Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

William Glasgow

1590 – 1645-09

Glasgow-3075 · 1 mapped association

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandSouth Leith, Midlothian, Scotland

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
7Close relations
12Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
1590 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland
Death
1645-09 · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland
Parents
Ninian GlasgowuncertainJonet (Meik) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Catherine (Fraser) GlasgowChristian (Scot) Glasgow
Children
Archibald GlasgowBessie GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-3075
Research clusters
Scotland One-Tree profile leads
Mapped descendants
18

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionArchibald Glasgow (1618)
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionBessie Glasgow (1616)
Paternal grandmother positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit19/100
Weak Lead
Dates1582–1647Generationnominally 8 years; approximate dates permit about 16–18 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Duddingston, Edinburghshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 8-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–18 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 30 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +5 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+12 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Archibald +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Automated fit12/100
Weak Lead
Dates1540–1598Generationat least 50 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Kirknewton, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Household · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Spouse · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • known spouse Jonet Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (50) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 50 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-4007) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 50 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject's birth fits within the candidate's overall child-bearing span (1575–1597) (+3; children are not tied to one spouse)
  • known spouse Jonet Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (50) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: George +5 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow, George Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); Agnes +3 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow) (+12 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-4007) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit2/100
Weak Lead
Dates1575–?Generationnominally 15 years; approximate dates permit about 16–25 years age gapRecorded placesInveresk, Midlothian, Scotland · Mid Calder, Linlithgowshire, Scotland · InvereskIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Broad Geography · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–25 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 37 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-3517) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–25 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 37 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Agnes +5 (46 public profiles; subject branch: Agnes Glasgow; candidate branch: Agnes Glasgow, Agnes Glasgow; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+12 total including +4 multi-name bonus)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named William Glasgow (Glasgow-3517) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)

Automated fit35/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1550–1598Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Household · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • known spouse Margaret (Graham) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+7)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)
  • known spouse Margaret (Graham) Glasgow had a plausible maternal age (40) at the subject's birth (+7)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)

Automated fit6/100
Chronology-Only Fallback
Dates1570–?Generation20 years age gapRecorded placesScotland · Inveresk and Musselburgh, Edinburghshire, Scotland · Scotland — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 20-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit33/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1540–?Generation50 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 9Age · Common Grandparent Birth-Order Naming · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Rare Branch-Name Recurrence · Rare Name Bundle · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • less typical 50-year parent-child age gap (+2)
  • candidate's birth is 72 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 5 years of the subject (+1)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son William Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; William in 223 profiles)
  • uncommon given names recur in both otherwise distinct descendant branches: Archibald +14 (9 public profiles; subject branch: Archibald Glasgow, Archibald Glasgow; candidate branch: Archibald Glasgow M.A.; +2 repetition bonus); George +3 (61 public profiles; subject branch: George Glasgow; candidate branch: George Glasgow) (+21 total including +4 multi-name bonus)
  • the subject would fill the second son position among the candidate's dated children, and the candidate's linked father William shares the subject's common given name (+2; Scottish grandparent-name pattern, William in 223 public profiles; WikiTree: relationship status unmarked; weak alone)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit27/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1560–1600Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · Briggate, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · GlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Great-Grandparent Name Echo · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Archibald +5 (+5 total; weak multigeneration clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit25/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1560–?Generation30 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Parental Couple StructureCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • candidate is the spouse of the linked opposite-sex parent (+8; tree couple clue)
  • plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 52 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit19/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1550–?Generation40 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Household · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
  • candidate's birth is 62 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • another recorded child shares the subject's birth year (+2; possible twins or date uncertainty)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1530–?Generation60 years age gapRecorded placesGlasgowIndependent clue breadth · 7Age · Household · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Local Sibling Birth · Sex-Aware Ordered Naming · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming
  • candidate's birth is 82 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); chronologically conflicting 60-year parent-child age gap (−8)

Show complete scoring
  • candidate's birth is 82 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1612), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • same specific indexed locality despite wider place-label differences: glasgow (+10)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • a known child was born within 8 years of the subject (+1)
  • candidate has another child, Robert Glasgow I, born 8 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)
  • a candidate spouse matches the first dated son Archibald Glasgow, the expected father position (+8; Archibald in 9 profiles)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): household chronology, locality, naming

