Individual research record
John Glasgow
c. 1590 – 1650-04
Glasgow-3296 · 1 mapped association
At a glance
Identity & family
Tree links organise the family; documentary status still varies.
- Birth
- c. 1590 · Lanarkshire, Scotland
- Death
- 1650-04 · Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland
- Parents
- Stephen GlasgowuncertainMargaret (Graham) Glasgowunmarked
- Spouses
- Bessie (Robertson) Glasgow
- Children
- John GlasgowWilliam Glasgow
- Gender
- Male
- WikiTree
- Glasgow-3296
- Research clusters
- Scotland One-Tree profile leads
- Mapped descendants
- 621
Comparison context
These child positions and checks are the subject details used to rank possible parents below.
Naming sequence used by the parentage model
Known-position checks: 0 support · 0 conflict. Ordinals retain unnamed children and recognise reused names.
Relationship comparison
Potential parents or duplicates
Compare scored leads with the subject details above—not proof.
Possible fathers5 leads
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1030
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1088) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- bounded birth date gives a parent-child age gap of at least 18 years (+10; true age remains uncertain)
- candidate's birth is 36 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son John Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, John in 278 profiles)
- uncommon spouse surnames recur across the subject and candidate branches: Smith +4 (+4 total)
- 3 independent unlinked-profile clue types converge (+5): collateral network, household chronology, naming
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1088) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Possible Father
John GlasgowGlasgow-1561
- the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–31 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 29 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3056) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 11-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–31 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 29 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate and subject share the given name John (+4; weak direct parent-child name recurrence, 278 public profiles)
- candidate's name matches the first dated son John Glasgow, the expected father position for a male subject (+4; catalogue rarity 0, John in 278 profiles)
- candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Andrew +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10); subject lies more than 20 years from the candidate's known child-bearing period (−6; children may be missing); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-3056) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible fathers
Possible Father
James GlasgowGlasgow-991
- the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–35 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: calder, midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1084) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 15-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (16–35 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 33 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: calder, midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- candidate's parents' names recur among the subject's grandchildren: Andrew +1 (+1 total; weak multigeneration clue)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); candidate already has another child named John Glasgow (Glasgow-1084) without a documented death permitting name reuse (−4; check whether the child profiles duplicate or conflict); no known spouse has a plausible maternal age at the subject's birth (−6; an unknown spouse remains possible)
Possible Father
Ninian GlasgowGlasgow-3188
- plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- known spouse Jonet (Hutcheson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+3)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 40-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 58 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1583–1592) (+6; other parent Jonet (Meik) Glasgow)
- known spouse Jonet (Hutcheson) Glasgow had a bounded, possibly plausible maternal age (30) at the subject's birth (+3)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Possible Father
George GlasgowGlasgow-1099
- plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 21-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 39 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different linked father is explicitly uncertain (−6; an existing hypothesis still needs resolving)
Possible mothers5 leads
Possible Mother
Jonet (Meik) GlasgowMeik-14
- plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 35-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 53 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- subject's birth fits between children attributed to the same parental couple (1583–1592) (+6; other parent Ninian Glasgow)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Isabella GlasgowGlasgow-3026
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- weak broad-area overlap: lanarkshire (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
- a candidate spouse matches the first dated son John Glasgow, the expected father position (+3; John in 278 profiles)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15)
Show 3 lower-scoring possible mothers
Possible Mother
Jonet (Hutcheson) GlasgowHutcheson-1774
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- plausible 30-year parent-child age gap (+18)
