Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Ninian Glasgow

c. 1550 – after 1613-05-08

Glasgow-3188 · 1 mapped association

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
6Close relations
8Evidence items
11Candidate leads
Birth
c. 1550 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Death
after 1613-05-08 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Parents
Robert Glasgowconfident
Spouses
Jonet (Hutcheson) GlasgowJonet (Meik) Glasgow
Children
Marion GlasgowRobert GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3188
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
85

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionRobert Glasgow (1583)
Maternal grandfather positionWilliam Glasgow (1590)
Maternal grandmother positionMarion Glasgow (1592)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit20/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1540–1586Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 16–30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Broad Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–30 years) (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Archibald +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Archibald Glasgow, Archibald Glasgow; candidate branch: Archibald Glasgow M.A.; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): ireland
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1542–1571Generationnominally 8 years; approximate dates permit about 16–18 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Stevenston, Ayrshire · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1542–1558Generationnominally 8 years; approximate dates permit about 16–18 years age gapRecorded placesStevenston, Ayrshire, Scotland · Stevenston — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1542–1558Generationnominally 8 years; approximate dates permit about 16–18 years age gapRecorded placesStevenston, Ayrshire · Stevenston — AyrshireIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1540–1598Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 16–20 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–20 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit66/100
Strong Multi-Factor Lead
Dates1535–?Generation15 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Exact Sibling Profiles · Parental Couple Structure · Sibling Parental CoupleCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 1 exact subject sibling profile (+16): Margaret (Glasgow) Edstoun
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • possible 15-year parent-child age gap (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Robert Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; Robert in 165 profiles)
  • candidate is already linked as parent of 1 exact subject sibling profile (+16): Margaret (Glasgow) Edstoun
  • the candidate and the subject's linked father Robert Glasgow are jointly recorded as parents of 1 exact sibling profile (+10; strong couple-structure clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit65/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1530–1563Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Collateral Naming · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's sibling and niece/nephew network repeats names in the subject's descendant line (three rarest at most): Ninian +16 (3 public profiles; niece/nephew Ninian Glasgow); Archibald +12 (9 public profiles; sibling Archibald Glasgow) (+28 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit59/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1516–1575Generationat least 34 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Broad Migration · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Local Sibling Birth · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 34 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 67 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • candidate has another child, Stephen Glasgow, born 0 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+6; possible sibling-household clue)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Archibald +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Archibald Glasgow, Archibald Glasgow; candidate branch: Archibald Glasgow M.A.; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): ireland
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Automated fit51/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1540–?Generationnominally 10 years; approximate dates permit about 15–30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Broad Migration · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Occupation · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): collateral network, household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)

parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 43 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • shared recorded occupation: priest (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Archibald +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Archibald Glasgow, Archibald Glasgow; candidate branch: Archibald Glasgow M.A.; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • descendant branches share only a broad migration destination country (+1; weak alone): ireland
  • 4 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+8): collateral network, household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Automated fit45/100
Moderate Lead
Dates1530–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1583), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Marion +8 (23 public profiles; subject branch: Marion Glasgow; candidate branch: Marion Glasgow) (+8 total)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: No indexed conflict; documentary proof still required

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Ninian GlasgowGlasgow-1079

Automated fit27/100
Similar Person
Dates1614–?PlacesGlasgow, ScotlandParent comparisonDifferent marked-confident fathers
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: Robert Glasgow (+7)

record-derived birth estimates differ by 64; retained without deduction; marked-confident fathers are different (−18)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • same parent name without a shared profile ID: Robert Glasgow (+7)

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 64; retained without deduction; marked-confident fathers are different (−18)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3188

Father assessment: Robert Glasgow (about 1520), fisher and burgess of Glasgow is confirmed by record. The attached John Glasgow (1516) should be removed as father.

Elizabeth Glasgow, widow of Alexander Kaine is a plausible possible older sister, but should not be attached. Ninian's sons Robert and William each have a daughter recorded as Elizabeth/Elizabethe or Bessie, creating an independent two-branch naming echo. No record calls Elizabeth Ninian's sister, the name was common, and her current before 1530 birth only fits their father Robert if Robert's approximate 1520 estimate is substantially too late.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1550

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3188

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3188

SourceFindingAssessment
NRS Glasgow Commissary Court CC9/7/5 and CC9/7/9The testaments identify Ninian's wives and sons but expressly provide no parentage for Ninian.Direct family evidence, negative for the attached father.
James R. Anderson, ed., ''Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750'' (1925), p. 24, 23 October 1596The roll admits "Glasgow, Ninian, B. and F., as second son to Robert G., fisher, burgess."Direct father-son evidence; also establishes Ninian's birth order, civic status and his father's occupation/status.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.9 claims
6Unknown
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.8 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.
  2. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
  3. original The occupation was formerly misread as flescher, meaning butcher. That reading should be withdrawn. The manuscript word is fyscher. An independent burgess list also places Niniane Glasgow under the heading Marinellis and Fischeris, meaning mariners and fishers. George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws (Glasgow: Bell & Bain, 1858), pp. 49
  4. unknown * By 1607 — he was the husband of Jonet Meik and the father of Robert Glasgow. Jonet's testament was indexed or recorded on 27 August 1607. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), entries under Glasgow, Ninian, and Meik, Jonet.
  5. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
  6. unknown Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7, Edinburgh, 1901.
  7. unknown George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws, Glasgow, 1858, burgess-roll section, pp. 49 and 56–57.
  8. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3188
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3188 was captured 2026-08-10T14:12:13+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-07-17.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10961520-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1572-00-00 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
ChildrenRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10271583-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1647-00-00
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-30751590-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1645-09-00 · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland
ChildrenMarion GlasgowGlasgow-30621592-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMargaret EdstounGlasgow-36130000-00-00 · 1580-11-08 · Whitburn, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
SiblingsJohn GlasgowGlasgow-10301575-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesJonet GlasgowMeik-141555-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesJonet GlasgowHutcheson-17741560-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1606-02-00