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); chronologically conflicting 60-year parent-child age gap (−8)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-992

Automated fit47/100
Similar Person
Dates1615–?PlacesGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • shared recorded place (+20)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 25; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)

Same-name candidate

William GlasgowGlasgow-1087

Automated fit42/100
Similar Person
Dates1609–?PlacesMid Calder, Midlothian, ScotlandParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 19 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 19 (+2)
  • overlapping locality (+8)
  • matching child name: William Glasgow

Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)

How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-3075

Father assessment: Ninian Glasgow (1550) is plausible, not proved as this William's father. Ninian's testament proves that he had a son William, but no reviewed record identifies that son as the later Leith mealmaker.

Child assessment: Archibald Glasgow (Glasgow-3078), born 20 March 1618, South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland is confirmed by three records. His 1618 baptism names William as his father; his 1639 apprenticeship identifies that father as William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith; and his 1647 service of heir repeats the same relationship and occupations.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
b. 1590

Profile-stated birthplace: Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland

Glasgow

One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.

One-Tree profile leadunknown
Source and mapping detail

WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3075

No sufficiently specific citation match found.

Precision: Settlement centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-3075

SourceFindingAssessment
NRS Glasgow Commissary Court CC9/7/9, Ninian Glasgow's 1613 testamentThe testament explicitly provides for "William glasgw his sone."Direct relational evidence; William's mother remains unproved.
Francis J. Grant, ed., *Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666* (Scottish Record Society 28, 1906), p. 71, 23 October 1639“Glasgow, Archibald, son to William G., mealmaker in Leith, with Thomas Park, cordiner.”Direct parent-child proof with William's occupation and residence. This identifies the 1618 child specifically as the son of the Leith mealmaker and explains Archibald's later occupation.
Great Britain Record Commission, *Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio*, vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, Internet Archive scan“ARCHIBALDUS GLASGOW, calcearius incola villæ de Leith, heres Willielmi Glasgow farinarii incolæ dictæ villæ, patris”: Archibald Glasgow, shoemaker in Leith, was heir of William Glasgow, mealmaker in the same town, his father.Direct legal proof that the adult Archibald was William's son. The Leith residence, occupations and matching 1618 baptism securely identify both profiles.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.10 claims
8Unknown
2Derivative
1Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Case-file assessments

Potential-father review — 10 August 2026

Glasgow-3075

George Glasgow (Glasgow-1099) is not supported as William's father. Ninian's 1613 testament directly names a son William; the uncertainty is whether that son was the later Leith mealmaker, not whether the testament names George instead. George's documented children with Margaret Stewart begin in 1607, and no record associates him with this William. Repeated Archibald and George names in later descendants are insufficient to overcome the direct parent-name conflict.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.12 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. The testament includes a provision for “William glasgw his sone”.
  2. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow, recorded 27 August 1607.
  3. unknown Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962, baptism of William Glasgw, 8 November 1612.
  4. derivative Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, database, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
  5. unknown Francis J. Grant, ed., Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666, Scottish Record Society 28 (1906), p. 71 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso28scotuoft/page/71/mode/2up), 23 October 1639.
  6. original Great Britain Record Commission, Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio, vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, Internet Archive (https://archive.org/details/inquisitionumadc00grea_0).
  7. unknown National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
  8. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow.
  9. unknown National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
  10. unknown Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962.
  11. derivative Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
  12. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3075
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-3075 was captured 2026-08-19T15:34:20+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birthGlasgow, Lanarkshire, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
deathSouth Leith, Midlothian, ScotlandWikiTree profile field
marriage1610-07-10Leith, Midlothian, ScotlandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsNinian GlasgowGlasgow-31881550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1613-05-08
ParentsJonet GlasgowMeik-141555-00-00 · Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenWilliam GlasgowGlasgow-15561612-08-10 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenBessie GlasgowGlasgow-33611616-02-25 · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenArchibald GlasgowGlasgow-30781618-03-20 · South Leith, Midlothian, Scotland · 1662-00-00
SiblingsRobert GlasgowGlasgow-10271583-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsMarion GlasgowGlasgow-30621592-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 0000-00-00
SpousesChristian GlasgowScot-3731590-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesCatherine GlasgowFraser-152861600-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1610-07-10 · Leith, Midlothian, Scotland

