Individual research record
Margaret (Glasgow) Edstoun
c. 1560 (estimated) – 1578-11
Glasgow-3613 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1560 (estimated) · Place not recorded
- Death
- 1578-11 · Whitburn, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
- Parents
- Robert GlasgowuncertainMargaret (Rolland) Glasgowuncertain
- Spouses
- John Edstoun
- Children
- Cuthbert Edstoun
- Gender
- Female
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3613
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 0
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Estimate and relationship notes
- Estimated from a birth or baptism record (est. b. 1560).
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3193
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-3181
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Glasgow (Glasgow-3589) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- the same sex-aware parent-name position recurs independently in sibling households: John Glasgow → John Glasgow (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Glasgow (Glasgow-3589) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
William GlasgowGlasgow-3522
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- known spouse Margaret (Herbison) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Margaret (Herbison) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-3921
- known spouse Margaret (Smith) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- known spouse Margaret (Smith) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+7)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Father
Andrew GlasgowGlasgow-3163
- known spouse Jonet Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- weak broad-area overlap: linlithgowshire (+1; not a locality match)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- weak broad-area overlap: linlithgowshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- known spouse Jonet Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (20) at the subject's birth (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Margaret (Smith) GlasgowSmith-374110
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Margaret (Herbison) GlasgowHerbison-439
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Margaret (Graham) GlasgowGraham-38221
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Margaret (Hutcheson) GlasgowHutcheson-1656
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Glasgow (Glasgow-3589) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–20 years) (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name Margaret (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 208 public profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate already has another child named Margaret Glasgow (Glasgow-3589) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Mother
Jonet GlasgowAnderson-103463
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked mother is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
No sufficiently similar same-name person is currently indexed.
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
Margaret's testament directly proves two relationships:
- she was spouse of John Edstoun (Edstoun-3), Croftmalloch;
- Cuthbert, surname unread, was her son and executor-dative.
The son is described in the original manuscript but is absent from the structured family. Create him as Cuthbert Unknown, attach Margaret as his confirmed mother, and leave his father blank. John Edstoun is a likely father because he was Margaret's husband, but the clause does not call Cuthbert John's son and the surname after Cuthbert has not been read securely.
The manuscript states that Margaret died intestate in November 1578. The profile's structured 8 November 1580 death is the testament-index date, not her death.
The attached parents, Robert Glasgow (Glasgow-1096), born about 1520, Glasgow and Margaret Rolland (Rolland-239), are not named by the testament. They remain uncertain topology only.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated death place: Croftmalloch, Whitburn parish, Linlithgowshire, Scotland
Linlithgowshire / West Lothian — exact locality unproved
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links. Birth year is estimated as 18 years before the earliest marriage, or otherwise 18 years before death.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3613
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: County-level representative point
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)
Source findings
| Source | Finding | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| NRS Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative of Margaret Glasgow; diplomatic transcription preserved on the live profile | Margaret was spouse to John Edstoun in Croftmalloch; she died intestate in November 1578; the inventory was given up by Cuthbert ... hir sone executour dative. | Direct spouse, son and death-month evidence. Cuthbert's surname is unread. |
| *Commissariot of Edinburgh: Register of Testaments, 1514-1600*, p. 108 | Index entry: Margaret Glasgow, sometime spouse to John Edstoun in Croftmalloch, 8 November 1580. | Independently confirms Margaret's identity, spouse and residence; 1580 is the court/index date, not death. |
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
Documented or strongly supported
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.0 open
No formal open question is recorded for this person.
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- derivative Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry describing her as “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
- unknown National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.
- unknown National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, images 355–356, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.