Record-bearing passages

  • This profile is based on two registered testaments in the Glasgow Commissary Court and a contemporary-period burgess list reproduced in a nineteenth-century history. The manuscript records control the spelling of names, stated relationships and occupation. Printed indexes and later database entries are treated as finding aids rather than exact transcriptions.
  • The principal records are:
  • the testament of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgw, National Records of Scotland reference CC9/7/5, Images 82–83; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.

    • the testament of Niniane Glasgw, National Records of Scotland reference CC9/7/9, Images 142–145. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. Identity, trade and civic status Niniane Glasgw was a fyscher and burges of Glasgw — a fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
  • The occupation was formerly misread as flescher, meaning butcher. That reading should be withdrawn. The manuscript word is fyscher. An independent burgess list also places Niniane Glasgow under the heading Marinellis and Fischeris, meaning mariners and fishers. George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws (Glasgow: Bell & Bain, 1858), pp. 49 and 56–57, reproducing the burgess roll associated with the reorganisation of 14 February 1605; Niniane Glasgow appears under “Marinellis and Fischeris”.
  • James R. Anderson, ed., Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750 (1925), [p. 24](https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596 | The roll admits "Glasgow, Ninian, B. and F., as second son to Robert G., fisher, burgess." | Direct father-son evidence; also establishes Ninian's birth order, civic status and his father's occupation/status. Chronology

    • 1605 — Niniane Glasgow appears in the burgess roll under mariners and fishers.
    • By 1607 — he was the husband of Jonet Meik and the father of Robert Glasgow. Jonet's testament was indexed or recorded on 27 August 1607. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), entries under Glasgow, Ninian, and Meik, Jonet.
    • 10 January 1613 — Niniane made his own testament at Glasgow.
    • January 1613 — he died during that month; the exact day is not stated.
    • 8 May 1613 — his testament was indexed or recorded under that date.
  • The 8 May date is not his date of death. Earlier known wife: Jonet Meik The earlier wife was Jonet Meik. Her surname is written Meik in the manuscript and in the printed testament index. The database form Melk is a later transcription or OCR error and should not be used as her surname.
  • Jonet's testament describes her as:
  • Robert is therefore directly identified as Jonet's son in two places. Niniane's 1613 testament independently calls Robert his son. This establishes Robert as the son of both Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik, rather than merely a probable relative.
  • A Marion Glasgow is named as a legatee in Jonet's testament, apparently receiving an article of clothing, but the clerk does not call Marion her daughter. Other Glasgow recipients may occur in the legacy list, but their forenames or relationships are not sufficiently clear to establish additional children.
  • Jonet was dead before her testament was recorded on 27 August 1607. Her death clause appears to refer to February, but the precise year numeral is not treated as settled here. Later wife: Jonet Hutchesoun Niniane had remarried by 10 January 1613. His later wife was another woman named Jonet. Her surname appears twice in his testament: once in the nomination of executors and again in the confirmation clause.
  • No surviving clause states that Jonet Hutchesoun was the mother of Robert or William. Robert's mother is independently proved to have been Jonet Meik. William's mother is not established by either testament.
  • The 1605 fisher list also contains a man printed as Niniane Hutchisonne immediately beside Niniane Glasgow. This makes Hutchesoun a locally and occupationally plausible surname, but it does not prove that the listed man was related to Niniane's later wife.
  • His assumed brother, John Glasgow (abt.1540-1576) married a Margaret (Hutcheson) Glasgow (1550-), and his presumed Uncle William Glasgow (abt.1525-bef.1586), married Margaret (Herbison) Glasgow (abt.1540-). Margaret’s father, Sir William Herbesoun, was a Roman priest with close ties to the Hutcheson family through his sister Helen Herbertson, who married Thomas Hutcheson of Lambhill. This connection made Margaret Herbison likely a cousin of George Hutcheson and Thomas Hutcheson Jr.. Evidence that the records concern the same Niniane Glasgow The 1607 and 1613 testamentary records should be treated as referring to the same man.
  • Both records name Niniane Glasgow in Glasgow. # The 1607 record calls him a burgess of Glasgow. # The 1605 roll lists a Niniane Glasgow among Glasgow's mariners and fishers. # The 1613 record calls him a fisher and burgess of Glasgow. # The 1607 testament calls Robert Glasgow the son of Jonet Meik. # The 1613 testament calls Robert Glasgow the son of Niniane Glasgow. # The records fall only six years apart and form a coherent sequence: Jonet Meik died, Niniane remarried, and Niniane later made his own testament.
  • The shared son Robert is the strongest point. The identification does not depend only on the rarity of the surname, although the rarity of the name combination provides further support. A second contemporary Ninian Glasgow, burgess or fisher of Glasgow, with a son Robert would be required to displace this identification. Children and other stated family The records establish the following relationships:
  • Robert Glasgw — son of Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik. ** Jonet's 1607 testament calls him hir sone. ** Niniane's 1613 testament calls him his sone. ** He appears in the administration of both estates.