Record-bearing passages

  • Biography William Glasgow was probably born during the 1580s or early 1590s, most likely in or near Glasgow.
  • He is currently identified, with some uncertainty, as the William Glasgw described as a son of Niniane Glasgow in Niniane's testament of January 1613. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. The testament includes a provision for “William glasgw his sone”.
  • On that identification, William's probable mother was Jonet Meik, the first known wife of Niniane Glasgow. Her own testament describes Niniane as her spouse and Robert Glasgow as her son. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow, recorded 27 August 1607.
  • The maternal identification is not directly stated. Jonet's testament names Robert as her son but does not expressly identify William. It remains theoretically possible that William was a child of an earlier, unidentified marriage of Niniane.
  • The spelling in the manuscript and printed testament index is Meik. The form Melk found in some electronic indexes is probably an OCR or data-entry error and should not be treated as a separate surname. Parentage evidence The identification of the Leith mealmaker with Niniane's son rests on several points:
  • Niniane's 1613 testament directly names a son William Glasgw.

    • The surname Glasgow was uncommon in this period.
    • The age and generation fit the William later found in Leith.
    • A possible Glasgow baptism record shows a William Glasgow already married and fathering a child in 1612.
    • William was certainly the father of a child baptised in 1618.
    • The movement from Glasgow to Leith is credible for a tradesman working in the meal and grain trade.
  • There is, however, no presently cited record which explicitly styles the Leith man:
  • The parent links should therefore be marked uncertain or probable, rather than certain. Marriage and children William may be the William Glasgw recorded in the Glasgow High Kirk baptism register as husband of Christian Scot and father of:
  • William Glasgw, baptised 8 November 1612, lawful son of William Glasgw and Christian Scot. Witnesses were John Allassoun and Mathew Sympsoun. Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962, baptism of William Glasgw, 8 November 1612.
  • This identification is plausible but not yet proved. The baptism places a man of the correct name in Glasgow immediately before Niniane's 1613 testament.
  • Archibald Glasgow, baptised in 1618. Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, database, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
  • William was the father of Archibald Glasgow. On 23 October 1639 the Edinburgh apprentice register described Archibald as the son of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, when he was apprenticed to Thomas Park, cordiner. On 1 May 1647 Archibald was served heir to William; the retour abstract again described Archibald as a shoemaker in Leith and William as a mealmaker in the same town, expressly calling William his father. These independent occupational and residence identifiers confirm that the adult Archibald was the son of this William. Francis J. Grant, ed., Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666, Scottish Record Society 28 (1906), p. 71 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso28scotuoft/page/71/mode/2up), 23 October 1639. Great Britain Record Commission, Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio, vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, Internet Archive (https://archive.org/details/inquisitionumadc00grea_0).
  • The 1618 baptism alone would only require William to have been born by about the late 1590s. If the 1612 baptism also concerns him, a birth in the 1580s or early 1590s is more likely. Occupation and residence William later lived in Leith, the port of Edinburgh, and worked as a mealmaker.
  • A mealmaker processed, prepared or sold grain meal, principally oat or barley meal. The occupation placed William within the urban food and grain economy rather than necessarily identifying him as a miller.
  • There may have been occupational links within the wider Meik surname:
  • John Meik, mealmaker and indweller in Niddrie, had a testament recorded in 1635.

    • William Meik, butterman in Whitburn, had a testament recorded in 1603.
  • These entries show that some people surnamed Meik worked in food-related trades. They do not prove that William Glasgow learned his occupation through his mother's family, or that either man was his relative. Death and testament William died in September 1645.
  • His Testament Dative and Inventar was registered in the Edinburgh Commissary Court on 22 July 1646. He was described as:
  • National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
  • Because William died without a surviving testamentary will, his brother Johne Glasgow was appointed executor dative by the Commissary Court.
  • The record states substantially:
  • The testament dative and inventar of the guidis geir & sowmes of money pertaining to umquhile William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, quha deit in the moneth of September the yeir of God 1645 zeiris ... guidis & geir perteining to him & given up be the said Johne Glasgow his brother in name of executour dative, decernit to him be decreit of the Commissar of Edinburgh upone the xxij day of Julij 1646 zeiris ...
  • The presence of several people surnamed Glasgow nevertheless suggests that William participated in a wider network of people bearing the surname across Leith, Glasgow, Lanarkshire and possibly England. Possible brother Johne William's testament expressly calls the executor Johne Glasgow his brother. His identity remains unresolved.
  • John Glasgow, associated with Mid Calder.

