Glasgow Surname Project

Individual research record

Daniel Neely Glasgow

before 1867 – ?

Glasgow-2413 · 1 mapped association

Lisnagaver, Killoquin, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom→Death place unknown
View on mapOpen WikiTreeCompareReport a correction

At a glance

Identity & family

Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.

1Mapped records
5Close relations
6Evidence items
12Candidate leads
Birth
before 1867 · Lisnagaver, Killoquin, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom
Death
Not recorded · Place not recorded
Parents
Thomas GlasgowconfidentMaryann (McCracken) Glasgowunmarked
Spouses
Mary Jane (Boyd) Glasgow
Children
Elizabeth Boyd GlasgowSarah Taylor Glasgow
Gender
Male
WikiTree
Glasgow-2413
Research clusters
Descendants of Unknown Glasgow (before 1740)
Mapped descendants
2

Comparison context

These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.

Naming sequence used by the parentage model

Paternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandfather positionNot identifiable from dated child profiles
Maternal grandmother positionElizabeth Boyd Glasgow (1889)
Paternal grandmother positionSarah Taylor Glasgow (1889)

Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.

Relationship comparison

Potential parents or duplicates

Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.

Higher-signal leadReview carefullyWeak lead

Possible fathers5 leads

Automated fit11/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1843–?Generationat most 24 years age gapRecorded placesLisnagarvey, Lisburn and Castlereagh, Ireland, United Kingdom · Dromore townland, Rasharkin civil parish, County Antrim · Lisnagaver townlandIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Time-Specific Locality · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate has a supported 1863 House and small garden at Dromore plot 18b in the subject's birth locality, 4 years from the subject's birth (+22)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 24 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 46 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has a supported 1863 House and small garden at Dromore plot 18b in the subject's birth locality, 4 years from the subject's birth (+22)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent)

Automated fit6/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1840–1902Generationat most 27 years age gapRecorded placesRasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · 58 East Rose St, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom · Gortereghy townlandIndependent clue breadth · 8Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Occupation · Spouse · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Time-Specific Locality · Two-GenerationSame-spouse child windowJane (Graham) GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate has a supported 1840 Son of Alexander; Lisnagaver household in the subject's birth locality, 27 years from the subject's birth (+15)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Mary Glasgow in 38 Graham St, Calton, Glasgow within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has a supported 1840 Son of Alexander; Lisnagaver household in the subject's birth locality, 27 years from the subject's birth (+15)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1859–1882) (+3; other parent Jane (Graham) Glasgow)
  • known spouse Jane (Graham) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (28) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • shared recorded occupation: farmer (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); candidate's household recorded Mary Glasgow in 38 Graham St, Calton, Glasgow within 0 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Automated fit1/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1852–1918Generationnominally 15 years; approximate dates permit about 16–25 years age gapRecorded placesLisnagaver, Killoquin, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · Lisnagaver, Killoquin, Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland · RasharkinIndependent clue breadth · 6Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Occupation · Spouse · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
  • the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–25 years) (+4)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–25 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 37 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
  • candidate is associated with the subject's stated birthplace, but not by a reliable near-contemporary record (+10)
  • known spouse Eliza Ann (Aiken) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (17) at the subject's birth (+3)
  • shared recorded occupation: farmer (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1861–1927Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 16–16 years age gapRecorded placesOhio, United States · Colerain Twp., Belmont, Ohio, United States · OhioIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Automated fit0/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1861–?Generationnominally 6 years; approximate dates permit about 16–16 years age gapRecorded placesNorth Carolina, United StatesIndependent clue breadth · 2Age · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Show complete scoring
  • the nominal 6-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–16 years) (+4)
  • candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)

Deductions and cautions: a different father is marked confident (−25; WikiTree: confident parent); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate is recorded only outside the subject's birth country (−25)

Possible mothers5 leads

Automated fit25/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1847–?Generationat most 20 years age gapRecorded placesLisnagarvey, Lisburn and Castlereagh, Ireland, United Kingdom · Lisburn / Lisnagarvey · Lisnagaver townlandIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Local Sibling Birth · Time-Specific Locality · Two-GenerationCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate has a supported 1876 Married Robert McCracken in the subject's birth locality, 9 years from the subject's birth (+22)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 20 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 42 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has a supported 1876 Married Robert McCracken in the subject's birth locality, 9 years from the subject's birth (+22)
  • same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
  • candidate has another child, William James McCracken, born 10 years from the subject in the same specific birth locality (+4; possible sibling-household clue)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit13/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1848–?Generationat most 19 years age gapRecorded placesRasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · RasharkinIndependent clue breadth · 5Age · Indirect Multi-Factor Convergence · Occupation · Two-Generation · Undated LocalityCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: rasharkin (+6)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 19 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 41 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • candidate has only broad or undated birth-locality overlap: rasharkin (+6)
  • shared recorded occupation: farmer (+3; weak household-continuity clue)
  • 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, locality