    • William Glasgw — son of Niniane Glasgow. ** He received a separate provision in Niniane's 1613 testament. ** His mother is not identified in the surviving wording.
    • Johne Glasgw — brother of Niniane Glasgow. ** Niniane left him ane new gowne.
    • Johne Meik — brother of Jonet Meik. ** Jonet left him a legacy in her testament.
    • Marion Glasgow — named as a legatee by Jonet Meik. ** No relationship is stated, so she should not presently be attached as a daughter solely from this entry.
  • Neither testament names Niniane's father or mother. No birthplace is stated. Inventory and estate Niniane's inventory concerns his household goods, furnishings, vessels, money and debts.
  • The clerk lists debts owed to Niniane, debts payable from his estate, the free gear remaining after deduction, and division of the net movable estate. The exact totals and several debtor or creditor names remain too compressed or faded to quote safely from the present images.
  • The presence of brewing vessels is ordinary household evidence and does not make Niniane a brewer. His stated occupation remains fisher. Testamentary provisions Niniane's personal testament begins at Glasgow on 10 January 1613. He was described as sick in body but of sound or perfect memory. He committed his soul to God and directed that his body be buried, although the precise burial wording is indistinct.
  • Johne Glasgw his brother was to receive ane new gowne;

    • William Glasgw his sone received a separate provision, the exact object or amount being partly indistinct;
    • further directions concern debts, expenses, legacies and the administration of the remaining estate. Confirmation and archival extent Niniane's testament begins partway down Image 142, continues through Images 143 and 144, and concludes in the upper portion of Image 145. The large new testament heading in the lower portion of Image 145 belongs to another deceased person.
  • The lower part of Image 144 and upper part of Image 145 contain the formal Commissary Court confirmation. Jonet Hutchesoun and Robert Glasgow are again named in the executor wording. A cautioner or surety was provided, though the name and parts of the formula remain difficult to read. Key semi-diplomatic extracts Jonet Meik's testament, 1607
  • Niniane Glasgow's testament, 1613
  • :The testament testamentar and Inventar :of the guidis geir debitis and sowmes of money q[uhi]lkis :pertening to vmq[uhi]le Niniane glasgw fyscher burges :of glasgw ...
  • :At glasgw the tent day of Januar 1613 zeiris :... :constitutis Jonet ⟦Hutchesoun?⟧ his spous & Robert :glasgw his sone his executouris & intromettouris :... :Item to Johne glasgw his brother ane new gowne :... :Item to William glasgw his sone ⟦legacy partly indistinct⟧ Modern English rendering Ninian Glasgow was a fisher and burgess of Glasgow. A burgess roll from 1605 places him among the city's mariners and fishers.
  • His earlier known wife was Janet Meik. Her testament identifies Ninian as her husband and Robert Glasgow as her son. It again describes Robert as her son in the legacy or residue section. Ninian's own testament later describes Robert as his son, directly establishing Robert as the child of both spouses.
  • Janet Meik died before her testament was recorded in August 1607. Ninian subsequently remarried. By January 1613 his wife was another Janet, whose surname is best read as Hutchesoun. She and Robert were appointed to administer Ninian's estate.
  • Ninian made his will at Glasgow on 10 January 1613 and died during that month. He left a new gown to his brother John Glasgow and made a separate provision for his son William. His testament was recorded or confirmed on 8 May 1613. Research notes

    • Meik, not Melk, is the correct surname in the 1607 testament.
    • The 1607 Jonet Meik was the earlier known wife of the same Ninian Glasgow who died in 1613.
    • Robert Glasgow is directly proved as the son of both Ninian Glasgow and Jonet Meik.
    • William Glasgow is directly proved as Ninian's son, but his mother remains unproved.
    • Marion Glasgow is a named legatee in Jonet's testament, not a proved daughter.
    • Ninian's occupation was fyscher or fisher, not flescher or butcher.
    • The printed testament index's description of him as a fisher is correct on this point.
    • The later wife's surname is best read Hutchesoun; Huchesoun remains a possible spelling. Smythesoun is withdrawn, and Herbessoun is less consistent with the repeated manuscript forms.
    • The nearby Niniane Hutchisonne in the 1605 fisher list is a research lead only. No relationship to Jonet Hutchesoun is established.
    • An estimated birth around 1550 is not stated in the records and should be labelled as an estimate, not a documented date.
    • No parentage or birthplace for Ninian is supplied by either testament.
    • No exact inventory or free-gear total is quoted here because the numeral groups have not yet been read securely. Sources
    • National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.
    • National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
    • Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7, Edinburgh, 1901.
    • George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws, Glasgow, 1858, burgess-roll section, pp. 49 and 56–57.