    • John Glasgow, associated with Grodguen or Quodquhen in the parish of Libberton.
    • John Glasgow, associated with Linlithgow.
  • The place written as Grodguen may represent Quodquhen, now Quothquan, but this palaeographic and geographical identification does not provide evidence of a sibling relationship. Research notes

    • This profile treats William as the probable son named in Niniane Glasgow's 1613 testament.
    • The identification is based on name, generation, Glasgow association and chronology; there is no direct statement connecting the 1645 Leith mealmaker to Niniane.
    • The parent links should remain marked uncertain.
    • The correct manuscript and index spelling of the probable mother's surname is Meik, not Melk.
    • Jonet Meik's testament expressly names Robert Glasgow as her son but does not expressly name William as her son.
    • If William was already a husband and father in 1612, he cannot have been a child of Niniane's later wife recorded in 1613.
    • Jonet Meik is therefore the most likely known mother, but an earlier unidentified wife of Niniane cannot be excluded.
    • The possible 1612 marriage to Christian Scot remains unproved.
    • The 1618 Archibald baptism supports the generation but does not alone establish William's parents.
    • A John Meik was a mealmaker in Niddrie in 1635, but this is not proof of a maternal occupational tradition.
    • The identity of William's brother Johne remains unresolved.
    • Andro Glasgow in Woodhead and the late John Glasgow in England should not be attached as relatives solely from debt entries. Sources
    • National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow.
    • National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
    • National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
    • Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962.
    • Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.

Profile source citations

  1. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. The testament includes a provision for “William glasgw his sone”.
  2. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow, recorded 27 August 1607.
  3. Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962, baptism of William Glasgw, 8 November 1612.
  4. Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, database, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
  5. Francis J. Grant, ed., Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666, Scottish Record Society 28 (1906), p. 71 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso28scotuoft/page/71/mode/2up), 23 October 1639. source link 1
  6. Great Britain Record Commission, Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio, vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, Internet Archive (https://archive.org/details/inquisitionumadc00grea_0). source link 1
  7. National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
  8. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow.
  9. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
  10. Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962.
  11. Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
Full captured biography text
Biography
William Glasgow was probably born during the 1580s or early 1590s, most likely in or near Glasgow.

He is currently identified, with some uncertainty, as the William Glasgw described as a son of Niniane Glasgow in Niniane's testament of January 1613. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. The testament includes a provision for “William glasgw his sone”. 

On that identification, William's probable mother was Jonet Meik, the first known wife of Niniane Glasgow. Her own testament describes Niniane as her spouse and Robert Glasgow as her son. National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow, recorded 27 August 1607. 

The maternal identification is not directly stated. Jonet's testament names Robert as her son but does not expressly identify William. It remains theoretically possible that William was a child of an earlier, unidentified marriage of Niniane.

The spelling in the manuscript and printed testament index is Meik. The form Melk found in some electronic indexes is probably an OCR or data-entry error and should not be treated as a separate surname.
Parentage evidence
The identification of the Leith mealmaker with Niniane's son rests on several points:

* Niniane's 1613 testament directly names a son William Glasgw.
* The surname Glasgow was uncommon in this period.
* The age and generation fit the William later found in Leith.
* A possible Glasgow baptism record shows a William Glasgow already married and fathering a child in 1612.
* William was certainly the father of a child baptised in 1618.
* The movement from Glasgow to Leith is credible for a tradesman working in the meal and grain trade.

There is, however, no presently cited record which explicitly styles the Leith man:

:William Glasgow, son of Niniane Glasgow, flescher and burgess of Glasgow

The parent links should therefore be marked uncertain or probable, rather than certain.
Marriage and children
William may be the William Glasgw recorded in the Glasgow High Kirk baptism register as husband of Christian Scot and father of:

* William Glasgw, baptised 8 November 1612, lawful son of William Glasgw and Christian Scot. Witnesses were John Allassoun and Mathew Sympsoun. Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962, baptism of William Glasgw, 8 November 1612. 

This identification is plausible but not yet proved. The baptism places a man of the correct name in Glasgow immediately before Niniane's 1613 testament.

