Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

John Glasgow

before 1516 – before 1575-11-08

Glasgow-1093 · 1 mapped association

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandStockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
7Close relations
13Evidence items
3Candidate leads
Birth
before 1516 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Death
before 1575-11-08 · Stockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Parents
William GlasgowconfidentIsobel (Brade) Glasgowconfident
Spouses
Jonet (Spreull) Glasgow
Children
Andrew GlasgowJohn GlasgowStephen GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-1093
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
815

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionAndrew Glasgow (1540)
Maternal grandfather positionJohn Glasgow (1540)
Maternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 1 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers1 leads

Automated fit0/100
Conflicting Tree Generation
Dates1475–?Generationat most 41 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Same-Sex Generational Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Sibling-Household ReplicationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1540), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); candidate's child William Glasgow (Glasgow-1098) is also a plausible father in the subject's birth locality (−6; current tree places this candidate one generation farther back)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 41 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 65 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1540), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
  • the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: James Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate is currently placed one generation above a linked parent (−15; grandparent rather than parent); candidate's child William Glasgow (Glasgow-1098) is also a plausible father in the subject's birth locality (−6; current tree places this candidate one generation farther back)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-1095

Automated fit52/100
Similar Person
Dates1475–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 41; retained without deduction

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 41; retained without deduction

Same-name candidate

John GlasgowGlasgow-1561

Automated fit32/100
Similar Person
Dates1579–?PlacesLinlithgowshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 63; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • matching child name: John Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 63; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); uncertain mother attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-1093

Father assessment: William Glasgow (1500) is confirmed by record.

Birth-date assessment: John's WikiTree value is before 1516, not an exact 1516 birth. He was already married to Jonet Spreull and receiving property with her on 31 December 1534. The record gives no age. The legal minimum marriage age supplies only a remote outer bound of birth before about 1520; treating him as an adult householder makes about 1510 the better working estimate, with roughly 1505-1516 a reasonable genealogical range. The existing before 1516 value is therefore defensible as a conservative boundary, but 1516 is not a recorded year.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1516

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1093

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-1093

SourceFindingAssessment
Robert Renwick, ed., *Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow*, protocol 1196, printed p. 72, 31 December 1534William Glasgow, with consent of Esbell Brade, resigned property to their son John Glasgow and Janet Spreull, his spouse.Direct proof of John's parents and that John was married by this date. It gives no age.
Robert Renwick, ed., *Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow*, vol. 3, protocol 805, printed p. 57, 28 October 1564John Glasgow received sasine as heir of William Glasgow, explicitly called "his father."A second, independent direct proof of the relationship. It also establishes that William was dead by this date.
National Records of Scotland, marriage-register research guideBefore 1929, Scottish boys could legally marry at 14, although such young marriages were rare.Makes birth by 1520 only a remote legal limit; it does not establish John's likely age.
Robert Renwick, ed., *Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow*, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563John Glasgow senior resigned burgage property to John Glasgow junior, explicitly called his son; payments were reserved to the elder John and Jonet Spreull, his spouse.Direct proof that John and Jonet had a son John. Identity with John Glasgow (Glasgow-3181), born about 1540, Scotland remains probable rather than resolved.
Same volume, protocol 847, printed p. 73, 24 August 1565John Glasgow senior resigned a burgage tenement to William Glasgow, explicitly called his son, while reserving liferent to himself and Jonet Spreull, his spouse.Direct proof that John and Jonet had a son William. The chronology and burgh network strongly favour William Glasgow (Glasgow-3522), estimated about 1540, Glasgow, but the profile match should be stated as probable. Scan and wording visually verified 18 July 2026.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.12 claims
11Unknown
1Derivative
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

Andrew Glasgow was possible son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

The generation works, but exhaustive published-register searches found no burgh-to-Calder bridge. Andrew's positive evidence is a rural Caldercleir testament and estate context.