Profile source citations

  1. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.
  2. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
  3. The occupation was formerly misread as flescher, meaning butcher. That reading should be withdrawn. The manuscript word is fyscher. An independent burgess list also places Niniane Glasgow under the heading Marinellis and Fischeris, meaning mariners and fishers. George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws (Glasgow: Bell & Bain, 1858), pp. 49 and 56–57, reproducing the burgess roll associated with the reorganisation of 14 February 1605; Niniane Glasgow appears under “Marinellis and Fischeris”.
  4. * By 1607 — he was the husband of Jonet Meik and the father of Robert Glasgow. Jonet's testament was indexed or recorded on 27 August 1607. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), entries under Glasgow, Ninian, and Meik, Jonet.
  5. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
  6. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7, Edinburgh, 1901.
  7. George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws, Glasgow, 1858, burgess-roll section, pp. 49 and 56–57.

Other external links in the profile

Full captured biography text
Biography
⚠️ Palaeographic and identity warning

This profile is based on two registered testaments in the Glasgow Commissary Court and a contemporary-period burgess list reproduced in a nineteenth-century history. The manuscript records control the spelling of names, stated relationships and occupation. Printed indexes and later database entries are treated as finding aids rather than exact transcriptions.

The principal records are:

* the testament of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgw, National Records of Scotland reference CC9/7/5, Images 82–83; National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw. 
* the testament of Niniane Glasgw, National Records of Scotland reference CC9/7/9, Images 142–145. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. 
Identity, trade and civic status
Niniane Glasgw was a fyscher and burges of Glasgw — a fisher and burgess of Glasgow. 

The occupation was formerly misread as flescher, meaning butcher. That reading should be withdrawn. The manuscript word is fyscher. An independent burgess list also places Niniane Glasgow under the heading Marinellis and Fischeris, meaning mariners and fishers. George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws (Glasgow: Bell & Bain, 1858), pp. 49 and 56–57, reproducing the burgess roll associated with the reorganisation of 14 February 1605; Niniane Glasgow appears under “Marinellis and Fischeris”. 

The 1605 list shows that he was already a burgess and associated with the fishing or maritime trade by that date. It does not necessarily give the date on which he was first admitted as a burgess.

James R. Anderson, ed., Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750 (1925), [p. 24](https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596 | The roll admits "Glasgow, Ninian, B. and F., as second son to Robert G., fisher, burgess." | Direct father-son evidence; also establishes Ninian's birth order, civic status and his father's occupation/status.
Chronology
* 1605 — Niniane Glasgow appears in the burgess roll under mariners and fishers. 
* By 1607 — he was the husband of Jonet Meik and the father of Robert Glasgow. Jonet's testament was indexed or recorded on 27 August 1607. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), entries under Glasgow, Ninian, and Meik, Jonet. 
* 10 January 1613 — Niniane made his own testament at Glasgow. 
* January 1613 — he died during that month; the exact day is not stated. 
* 8 May 1613 — his testament was indexed or recorded under that date. 

The 8 May date is not his date of death.
Earlier known wife: Jonet Meik
The earlier wife was Jonet Meik. Her surname is written Meik in the manuscript and in the printed testament index. The database form Melk is a later transcription or OCR error and should not be used as her surname. 

Jonet's testament describes her as:

:Jonet meik spous to Niniane glasgw burges of glasgw

The executor or giving-up clause names:

:Niniane glasgw hir spous and Robert glasgw hir sone

A later legacy or residue clause again calls Robert:

:Robert glasgw hir sone

Robert is therefore directly identified as Jonet's son in two places. Niniane's 1613 testament independently calls Robert his son. This establishes Robert as the son of both Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik, rather than merely a probable relative.

Jonet also left a legacy to:

:Johne meik hir brother

A Marion Glasgow is named as a legatee in Jonet's testament, apparently receiving an article of clothing, but the clerk does not call Marion her daughter. Other Glasgow recipients may occur in the legacy list, but their forenames or relationships are not sufficiently clear to establish additional children.

Jonet was dead before her testament was recorded on 27 August 1607. Her death clause appears to refer to February, but the precise year numeral is not treated as settled here.
Later wife: Jonet Hutchesoun
Niniane had remarried by 10 January 1613. His later wife was another woman named Jonet. Her surname appears twice in his testament: once in the nomination of executors and again in the confirmation clause.

The best palaeographic reading is Hutchesoun, possibly Huchesoun. The middle of the word contains a crossed t followed by a ch-type group. The earlier working reading Herbessoun was closer than Smythesoun, but does not fit the repeated letter pattern as well. Smythesoun should be withdrawn.

In a cautious semi-diplomatic transcription the name should be shown as:

:Jonet ⟦Hutchesoun?⟧

Jonet Hutchesoun and Robert Glasgow were appointed executors and intromitters with Niniane's movable estate. 

No surviving clause states that Jonet Hutchesoun was the mother of Robert or William. Robert's mother is independently proved to have been Jonet Meik. William's mother is not established by either testament.

The 1605 fisher list also contains a man printed as Niniane Hutchisonne immediately beside Niniane Glasgow. This makes Hutchesoun a locally and occupationally plausible surname, but it does not prove that the listed man was related to Niniane's later wife.