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Automated fit9/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1835–?Generationat most 32 years age gapRecorded placesireland · County Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Broad Geography · Spouse-Specific Child Window · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternSame-spouse child windowWilliam GlasgowCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 32 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 54 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • subject birth boundary overlaps children attributed to the same parental couple (1864–1878) (+3; other parent William Glasgow)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Catherine +3 (32 public profiles); Jane +3 (71 public profiles) (+6 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit3/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1830–?Generationat most 37 years age gapRecorded placesCounty Antrim — exact locality unprovedIndependent clue breadth · 3Age · Broad Geography · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 37 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 59 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • weak broad-area overlap: antrim (+1; not a locality match)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Catherine +3 (32 public profiles) (+3 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)

Automated fit2/100
Competing Linked Parent
Dates1840–?Generationat most 27 years age gapRecorded placesBallymoneyIndependent clue breadth · 4Age · Contemporaneous Household Conflict · Household · Two-GenerationExisting-tree context (not an independent clue)Rare Sibling-Name PatternCurrent relationshipNot currently linked as parent
Strongest signals
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)

a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Rose Ann Glasgow in Ballymena, Ballymena, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

Show complete scoring
  • bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at most 27 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
  • candidate's birth is 49 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1889), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
  • a known child was born within 1 years of the subject (+3)
  • candidate's other children share uncommon given names with the subject's recorded siblings: Rose +12 (9 public profiles) (+12 total)

Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction); candidate's household recorded Rose Ann Glasgow in Ballymena, Ballymena, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom within 1 years of the subject (−12; no contemporaneous child is indexed in the subject's locality)

How parent leads are calculated

Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.

Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.

Same-name candidate

Daniel GlasgowGlasgow-2416

Automated fit51/100
Similar Person
Dates1865–1931PlacesIreland, United Kingdom → Troy, Rensselaer, New York, United StatesParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 2 (+25)
  • overlapping locality (+8)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
Automated fit20/100
Similar Person
Dates1879–1949PlacesLiverpool, Lancashire, England, United Kingdom → Queensland, AustraliaParent comparisonNo shared parent is indexed
Why it may fit
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)

No indexed conflict

Full comparison detail
  • same first and last name (+18)
  • birth years within 12 (+2)

Conflicts: No indexed conflict

Open side-by-side comparison
How duplicate leads are calculated

Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.

Open only what you need

Research & records

Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated

Current conclusion

Glasgow-2413

The existing Glasgow-2413 profile represents Daniel Neely Glasgow. His original 28 June 1888 marriage return names Thomas Glasgow, farmer, as his father and Lisnagaver as Daniel's residence. Daniel Glasgow's 1871 will independently calls Daniel Neely his nephew and Thomas his late brother. The structured marriage date shown as 22 June conflicts with the original return and should be corrected to 28 June 1888.

The original birth returns for Daniel's twin daughters add a significant emigration clue. Both say that Daniel was a labourer residing in New York when Sarah Taylor Glasgow and Elizabeth Boyd Glasgow were born at Tamlaght in September 1889. An Irish-born cemetery labourer named Daniel Glascow who died at Troy, New York, on 12 February 1931 is therefore a strong candidate for the same man. The identity is not yet proved: the decisive 1920 census image and death certificate have not been inspected for his wife, parents, precise Irish origin, or other identifying details.

Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
1888

Resident at Lisnagaver when married

Lisnagaver townland

His marriage names Thomas Glasgow, farmer, as his father.

Proved parent-child linkoriginal
Source and mapping detail

Marriage record, Daniel Glasgow and Mary Boyd, 22-Jun-1888, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 2375666 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf]

Candidate matched on record type, year; inspect before treating it as the underlying record.