William was the father of:

* Archibald Glasgow, baptised in 1618. Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, database, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618. 

William was the father of Archibald Glasgow. On 23 October 1639 the Edinburgh apprentice register described Archibald as the son of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, when he was apprenticed to Thomas Park, cordiner. On 1 May 1647 Archibald was served heir to William; the retour abstract again described Archibald as a shoemaker in Leith and William as a mealmaker in the same town, expressly calling William his father. These independent occupational and residence identifiers confirm that the adult Archibald was the son of this William. Francis J. Grant, ed., Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666, Scottish Record Society 28 (1906), p. 71 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso28scotuoft/page/71/mode/2up), 23 October 1639. Great Britain Record Commission, Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio, vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, Internet Archive (https://archive.org/details/inquisitionumadc00grea_0). 

The 1618 baptism alone would only require William to have been born by about the late 1590s. If the 1612 baptism also concerns him, a birth in the 1580s or early 1590s is more likely.
Occupation and residence
William later lived in Leith, the port of Edinburgh, and worked as a mealmaker.

A mealmaker processed, prepared or sold grain meal, principally oat or barley meal. The occupation placed William within the urban food and grain economy rather than necessarily identifying him as a miller.

There may have been occupational links within the wider Meik surname:

* John Meik, mealmaker and indweller in Niddrie, had a testament recorded in 1635.
* William Meik, butterman in Whitburn, had a testament recorded in 1603.

These entries show that some people surnamed Meik worked in food-related trades. They do not prove that William Glasgow learned his occupation through his mother's family, or that either man was his relative.
Death and testament
William died in September 1645.

His Testament Dative and Inventar was registered in the Edinburgh Commissary Court on 22 July 1646. He was described as:

:William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith

 National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646. 

Because William died without a surviving testamentary will, his brother Johne Glasgow was appointed executor dative by the Commissary Court.

The record states substantially:

The testament dative and inventar of the guidis geir & sowmes of money pertaining to umquhile William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, quha deit in the moneth of September the yeir of God 1645 zeiris ... guidis & geir perteining to him & given up be the said Johne Glasgow his brother in name of executour dative, decernit to him be decreit of the Commissar of Edinburgh upone the xxij day of Julij 1646 zeiris ...

The present evidence does not securely identify this brother Johne with any existing profile. Possible candidates should remain in research notes rather than being attached solely on similarity of name and age.
Estate and financial connections
The inventory and debt account include the following working readings:

* £20 Scots owed by Andro Glasgow in Woodhead.
* £2 10s Scots associated with the late John Glasgow in England.
* £16 9s 4d Scots in debts owed by William and deductible from the estate.

These entries establish financial or commercial relationships. They do not by themselves establish that Andro Glasgow or the late John Glasgow was a relative.

The presence of several people surnamed Glasgow nevertheless suggests that William participated in a wider network of people bearing the surname across Leith, Glasgow, Lanarkshire and possibly England.
Possible brother Johne
William's testament expressly calls the executor Johne Glasgow his brother. His identity remains unresolved.

Possible profiles previously considered include:

* John Glasgow, associated with Mid Calder.
* John Glasgow, associated with Grodguen or Quodquhen in the parish of Libberton.
* John Glasgow, associated with Linlithgow.

None is presently proved to be William's brother.

The place written as Grodguen may represent Quodquhen, now Quothquan, but this palaeographic and geographical identification does not provide evidence of a sibling relationship.
Research notes
* This profile treats William as the probable son named in Niniane Glasgow's 1613 testament.
* The identification is based on name, generation, Glasgow association and chronology; there is no direct statement connecting the 1645 Leith mealmaker to Niniane.
* The parent links should remain marked uncertain.
* The correct manuscript and index spelling of the probable mother's surname is Meik, not Melk.
* Jonet Meik's testament expressly names Robert Glasgow as her son but does not expressly name William as her son.
* If William was already a husband and father in 1612, he cannot have been a child of Niniane's later wife recorded in 1613.
* Jonet Meik is therefore the most likely known mother, but an earlier unidentified wife of Niniane cannot be excluded.
* The possible 1612 marriage to Christian Scot remains unproved.
* The 1618 Archibald baptism supports the generation but does not alone establish William's parents.
* A John Meik was a mealmaker in Niddrie in 1635, but this is not proof of a maternal occupational tradition.
* The identity of William's brother Johne remains unresolved.
* Andro Glasgow in Woodhead and the late John Glasgow in England should not be attached as relatives solely from debt entries.
Sources
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow.
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
* National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
* Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777, volume 1/962.
* Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.
Raw WikiTree biography markup
== Biography ==

'''William Glasgow''' was probably born during the '''1580s or early 1590s''', most likely in or near Glasgow.