- candidate's birth is 48 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a compatible grandparent-generation interval (+4)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); locality comparison is unavailable because one or both profiles lack adequate place data (no deduction)
Possible Mother
Catherine (Glasgow) WeirGlasgow-1495
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 10-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–30 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 28 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction); same country, but no indexed locality overlap (−10)
Possible Mother
Margaret GlasgowGlasgow-3589
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 32 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
Show complete scoring
- the nominal 14-year gap is too small, but the approximate birth date permits a narrow biologically viable interval (15–24 years) (+4)
- candidate's birth is 32 years before the subject's earliest dated child (1608), a marginal two-generation interval (+1)
- weak broad-area overlap: midlothian (+1; not a locality match)
- same research cluster (+0; grouping is not kinship evidence)
Deductions and cautions: a different mother is already linked but its evidence is unassessed (−15); parentage requires the approximate birth estimate to be early enough (no deduction)
How parent leads are calculated
Automated leads use birth surnames—not married surnames—as parental eligibility, role-specific biological age limits, bounded and approximate-date uncertainty, household chronology, specific time-aware localities, mapped distance, tenancy succession, migration destinations and sex-aware Scottish naming positions across generations. People already attached as the subject's parents stay in the identity summary and are excluded from this alternative-candidate list, regardless of relationship confidence. The main calibration uses clues available on disconnected profiles; existing parent and sibling links are retained as comparison context rather than treated as transferable evidence. Common ordered names and grandparent-to-child echoes receive a small non-zero weight, so a John or James match can support several independent criteria without producing a lead alone. Rare names, repeated bearers and bundles across otherwise distinct branches receive substantially more weight according to catalogue frequency. An exact migration place is weighted by its rarity and repetition across both branches; a shared destination country is worth only one point. Extra weight is added only when at least three independent clue types converge: naming, locality, specific migration, household chronology or collateral networks. Sparse profiles retain a clearly labelled chronology-only fallback instead of disappearing. Countries, states, counties and research clusters do not count as a shared locality, and fallback, broad representative or kin-inferred coordinates are excluded from distance scoring. Shared descendant profiles are removed before branch-name comparison. A candidate already recorded as a parent-in-law is excluded. A confident or independently supported parent is treated as settled; uncertain and unassessed attachments remain open to alternative comparison. A different linked parent, an uncle/aunt or grandparent path, and a matching existing child profile prevent an alternative from being classified as a strong direct-parent lead until the underlying tree conflict or duplicate is resolved. Familiar forms such as Bessie are normalised. Surname remains an eligibility filter worth zero points.
Naming customs, shared farms and occupations are circumstantial. Children, spouses and collateral relatives may be missing, and tree-derived family networks are not independent evidence. Scores rank research leads; they do not prove parentage.
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-1030
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- overlapping locality (+8)
uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- birth years within 18 (+2)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child name: John Glasgow
Conflicts: uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction)
Same-name candidate
John GlasgowGlasgow-3331
- same first and last name (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child names: John Glasgow, William Glasgow
record-derived birth estimates differ by 42; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)
Full comparison detail
- same first and last name (+18)
- overlapping locality (+8)
- matching child names: John Glasgow, William Glasgow
Conflicts: record-derived birth estimates differ by 42; retained without deduction; uncertain father attachments differ (no deduction); unassessed mother attachments differ (−5)
How duplicate leads are calculated
Dates are eligibility gates, not merely deductions: chronologically impossible people are excluded. Dates, places, spouses, parent certainty and children's profiles and names are then compared. A high score is a prompt to inspect records, not a merge recommendation.
Open only what you need
Research & records
Latest case researchThe current conclusion from the durable research case file.Updated
Current conclusion
Glasgow-3296 is the exact profile for the John Glasgow of Quodquen whose estate was confirmed on 27 May 1650. Its biography cites the original testament and says he died in April 1650, but its structured death fields still say 1649 and Carluke. The original identifies no child.
The project now also uses Glasgow-3296 for John Glasgow of Montfoid, husband of Bessie Robertson in 1610. This is a workable same-person identification by name and generation, but the record does not bridge Montfoid in Ayrshire to Quothquan in Lanarkshire. Present the 1610 occurrence as an uncertain earlier identity rather than a proved movement.