- derivative Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry: “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3613
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3613
Margaret (Glasgow) Edstoun
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3613 was captured 2026-08-19T15:34:20+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| death | — | Croftmalloch, Whitburn parish, Linlithgowshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Robert Glasgow | Glasgow-1096 | 1520-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1575-02-07 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland |
| Parents | Margaret Glasgow | Rolland-239 | 1535-00-00 · Glasgow · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | Cuthbert Edstoun | Edstoun-4 | 1578-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Siblings | Ninian Glasgow | Glasgow-3188 | 1550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1613-05-08 |
| Siblings | John Glasgow | Glasgow-1030 | 1572-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | John Edstoun | Edstoun-3 | 0000-00-00 · 1580-00-00 · Whitburn, Linlithgowshire, Scotland |
Record-bearing passages
- This profile uses only information supported by the manuscript images or by the supplied testament index. Original spelling and physical lineation are retained in the diplomatic transcription.
Expanded abbreviations appear in ⟨angle brackets⟩.
- Doubtful or index-supplied readings appear in [square brackets].
- [....] marks wording that has not been read securely.
- No names, sums or clauses have been silently reconstructed from standard legal formulae. Deceased Margaret Glasgow was described in the supplied testament index as sometime spouse to John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry describing her as “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
- Her testament dative states that she died intestate in the month of November 1578. The manuscript gives no birth date, age or place of birth. National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow. Executor-Dative and Court Action The testament and inventory were given up by a man named Cuthbert. The manuscript describes him as Margaret’s son and as executor-dative. The existing profile label Edstoun-4 is retained for continuity, but the manuscript does not securely establish his surname.
- The second annotation means “the last day of November 1580”. It is a court or register annotation and is not Margaret’s date of death. Inventory and Estate Accounting The manuscript contains an inventory followed by the usual estate-accounting sections. The following headings or accounting descriptions are securely identifiable:
- :1 The testament dative & inventar of the guidis geir sowmes :2 of money & dettis pertening to vmq⟨uhi⟩le Margaret glasgw :3 spous to Johne [Edstoun] in [Croftmalloch] the :4 tyme of hir deceis quha deceist ab intestat in the :5 moneth of nouember the zeir of god Jaj vc lxxviij zeiris :6 faithfullie maid & gevin vp be Cuthbert [....] in :7 [Croftmalloch] hir sone ex⟨ecutou⟩r dative surrogat & in :8 place of the procuratour fiscall be decreit of the :9 commissaris of Edinburgh as the samyn decreit of the dait the :10 xvij day of october the zeir of god Jaj vc fourscoir zeiris :11 at lenth proportis
- :a1 Summa of the inventar — [sum not securely read] :a2 Dettis awand to the deid :a3 Summa of the dettis awand to the deid — [sum not securely read] :a4 Dettis awand be the deid :a5 Summa of the dettis awand be the deid — [sum not securely read] :a6 Restis of frie geir the dettis deducit — [sum not securely read] :a7 [division and quota calculation not securely transcribed] Modern Rendering This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the late Margaret Glasgow, spouse of John Edstoun in Croftmalloch.
- Margaret died without leaving a will in November 1578. Her son Cuthbert presented the inventory and was made executor-dative in place of the Procurator Fiscal under a decree of the Commissaries of Edinburgh dated 17 October 1580.
- The remainder of the record accounts for Margaret’s property, money and debts. It distinguishes between money owed to her and money owed by her, then calculates the free estate remaining after the debts were deducted.
The manuscript has a marginal annotation dated the last day of November 1580. This is later court or registration information, not the date of Margaret’s death. Research Notes
- Margaret’s entry begins in the lower portion of manuscript image 355 and continues on image 356. Text belonging to the preceding entries must not be incorporated into her profile.
- The supplied index has a separate date field of 8 November 1580. This has not been treated as Margaret’s death date. The manuscript itself gives: ** November 1578 — Margaret’s death. ** 17 October 1580 — date of the decree appointing or surrogating the executor-dative. ** ultimo November 1580 — marginal court or register annotation.
- The records-site wording supplied by the researcher is John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. The former readings “Johne Eastoun”, “Crost Mylnis” and “Cross Mills, Glasgow” are not retained.
- No birth year can be derived from this testament.
- The earlier proposed readings “Cuthbert wrycht”, “Johne Browne”, “1583”, “funeral expenses”, “kirk and bell”, and “to the poor” have not been retained. They are not sufficiently supported by these images.