He is currently identified, with some uncertainty, as the '''William Glasgw''' described as a son of [[Glasgow-3182|Niniane Glasgow]] in Niniane's testament of January 1613.<ref name=Ninian1613>National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613. The testament includes a provision for “William glasgw his sone”.</ref>

On that identification, William's probable mother was [[Meik-1|Jonet Meik]], the first known wife of Niniane Glasgow. Her own testament describes Niniane as her spouse and Robert Glasgow as her son.<ref name=Jonet1607>National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow, recorded 27 August 1607.</ref>

The maternal identification is not directly stated. Jonet's testament names Robert as her son but does not expressly identify William. It remains theoretically possible that William was a child of an earlier, unidentified marriage of Niniane.

The spelling in the manuscript and printed testament index is '''Meik'''. The form '''Melk''' found in some electronic indexes is probably an OCR or data-entry error and should not be treated as a separate surname.

=== Parentage evidence ===

The identification of the Leith mealmaker with Niniane's son rests on several points:

* Niniane's 1613 testament directly names a son '''William Glasgw'''.
* The surname Glasgow was uncommon in this period.
* The age and generation fit the William later found in Leith.
* A possible Glasgow baptism record shows a William Glasgow already married and fathering a child in 1612.
* William was certainly the father of a child baptised in 1618.
* The movement from Glasgow to Leith is credible for a tradesman working in the meal and grain trade.

There is, however, no presently cited record which explicitly styles the Leith man:

:'''William Glasgow, son of Niniane Glasgow, flescher and burgess of Glasgow'''

The parent links should therefore be marked '''uncertain''' or '''probable''', rather than certain.

=== Marriage and children ===

William may be the '''William Glasgw''' recorded in the Glasgow High Kirk baptism register as husband of '''Christian Scot''' and father of:

* '''William Glasgw''', baptised 8 November 1612, lawful son of William Glasgw and Christian Scot. Witnesses were John Allassoun and Mathew Sympsoun.<ref name=Baptism1612>''Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777'', volume 1/962, baptism of William Glasgw, 8 November 1612.</ref>

This identification is plausible but not yet proved. The baptism places a man of the correct name in Glasgow immediately before Niniane's 1613 testament.

William was the father of:

* [[Glasgow-3078|Archibald Glasgow]], baptised in 1618.<ref name=Archibald1618>''Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950'', database, FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.</ref>

William was the father of [[Glasgow-3078|Archibald Glasgow]]. On 23 October 1639 the Edinburgh apprentice register described Archibald as the son of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, when he was apprenticed to Thomas Park, cordiner. On 1 May 1647 Archibald was served heir to William; the retour abstract again described Archibald as a shoemaker in Leith and William as a mealmaker in the same town, expressly calling William his father. These independent occupational and residence identifiers confirm that the adult Archibald was the son of this William.<ref>Francis J. Grant, ed., ''Register of Apprentices of the City of Edinburgh, 1583-1666'', Scottish Record Society 28 (1906), [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso28scotuoft/page/71/mode/2up p. 71], 23 October 1639.</ref><ref>Great Britain Record Commission, ''Inquisitionum ad Capellam Domini Regis Retornatarum... Abbreviatio'', vol. 2 (1811), Inquisitiones Generales, no. 3278, 1 May 1647, original retour xix.128, [https://archive.org/details/inquisitionumadc00grea_0 Internet Archive].</ref>

The 1618 baptism alone would only require William to have been born by about the late 1590s. If the 1612 baptism also concerns him, a birth in the 1580s or early 1590s is more likely.

=== Occupation and residence ===

William later lived in '''Leith''', the port of Edinburgh, and worked as a '''mealmaker'''.

A mealmaker processed, prepared or sold grain meal, principally oat or barley meal. The occupation placed William within the urban food and grain economy rather than necessarily identifying him as a miller.