His assumed brother, John Glasgow (abt.1540-1576) married a Margaret (Hutcheson) Glasgow (1550-), and his presumed Uncle William Glasgow (abt.1525-bef.1586), married Margaret (Herbison) Glasgow (abt.1540-). Margaret’s father, Sir William Herbesoun, was a Roman priest with close ties to the Hutcheson family through his sister Helen Herbertson, who married Thomas Hutcheson of Lambhill. This connection made Margaret Herbison likely a cousin of George Hutcheson and Thomas Hutcheson Jr..
Evidence that the records concern the same Niniane Glasgow
The 1607 and 1613 testamentary records should be treated as referring to the same man.

The identification rests on a combined evidence set:

# Both records name Niniane Glasgow in Glasgow.
# The 1607 record calls him a burgess of Glasgow.
# The 1605 roll lists a Niniane Glasgow among Glasgow's mariners and fishers.
# The 1613 record calls him a fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
# The 1607 testament calls Robert Glasgow the son of Jonet Meik.
# The 1613 testament calls Robert Glasgow the son of Niniane Glasgow.
# The records fall only six years apart and form a coherent sequence: Jonet Meik died, Niniane remarried, and Niniane later made his own testament.

The shared son Robert is the strongest point. The identification does not depend only on the rarity of the surname, although the rarity of the name combination provides further support. A second contemporary Ninian Glasgow, burgess or fisher of Glasgow, with a son Robert would be required to displace this identification.
Children and other stated family
The records establish the following relationships:

* Robert Glasgw — son of Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik.
** Jonet's 1607 testament calls him hir sone.
** Niniane's 1613 testament calls him his sone.
** He appears in the administration of both estates.
* William Glasgw — son of Niniane Glasgow.
** He received a separate provision in Niniane's 1613 testament.
** His mother is not identified in the surviving wording.
* Johne Glasgw — brother of Niniane Glasgow.
** Niniane left him ane new gowne.
* Johne Meik — brother of Jonet Meik.
** Jonet left him a legacy in her testament.
* Marion Glasgow — named as a legatee by Jonet Meik.
** No relationship is stated, so she should not presently be attached as a daughter solely from this entry.

Neither testament names Niniane's father or mother. No birthplace is stated.
Inventory and estate
Niniane's inventory concerns his household goods, furnishings, vessels, money and debts.

Substantially readable items include:

* twa kistis and ane pres — two chests and a press or cupboard;
* ane mekill and littill buird — a large and a small board or table;
* all vther tymmer wark — the remaining wooden furniture;
* pewter vessels, described by weight;
* brewing vessels and other household vessels;
* the abuilzement of his bodie — his clothing or personal apparel.

The clerk lists debts owed to Niniane, debts payable from his estate, the free gear remaining after deduction, and division of the net movable estate. The exact totals and several debtor or creditor names remain too compressed or faded to quote safely from the present images.

The presence of brewing vessels is ordinary household evidence and does not make Niniane a brewer. His stated occupation remains fisher.
Testamentary provisions
Niniane's personal testament begins at Glasgow on 10 January 1613. He was described as sick in body but of sound or perfect memory. He committed his soul to God and directed that his body be buried, although the precise burial wording is indistinct.

He appointed:

* his later wife, Jonet Hutchesoun; and
* his son, Robert Glasgw

as his executors and intromitters.

Among the readable legacies:

* Johne Glasgw his brother was to receive ane new gowne;
* William Glasgw his sone received a separate provision, the exact object or amount being partly indistinct;
* further directions concern debts, expenses, legacies and the administration of the remaining estate.
Confirmation and archival extent
Niniane's testament begins partway down Image 142, continues through Images 143 and 144, and concludes in the upper portion of Image 145. The large new testament heading in the lower portion of Image 145 belongs to another deceased person.

The lower part of Image 144 and upper part of Image 145 contain the formal Commissary Court confirmation. Jonet Hutchesoun and Robert Glasgow are again named in the executor wording. A cautioner or surety was provided, though the name and parts of the formula remain difficult to read.
Key semi-diplomatic extracts
Jonet Meik's testament, 1607

:Jonet meik spous to Niniane glasgw burges of glasgw
:...
:be Niniane glasgw hir spous and Robert glasgw hir sone
:...
:to Johne meik hir brother
:...
:Robert glasgw hir sone

Niniane Glasgow's testament, 1613

:The testament testamentar and Inventar
:of the guidis geir debitis and sowmes of money q[uhi]lkis
:pertening to vmq[uhi]le Niniane glasgw fyscher burges
:of glasgw ...

:At glasgw the tent day of Januar 1613 zeiris
:...
:constitutis Jonet ⟦Hutchesoun?⟧ his spous & Robert
:glasgw his sone his executouris & intromettouris
:...
:Item to Johne glasgw his brother ane new gowne
:...
:Item to William glasgw his sone ⟦legacy partly indistinct⟧
Modern English rendering
Ninian Glasgow was a fisher and burgess of Glasgow. A burgess roll from 1605 places him among the city's mariners and fishers.

His earlier known wife was Janet Meik. Her testament identifies Ninian as her husband and Robert Glasgow as her son. It again describes Robert as her son in the legacy or residue section. Ninian's own testament later describes Robert as his son, directly establishing Robert as the child of both spouses.