Father assessment: father not identified; uncertain. The 1650 testament identifies John's sister but names neither parent.
Life and record timelineChronological mapped occurrences and their underlying sources.1 record
Profile-stated birthplace: Lanarkshire, Scotland
Lanarkshire — exact locality unproved
One-Tree export profile fields are search leads, not sources; relationships are shown only where the export supplies parent links.
Source and mapping detail
WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3296
No sufficiently specific citation match found.
Precision: County-level representative point
Case-file source findingsSource extracts and analysis regenerated from findings.md.1 section(s)
Source findings
| Source | Finding | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
NRS CC14/5/5, cited and transcribed in the live profile capture captures/20260717T084255Z_Glasgow-3296.json | John lived at Quodquen, died in April 1650, and had sister/executrix Bessie; no child is identified. | Original-record transcription already on profile. |
Grant, *Commissariot Record of Lanark*, p. 38, local copy ../../surname-research/pre-1700/sources/grant_commissariot_of_lanark_testaments_1595_1800_1903.pdf | Indexes John in Quodquen on 27 May 1650. | Independent published index confirmation. |
| Same live capture | Structured data still gives death 1649 at Carluke and attaches Glasgow-3019 as son. | Inconsistent with the profile's cited evidence. |
| Francis J. Grant, ed., *Commissariot Record of Glasgow*, p. 426 and cross-reference p. 196 | Bessie Robertson, spouse of John Glasgow in Montfoid, was indexed on 17 August 1610. | Direct spouse and locality evidence for the Montfoid man; identity with the 1650 Quothquan John remains inferred. |
Evidence assessmentWhat is supported, uncertain or disputed in the current case model.7 claims
Documented or strongly supported
Glasgow-3296 is the 1650 Quodquen decedent; structured death data and the attached son conflict with the cited testament.
CC14/5/5 identifies death in April 1650 and no child, while the data fields say 1649 at Carluke.
Working hypotheses and conflicts
No claims in this category have been formally assessed.
Research questionsOpen problems, missing bridges and the next records to inspect.4 open
Which records prove the subject's identity across events?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Which original or indexed records identify the parents?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: A contemporary record explicitly identifying the parent or parents.
Which spouses and children are directly supported by records?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
What conflicts or same-name conflations must be resolved?
No current conclusion recorded.
Missing bridge: Not specified
Sources and provenanceStructured citations and source-quality classifications.8 sources
Source or provenance: quality describes the record layer, not every conclusion drawn from it.
- unknown Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 426 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/n435/mode/1up), Robertson, Bessie, 17 August 1610; cross-reference under Glasgow, John, p. 196 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/196/mode/1up).
- unknown National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, Wills and Testaments, reference CC14/5/5, testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, images 65–66.
- unknown Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Lanark: Register of Testaments, 1595–1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1903), printed p. 38, “Glasgow, John, in Quodquen,” 27 May 1650, digital copy (https://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/the_commissariot_record_of_lanark__register_of_testaments__1595-1800_~_1903.pdf#page=50).
- unknown 426, entry for Robertson, Bessie, dated 17 August 1610, digital copy
- unknown See John Glasgow (1608-)
- tree_only WikiTree profile export for Glasgow-3296
- unknown captures/20260717T084255Z_Glasgow-3296.json
- unknown sources/grant_commissariot_of_lanark_testaments_1595_1800_1903.pdf
Technical profile and raw captureDataset metadata, machine dossier and captured WikiTree biography.Advanced
WikiTree profile information
Glasgow-3296
John Glasgow
Updated 2026-08-19
Dataset: ONT_Glasco_2026-08-18T16_05.json · generated 2026-08-20
WikiTree biography, citations and relationship snapshot
Glasgow-3296 was captured 2026-08-19T15:34:20+00:00; WikiTree profile revision 2026-08-19.