There may have been occupational links within the wider Meik surname:

* '''John Meik''', mealmaker and indweller in Niddrie, had a testament recorded in 1635.
* '''William Meik''', butterman in Whitburn, had a testament recorded in 1603.

These entries show that some people surnamed Meik worked in food-related trades. They do not prove that William Glasgow learned his occupation through his mother's family, or that either man was his relative.

=== Death and testament ===

William died in '''September 1645'''.

His '''Testament Dative and Inventar''' was registered in the Edinburgh Commissary Court on '''22 July 1646'''. He was described as:

:'''William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith'''

<ref name=Testament>National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.</ref>

Because William died without a surviving testamentary will, his brother '''Johne Glasgow''' was appointed executor dative by the Commissary Court.

The record states substantially:

<blockquote>
The testament dative and inventar of the guidis geir & sowmes of money pertaining to umquhile William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, quha deit in the moneth of September the yeir of God 1645 zeiris ... guidis & geir perteining to him & given up be the said Johne Glasgow his brother in name of executour dative, decernit to him be decreit of the Commissar of Edinburgh upone the xxij day of Julij 1646 zeiris ...
</blockquote>

The present evidence does not securely identify this brother Johne with any existing profile. Possible candidates should remain in research notes rather than being attached solely on similarity of name and age.

=== Estate and financial connections ===

The inventory and debt account include the following working readings:

* '''£20 Scots''' owed by '''Andro Glasgow in Woodhead'''.
* '''£2 10s Scots''' associated with the late '''John Glasgow''' in England.
* '''£16 9s 4d Scots''' in debts owed by William and deductible from the estate.

These entries establish financial or commercial relationships. They do not by themselves establish that Andro Glasgow or the late John Glasgow was a relative.

The presence of several people surnamed Glasgow nevertheless suggests that William participated in a wider network of people bearing the surname across Leith, Glasgow, Lanarkshire and possibly England.

=== Possible brother Johne ===

William's testament expressly calls the executor '''Johne Glasgow his brother'''. His identity remains unresolved.

Possible profiles previously considered include:

* [[Glasgow-1030|John Glasgow]], associated with Mid Calder.
* [[Glasgow-3296|John Glasgow]], associated with Grodguen or Quodquhen in the parish of Libberton.
* [[Glasgow-1561|John Glasgow]], associated with Linlithgow.

None is presently proved to be William's brother.

The place written as Grodguen may represent '''Quodquhen''', now Quothquan, but this palaeographic and geographical identification does not provide evidence of a sibling relationship.

== Research notes ==

* This profile treats William as the probable son named in Niniane Glasgow's 1613 testament.
* The identification is based on name, generation, Glasgow association and chronology; there is no direct statement connecting the 1645 Leith mealmaker to Niniane.
* The parent links should remain marked uncertain.
* The correct manuscript and index spelling of the probable mother's surname is '''Meik''', not Melk.
* Jonet Meik's testament expressly names Robert Glasgow as her son but does not expressly name William as her son.
* If William was already a husband and father in 1612, he cannot have been a child of Niniane's later wife recorded in 1613.
* Jonet Meik is therefore the most likely known mother, but an earlier unidentified wife of Niniane cannot be excluded.
* The possible 1612 marriage to Christian Scot remains unproved.
* The 1618 Archibald baptism supports the generation but does not alone establish William's parents.
* A John Meik was a mealmaker in Niddrie in 1635, but this is not proof of a maternal occupational tradition.
* The identity of William's brother Johne remains unresolved.
* Andro Glasgow in Woodhead and the late John Glasgow in England should not be attached as relatives solely from debt entries.

== Sources ==

<references />

* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/5, Images 82–83, testament testamentar and inventory of Jonet Meik, spouse of Niniane Glasgow.
* National Records of Scotland, Glasgow Commissary Court, CC9/7/9, Images 142–145, testament testamentar and inventory of Niniane Glasgw, flescher and burgess of Glasgow, 1613.
* National Records of Scotland, Edinburgh Commissary Court, CC8/8/62, testament dative and inventory of William Glasgow, mealmaker in Leith, registered 22 July 1646.
* ''Glasgow High Kirk Baptisms 1609–1777'', volume 1/962.
* ''Scotland Births and Baptisms, 1564–1950'', FamilySearch, entry for Archbald Glascow, 1618.