Precision: Townland centrepoint

Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)

Source findings

Glasgow-2413

SourceFindingAssessment
Original civil marriage return, 28 June 1888Daniel Neely Glasgow, farmer of Lisnagaver, married Mary Jane Boyd; father Thomas Glasgow, farmer.Direct identity, residence, spouse and father evidence.
Original registered will of Daniel Glasgow of Kilrea, proved 1871Daniel called Thomas his late brother and Daniel Neely Glasgow his nephew.Direct kinship evidence completing the uncle-nephew chain.
Original birth return for Sarah Taylor Glasgow and parallel return for Elizabeth Boyd Glasgow, September 1889Twin daughters were born at Tamlaght to Daniel Glasgow and Mary Jane Glasgow formerly Boyd. Daniel was a labourer whose residence was New York.Direct evidence for the children, mother, Daniel's occupation, and his presence in New York by the twins' birth. Local preservation copies: Sarah and Elizabeth.
1901 Ireland census, Tamlaght house 2, original household formSarah T. and Lizzie B. Glasgow, aged 11, were nieces in the household of Hugh S. Boyd and his wife Sarah J. Boyd.Direct household evidence that the twins remained with their maternal Boyd relatives. Saved as the original form.
Drimbolg Reformed Presbyterian grave transcriptionThe Boyd stone names niece Elizabeth Boyd Glasgow, died 4 January 1933 aged 43, and Mary Jane Glasgow, beloved sister of Hugh Scott and Joseph A. Boyd, died 17 September 1958 aged 93.Strong compiled evidence for Mary Jane's Boyd family and Elizabeth's later identity. It does not prove whether Elizabeth or Sarah married or had children.
New York State Death Index: Daniel GlascowDaniel Glascow died at Troy on 12 February 1931; state certificate 9941.Authoritative index evidence for the candidate's death, but it gives no age, parents, spouse, occupation, or birthplace.
Find a Grave memorial 171978557Gives birth 1865 in Ireland, death 12 February 1931 at Troy, burial in Albany Rural Cemetery section 116 lot 76, and says he had worked for the cemetery for over forty years.Derivative/cemetery evidence closely matching the 1889 New York labourer clue. Identity with Daniel Neely remains unproved.
Albany Rural Cemetery database transcriptionGives the same Irish-born Daniel and section/plot but transcribes the death as 12 February 1913, age 66.The official New York index proves 1931; 1913 is best treated as a digit transposition unless an original cemetery card shows otherwise.
Exact civil-index marriage searches for Sarah Glasgow and Lizzie Glasgow, 1901-1925No candidate was identified that could be tied to the Tamlaght twins.Bounded negative only; spelling, place, emigration, and index limitations remain. Saved search captures: Sarah and Lizzie.
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.15 claims
5Original
1Tree Only

Documented or strongly supported

Daniel Neely Glasgow was recorded in Lisnagaver townland (1888).

proved1 linked evidence item

Resident at Lisnagaver when married

Daniel Neely Glasgow was probable same man as Daniel Glasgow

proved1 linked evidence item

The twins' 1889 original returns put their labourer father Daniel in New York. The Troy man was Irish-born, a long-serving cemetery labourer, and died 12 February 1931; the cited 1920 lead reports immigration in 1889. No inspected US record names Mary Jane Boyd or Daniel's parents.

Working hypotheses and conflicts

No claims in this category have been formally assessed.

Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open

Which records prove the subject's identity across events?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Which original or indexed records identify the parents?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.

Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?

No current conclusion recorded.

Missing bridge: Not specified

Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.5 sources

Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.

  1. original IrishGenealogy.ie index (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-2455742) and original marriage return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf), 28 June 1888.
  2. original Marriage record, Daniel Glasgow and Mary Boyd, 22-Jun-1888, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 2375666 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf]
  3. original Daughter's birth record, Sarah Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 9476698 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915876.pdf]
  4. original Daughter's birth record, Elizabeth Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 10418522 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915877.pdf]
  5. tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-2413
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced

WikiTree profile information

Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20

Machine-readable dossier

WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot

Glasgow-2413 was captured 2026-08-09T11:27:23+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-09.