Profile location claims
| Event | Date | Location | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| birth | — | Lanarkshire, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
| death | — | Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland | WikiTree profile field |
Immediate relationship snapshot
| Relationship | Person | WikiTree ID | Dates and places returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents | Stephen Glasgow | Glasgow-1029 | 1550-00-00 · Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland · 1598-00-00 · High Street, Merchant City, Glasgow, Lanarkshire, Scotland |
| Parents | Margaret Glasgow | Graham-38221 | 1550-00-00 · 0000-00-00 |
| Children | John Glasgow | Glasgow-1086 | 1608-00-00 · Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 1685-00-00 · Biggar, Lanarkshire, Scotland |
| Children | William Glasgow | Glasgow-1087 | 1609-12-24 · Mid Calder, Midlothian, Scotland · 0000-00-00 |
| Spouses | Bessie Glasgow | Robertson-33965 | 1590-00-00 · 0000-00-00 · 1610-00-00 |
Record-bearing passages
- A 1610 Glasgow Commissary Court index records "Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid" on 17 August 1610. Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 426 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/n435/mode/1up), Robertson, Bessie, 17 August 1610; cross-reference under Glasgow, John, p. 196 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/196/mode/1up). This profile retains the Montfoid husband as an uncertain earlier same-person hypothesis for the John Glasgow of Quodquen whose estate was confirmed in 1650; no reviewed record bridges the two places or proves they were the same man.
- This profile is based principally on the 1650 testament dative of John Glasgow in Quodquen. The document is written in seventeenth-century Scots Secretary Hand.
- The relationship between John and Bessie Glasgow is secure. The testament first describes Bessie as John’s “laufull sister” and later describes John as “hir brother”.
- A separate 1610 testament index identifies Bessie Robertson as the spouse of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. It has not been established that the John Glasgow in Montfoid was the same man as John Glasgow in Quodquen. BiographyResidence and death John Glasgow lived at Quodquen, in Lanarkshire, Scotland. National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, Wills and Testaments, reference CC14/5/5, testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, images 65–66.
- He died during April 1650. His estate was confirmed at Lanark on 27 May 1650. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Lanark: Register of Testaments, 1595–1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1903), printed p. 38, “Glasgow, John, in Quodquen,” 27 May 1650, digital copy (https://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/the_commissariot_record_of_lanark__register_of_testaments__1595-1800_~_1903.pdf#page=50).
- The record gives Quodquen as John’s residence. It does not state his birthplace or exact place of death. Testament and executrix John’s estate was recorded as a testament dative. He had died intestate, and the commissary court appointed an executor to administer the estate.
- Bessie Glasgow was appointed executrix dative. The testament expressly describes her as John’s:
- The relationship is therefore directly stated twice in the original record.
- The testament also listed debts and sums owing to John’s estate. The clerk recorded:
- No parent, wife, son or daughter is identified in John’s 1650 testament.
- The absence of a wife or child from the record does not prove that John had never married or had no children. It means only that none is named in this testament. Possible wife: Bessie Robertson The published index to the Glasgow Commissariot Register contains the entry:
- This establishes that Bessie Robertson was the wife of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. The date is the testament date, not a marriage date. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), p. 426, entry for Robertson, Bessie, dated 17 August 1610, digital copy (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/426/mode/2up).
- It is possible that the Montfoid man was the same John who later lived at Quodquen, but this has not been proved. The two records concern different residences and commissary jurisdictions, and neither provides a distinctive identifier linking the men.
- Bessie Robertson should therefore remain a research possibility, not a confirmed wife. She must not be confused with John’s sister Bessie Glasgow. Other people named in the testament The following people appear in connection with money or debts owing to John’s estate:
- Thomas Glasgow and W[illia]m Glasgow may have belonged to the wider Glasgow family at Quodquen, but the testament does not state their relationship to John. Research NotesData corrections The cited testament shows that John:
died in April 1650, not 1649;
- lived at Quodquen;
- was confirmed on 27 May 1650.
