Scottish marriages & banns through 1700

The supplied index records AGNES Glasgow and WILLIAM THOMSONE/FR 70 (FR 70) at Carstairs on 1681-12-15. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The same indexed couple and date are already represented on the existing live profile; this is confirming source evidence.

4 Jul 1632 Glasgow index is already preserved; 7 Apr structured value remains unresolved.

The printed marriage register adds John Bruce’s trade of smith, independently of the generic OPR index. Glasgow-3143 is already supported as Marion who married the Edinburgh weaver William Calder in June 1686; that established life segment is not transferred into this 1684 event. Bruce-6113 represents Sir John Bruce of Kinross with the 1687 Christian Leslie marriage, whereas Bruce-3507 has only a speculative Clackmannan son whose own profile explicitly leaves his baptism/parentage open. Neither inspected family supplies this smith-and-Marion couple. Different spouses alone are not exclusions; keep both candidate husbands qualified and the events separate.

The blank-name Glasgow and Smith entry may accompany the named John/Bessie entry one week earlier at the preceding reference; the identities remain unproved.

The supplied index records ----- Glasgow and MARGARET /FR 801 GROOM SURNAME ASSUMED (FR 801) at Strathblane on 1679-07-24. The groom has no given name and his Glasgow surname is explicitly assumed; Margaret has no surname. Neither entry defines a searchable distinct person. Preserve one documentary account; do not invent a child, parents or independent profiles.

Exact Thomas/Catharine household; 1644–50 children corroborate the couple.

The printed Edinburgh register identifies Alexander as a tailor and dates his marriage to Eupham to 8 December 1671. The same-name tailor’s Edinburgh burgess admission on 22 June 1670 records apprenticeship to the late Alexander Thomsone (31 January 1655); this is a strong occupational lead for the groom, not a father clause. Thomsone is a master, not a parent. Eupham Glasgow-3358’s 1651 Edinburgh child index names Robert Glasgow/Eupham Lorimer; Glasgow-1167’s 1634 event has a documented Glasgow/Glassford father conflict. Neither child-to-bride identification is proved. The Channelkirk September event is provisionally one-couple related but stays a distinct register occurrence. Rev. Alexander Hutcheson-361 is retained as a lower-ranked candidate: his estimated 1630–1640 birth and unknown wife do not conflict by themselves, though his 1653 divinity degree and Scottish/Down ministry differ materially from the recorded Edinburgh tailor. A country-only filter was insufficient to reject him; no merger, marriage attachment or father inference follows.

The 1698 adult marriage is already attached to Glasgow-3103, but neither the 1679 nor 1680 child is proved to be that adult. The index adds Jean’s alternative surname “or Wood”.

The supplied index records JEAN Glasgow and ROBERT WOODSYD/FR 357 (FR 357) at West Kilbride on 1700-01-13. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The inspected printed page calls William Mitchell a merchant in his marriage to Jean on 16 December 1675. Mitchell-54981’s attached daughter Mary Mitchell-54795 explicitly questions her own paternal assignment; the Carolina birth placement is estimated and its 1720 deed does not establish this William’s identity. It is not used to exclude an earlier/later marriage. Glasgow-1163’s 1650 Edinburgh child index names Thomas Glasgow/Catharine Weir; it is a compatible local child candidate, not proof that those are the bride’s parents.

The same indexed couple and date are already represented on the existing live profile; this is confirming source evidence.

The supplied index records AGNES Glasgow and PATRIK PAUL/FR 40 (FR 40) at Kirknewton and East Calder on 1670-07-08. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The printed page identifies George Cargill as bookseller and Alison as his bride on 11 March 1651. A nearby George Cargill, printer, marries Elspeth Orme in 1663; it is a second documentary occurrence and is not asserted to be the same husband. Newly completed Allison/Alesoun/Alisoun Glasgow and Alisone/Alice Glesgow API variants returned no historical Open candidate. Neither bookseller’s parentage nor Alison’s father is given here.

John Glasgow and Jean Cunynghame match the live attached pair and date.

Exact John/Issobell household; children in 1643 and 1652 corroborate the couple.

Jonet Glasgow and John Stewart match live pair/date.

The supplied index records MARGARET Glasgow and JOHN TAILZER/FR 111 (FR 111) at Walston on 1690-12-18. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

Exact marriage already represented and live biography verified.

Exact marriage and father-daughter evidence already represented and live biography verified.

Robert Glasgow and Jonet Conynghame match live pair/date.

William Glasgow and Bessie Howie are attached; index predates unsourced structured 1640 date.

Exact marriage already represented.

James's Agnes Duncan marriage already represented and live biography verified.

The supplied index records JEANE Glasgow and ROBERT ALIESONE/FR 91 AND 92 (FR 92) at St Monance on 1652-05-28. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The supplied index records AGNAS Glasgow and WILLIAM ANDERSON/FR 100 (FR 100) at Longformacus on 1666-07-05. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The supplied index records AGNES Glasgow and JAMES SWAN/FR 36 (FR 36) at Kirknewton and East Calder on 1666-05-12. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The supplied index records ALEXANDER Glasgow and ISSOBELL ANDERSON/FR 991 (FR 991) at Edinburgh on 1665-06-16. Live Glasgow-1152 and Anderson-56713 reciprocally record exactly 16 June 1665 as their marriage date. Their names and Edinburgh family chronology match this entry; Glasgow-3118 is superseded as the leading identification. The register image remains uninspected.