Janet Meik died before her testament was recorded in August 1607. Ninian subsequently remarried. By January 1613 his wife was another Janet, whose surname is best read as Hutchesoun. She and Robert were appointed to administer Ninian's estate.

Ninian made his will at Glasgow on 10 January 1613 and died during that month. He left a new gown to his brother John Glasgow and made a separate provision for his son William. His testament was recorded or confirmed on 8 May 1613.
Research notes
* Meik, not Melk, is the correct surname in the 1607 testament.
* The 1607 Jonet Meik was the earlier known wife of the same Ninian Glasgow who died in 1613.
* Robert Glasgow is directly proved as the son of both Ninian Glasgow and Jonet Meik.
* William Glasgow is directly proved as Ninian's son, but his mother remains unproved.
* Marion Glasgow is a named legatee in Jonet's testament, not a proved daughter.
* Ninian's occupation was fyscher or fisher, not flescher or butcher.
* The printed testament index's description of him as a fisher is correct on this point.
* The later wife's surname is best read Hutchesoun; Huchesoun remains a possible spelling. Smythesoun is withdrawn, and Herbessoun is less consistent with the repeated manuscript forms.
* The nearby Niniane Hutchisonne in the 1605 fisher list is a research lead only. No relationship to Jonet Hutchesoun is established.
* An estimated birth around 1550 is not stated in the records and should be labelled as an estimate, not a documented date.
* No parentage or birthplace for Ninian is supplied by either testament.
* No exact inventory or free-gear total is quoted here because the numeral groups have not yet been read securely.
Sources
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
* Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7, Edinburgh, 1901.
* George Crawfurd, A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws, Glasgow, 1858, burgess-roll section, pp. 49 and 56–57.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
==  Biography  ==
⚠️ '''Palaeographic and identity warning'''

This profile is based on two registered testaments in the Glasgow Commissary Court and a contemporary-period burgess list reproduced in a nineteenth-century history. The manuscript records control the spelling of names, stated relationships and occupation. Printed indexes and later database entries are treated as finding aids rather than exact transcriptions.

The principal records are:

* the testament of '''Jonet Meik''', spouse of Niniane Glasgw, National Records of Scotland reference '''CC9/7/5''', Images 82–83;<ref name="Jonet1607">National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.</ref>
* the testament of '''Niniane Glasgw''', National Records of Scotland reference '''CC9/7/9''', Images 142–145.<ref name="Ninian1613">National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.</ref>

{{Image|file=Ninian_Glasgow_identity_evidence_1605_1613.png|align=c|size=xl|caption=Identity evidence from the 1605 printed burgess roll, Jonet Meik's 1607 testament and Niniane Glasgow's 1613 testament. Manuscript extracts Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland.}}

===  Identity, trade and civic status  ===

'''Niniane Glasgw''' was a '''fyscher''' and '''burges of Glasgw''' — a fisher and burgess of Glasgow.<ref name="Ninian1613" />

The occupation was formerly misread as '''flescher''', meaning butcher. That reading should be withdrawn. The manuscript word is '''fyscher'''. An independent burgess list also places '''Niniane Glasgow''' under the heading '''Marinellis and Fischeris''', meaning mariners and fishers.<ref name="Burgess1605">George Crawfurd, ''A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws'' (Glasgow: Bell & Bain, 1858), pp. 49 and 56–57, reproducing the burgess roll associated with the reorganisation of 14 February 1605; Niniane Glasgow appears under “Marinellis and Fischeris”.</ref>

The 1605 list shows that he was already a burgess and associated with the fishing or maritime trade by that date. It does not necessarily give the date on which he was first admitted as a burgess.

James R. Anderson, ed., ''Burgesses & Guild Brethren of Glasgow, 1573-1750'' (1925), [p. 24](https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso43scotuoft/page/24/mode/2up), 23 October 1596 | The roll admits "Glasgow, Ninian, B. and F., as second son to Robert G., fisher, burgess." | Direct father-son evidence; also establishes Ninian's birth order, civic status and his father's occupation/status.

===  Chronology  ===

* '''1605''' — Niniane Glasgow appears in the burgess roll under mariners and fishers.<ref name="Burgess1605" />
* '''By 1607''' — he was the husband of Jonet Meik and the father of Robert Glasgow. Jonet's testament was indexed or recorded on 27 August 1607.<ref name="Jonet1607" /><ref name="SRSIndex">Francis J. Grant, ed., ''The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800'', Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), entries under Glasgow, Ninian, and Meik, Jonet.</ref>
* '''10 January 1613''' — Niniane made his own testament at Glasgow.<ref name="Ninian1613" />
* '''January 1613''' — he died during that month; the exact day is not stated.<ref name="Ninian1613" />
* '''8 May 1613''' — his testament was indexed or recorded under that date.<ref name="SRSIndex" />

The 8 May date is not his date of death.