- The record does not state that he died at Carluke. Carluke should therefore be removed as the death location unless supported by another source. Working child relationship No child is identified in John’s testament.
- The existing relationship to John Glasgow (formerly Glasgow-3019) is retained as an uncertain working son, not as a proved relationship. The 1650 testament neither identifies nor disproves him.
- The 1650 testament does not prove John as the father of:
Isobell Glasgow;
- John Glasgow of Burnesyde;
- any other presently identified child. Parentage John’s father and mother are not named in the 1650 testament.
- Any parent relationship should remain unsupported unless established by another record. Further research Useful records include:
the original 1610 testament of Bessie Robertson;
- Quodquen parish and kirk-session records;
- land, sasine and rental records naming John, Bessie, Thomas or William Glasgow;
- records identifying John Miller and the estate for which he acted;
- any record connecting John Glasgow of Montfoid with Quodquen;
- evidence establishing whether Thomas Glasgow or William Glasgow was related to John and Bessie.
- John was born before 1590.
Might be the same person as John Glasgow (abt.1590-1649) and/or John Glasgow (abt.1579-) Sources
- See John Glasgow (1608-)
Profile source citations
- Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 426 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/n435/mode/1up), Robertson, Bessie, 17 August 1610; cross-reference under Glasgow, John, p. 196 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/196/mode/1up). source link 1 source link 2
- National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, Wills and Testaments, reference CC14/5/5, testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, images 65–66.
- Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Lanark: Register of Testaments, 1595–1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1903), printed p. 38, “Glasgow, John, in Quodquen,” 27 May 1650, digital copy (https://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/the_commissariot_record_of_lanark__register_of_testaments__1595-1800_~_1903.pdf#page=50). source link 1
- Bessie Glasgow was appointed executrix dative. The testament expressly describes her as John’s: “laufull sister” The confirmation later describes John as: “hir brother” The relationship is therefore directly stated twice in the original record. On 27 May 1650 Bessie appeared before Master John Carmichael, commissary of Lanark, presented the inventory and was confirmed as executrix after providing the required caution. Estate John’s physical possessions included: * three kine, valued together at £8 Scots; * his clothing or bodily apparel, valued at £20 Scots. The physical inventory totalled £28 Scots. The testament also listed debts and sums owing to John’s estate. The clerk recorded: “Na debtis awin be ye deid” No debts owed by John himself were entered. The clerk also recorded: “Na divisioun” No formal division of the estate was entered. FamilySister * Bessie Glasgow — John’s lawful sister and executrix dative. No parent, wife, son or daughter is identified in John’s 1650 testament. The absence of a wife or child from the record does not prove that John had never married or had no children. It means only that none is named in this testament. Possible wife: Bessie Robertson The published index to the Glasgow Commissariot Register contains the entry: “Robertson, Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid — 17 Aug. 1610” The corresponding entry under Glasgow reads: “Glasgow, John, in Montfoid. See Robertson, Bessie.” This establishes that Bessie Robertson was the wife of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. The date is the testament date, not a marriage date. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), p. 426, entry for Robertson, Bessie, dated 17 August 1610, digital copy (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/426/mode/2up). source link 1
- See John Glasgow (1608-)
Full captured biography text
A 1610 Glasgow Commissary Court index records "Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid" on 17 August 1610. Francis J. Grant, ed., Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), p. 426 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/n435/mode/1up), Robertson, Bessie, 17 August 1610; cross-reference under Glasgow, John, p. 196 (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/196/mode/1up). This profile retains the Montfoid husband as an uncertain earlier same-person hypothesis for the John Glasgow of Quodquen whose estate was confirmed in 1650; no reviewed record bridges the two places or proves they were the same man. Transcription and identification note: This profile is based principally on the 1650 testament