  as the samin decreit of the dait xxj day of Aprile the zeir of
:9  god j m v c lxxvij zeiris at lenth proportis
:10 In the first the said vmq[uhi]le Johne Glasgw had guidis geir soumes
:11 of money & dettis of the availl & pryces following pertening to him
:12 in the tyme of his deceis foirsaid viz tua ky [valuation indistinct]
:13 Item tua young nolt of tua zeir auld pryce [indistinct]
:14 [Further livestock entry and valuation indistinct]
:15 [Further goods or produce and valuation indistinct]
:16 [Grain, meal or malt entry partly indistinct]
:17 [Further inventory entry partly indistinct]
:18 Item the abuilzement of his body [remainder partly indistinct]
:19 Summa of the Inventar, '''xlix li xiij s iiij d'''
:20 Followis the dettis awand to the deid
:21–32 [Several named debtors, places and sums follow. See the working readings above. A complete diplomatic reading of each name and marginal sum is not yet secure.]
:33 Followis the dettis awand be the deid
:34–40 [Kirk, burial and funeral expenses and arrears of maill follow. Individual wording and sums remain partly indistinct.]
:41–Image 277 upper [The court confirmation and caution clause continues.]
:End [Johne Glasgw's entry ends before the new testament for Petir Hyme.]

'''Modern English rendering'''

:1–2  This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the goods, property, money and debts belonging to the late John Glasgow in Hirmansheils.
:3–4  He died in November 1576.
:4–6  His widow, Margaret Hoghame, submitted the inventory in the name and on behalf of Katherine and Marjorie Glasgow.
:6–9  Katherine and Marjorie were their lawful children and had been appointed executors dative to their late father by a decree of the Commissary Court of Edinburgh dated 21 April 1577.
:10–18  The inventory then lists John Glasgow's property and the value assigned to each item. The clearest entry is two young cattle, each two years old. Other entries concern livestock, agricultural produce, household goods and his clothing.
:19  The total inventory was £49 13s 4d Scots.
:20–32  The next section lists debts and other sums owed to John by named individuals.
:33–40  The following section lists John's own unpaid debts, including burial or kirk expenses and arrears of rent.
:Image 277 upper  The Commissary Court then completed the formal confirmation of the testament and executors after the required caution or surety was provided.

==  Research notes  ==

* '''1576 and 1577 are not competing readings of the same date.''' The manuscript gives death in November 1576, followed by court proceedings in April and May 1577.
* '''Hirmanscheillis''' is retained as the testament's confirmed place form. Published Calder barony-court extracts and a University of Glasgow place-name study identify the historical Hirdmanschiels forms with Hermand in West Calder.<ref>Hardy Bertram McCall, ''The History and Antiquities of the Parish of Mid-Calder'' (1894), [https://www.electricscotland.com/history/westcalder/mid_calder.pdf barony-court extracts]; ''The Germanic Toponymicon of Southern Scotland'', University of Glasgow thesis, [https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1343/1/2003scott1phd.pdf Hermand entry].</ref>
* '''Quarter maister''' belongs to Petir Hyme's separate testament in the lower portion of Image 277. It is not Johne Glasgw's occupation.
* The debt owed by Johne Mathie does not establish a family relationship.
* All monetary amounts are Scots money unless the source expressly says otherwise.
* The inventory total is read as '''xlix li xiij s iiij d''' — £49 13s 4d Scots.
* The item-level inventory and debtor readings remain provisional where the clerk's minims, abbreviations or marginal figures are indistinct.

==  Sources  ==
<references />
* National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/5, Image 276 and upper portion of Image 277, testament dative and inventory of Johne Glasgw in Hirmanscheillis; court record dated 1577.