- Cuthbert’s surname remains unresolved. The manuscript contains writing after his forename, but it has not been read securely enough to identify him further.
- Cuthbert is attached to Margaret as his confirmed mother because the testament directly calls him her son. John Edstoun is Margaret's record-proved husband and a natural father candidate, but the clause does not identify him as Cuthbert's father; that father relationship is retained as uncertain pending another record. Sources
- National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, images 355–356, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.
- Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry: “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
Profile source citations
- Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry describing her as “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
- National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.
- National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, images 355–356, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.
- Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry: “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
Full captured biography text
Biography ⚠️ Palaeographic Note This profile uses only information supported by the manuscript images or by the supplied testament index. Original spelling and physical lineation are retained in the diplomatic transcription. * Expanded abbreviations appear in ⟨angle brackets⟩. * Doubtful or index-supplied readings appear in [square brackets]. * [....] marks wording that has not been read securely. * No names, sums or clauses have been silently reconstructed from standard legal formulae. Deceased Margaret Glasgow was described in the supplied testament index as sometime spouse to John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry describing her as “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”. Her testament dative states that she died intestate in the month of November 1578. The manuscript gives no birth date, age or place of birth. National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow. Executor-Dative and Court Action The testament and inventory were given up by a man named Cuthbert. The manuscript describes him as Margaret’s son and as executor-dative. The existing profile label Edstoun-4 is retained for continuity, but the manuscript does not securely establish his surname. Wording following Cuthbert’s forename is not sufficiently clear to establish a surname. It should therefore not be assumed that he was Cuthbert Edstoun, Cuthbert Glasgow, Cuthbert Calder, Cuthbert Wrycht, or any other similarly named person without separate evidence. Cuthbert was surrogated in place of the Procurator Fiscal by decree of the Commissaries of Edinburgh. The decree is dated 17 October 1580. A marginal annotation beside the entry reads: :margaret glasgw :ultimo nouember 1580 The second annotation means “the last day of November 1580”. It is a court or register annotation and is not Margaret’s date of death. Inventory and Estate Accounting The manuscript contains an inventory followed by the usual estate-accounting sections. The following headings or accounting descriptions are securely identifiable: * Summa of the inventar — total of the inventory. * Dettis awand to the deid — debts owed to Margaret. * Summa of the dettis awand to the deid — total debts owed to Margaret. * Dettis awand be the deid — debts owed by Margaret. * Summa of the dettis awand be the deid — total debts owed by Margaret. * Restis of frie geir the dettis deducit — free estate remaining after deduction of debts. * A following division and quota calculation. The individual inventory articles, debtor and creditor names, and right-margin monetary figures are not sufficiently secure in this copy to publish as facts. They have therefore not been included. Diplomatic Transcription Image 355: opening block :1 The testament dative & inventar of the guidis geir sowmes :2 of money & dettis pertening to vmq⟨uhi⟩le Margaret glasgw :3 spous to Johne [Edstoun] in [Croftmalloch] the :4 tyme of hir deceis quha deceist ab intestat in the :5 moneth of nouember the zeir of god Jaj vc lxxviij zeiris :6 faithfullie maid & gevin vp be Cuthbert [....] in :7 [Croftmalloch] hir sone ex⟨ecutou⟩r dative surrogat & in :8 place of the procuratour fiscall be decreit of the :9 commissaris of Edinburgh as the samyn decreit of the dait the :10 xvij day of october the zeir of god Jaj vc fourscoir zeiris :11 at lenth proportis Beginning of the inventory :i1 In the first the said vmq⟨uhi⟩le woman had the guidis geir :i2 sowmes of money & dettis of the availlis & pryces [....] :i3 pertening to hir the tyme of hir deceis foirsaid viz [....] Image 356: securely identifiable accounting headings :a1 Summa of the inventar — [sum not securely read] :a2 