===  Earlier known wife: Jonet Meik  ===

The earlier wife was '''Jonet Meik'''. Her surname is written '''Meik''' in the manuscript and in the printed testament index. The database form '''Melk''' is a later transcription or OCR error and should not be used as her surname.<ref name="Jonet1607" /><ref name="SRSIndex" />

Jonet's testament describes her as:

:'''Jonet meik spous to Niniane glasgw burges of glasgw'''

The executor or giving-up clause names:

:'''Niniane glasgw hir spous and Robert glasgw hir sone'''

A later legacy or residue clause again calls Robert:

:'''Robert glasgw hir sone'''

Robert is therefore directly identified as Jonet's son in two places. Niniane's 1613 testament independently calls Robert his son. This establishes Robert as the son of both Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik, rather than merely a probable relative.

Jonet also left a legacy to:

:'''Johne meik hir brother'''

A '''Marion Glasgow''' is named as a legatee in Jonet's testament, apparently receiving an article of clothing, but the clerk does not call Marion her daughter. Other Glasgow recipients may occur in the legacy list, but their forenames or relationships are not sufficiently clear to establish additional children.

Jonet was dead before her testament was recorded on 27 August 1607. Her death clause appears to refer to February, but the precise year numeral is not treated as settled here.

===  Later wife: Jonet Hutchesoun  ===

Niniane had remarried by 10 January 1613. His later wife was another woman named '''Jonet'''. Her surname appears twice in his testament: once in the nomination of executors and again in the confirmation clause.

The best palaeographic reading is '''Hutchesoun''', possibly '''Huchesoun'''. The middle of the word contains a crossed '''t''' followed by a '''ch'''-type group. The earlier working reading '''Herbessoun''' was closer than '''Smythesoun''', but does not fit the repeated letter pattern as well. '''Smythesoun''' should be withdrawn.

In a cautious semi-diplomatic transcription the name should be shown as:

:'''Jonet ⟦Hutchesoun?⟧'''

Jonet Hutchesoun and Robert Glasgow were appointed executors and intromitters with Niniane's movable estate.<ref name="Ninian1613" />

No surviving clause states that Jonet Hutchesoun was the mother of Robert or William. Robert's mother is independently proved to have been Jonet Meik. William's mother is not established by either testament.

The 1605 fisher list also contains a man printed as '''Niniane Hutchisonne''' immediately beside Niniane Glasgow.<ref name="Burgess1605" /> This makes Hutchesoun a locally and occupationally plausible surname, but it does not prove that the listed man was related to Niniane's later wife.

{{Image|file=Ninian_Glasgow_two_wives_evidence.png|align=c|size=xl|caption=The earlier wife Jonet Meik in the 1607 testament and the later wife's surname in two 1613 occurrences, best read as Hutchesoun. Manuscript extracts Crown copyright, National Records of Scotland.}}


His assumed brother, [[Glasgow-3181|John Glasgow (abt.1540-1576)]] married a [[Hutcheson-1656|Margaret (Hutcheson) Glasgow (1550-)]], and his presumed Uncle [[Glasgow-3522|William Glasgow (abt.1525-bef.1586)]], married [[Herbison-439|Margaret (Herbison) Glasgow (abt.1540-)]]. Margaret’s father, Sir William Herbesoun, was a Roman priest with close ties to the Hutcheson family through his sister [[Herbertson-132|Helen Herbertson]], who married [[Hutcheson-1647|Thomas Hutcheson of Lambhill]]. This connection made Margaret Herbison likely a cousin of [[Hutcheson-1648|George Hutcheson]] and [[Hutcheson-1649|Thomas Hutcheson Jr.]].

===  Evidence that the records concern the same Niniane Glasgow  ===

The 1607 and 1613 testamentary records should be treated as referring to the same man.

The identification rests on a combined evidence set:

# Both records name '''Niniane Glasgow''' in Glasgow.
# The 1607 record calls him a '''burgess of Glasgow'''.
# The 1605 roll lists a Niniane Glasgow among Glasgow's mariners and fishers.
# The 1613 record calls him a '''fisher and burgess of Glasgow'''.
# The 1607 testament calls '''Robert Glasgow''' the son of Jonet Meik.
# The 1613 testament calls '''Robert Glasgow''' the son of Niniane Glasgow.
# The records fall only six years apart and form a coherent sequence: Jonet Meik died, Niniane remarried, and Niniane later made his own testament.

The shared son Robert is the strongest point. The identification does not depend only on the rarity of the surname, although the rarity of the name combination provides further support. A second contemporary Ninian Glasgow, burgess or fisher of Glasgow, with a son Robert would be required to displace this identification.

===  Children and other stated family  ===

The records establish the following relationships:

* '''Robert Glasgw''' — son of Niniane Glasgow and Jonet Meik.
** Jonet's 1607 testament calls him '''hir sone'''.
** Niniane's 1613 testament calls him '''his sone'''.
** He appears in the administration of both estates.
* '''William Glasgw''' — son of Niniane Glasgow.
** He received a separate provision in Niniane's 1613 testament.
** His mother is not identified in the surviving wording.
* '''Johne Glasgw''' — brother of Niniane Glasgow.
** Niniane left him '''ane new gowne'''.
* '''Johne Meik''' — brother of Jonet Meik.
** Jonet left him a legacy in her testament.
* '''Marion Glasgow''' — named as a legatee by Jonet Meik.
** No relationship is stated, so she should not presently be attached as a daughter solely from this entry.

Neither testament names Niniane's father or mother. No birthplace is stated.

===  Inventory and estate  ===

Niniane's inventory concerns his household goods, furnishings, vessels, money and debts.