dative of John Glasgow in Quodquen. The document is written in seventeenth-century Scots Secretary Hand. The relationship between John and Bessie Glasgow is secure. The testament first describes Bessie as John’s “laufull sister” and later describes John as “hir brother”. A separate 1610 testament index identifies Bessie Robertson as the spouse of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. It has not been established that the John Glasgow in Montfoid was the same man as John Glasgow in Quodquen. BiographyResidence and death John Glasgow lived at Quodquen, in Lanarkshire, Scotland. National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, Wills and Testaments, reference CC14/5/5, testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, images 65–66. He died during April 1650. His estate was confirmed at Lanark on 27 May 1650. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Lanark: Register of Testaments, 1595–1800 (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1903), printed p. 38, “Glasgow, John, in Quodquen,” 27 May 1650, digital copy (https://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/the_commissariot_record_of_lanark__register_of_testaments__1595-1800_~_1903.pdf#page=50). The record gives Quodquen as John’s residence. It does not state his birthplace or exact place of death. Testament and executrix John’s estate was recorded as a testament dative. He had died intestate, and the commissary court appointed an executor to administer the estate. Bessie Glasgow was appointed executrix dative. The testament expressly describes her as John’s: “laufull sister” The confirmation later describes John as: “hir brother” The relationship is therefore directly stated twice in the original record. On 27 May 1650 Bessie appeared before Master John Carmichael, commissary of Lanark, presented the inventory and was confirmed as executrix after providing the required caution. Estate John’s physical possessions included: * three kine, valued together at £8 Scots; * his clothing or bodily apparel, valued at £20 Scots. The physical inventory totalled £28 Scots. The testament also listed debts and sums owing to John’s estate. The clerk recorded: “Na debtis awin be ye deid” No debts owed by John himself were entered. The clerk also recorded: “Na divisioun” No formal division of the estate was entered. FamilySister * Bessie Glasgow — John’s lawful sister and executrix dative. No parent, wife, son or daughter is identified in John’s 1650 testament. The absence of a wife or child from the record does not prove that John had never married or had no children. It means only that none is named in this testament. Possible wife: Bessie Robertson The published index to the Glasgow Commissariot Register contains the entry: “Robertson, Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid — 17 Aug. 1610” The corresponding entry under Glasgow reads: “Glasgow, John, in Montfoid. See Robertson, Bessie.” This establishes that Bessie Robertson was the wife of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. The date is the testament date, not a marriage date. Francis J. Grant, ed., The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800, Scottish Record Society, vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), p. 426, entry for Robertson, Bessie, dated 17 August 1610, digital copy (https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/426/mode/2up). It is possible that the Montfoid man was the same John who later lived at Quodquen, but this has not been proved. The two records concern different residences and commissary jurisdictions, and neither provides a distinctive identifier linking the men. Bessie Robertson should therefore remain a research possibility, not a confirmed wife. She must not be confused with John’s sister Bessie Glasgow. Other people named in the testament The following people appear in connection with money or debts owing to John’s estate: * Thomas Glasgow, deceased, in Quodquen; * John Miller, described as an executor; * W[illia]m Glasgow, apparently owing £8 Scots; * Isobell Fisher in Glasfurde; * James Gibson in Quodquen; * a probable William Wilsone; * Master John Carmichael, commissary of Lanark; * an unidentified cautioner for Bessie Glasgow. Thomas Glasgow and W[illia]m Glasgow may have belonged to the wider Glasgow family at Quodquen, but the testament does not state their relationship to John. Research NotesData corrections The cited testament shows that John: * died in April 1650, not 1649; * lived at Quodquen; * was confirmed on 27 May 1650. The record does not state that he died at Carluke. Carluke should therefore be removed as the death location unless supported by another source. Working child relationship No child is identified in John’s testament. The existing relationship to John Glasgow (formerly Glasgow-3019) is