John Glasgow was possible son of John Glasgow

possible1 linked evidence item

Two protocols prove the elder John had a son John of the right generation. The Hermand testament names no parent, and no record carries the burgh son into the Calder household.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.12 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, protocol 1196, 31 December 1534, printed p. 72 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up).
  2. derivative Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, protocol abstract (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up).
  3. unknown Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 847, 24 August 1565, printed p. 73 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n85/mode/2up).
  4. unknown Record dated 8 November 1575 naming Stephen Glasgow as son of the late John Glasgow; precise archival citation still needed.
  5. unknown Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433071388825)
  6. unknown Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756)
  7. unknown Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030643244)
  8. unknown Abstracts of Protocols..., Date/Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt)
  9. unknown Link: Commissariot Record Scan
  10. unknown Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, printed p. 57 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up).
  11. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-1093
  12. unknown Controlled relationship assessment
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-1093 was captured 2026-08-19T15:34:20+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathStockwell Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-10980000-00-00 · 1564-10-28
ParentsIsobel GlasgowBrade-2321500-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenAndrew GlasgowGlasgow-31631540-00-00 · Scotland · 1598-07-10 · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
ChildrenJohn GlasgowGlasgow-31811540-00-00 · Scotland · 1576-11-00 · Hirmanscheillis, Midlothian, Scotland
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-35221540-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1586-07-15 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenStephen GlasgowGlasgow-10291550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1598-00-00 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsJames GlasgowGlasgow-11681515-00-00 · Scotland · 1571-02-09 · Stevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10961520-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1575-02-07 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsArchibald GlasgowGlasgow-10971530-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1560-00-00 · Bridgegate, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
SiblingsIsobella HerbisonGlasgow-39161530-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1563-01-27
SpousesJonet GlasgowSpreull-41516-00-00 · 1575-00-00 · 1534-00-00

Profile categories

Glasgow_Name_Study

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography John Glasgow was born before 1516 as a conservative working boundary, with roughly 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range. No birth record supplies his year or place. He was already married and receiving property with his spouse in 1534, so the boundary is inferred from adult activity and is not a recorded birth year. Glasgow, Lanarkshire is retained as an uncertain birthplace lead. He was an active burgess there in the mid-16th century. Marriage and Family On 31 December 1534, William Glasgow, with the consent of Esbell Brade, resigned property to their son John Glasgow and Janet Spreull, John's spouse. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, protocol 1196, 31 December 1534, printed p. 72 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up). This directly proves John's parents and that John and Jonet were married by that date; it gives no age.
  • On 13 May 1563, John Glasgow senior resigned burgage property to John Glasgow junior, explicitly called his son, while reserving payments to the elder John and Jonet Spreull, his spouse. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, protocol abstract (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up). This proves that John and Jonet had a son John. The mapping of that record son to John Glasgow is probable, not certain.
  • On 24 August 1565, John Glasgow senior resigned a burgage tenement to William Glasgow, explicitly called his son, reserving liferent to himself and Jonet Spreull. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 847, 24 August 1565, printed p. 73 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n85/mode/2up). This proves that the couple had a son William. The chronology and burgh network strongly favour William Glasgow as that son, but the profile mapping remains probable.
  • On 8 November 1575, following John's death, his son Stephen was granted a position with the consent of his mother, Jonet Spreull. John Spreull (likely Jonet's relative) acted as a ruling elder in this matter. Record dated 8 November 1575 naming Stephen Glasgow as son of the late John Glasgow; precise archival citation still needed. Civic Life, Property, and Occupation John Glasgow's name appears numerous times in Glasgow records, indicating his established presence in the burgh:

    • 1554-5: Land belonging to John Glasgow is mentioned as an eastern boundary for a nearby tenement. Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433071388825)
    • 1560: A tenement located on the west side of a Glasgow street used John Glasgow's property as its western boundary. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756)
    • 1565-6: A property description mentions the "back tenement of John Glasgow" forming a western boundary. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030643244)
    • 1568: His land is mentioned in proximity to, or possibly related to, property associated with Robert Glasgow (b. c. 1520), suggesting they were neighbours or had related holdings. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt)
    • 1570: A record distinguishes a John Glasgow senior from “John Glasgow, younger son of John Glasgow,” but that wording does not identify the father of this profile. Protocol 805 independently and explicitly names William Glasgow as this John's father.
    • 1571-2: Property on the west side of Walkergait (likely modern-day Stockwell Street or similar) bordered John Glasgow's land to the north. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756)
    • 1572-3: Land resigned by James Rolland (related to Robert Glasgow's wife, Margaret Rolland) bordered John Glasgow's property to the west. This is the same property transaction involving Robert Glasgow Glasgow-1096. Abstracts of Protocols..., 12 Feb 1572/3 record. Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt)
    • 1573: John is explicitly identified as a fisher when appearing alongside Robert Glasgow (also a fisher) as a witness in civic proceedings. Abstracts of Protocols..., Date/Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) Death John Glasgow died sometime before 8 November 1575, the date when his son Stephen is referred to in a record as the son of "the late John Glasgow". Regarding the 1577 Testament A Will and Testament dated 1577 exists for a Johne Glasgw (1577 Glasgw, Johne). As this John Glasgow ([Glasgow-1093]) demonstrably died before 8 November 1575, this testament cannot belong to him. It most likely pertains to another contemporary John Glasgow. Given that John Glasgow (b. c. 1568) is only a speculative son and would have been very young in 1577, it is perhaps less likely, though not impossible, that the testament belongs to him. It may relate to an entirely different John Glasgow active at that time. The 1577 Commissariot record mentioning John Glasgow in Hirmenscheils likely also refers to this other John. Edinburgh Commissariot Record, 1577. Link: Commissariot Record Scan (https://archive.org/details/commissariotreco16scot/page/n117/mode/2up?q=Glasgow) Research NotesParentage and birth estimate Protocol 1196 proves that William Glasgow and Esbell Brade were John's parents. A second independent record, protocol 805 of 28 October 1564, records John receiving sasine as heir of William Glasgow and explicitly calls William “his father.” Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, printed p. 57 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up). It also establishes that William was dead by that date.
  • John's before-1516 birth boundary is a conservative estimate. His documented marriage and property settlement by 31 December 1534 make approximately 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range, but no birth record supplies an exact year. The boundary must not be treated as an exact 1516 birth or used to reject the son William. Record sons and profile mappings Protocols 748 and 847 directly prove sons named John and William. They do not supply WikiTree IDs. The links to Glasgow-3181 and Glasgow-3522 are retained as probable mappings and should remain Uncertain unless a further identifier resolves them. 1577 testament The 1577 testament of a Johne Glasgw cannot belong to this John, who was already described as late by 8 November 1575. It concerns another contemporary man and should not be used to reconstruct this family without an identity record. Sources

Profile source citations

  1. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, protocol 1196, 31 December 1534, printed p. 72 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up). source link 1
  2. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, protocol abstract (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up). source link 1
  3. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 847, 24 August 1565, printed p. 73 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n85/mode/2up). source link 1
  4. Record dated 8 November 1575 naming Stephen Glasgow as son of the late John Glasgow; precise archival citation still needed.
  5. Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433071388825) source link 1
  6. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756) source link 1
  7. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030643244) source link 1
  8. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) source link 1
  9. Abstracts of Protocols..., 12 Feb 1572/3 record. Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) source link 1
  10. Abstracts of Protocols..., Date/Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) source link 1
  11. Regarding the 1577 Testament A Will and Testament dated 1577 exists for a Johne Glasgw (1577 Glasgw, Johne). As this John Glasgow ([Glasgow-1093]) demonstrably died before 8 November 1575, this testament cannot belong to him. It most likely pertains to another contemporary John Glasgow. Given that John Glasgow (b. c. 1568) is only a speculative son and would have been very young in 1577, it is perhaps less likely, though not impossible, that the testament belongs to him. It may relate to an entirely different John Glasgow active at that time. The 1577 Commissariot record mentioning John Glasgow in Hirmenscheils likely also refers to this other John. Edinburgh Commissariot Record, 1577. Link: Commissariot Record Scan (https://archive.org/details/commissariotreco16scot/page/n117/mode/2up?q=Glasgow) source link 1
  12. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, printed p. 57 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up). source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
John Glasgow was born before 1516 as a conservative working boundary, with roughly 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range. No birth record supplies his year or place. He was already married and receiving property with his spouse in 1534, so the boundary is inferred from adult activity and is not a recorded birth year. Glasgow, Lanarkshire is retained as an uncertain birthplace lead. He was an active burgess there in the mid-16th century.
Marriage and Family
On 31 December 1534, William Glasgow, with the consent of Esbell Brade, resigned property to their son John Glasgow and Janet Spreull, John's spouse. Robert Renwick, ed., Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, protocol 1196, 31 December 1534, printed p. 72 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up). This directly proves John's parents and that John and Jonet were married by that date; it gives no age.