Substantially readable items include:

* '''twa kistis and ane pres''' — two chests and a press or cupboard;
* '''ane mekill and littill buird''' — a large and a small board or table;
* '''all vther tymmer wark''' — the remaining wooden furniture;
* pewter vessels, described by weight;
* brewing vessels and other household vessels;
* '''the abuilzement of his bodie''' — his clothing or personal apparel.

The clerk lists debts owed to Niniane, debts payable from his estate, the free gear remaining after deduction, and division of the net movable estate. The exact totals and several debtor or creditor names remain too compressed or faded to quote safely from the present images.

The presence of brewing vessels is ordinary household evidence and does not make Niniane a brewer. His stated occupation remains fisher.

===  Testamentary provisions  ===

Niniane's personal testament begins at Glasgow on 10 January 1613. He was described as sick in body but of sound or perfect memory. He committed his soul to God and directed that his body be buried, although the precise burial wording is indistinct.

He appointed:

* his later wife, '''Jonet Hutchesoun'''; and
* his son, '''Robert Glasgw'''

as his executors and intromitters.

Among the readable legacies:

* '''Johne Glasgw his brother''' was to receive '''ane new gowne''';
* '''William Glasgw his sone''' received a separate provision, the exact object or amount being partly indistinct;
* further directions concern debts, expenses, legacies and the administration of the remaining estate.

===  Confirmation and archival extent  ===

Niniane's testament begins partway down Image 142, continues through Images 143 and 144, and concludes in the upper portion of Image 145. The large new testament heading in the lower portion of Image 145 belongs to another deceased person.

The lower part of Image 144 and upper part of Image 145 contain the formal Commissary Court confirmation. Jonet Hutchesoun and Robert Glasgow are again named in the executor wording. A cautioner or surety was provided, though the name and parts of the formula remain difficult to read.

===  Key semi-diplomatic extracts  ===

'''Jonet Meik's testament, 1607'''

:Jonet meik spous to Niniane glasgw burges of glasgw
:...
:be Niniane glasgw hir spous and Robert glasgw hir sone
:...
:to Johne meik hir brother
:...
:Robert glasgw hir sone

'''Niniane Glasgow's testament, 1613'''

:The testament testamentar and Inventar
:of the guidis geir debitis and sowmes of money q[uhi]lkis
:pertening to vmq[uhi]le Niniane glasgw fyscher burges
:of glasgw ...

:At glasgw the tent day of Januar 1613 zeiris
:...
:constitutis Jonet ⟦Hutchesoun?⟧ his spous & Robert
:glasgw his sone his executouris & intromettouris
:...
:Item to Johne glasgw his brother ane new gowne
:...
:Item to William glasgw his sone ⟦legacy partly indistinct⟧

===  Modern English rendering  ===

Ninian Glasgow was a fisher and burgess of Glasgow. A burgess roll from 1605 places him among the city's mariners and fishers.

His earlier known wife was Janet Meik. Her testament identifies Ninian as her husband and Robert Glasgow as her son. It again describes Robert as her son in the legacy or residue section. Ninian's own testament later describes Robert as his son, directly establishing Robert as the child of both spouses.

Janet Meik died before her testament was recorded in August 1607. Ninian subsequently remarried. By January 1613 his wife was another Janet, whose surname is best read as Hutchesoun. She and Robert were appointed to administer Ninian's estate.

Ninian made his will at Glasgow on 10 January 1613 and died during that month. He left a new gown to his brother John Glasgow and made a separate provision for his son William. His testament was recorded or confirmed on 8 May 1613.

==  Research notes  ==

* '''Meik''', not Melk, is the correct surname in the 1607 testament.
* The 1607 Jonet Meik was the earlier known wife of the same Ninian Glasgow who died in 1613.
* '''Robert Glasgow''' is directly proved as the son of both Ninian Glasgow and Jonet Meik.
* '''William Glasgow''' is directly proved as Ninian's son, but his mother remains unproved.
* '''Marion Glasgow''' is a named legatee in Jonet's testament, not a proved daughter.
* Ninian's occupation was '''fyscher''' or fisher, not '''flescher''' or butcher.
* The printed testament index's description of him as a fisher is correct on this point.
* The later wife's surname is best read '''Hutchesoun'''; '''Huchesoun''' remains a possible spelling. Smythesoun is withdrawn, and Herbessoun is less consistent with the repeated manuscript forms.
* The nearby '''Niniane Hutchisonne''' in the 1605 fisher list is a research lead only. No relationship to Jonet Hutchesoun is established.
* An estimated birth around 1550 is not stated in the records and should be labelled as an estimate, not a documented date.
* No parentage or birthplace for Ninian is supplied by either testament.
* No exact inventory or free-gear total is quoted here because the numeral groups have not yet been read securely.

==  Sources  ==

<references />

* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse to Niniane Glasgw.
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, fisher and burgess of Glasgow.
* Francis J. Grant, ed., ''The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800'', Scottish Record Society, old series vol. 7, Edinburgh, 1901.
* George Crawfurd, ''A Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Trades' House of Glasgow: Its Constitution, Funds, and Bye-laws'', Glasgow, 1858, burgess-roll section, pp. 49 and 56–57.