retained as an uncertain working son, not as a proved relationship. The 1650 testament neither identifies nor disproves him. The 1650 testament does not prove John as the father of: * Isobell Glasgow; * John Glasgow of Burnesyde; * any other presently identified child. Parentage John’s father and mother are not named in the 1650 testament. Any parent relationship should remain unsupported unless established by another record. Further research Useful records include: * the original 1610 testament of Bessie Robertson; * Quodquen parish and kirk-session records; * land, sasine and rental records naming John, Bessie, Thomas or William Glasgow; * records identifying John Miller and the estate for which he acted; * any record connecting John Glasgow of Montfoid with Quodquen; * evidence establishing whether Thomas Glasgow or William Glasgow was related to John and Bessie. John was born before 1590. Might be the same person as John Glasgow (abt.1590-1649) and/or John Glasgow (abt.1579-) Sources * See John Glasgow (1608-)
Raw WikiTree biography markup
A 1610 Glasgow Commissary Court index records "Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid" on 17 August 1610.<ref>Francis J. Grant, ed., ''Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547-1800'' (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1901), [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/n435/mode/1up p. 426], Robertson, Bessie, 17 August 1610; cross-reference under Glasgow, John, [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/196/mode/1up p. 196].</ref> This profile retains the Montfoid husband as an '''uncertain earlier same-person hypothesis''' for the John Glasgow of Quodquen whose estate was confirmed in 1650; no reviewed record bridges the two places or proves they were the same man.
'''Transcription and identification note:'''
This profile is based principally on the 1650 testament dative of John Glasgow in Quodquen. The document is written in seventeenth-century Scots Secretary Hand.
The relationship between John and Bessie Glasgow is secure. The testament first describes Bessie as John’s “laufull sister” and later describes John as “hir brother”.
A separate 1610 testament index identifies Bessie Robertson as the spouse of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. It has not been established that the John Glasgow in Montfoid was the same man as John Glasgow in Quodquen.
{{Image|file=Glasgow-3296.png
|align=c
|size=l
|caption=Testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, 1650. Lanark Commissary Court, National Records of Scotland reference CC14/5/5, images 65–66.
}}
== Biography ==
=== Residence and death ===
'''John Glasgow''' lived at '''Quodquen''', in Lanarkshire, Scotland.<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5">National Records of Scotland, Lanark Commissary Court, Wills and Testaments, reference CC14/5/5, testament dative and inventory of John Glasgow in Quodquen, images 65–66.</ref>
He died during '''April 1650'''. His estate was confirmed at Lanark on '''27 May 1650'''.<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/><ref name="LanarkIndex1650">Francis J. Grant, ed., ''The Commissariot Record of Lanark: Register of Testaments, 1595–1800'' (Edinburgh: Scottish Record Society, 1903), printed p. 38, “Glasgow, John, in Quodquen,” 27 May 1650, [https://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/the_commissariot_record_of_lanark__register_of_testaments__1595-1800_~_1903.pdf#page=50 digital copy].</ref>
The record gives Quodquen as John’s residence. It does not state his birthplace or exact place of death.
=== Testament and executrix ===
John’s estate was recorded as a '''testament dative'''. He had died intestate, and the commissary court appointed an executor to administer the estate.<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/>
[[Glasgow-XXXX|Bessie Glasgow]] was appointed executrix dative. The testament expressly describes her as John’s:
<blockquote>
“laufull sister”
</blockquote>
The confirmation later describes John as:
<blockquote>
“hir brother”
</blockquote>
The relationship is therefore directly stated twice in the original record.
On 27 May 1650 Bessie appeared before Master John Carmichael, commissary of Lanark, presented the inventory and was confirmed as executrix after providing the required caution.<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/>
=== Estate ===
John’s physical possessions included:<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/>
* three kine, valued together at £8 Scots;
* his clothing or bodily apparel, valued at £20 Scots.
The physical inventory totalled '''£28 Scots'''.
The testament also listed debts and sums owing to John’s estate. The clerk recorded:
<blockquote>
“Na debtis awin be ye deid”
</blockquote>
No debts owed by John himself were entered.