Dettis awand to the deid :a3 Summa of the dettis awand to the deid — [sum not securely read] :a4 Dettis awand be the deid :a5 Summa of the dettis awand be the deid — [sum not securely read] :a6 Restis of frie geir the dettis deducit — [sum not securely read] :a7 [division and quota calculation not securely transcribed] Modern Rendering This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the late Margaret Glasgow, spouse of John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. Margaret died without leaving a will in November 1578. Her son Cuthbert presented the inventory and was made executor-dative in place of the Procurator Fiscal under a decree of the Commissaries of Edinburgh dated 17 October 1580. The remainder of the record accounts for Margaret’s property, money and debts. It distinguishes between money owed to her and money owed by her, then calculates the free estate remaining after the debts were deducted. The manuscript has a marginal annotation dated the last day of November 1580. This is later court or registration information, not the date of Margaret’s death. Research Notes * Margaret’s entry begins in the lower portion of manuscript image 355 and continues on image 356. Text belonging to the preceding entries must not be incorporated into her profile. * The supplied index has a separate date field of 8 November 1580. This has not been treated as Margaret’s death date. The manuscript itself gives: ** November 1578 — Margaret’s death. ** 17 October 1580 — date of the decree appointing or surrogating the executor-dative. ** ultimo November 1580 — marginal court or register annotation. * The records-site wording supplied by the researcher is John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. The former readings “Johne Eastoun”, “Crost Mylnis” and “Cross Mills, Glasgow” are not retained. * No birth year can be derived from this testament. * The earlier proposed readings “Cuthbert wrycht”, “Johne Browne”, “1583”, “funeral expenses”, “kirk and bell”, and “to the poor” have not been retained. They are not sufficiently supported by these images. * Cuthbert’s surname remains unresolved. The manuscript contains writing after his forename, but it has not been read securely enough to identify him further. * Cuthbert is attached to Margaret as his confirmed mother because the testament directly calls him her son. John Edstoun is Margaret's record-proved husband and a natural father candidate, but the clause does not identify him as Cuthbert's father; that father relationship is retained as uncertain pending another record. Sources * National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, images 355–356, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow. * Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807, Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry: “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography == ⚠️ '''Palaeographic Note''' This profile uses only information supported by the manuscript images or by the supplied testament index. Original spelling and physical lineation are retained in the diplomatic transcription. * Expanded abbreviations appear in ⟨angle brackets⟩. * Doubtful or index-supplied readings appear in [square brackets]. * [....] marks wording that has not been read securely. * No names, sums or clauses have been silently reconstructed from standard legal formulae. === Deceased === '''Margaret Glasgow''' was described in the supplied testament index as sometime spouse to '''John Edstoun in Croftmalloch'''.<ref>''Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807'', Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry describing her as “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.</ref> Her testament dative states that she died intestate in the month of '''November 1578'''. The manuscript gives no birth date, age or place of birth.<ref>National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/8, image 355, testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow.</ref> === Executor-Dative and Court Action === The testament and inventory were given up by a man named '''[[Edstoun-4|Cuthbert]]'''. The manuscript describes him as Margaret’s '''son''' and as executor-dative. The existing profile label Edstoun-4 is retained for continuity, but the manuscript does not securely establish his surname. Wording following Cuthbert’s forename is not sufficiently clear to establish a surname. It should therefore not be assumed that he was Cuthbert Edstoun, Cuthbert Glasgow, Cuthbert Calder, Cuthbert Wrycht, or any other similarly named person without separate evidence. Cuthbert was surrogated in place of the Procurator Fiscal by decree of the Commissaries of Edinburgh. The decree is dated '''17 October 1580'''. A marginal annotation beside the entry reads: :''margaret glasgw'' :''ultimo nouember 1580'' The second annotation