Profile location claims

EventDateLocationStatus
birth—Lisnagaver, Killoquin, Rasharkin, County Antrim, IrelandWikiTree profile field
marriage1888-06-22Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, IrelandWikiTree relationship field

Immediate relationship snapshot

RelationshipPersonWikiTree IDDates and places returned
ParentsThomas GlasgowGlasgow-9871815-00-00 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1870-06-21 · Lisnagaver, County Antrim, Ireland
ParentsMaryann GlasgowMcCracken-56811822-00-00 · 0000-00-00
ChildrenElizabeth Boyd GlasgowGlasgow-24151889-09-09 · Tamlaght, Kilrea, Aghadowey, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
ChildrenSarah Taylor GlasgowGlasgow-24141889-09-09 · Tamlaght, Kilrea, Aghadowey, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00
SiblingsRose Ann RedpathGlasgow-10341841-00-00 · Rasharkin, County Antrim, Ireland, United Kingdom · 1921-07-08 · Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
SiblingsEliza GlasgowGlasgow-13601842-08-17 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 1845-00-00
SiblingsEliza HaighGlasgow-7821843-10-17 · County Antrim, Ireland · 1934-08-12 · Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
SiblingsJane GlasgowGlasgow-13611846-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsNancy GlasgowGlasgow-13621848-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 1937-09-20 · Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
SiblingsMargaret GlasgowGlasgow-13631850-00-00 · Rasharkin, Kilconway, Antrim · 0000-00-00
SiblingsCatherine EkbergGlasgow-39761852-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SiblingsSarah TaylorGlasgow-39751870-00-00 · 0000-00-00
SpousesMary Jane GlasgowBoyd-185481868-00-00 · Tamlaght, Kilrea, Aghadowey, County Londonderry, Ireland · 0000-00-00 · 1888-06-22 · Tamlaght O'Crilly, County Londonderry, Ireland

Profile categories

Estimated_Birth_Date

Record-bearing passages

Profile source citations

  1. IrishGenealogy.ie index (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-2455742) and original marriage return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf), 28 June 1888. source link 1 source link 2
  2. Marriage record, Daniel Glasgow and Mary Boyd, 22-Jun-1888, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 2375666 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf] source link 1
  3. Daughter's birth record, Sarah Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 9476698 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915876.pdf] source link 1
  4. Daughter's birth record, Elizabeth Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 10418522 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915877.pdf] source link 1
Full captured biography text
Biography
Daniel Neely Glasgow was a farmer of Lisnagaver when he married Mary Jane Boyd at Boveedy First Presbyterian Church on 28 June 1888. The original civil marriage return names his father as Thomas Glasgow, farmer. IrishGenealogy.ie index (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-2455742) and original marriage return (https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf), 28 June 1888. 

His uncle Daniel Glasgow had previously named “my nephew Daniel Neely Glasgow” and “my late brother Thomas Glasgow” in his 1871 will. Together the will and marriage prove the uncle-nephew and father-son links.

Daniel's twin daughters Sarah and Lizzie were born in 1889 in Tamlaght, Kilrea, County Derry. According to their birth records, Daniel was residing in New York at that time. 

According to his marriage record, Daniel's father was Thomas Glasgow.
Sources
* Marriage record, Daniel Glasgow and Mary Boyd, 22-Jun-1888, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 2375666 * Daughter's birth record, Sarah Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 9476698 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915876.pdf (https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf])
* Daughter's birth record, Elizabeth Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 10418522 [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915877.pdf]
Raw WikiTree biography markup
{{Estimated Date}}
== Biography ==

Daniel Neely Glasgow was a farmer of Lisnagaver when he married Mary Jane Boyd at Boveedy First Presbyterian Church on 28 June 1888. The original civil marriage return names his father as Thomas Glasgow, farmer.<ref>[https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/view/?record_id=cima-2455742 IrishGenealogy.ie index] and [https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf original marriage return], 28 June 1888.</ref>

His uncle [[Glasgow-3896|Daniel Glasgow]] had previously named “my nephew Daniel Neely Glasgow” and “my late brother Thomas Glasgow” in his 1871 will. Together the will and marriage prove the uncle-nephew and father-son links.

Daniel's twin daughters Sarah and Lizzie were born in 1889 in Tamlaght, Kilrea, County Derry. According to their birth records, Daniel was residing in New York at that time. 

According to his marriage record, Daniel's father was Thomas Glasgow.
== Sources ==
<references />
* Marriage record, Daniel Glasgow and Mary Boyd, 22-Jun-1888, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 2375666   [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/marriage_returns/marriages_1888/10763/5925382.pdf]
* Daughter's birth record, Sarah Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 9476698   [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915876.pdf]
* Daughter's birth record, Elizabeth Glasgow, 1889, Ireland, County Derry, Ballymoney SR District, Group Registration ID 10418522   [https://civilrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/images/birth_returns/births_1889/02466/1915877.pdf]