On 13 May 1563, John Glasgow senior resigned burgage property to John Glasgow junior, explicitly called his son, while reserving payments to the elder John and Jonet Spreull, his spouse. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, protocol abstract (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up). This proves that John and Jonet had a son John. The mapping of that record son to John Glasgow is probable, not certain.

On 24 August 1565, John Glasgow senior resigned a burgage tenement to William Glasgow, explicitly called his son, reserving liferent to himself and Jonet Spreull. Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 847, 24 August 1565, printed p. 73 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n85/mode/2up). This proves that the couple had a son William. The chronology and burgh network strongly favour William Glasgow as that son, but the profile mapping remains probable.

The existing profile also links Stephen Glasgow on the evidence described below.

On 8 November 1575, following John's death, his son Stephen was granted a position with the consent of his mother, Jonet Spreull. John Spreull (likely Jonet's relative) acted as a ruling elder in this matter. Record dated 8 November 1575 naming Stephen Glasgow as son of the late John Glasgow; precise archival citation still needed. 
Civic Life, Property, and Occupation
John Glasgow's name appears numerous times in Glasgow records, indicating his established presence in the burgh:
* 1554-5: Land belonging to John Glasgow is mentioned as an eastern boundary for a nearby tenement. Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow, Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433071388825) 
* 1560: A tenement located on the west side of a Glasgow street used John Glasgow's property as its western boundary. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756) 
* 1565-6: A property description mentions the "back tenement of John Glasgow" forming a western boundary. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030643244) 
* 1568: His land is mentioned in proximity to, or possibly related to, property associated with Robert Glasgow (b. c. 1520), suggesting they were neighbours or had related holdings. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) 
* 1570: A record distinguishes a John Glasgow senior from “John Glasgow, younger son of John Glasgow,” but that wording does not identify the father of this profile. Protocol 805 independently and explicitly names William Glasgow as this John's father.
* 1571-2: Property on the west side of Walkergait (likely modern-day Stockwell Street or similar) bordered John Glasgow's land to the north. Abstracts of Protocols..., Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: HathiTrust Link (https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756) 
* 1572-3: Land resigned by James Rolland (related to Robert Glasgow's wife, Margaret Rolland) bordered John Glasgow's property to the west. This is the same property transaction involving Robert Glasgow Glasgow-1096. Abstracts of Protocols..., 12 Feb 1572/3 record. Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) 
* 1573: John is explicitly identified as a fisher when appearing alongside Robert Glasgow (also a fisher) as a witness in civic proceedings. Abstracts of Protocols..., Date/Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: Archive.org Text Link (https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt) 
Death
John Glasgow died sometime before 8 November 1575, the date when his son Stephen is referred to in a record as the son of "the late John Glasgow". 
Regarding the 1577 Testament
A Will and Testament dated 1577 exists for a Johne Glasgw (1577 Glasgw, Johne). As this John Glasgow ([Glasgow-1093]) demonstrably died before 8 November 1575, this testament cannot belong to him. It most likely pertains to another contemporary John Glasgow. Given that John Glasgow (b. c. 1568) is only a speculative son and would have been very young in 1577, it is perhaps less likely, though not impossible, that the testament belongs to him. It may relate to an entirely different John Glasgow active at that time. The 1577 Commissariot record mentioning John Glasgow in Hirmenscheils likely also refers to this other John. Edinburgh Commissariot Record, 1577. Link: Commissariot Record Scan (https://archive.org/details/commissariotreco16scot/page/n117/mode/2up?q=Glasgow) 
Research NotesParentage and birth estimate
Protocol 1196 proves that William Glasgow and Esbell Brade were John's parents. A second independent record, protocol 805 of 28 October 1564, records John receiving sasine as heir of William Glasgow and explicitly calls William “his father.” Renwick, Abstracts of Protocols, vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, printed p. 57 (https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up). It also establishes that William was dead by that date.