means “the last day of November 1580”. It is a court or register annotation and is not Margaret’s date of death. === Inventory and Estate Accounting === The manuscript contains an inventory followed by the usual estate-accounting sections. The following headings or accounting descriptions are securely identifiable: * ''Summa of the inventar'' — total of the inventory. * ''Dettis awand to the deid'' — debts owed to Margaret. * ''Summa of the dettis awand to the deid'' — total debts owed to Margaret. * ''Dettis awand be the deid'' — debts owed by Margaret. * ''Summa of the dettis awand be the deid'' — total debts owed by Margaret. * ''Restis of frie geir the dettis deducit'' — free estate remaining after deduction of debts. * A following division and quota calculation. The individual inventory articles, debtor and creditor names, and right-margin monetary figures are not sufficiently secure in this copy to publish as facts. They have therefore not been included. === Diplomatic Transcription === ''Image 355: opening block'' :1 The testament dative & inventar of the guidis geir sowmes :2 of money & dettis pertening to vmq⟨uhi⟩le Margaret glasgw :3 spous to Johne [Edstoun] in [Croftmalloch] the :4 tyme of hir deceis quha deceist ab intestat in the :5 moneth of nouember the zeir of god Jaj vc lxxviij zeiris :6 faithfullie maid & gevin vp be Cuthbert [....] in :7 [Croftmalloch] hir sone ex⟨ecutou⟩r dative surrogat & in :8 place of the procuratour fiscall be decreit of the :9 commissaris of Edinburgh as the samyn decreit of the dait the :10 xvij day of october the zeir of god Jaj vc fourscoir zeiris :11 at lenth proportis ''Beginning of the inventory'' :i1 In the first the said vmq⟨uhi⟩le woman had the guidis geir :i2 sowmes of money & dettis of the availlis & pryces [....] :i3 pertening to hir the tyme of hir deceis foirsaid viz [....] ''Image 356: securely identifiable accounting headings'' :a1 Summa of the inventar — [sum not securely read] :a2 Dettis awand to the deid :a3 Summa of the dettis awand to the deid — [sum not securely read] :a4 Dettis awand be the deid :a5 Summa of the dettis awand be the deid — [sum not securely read] :a6 Restis of frie geir the dettis deducit — [sum not securely read] :a7 [division and quota calculation not securely transcribed] === Modern Rendering === This is the court-appointed testament and inventory of the late Margaret Glasgow, spouse of John Edstoun in Croftmalloch. Margaret died without leaving a will in November 1578. Her son Cuthbert presented the inventory and was made executor-dative in place of the Procurator Fiscal under a decree of the Commissaries of Edinburgh dated 17 October 1580. The remainder of the record accounts for Margaret’s property, money and debts. It distinguishes between money owed to her and money owed by her, then calculates the free estate remaining after the debts were deducted. The manuscript has a marginal annotation dated the last day of November 1580. This is later court or registration information, not the date of Margaret’s death. == Research Notes == * Margaret’s entry begins in the lower portion of manuscript image 355 and continues on image 356. Text belonging to the preceding entries must not be incorporated into her profile. * The supplied index has a separate date field of '''8 November 1580'''. This has not been treated as Margaret’s death date. The manuscript itself gives: ** November 1578 — Margaret’s death. ** 17 October 1580 — date of the decree appointing or surrogating the executor-dative. ** ''ultimo November 1580'' — marginal court or register annotation. * The records-site wording supplied by the researcher is '''John Edstoun in Croftmalloch'''. The former readings “Johne Eastoun”, “Crost Mylnis” and “Cross Mills, Glasgow” are not retained. * No birth year can be derived from this testament. * The earlier proposed readings “Cuthbert wrycht”, “Johne Browne”, “1583”, “funeral expenses”, “kirk and bell”, and “to the poor” have not been retained. They are not sufficiently supported by these images. * Cuthbert’s surname remains unresolved. The manuscript contains writing after his forename, but it has not been read securely enough to identify him further. * [[Edstoun-4|Cuthbert]] is attached to Margaret as his confirmed mother because the testament directly calls him her son. [[Edstoun-3|John Edstoun]] is Margaret's record-proved husband and a natural father candidate, but the clause does not identify him as Cuthbert's father; that father relationship is retained as uncertain pending another record. == Sources == <references /> * National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, '''CC8/8/8''', images '''355–356''', testament dative and inventory of Margaret Glasgow. * ''Scotland, Will and Testament Index 1481–1807'', Margaret Glasgow, 1580; supplied index entry: “sometime spouse to John Edstoun, in Croftmalloch”.