The clerk also recorded:
<blockquote>
“Na divisioun”
</blockquote>
No formal division of the estate was entered.
=== Family ===
==== Sister ====
* [[Glasgow-XXXX|Bessie Glasgow]] — John’s lawful sister and executrix dative.<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/>
No parent, wife, son or daughter is identified in John’s 1650 testament.
The absence of a wife or child from the record does not prove that John had never married or had no children. It means only that none is named in this testament.
==== Possible wife: Bessie Robertson ====
The published index to the Glasgow Commissariot Register contains the entry:
<blockquote>
“Robertson, Bessie, spouse to John Glasgow, in Montfoid — 17 Aug. 1610”
</blockquote>
The corresponding entry under Glasgow reads:
<blockquote>
“Glasgow, John, in Montfoid. See Robertson, Bessie.”
</blockquote>
This establishes that '''Bessie Robertson''' was the wife of a John Glasgow in Montfoid. The date is the testament date, not a marriage date.<ref name="GlasgowCommissariot1610">Francis J. Grant, ed., ''The Commissariot Record of Glasgow: Register of Testaments, 1547–1800'', Scottish Record Society, vol. 7 (Edinburgh, 1901), p. 426, entry for Robertson, Bessie, dated 17 August 1610, [https://archive.org/details/scottishrecordso07scotuoft/page/426/mode/2up digital copy].</ref>
It is possible that the Montfoid man was the same John who later lived at Quodquen, but this has not been proved. The two records concern different residences and commissary jurisdictions, and neither provides a distinctive identifier linking the men.
Bessie Robertson should therefore remain a research possibility, not a confirmed wife. She must not be confused with John’s sister Bessie Glasgow.
=== Other people named in the testament ===
The following people appear in connection with money or debts owing to John’s estate:<ref name="LanarkCC14_5_5"/>
* Thomas Glasgow, deceased, in Quodquen;
* John Miller, described as an executor;
* W[illia]m Glasgow, apparently owing £8 Scots;
* Isobell Fisher in Glasfurde;
* James Gibson in Quodquen;
* a probable William Wilsone;
* Master John Carmichael, commissary of Lanark;
* an unidentified cautioner for Bessie Glasgow.
Thomas Glasgow and W[illia]m Glasgow may have belonged to the wider Glasgow family at Quodquen, but the testament does not state their relationship to John.
== Research Notes ==
=== Data corrections ===
The cited testament shows that John:
* died in April 1650, not 1649;
* lived at Quodquen;
* was confirmed on 27 May 1650.
The record does not state that he died at Carluke. Carluke should therefore be removed as the death location unless supported by another source.
=== Working child relationship ===
No child is identified in John’s testament.
The existing relationship to [[Glasgow-1086|John Glasgow]] (formerly Glasgow-3019) is retained as an '''uncertain working son''', not as a proved relationship. The 1650 testament neither identifies nor disproves him.
The 1650 testament does not prove John as the father of:
* Isobell Glasgow;
* John Glasgow of Burnesyde;
* any other presently identified child.
=== Parentage ===
John’s father and mother are not named in the 1650 testament.
Any parent relationship should remain unsupported unless established by another record.
=== Further research ===
Useful records include:
* the original 1610 testament of Bessie Robertson;
* Quodquen parish and kirk-session records;
* land, sasine and rental records naming John, Bessie, Thomas or William Glasgow;
* records identifying John Miller and the estate for which he acted;
* any record connecting John Glasgow of Montfoid with Quodquen;
* evidence establishing whether Thomas Glasgow or William Glasgow was related to John and Bessie.
John was born before 1590.
Might be the same person as [[Glasgow-3296|John Glasgow (abt.1590-1649)]] and/or [[Glasgow-1561|John Glasgow (abt.1579-)]]
== Sources ==
<references />
* See [[Glasgow-1086|John Glasgow (1608-)]]