John's before-1516 birth boundary is a conservative estimate. His documented marriage and property settlement by 31 December 1534 make approximately 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range, but no birth record supplies an exact year. The boundary must not be treated as an exact 1516 birth or used to reject the son William.
Record sons and profile mappings
Protocols 748 and 847 directly prove sons named John and William. They do not supply WikiTree IDs. The links to Glasgow-3181 and Glasgow-3522 are retained as probable mappings and should remain Uncertain unless a further identifier resolves them.
1577 testament
The 1577 testament of a Johne Glasgw cannot belong to this John, who was already described as late by 8 November 1575. It concerns another contemporary man and should not be used to reconstruct this family without an identity record.
Sources
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==
{{One Name Study|name=Glasgow}}

'''[[Glasgow-1093|John Glasgow]]''' was born before '''1516''' as a conservative working boundary, with roughly 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range. No birth record supplies his year or place. He was already married and receiving property with his spouse in 1534, so the boundary is inferred from adult activity and is not a recorded birth year. Glasgow, Lanarkshire is retained as an uncertain birthplace lead. He was an active burgess there in the mid-16th century.


=== Marriage and Family ===

On 31 December 1534, [[Glasgow-1098|William Glasgow]], with the consent of [[Brade-232|Esbell Brade]], resigned property to their son John Glasgow and [[Spreull-4|Janet Spreull]], John's spouse.<ref name="P1196">Robert Renwick, ed., ''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', protocol 1196, 31 December 1534, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc08robegoog/page/n84/mode/2up printed p. 72].</ref> This directly proves John's parents and that John and Jonet were married by that date; it gives no age.

On 13 May 1563, John Glasgow senior resigned burgage property to John Glasgow junior, explicitly called his son, while reserving payments to the elder John and Jonet Spreull, his spouse.<ref name="P748">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 748, 13 May 1563, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n52/mode/2up protocol abstract].</ref> This proves that John and Jonet had a son John. The mapping of that record son to [[Glasgow-3181|John Glasgow]] is probable, not certain.

On 24 August 1565, John Glasgow senior resigned a burgage tenement to William Glasgow, explicitly called his son, reserving liferent to himself and Jonet Spreull.<ref name="P847">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 847, 24 August 1565, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n85/mode/2up printed p. 73].</ref> This proves that the couple had a son William. The chronology and burgh network strongly favour [[Glasgow-3522|William Glasgow]] as that son, but the profile mapping remains probable.

The existing profile also links [[Glasgow-1029|Stephen Glasgow]] on the evidence described below.

On 8 November 1575, following John's death, his son Stephen was granted a position with the consent of his mother, Jonet Spreull. John Spreull (likely Jonet's relative) acted as a ruling elder in this matter.<ref name="Death1575">Record dated 8 November 1575 naming Stephen Glasgow as son of the late John Glasgow; precise archival citation still needed.</ref>