The supplied index records ANNA Glasgow and THOMAS GRAY/FR 49 (FR 49) at Kirknewton and East Calder on 1676-06-16. Glasgow-1439 (Anne) and Grey-2711 (Thomas) are already reciprocally attached as spouses; both are placed at Kirknewton and East Calder, with compatible 1652/1650 birth placements. This is the same named local couple. The supplied entry supplies their 1676 event date, whose banns/marriage distinction still requires the original.

Exact marriage already represented; connected Barbara identities remain unmerged.

The existing attached couple and date match this index entry; the official OPR locator adds supporting evidence without a new profile-level fact.

Channelkirk 17 September 1671 Effie–Alexander Hutchesone is kept as a distinct event, provisionally associated with the Edinburgh 8 December 1671 Eupham–Alexander tailor event. Same couple is plausible under Effie/Eupham and Hutcheson variants, but the difference of parish and date does not establish banns followed by marriage or identity with a named father. The occupational fact read at Edinburgh is not assigned as a quoted Channelkirk fact. Rev. Alexander Hutcheson-361 is retained as a lower-ranked candidate: his estimated 1630–1640 birth and unknown wife do not conflict by themselves, though his 1653 divinity degree and Scottish/Down ministry differ materially from the recorded Edinburgh tailor. A country-only filter was insufficient to reject him; no merger, marriage attachment or father inference follows.

The 1680 Isobell Young entry supplies a new comparison for George’s Young/Gardiner problem; Isobell is not automatically Jonet Young, and the George identity is unproved.

James's Bessie Whyte marriage already represented and live biography verified.

John Glasgow and Margaret Scot match live pair/date.

Jonat Mathen is compatible with existing Jonet Mathie at the same date; spelling not asserted identical.

Jonat Glasgow/Martyn Ramsy, Mid Calder 1624 is already cited on the live profile and maintained findings.

The supplied index records MARGRAT Glasgow and JOHN AITON/FR 256 (FR 256) at Cambusnethan on 1693-10-18. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The printed register preserves surname Rait (Raite/Rate), John’s trade as tailor and the 28 June 1659 marriage to Marion. Reid-24609 represents the Edinburgh Reid–Helen Henderson family, with son George Reade-97 in Maryland; the surname is a weaker phonetic lead and no tailor/Marion bridge is established. The unrestricted Raitt search and full biographies identify Raitt-2 as the 1806 Captain and Raitt-360 as the 1866-born Western Australian butcher, excluding both concretely. Other printed Rait entries do not identify this husband’s father.

Exact marriage already represented and live biography verified.

The Carstairs 1679 Thomas–Gyles Spence entry is separate from the Strathblane unnamed event on the same day. Thomas Glasgow-1449 is newly excluded by his represented later family: father Glasgow-1382 is explicitly born about 1766 and dies 1851; mother Christine Davidson has documented motherhood of Nathaniel in 1774, incompatible with being the mother of a 1679 adult. Glasgow-1226 remains a weaker possibility because fatherhood through 1735 would imply an older father but is not impossible. Graduate Glasgow-3413’s 1670 degree does not establish his assumed Thomas Glasgow-3187 father, and the 1660 burgess entry gives no father. Newly searched Gellies/Gilles/Giles Spence/Spens/Spense yielded no historical woman; the Tudor male Spencer lead remains excluded.

Both reciprocal rows describe the same entry. Marion-3025 is a possible bride by name, locality and age, not a proved match; the recorded William remains unidentified.

Alexander Glasgow/Margaret Smith, 1667 is already represented by the live profile's FamilySearch marriage citation.

The printed register identifies John Williamson as a cordiner in the 14 November 1672 Alison marriage. Father John Williamson-14320’s inspected child profiles preserve Kirkcaldy index entries with Christian Turpie in 1674, 1677 and 1680, plus their 1655 marriage and her 1690 death entry. This continuing named-couple sequence conflicts with identifying him as the Edinburgh Alison bridegroom and is a substantive competing-household exclusion, not merely another spouse’s name. Son Williamson-14321, baptised 1657, is still a compatible but young candidate with no child or occupation bridge. Alison remains without a compatible profile; the row’s spouse candidates must not change her own no-profile status.

George Glasgow and Jean Gardiner match live pair/date.

Helen Glasgow-3024 is a compatible 1652 Kirknewton/East Calder baptism candidate for 1672 James Hamiltoun entry.

The supplied index records ISOB Glasgow and JAMES COLDWELL/ at Glasgow on 1684-04-17. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

Exact Issobell Glasgow and Robert McCaskie marriage already represented in the saved biography.

The same indexed couple and date are already represented on the existing live profile; this is confirming source evidence.

The existing attached couple and date match this index entry; the official OPR locator adds supporting evidence without a new profile-level fact.

The supplied index records JOANNET Glasgow and ANDREW ALLEXANDER/ at Glasgow on 1661-08-08. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

The existing John/Bessie attachment matches 30 July 1687; the adjacent 6 August blank-name entry supplies a new possible companion record.

Margaret Glasgow-3112, born 1646 under the Kirknewton/East Calder label, is compatible with the 1674 William Thomsone entry.

The supplied index records MARION Glasgow and JOHN GRAY/FR 67 (FR 67) at Carriden on 1686-09-30. The linked candidates fit this occurrence by recorded name and chronology. The best local/dated candidates are listed first; any loose before-date legacy lead remains lower-ranked unless actual family or life-span evidence excludes it. No identity or family attachment is asserted solely from a same-name group.

Both reciprocal rows describe the same entry. Marion-3025 is a possible bride by name, locality and age, not a proved match; the recorded William remains unidentified.