=== Civic Life, Property, and Occupation ===

John Glasgow's name appears numerous times in Glasgow records, indicating his established presence in the burgh:
*   '''1554-5:''' Land belonging to John Glasgow is mentioned as an eastern boundary for a nearby tenement.<ref name="Prop1554">''Abstracts of Protocols of the Town Clerks of Glasgow'', Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nyp.33433071388825 HathiTrust Link]</ref>
*   '''1560:''' A tenement located on the west side of a Glasgow street used John Glasgow's property as its western boundary.<ref name="Prop1560">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756 HathiTrust Link]</ref>
*   '''1565-6:''' A property description mentions the "back tenement of John Glasgow" forming a western boundary.<ref name="Prop1565">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015030643244 HathiTrust Link]</ref>
*   '''1568:''' His land is mentioned in proximity to, or possibly related to, property associated with [[Glasgow-1096|Robert Glasgow]] (b. c. 1520), suggesting they were neighbours or had related holdings.<ref name="Prop1568">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt Archive.org Text Link]</ref>
*   '''1570:''' A record distinguishes a John Glasgow senior from “John Glasgow, younger son of John Glasgow,” but that wording does not identify the father of this profile. Protocol 805 independently and explicitly names William Glasgow as this John's father.
*   '''1571-2:''' Property on the west side of Walkergait (likely modern-day Stockwell Street or similar) bordered John Glasgow's land to the north.<ref name="Prop1571">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015031893756 HathiTrust Link]</ref>
*   '''1572-3:''' Land resigned by James Rolland (related to Robert Glasgow's wife, Margaret Rolland) bordered John Glasgow's property to the west. This is the same property transaction involving Robert Glasgow [[Glasgow-1096]].<ref name="Prop1572">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', 12 Feb 1572/3 record. Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt Archive.org Text Link]</ref>
*   '''1573:''' John is explicitly identified as a '''fisher''' when appearing alongside Robert Glasgow (also a fisher) as a witness in civic proceedings.<ref name="Fisher1573">''Abstracts of Protocols...'', Date/Vol/Protocol # needed. Link: [https://archive.org/stream/abstractsprotoc00robegoog/abstractsprotoc00robegoog_djvu.txt Archive.org Text Link]</ref>

=== Death ===

John Glasgow died sometime '''before 8 November 1575''', the date when his son Stephen is referred to in a record as the son of "the late John Glasgow".<ref name="Death1575"/>

=== Regarding the 1577 Testament ===

A Will and Testament dated '''1577''' exists for a ''Johne Glasgw'' ([[Space:1577_Glasgw,_Johne|1577 Glasgw, Johne]]). '''As this John Glasgow ([Glasgow-1093]) demonstrably died before 8 November 1575, this testament cannot belong to him.''' It most likely pertains to another contemporary John Glasgow. Given that [[Glasgow-1030|John Glasgow]] (b. c. 1568) is only a speculative son and would have been very young in 1577, it is perhaps less likely, though not impossible, that the testament belongs to him. It may relate to an entirely different John Glasgow active at that time. The 1577 Commissariot record mentioning John Glasgow in ''Hirmenscheils'' likely also refers to this other John.<ref name="CommRecord1577">Edinburgh Commissariot Record, 1577. Link: [https://archive.org/details/commissariotreco16scot/page/n117/mode/2up?q=Glasgow Commissariot Record Scan]</ref>

== Research Notes ==

=== Parentage and birth estimate ===
Protocol 1196 proves that William Glasgow and Esbell Brade were John's parents. A second independent record, protocol 805 of 28 October 1564, records John receiving sasine as heir of William Glasgow and explicitly calls William “his father.”<ref name="P805">Renwick, ''Abstracts of Protocols'', vol. 3, protocol 805, 28 October 1564, [https://archive.org/details/abstractsprotoc06scogoog/page/n69/mode/2up printed p. 57].</ref> It also establishes that William was dead by that date.

John's before-1516 birth boundary is a conservative estimate. His documented marriage and property settlement by 31 December 1534 make approximately 1505–1516 a reasonable genealogical range, but no birth record supplies an exact year. The boundary must not be treated as an exact 1516 birth or used to reject the son William.

=== Record sons and profile mappings ===
Protocols 748 and 847 directly prove sons named John and William. They do not supply WikiTree IDs. The links to Glasgow-3181 and Glasgow-3522 are retained as probable mappings and should remain Uncertain unless a further identifier resolves them.

=== 1577 testament ===
The 1577 testament of a Johne Glasgw cannot belong to this John, who was already described as late by 8 November 1575. It concerns another contemporary man and should not be used to reconstruct this family without an identity record.

== Sources ==
<references />